My buddy Manila Ryce’s blog at The Largest Minority had a post by peacelf that mimcs how I feel about Mr Obama and his message of “change”.
What is different about him? Other than the flashy wording that Americans are want to hear. Is it really truth? Does he mean it?
America may be better off with Obama than any of the rest now participating, but not by much. And I agree with peacelf that America is likely in for a huge let down.
Kennedy Endorsement of Barack Obama Overrated
By peacelf
Published Tuesday, February 5th, 2008, 8:21 pm
Right now I’m going to challenge one of the sacred relics of the sixties. Here goes. I am not impressed with Maria Shriver, Caroline Kennedy, or Ted Kennedy’s support of Barack Obama. JFK is no hero.
The tragic death of JFK, notwithstanding, does not make a great president. JFK’s “greatness” is based on ‘could haves’ and ‘would haves,’ not on any real changes he proposed or made. Yes, he utilized lofty language in his speeches, but when it came right down to it, he balked at implementing the changes of the civil rights movement, he introduced [a]merica to a tiny nation in Southeast Asia called Vietnam and, oh yeah, saved us from the evil Soviet empire. Other than getting killed in front of a camera in a somewhat suspicious manner, JFK was still a sayer and not a doer. I can level that same charge against Barack Obama.
Obama’s lofty language of “change” and “working together” coupled with his popularity only suggests to me that the American people want to be hopeful, want to be inspired, want a leader who will listen to The People; but again, I’m afraid they will be sadly disappointed when that change does not occur. And, it will compound American anger, cynicism, and ultimately, their feelings of powerlessness about politicians making any significant changes.
Moreover, it won’t be because Obama lied to us. No, it’s clearly stated on his web site that he is part of the status quo in politics, that his ideas for change are no different than Hillary’s, McCain’s, and Romney’s. In other words, if people would look at Obama’s campaign issues with even a modicum of critical thinking, they would understand my point here: Obama is still part of the problem, not the solution for genuine progressive change.
Yet, this is the state of America-in-denial. We love the luxury of living in an empire, but feel guilty enough to select leaders who use moral and lofty language as a political expediency, as a way to assuage that guilt we all feel for shopping at Wal-Mart and living in relative luxury thanks to poor people around the world who work for us in sweat shops, rather than making the difficult choices to support candidates who will challenge who we are fundamentally as a nation and a people.
Yet, I have hope that someday love, compassion, and justice will prevail, not just in american politics, but in the will of the people. However, first, it must begin with so-called progressives and liberals who continually support the status quo encapsulated in candidates like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
peacelf