Ralph Nader

I have no particular love for any of the candidates. Each one has a certain issue or two (minimally) that I disagree with. In McCain’s case, he is a lying shift changer totally devoid of truth, hence no way I could vote for him in any circumstance (I’d even vote for Hillary before him).

Even though I like the hype and “feel goodness” of Mr Obama’s words, I have not truly trusted him because he is a part of that Dem Party. The simple fact is that I don’t trust them any more than I do the ReTHUGs. Pelosi and Reid have both shown via their inability to carry forward on the ‘06 mandate that the leadership simply are untrustworthy.

The Blue-Dogs are THUG-lites and continue to STOP any real attempt at accountability and for what it is worth, I hope they all lose their seats soon for their complicity in harboring these criminals. The THUGS are set to lose many seats, so they are likely to be a non-entity, soon.

So, I have been researching alternative parties, specifically someone “independnet”, to see how closely they relate to my goals for this country. There are several folks out there that speak to me, but the more I read and listen to Ralph Nader, the more I like and respect him. He is saying what I bitch about, almost to a “T”.

I, for one, will not be fooled by the Dem rhetoric that Nader causes lost elections. I refuse to be cornered by these people when a simple cursory view of history proves that this system was never meant to be controlled by two parties, as has happened.

Therefore, I am looking elsewhere, until one the “Major Party Candidates” can speak for the people and not their Big Money/Big Military controllers. I almost wish Obama was the guy, but money will control him, as well. He knows what needs to be said and done, hinting at some of the fringe issues (Executive Order review), but he is either too frightened or “bought” to tell the whole truth and push for justice and full accountability for the crimes conducted.

Visit Mr Nader’s site (VoteNader.org) and see if he speaks to your desire for this country and let me know.

The Onion Movie

B’Man: Any regular visitor knows that I enjoy The Onion (America’s Finest News Source) and present a lot of their content. That site is hilarious (with Doyle Redland’s Onion Radio News being one of my personal favorites), so when I was approached to add a special post about the new movie coming up, I could not turn it down. The Onion Movie DVD is set for release on June 3.

View the press release (for formality):

ONLY ONE NEWS ORGANIZATION
HAS THE GUTS TO TELL IT LIKE IT IS

THE ONION MOVIE

America’s Finest News Source Tackles All The Issues
On Unrated DVD June 3rd From Fox Home Entertainment

CENTURY CITY, Calif. – One of the world’s most popular news weeklies takes its crucial stories, essential interviews, fundamental concerns and hard-hitting movie previews to the screen when The Onion Movie makes its debut on unrated DVD June 3rd from Fox Home Entertainment. From the sharp minds of Robert Siegel and Todd Hanson, long-time editors and writers for The Onion newspaper and website, The Onion Movie presents a hard look at world events, cultural fads and curious human behavior, reporting on topics that most news programs wouldn’t dare touch. The movie features award winning anchor Norm Archer as he presents some of the most recent controversial news stories including American Automobile’s recall of all cars featuring neck-belts and legislation by Congress that limits smoking within U.S. borders to a single 10×10 room in Des Moines. Additionally, The Onion’s own Kip Kendall sits down for an exclusive interview with pop sensation Melissa Cherry to discuss her new album “Come With Me” and the accusations that her songs have a sexually explicit message. Lastly, The Onion Movie features the world premiere trailer of the explosive action-packed thriller Cockpuncher starring a martial arts superstar whose identity must remain a mystery. With bonus features including deleted scenes and outtakes, The Onion Movie DVD will be available for the suggested retail price of $26.98 U.S. / $37.98 Canada. Prebook is May 7.

DVD Special Features:
The Onion Movie DVD is presented in widescreen format (1.85:1 ratio) with English 5.1 Dolby Surround, Spanish Dolby Surround and English, Spanish and French subtitles. Additionally, the disc includes the following bonus content:
· Deleted scenes
· Outtakes

Synopsis
This just in…The Onion invades DVD! Based on the wildly popular satirical newspaper hailed by The New Yorker as “the funniest publication in the United States,” The Onion Movie brings you uncensored, uninhibited, UNRATED news and views from around the world. And in a stunning development, when Onion News anchorman Norm Archer (Len Cariou) is asked to compromise his journalistic integrity to please a new corporate sponsor, he doesn’t just get mad, he gets…angry. Taking aim at pop stars, party games, prisoners and peace talks, The Onion Movie delivers hard-hitting headlines—and side-splitting laughs!

A recognized global industry leader, Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment LLC (TCFHE) is the worldwide marketing, sales and distribution company for all Fox film and television programming on VHS, DVD and Blu-ray Disc (BD) as well as acquisitions and original productions. The company also releases all products around the globe for MGM Home Entertainment. Each year TCFHE introduces hundreds of new and newly enhanced products, which it services to retail outlets from mass merchants and warehouse clubs to specialty stores and e-commerce throughout the world. Twentieth Century Fox Home Entertainment LLC is a subsidiary of Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, a News Corporation company.

You don’t have the balls to check out The Onion Movie Blog

If you like to punch cocks, they even have a game for you.

Richard Noggin’ Saturday: (Young) Hillary Clinton

She apparently never grew up…

Flying Airplanes

9/11 Conspiracies and all the different organizations and websites centered around the 9/11 attacks can drive a person crazy with the detail that needs to be digested even to form a minor opinion on whether or not our government (some crazy group within that government, anyway) was complicit, if not the actual perpetrators. There are scientists, physicists and engineers (structural, demolitions, and many other areas of expertise) who disown the proposed “facts” as misleading or false. There are firemen, policemen and everyday citizens who heard and witnessed strange phenomena like extra explosions, etc that don’t add up to the findings in the 9/11 Commission Report.

As a matter of fact, the report itself is so ineffectual and lacking that it is deserving of another try through independent means. Luckily for the perpetrators, all the evidence was quickly hauled away without review and we have no evidence to examine except video shots, etc. (Can you imagine even a car wreck where such an examination were not conducted, yet the worst travesty ever perpetrated on America was not truly investigated?)

One of the most telling examples is all the published interviews with the flight instructors of the “terrorists” before they “hijacked” the planes. Basically, these “terrorist pilots” could barely fly single engine “learner” aircraft. In some cases the instructors were scared to death to even taxi, much less fly with these “pilots”.

Now a bit about old BuelahMan. I actually used to fly small planes with my adoptive dad. He was a pilot for many years and had several of these overwing planes before purchasing a Cherokee Lance (multi-passenger underwing, single engine plane… that ultimately took his and my 5 yo brother’s life in a crash at our local airport). I was actually set to make that flight with a buddy, but we decided not to at the very last minute. This crash is the reason I never pursued flying again.

Anyway, I spent a few summers flying often with him, taking the controls while flying and as the summer progressed, learned how to take off and land the plane. Now since I never flew a big jet, I can only compare an airline pilot’s testimony to my small plane experience, but from what I understand these jets are one hell-uv-a lot harder to navigate and control than a small Cessna (makes sense to me, as well).

A Cessna can do some fairly audacious manuevers, while a behemoth like a 737 cannot.

On one of my attempted landings we had some side winds (not much, but enough to cause the small plane to lurch and move sideways as we approached). It scared the hell out of me and I told my dad to take the controls (he did and brought us down as if there were no wind whatsoever). However, I have never forgotten that experience because it showed me how difficult it is to keep even a small aircraft on line.

Can you imagine trying this with a huge jet and little more experience than I had?

Now, one thing that is never talked about is the auto-pilot functionality of these jets and the fact that we have aircraft that are totally capable to be flown remotely (yes, even jets).

My point is that I cannot believe that these “pilots” who could barely fly small aircraft could not possible have done what was done. Some of the planes’ maneuvers were so radical that it is suggested that they could not have done it. I agree.

So, how did these piss-poor pilots fly these jets into buildings with such accuracy?

In my mind, they didn’t.

They Couldn’t.

The Persian Abyss: Talking about talking

What exactly does ‘talking’ mean to Clinton, Obama or McClain?

Anyone who has followed the endless, sometimes painfully monotonous, US presidential marathon has most likely heard the three major candidates’ positions vis-à-vis Iran – all of whom have unfortunately taken incoherent stances regarding their characterization of diplomatic engagement.

The Republican nominee, John McCain, seems to have forfeited his once “maverick” persona in exchange for a carbon copy of George Bush’s foreign policy (i.e. not negotiating with “rogue nations” or conversely engaging terrorist organizations). A few weeks ago he pledged that he would be Hamas’ “worst nightmare” [1]. In the United States, and in many Israeli policy circles, this popular Palestinian militant group has been incorrectly labeled as an “Iranian proxy”. Yet, even if we assume that this oversimplification of complex and endemic Palestinian politics is true, the same John McCain, in 2006, stated that the United States should now “deal” with Hamas, since they had become the elected Palestinian government [2].

Hillary Clinton, in a bizarre turn of events, has even attempted to be more hawkish than the current US Vice President, threatening to “obliterate” the Islamic Republic, offering a nuclear umbrella not only to Israel but also to America’s colonially inherited Arab autocracies in the Middle East in the wake of a rising Iran. Albeit, this same woman has promised that she would drastically reduce the American military occupation of Iraq, according to her so-called “Three-Step Plan”, which would apparently redeploy American military personnel within 60 days of her inauguration [3]. However, to do this, even as the Senator herself has attested, would necessitate the cooperation of neighboring countries, including that of Iran, which is undoubtedly the most influential and powerful actor in war-torn Iraq. So this begs the question, how can an American president threaten to “obliterate” a nation whose lack of cooperation renders an American withdrawal from Iraq near impossible?

Barack Obama, initially proposing a radical shift from the past 8-year diplomatic inertia, previously pledged that he would meet, without “preconditions”, with heads of states that are antagonistic to American objectives. However, in recent weeks, has now seemed to alter his position, arguing that “preparations”, most likely at the mid-diplomatic level, must be made before engaging in one-to-one talks with leaders such as Raul Castro, Hugo Chavez, or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad [4]. Although the Illinois Senator may be able to parse and ultimately distinguish the meaning of “preconditions” from “preparations”, this ill-defined strategy does not augur well for those wishing to seek a fundamental shift in US diplomatic deportment.

Therefore, the principle question remains – What does “talking” really mean? In other words, what is the conceptualization of diplomatic initiative?

Since the American president’s recent speech at the Israeli Knesset, wherein he inanely linked engaging in wise diplomacy with Iran to the WWII “appeasement” of Adolph Hitler by UK Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, a fusillade of political salvos has been exchanged amongst the various factions of America’s fragmented foreign policy elite. However, students of history understand that “appeasement” was and is not discourse. Regarding Hitler and the notion of “appeasement”, many nations had open diplomatic contact with the Third Reich. “Appeasement” came when the Sudetenland of the former Czechoslovakia was offered to the revanchist Germans in exchange for the possibility of peace and stability in Europe. This is the reality behind this tired slogan that, unfortunately, has been mimicked in many US policy circles.

Yet the truth remains – the problems that the United States has with nations such as Cuba, North Korea, Iran, and Venezuela are not related to WWII historiography. None of these countries are expansionist, yet even if borders are one of many points of contention between them and the American government, the disputes between each of these nations and those that are unmentioned, with the United States, are deeply rooted in past grievances that are diverse from one another, being endemic to the ethos and the psyche of each respective society. Therefore, in order to achieve success – to be defined as a drastic change of behavior by governments deemed “threatening” to the US interests – a blanket policy or a generalized formula to address each nation will be futile.

For example, the American row with Cuba is deeply rooted in Cold War hysteria that does not apply to current geopolitical realities. The Cuban island at one point was correctly perceived as a Soviet base, possibly a launching pad for Soviet missiles against the American mainland. With the death of the Soviet Union, US policy towards the beleaguered island has become astonishingly anachronistic, serving no purpose save for garnering the anti-Castro Cuban vote in South Florida, all the while punishing the average citizen of the weak and feeble Communist State. No reasonable political scientist could argue that Cuba, in any way, shape, or form, is somehow a threat to the US or its interests. Furthermore, Venezuela’s recent animus against the United States stems primarily from American economic deportment in Latin America – only to be heightened by the possible US complicity in the 2002 attempted coup against the Chavez government.

Regarding the Iranian issue, American perception of Iran and its supposed threat has been so divorced from reality, that any nuance in understanding the legitimate security concerns of the Islamic Republic virtually evades the current administration in Washington. Iran is a nation that has been invaded three times by massive armies in the last century. It is a people whose culture and identity has largely been shaped by existential threats. The use of chemical weapons upon Iranian soldiers and civilians alike by an American proxy, and the subsequent lack of international condemnation, to this day, shapes the foreign policy of the leadership of the Islamic Republic. Moreover, the historical role of the United States in internal Iranian affairs, similar to American behavior in certain Latin American countries, and the fact that the United States has yet to reconcile with the loss of their puppet Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the self-proclaimed Shah, is still a grievance that affects the political hierarchy of Iran. These facts are paramount in explaining current US- Iranian relations. Without properly addressing these, along with several other economic, security, and political issues, no dialogue between the United States and Iran will bear any fruit.

It is the absence of these key factors and the lack of a rudimentary understanding of basic Middle Eastern history that allows for the dissemination of innuendo and the oversimplification of enigmatic political dilemmas to subsist. Consider Tom Friedman’s article in the NY Times just a few weeks ago. In his piece, Friedman attempted to construct a paradigm that somehow proposes that the United States has now entered a “new Cold War” with Iran, even citing Israeli journalist Ehud Yaaris concept of “Pax Iranica” [5]! Although this analysis may feed into Ahmadinejad’s ego or the conspiracy theories rife within Saudi-controlled Arab press, I fail to see the purpose of such a ridiculous notion.

Certainly Iran is a direct benefactor of the current climate within the Middle East and the broader Muslim World, partially caused by the failed policies of consecutive American administrations, yet by no means is the Islamic Republic the basis of them. Brian Burton’s insightful article in World Politics Review elucidates the fact that although Iran has utilized the various political movements in the Arab World for their advantage, the genesis of these movements spawned from economic and political injustices levied out by America’s Arab autocracies upon their own citizenry:

“…lumping together disparate Arab political movements as “Teheran’s friends” glosses over their root causes and offers a grossly oversimplified prescription for dealing with them. Neither Hizbullah nor Hamas nor the Sadrist movement originated in Iran; all were formed due to local grievances and achieved power by addressing those grievances. Hizbullah arose in opposition to Israel’s occupation of southern Lebanon and the political and economic exclusion felt by the Lebanese Shiite population. Hamas emerged during the first Palestinian intifada against the Israelis as a religious alternative to Yasser Arafat’s exiled Palestine Liberation Organization. Moqtada al-Sadr and the Mahdi Army gained support because they embodied the nationalistic aspirations of Iraq’s long-repressed urban Shiites. What all three of these movements have in common is that they have been able to solidify the loyalties of local constituencies. Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Sadrists provide jobs, homes, medical care, and leadership to destitute populations who have suffered malign neglect and oppression, often at the hands of governments aligned with the United States. It is the loyalty of these underprivileged populations, gained through effective local leadership and measures to alleviate everyday suffering, that accounts for their rise. The leaders of these respective groups can and do channel popular discontent into support for their own violent political agenda, but it must not be forgotten that it is the effective provision of services and support to local populations that form the foundations of these militant groups.

Emphasizing that radicals across the Arab world are “Iranian-backed” encourages US policymakers to wrongly look to Iran as the source of all problems…[6]”

Burton’s assessment is one that is attuned to the pulse of broader Middle Eastern and Islamic society, a culture and identity that has consistently been left out of the Golden Palace that US-aligned comprador elites and rulers created for themselves. Furthermore, although the relationship that Hizbullah and the Shia militias in Iraq have with Iran is quite unique in that the Islamic Republic was an inspiration in their formations, they cannot be viewed as simply an arm of Iran. In addition, Hamas in the Palestinian territories and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, with their satellites in Jordan, were all formed as a response to the illegitimacy and ineptitude of their host governments – all of which are deemed Moderate Arab States and allies of the United States.

As it relates to Iran, there is no doubt that the Islamic Republic has a great amount of influence over these groups, yet one must ask how this influence was initially attained. The fact is that the Islamic Republic of Iran was born out of the same circumstances that spawned all the aforementioned entities – pro-Western governments whose autocratic proclivities over their own populace eventually rendered them illegitimate. And for all the internal pathologies that the Islamic Republic possess, for there are many, the Iranian government is, oddly enough, much more democratic than the Arab nations whose reliance the United States depends upon for access to cheap oil and a Middle Eastern presence. The various political movements that have become so antagonistic towards American objectives have built an extensive base of support that is deeply rooted in their respective societies. Therefore, as strange as it may appear, the main weapon that is utilized by Iran’s hybrid government is the same calls for democracy that the Bush administration has inculcated in their rhetoric, and only in their rhetoric. The 2006 Hamas electoral victories, which arguably was the most free and fair the Arab world had ever experienced, and the 2005 stunning victory of Muslim Brotherhood in the repressed Egyptian parliamentary elections were clear indications of the transformation of the Arab body politic [7]. If Iran is somehow perceived as rising power, it is certainly not by the cunning of Iranian leaders but more by default.

So what does this all mean? Simply put, when attempting to engage in diplomacy with either Iran, the various violent political factions of the Arab world, Latin American leftist leaders, or any such government that is antithetical to the United States, American statecraft must understand the roots of each crisis, the legitimacy of each nation states’ discontent, and the possibility of rectification.

References:http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/04/25/mccain_hamas/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“Islamist Win Big in Egypt Election: Banned Party takes 20% of Parliament seats: Violence Mars Vote.” Associated Press (December 9, 2005): 

http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/article.aspx?id=2176

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/14/opinion/14friedman.html?_r=1&oref=sloginhttp://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jgNrscc8uvyp-L659qdXVCK2OAhgD90QV3C80http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/Iraq/http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/14/opinion/14friedman.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jgNrscc8uvyp-L659qdXVCK2OAhgD90QV3C80http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/Iraq/http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jgNrscc8uvyp-L659qdXVCK2OAhgD90QV3C80

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/Iraq/http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/Iraq/

 

 

http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/article.aspx?id=2176http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/14/opinion/14friedman.html?_r=1&oref=sloginhttp://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jgNrscc8uvyp-L659qdXVCK2OAhgD90QV3C80http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/Iraq/

http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/article.aspx?id=2176

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/14/opinion/14friedman.html?_r=1&oref=sloginhttp://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jgNrscc8uvyp-L659qdXVCK2OAhgD90QV3C80http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/Iraq/

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/14/opinion/14friedman.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jgNrscc8uvyp-L659qdXVCK2OAhgD90QV3C80http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/Iraq/

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jgNrscc8uvyp-L659qdXVCK2OAhgD90QV3C80

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/Iraq/

http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/Iraq/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/05/15/AR2008051503306.html?hpid=opinionsbox

What Do Iraqi People Dream About?

B’Man: My daughter (3.5) awoke this morning and told us, “I had a dream and in my dream I was going to “Big School” and they taught me all sorts of things. Then my boyfriend, Justin, said that we were going to get married.”

Now, I have no idea where the boyfriend crap comes from, but there is a 4 yo boy at her preschool named Justin (I’m gonna have to have a little man to man with “little man”… LOL). Nor do I understand where she gets the big school stuff from, except probably the older kids at her preschool.

My point is that she dreams this funny, happy-go-lucky stuff. Even with some allergies, she is probably one of the happiest kids I ever knew. She, her Mom and I are blessed in many ways, when I consider what Iraqi people are thinking and living through.

Do the little Iraqi girls dream of such things? Iraqis in general? I know in my heart that most of them don’t dream such wonderful things, even though I wish they all did. Then, this afternoon, I read about some of their dreams in this article at Alternet and I believe that all rednecks should understand that their dreams are nothing to Americans, simple everyday conveniences, for we have all these things in abundance and are spoiled by it.

We have spent Billions, millions dead, millions fled to other countries to survive what we unleashed. Murder on every corner. Threats, intimidation. FEAR!

We have no real understanding of what they don’t have, because it is all stuff that we take for granted.

And many rednecks want more of this horror for them. Unbelievably cruel. Heartless, unfeeling and embarrassing to this redneck. No decent human being would ever want this to go on.

Five Years After Mission Accomplished, Iraqis “Dream of the End of the Occupation”

By Dahr Jamail and Ahmed Ali, IPS News. Posted May 28, 2008.

BAQUBA — After more than five years of U.S. occupation, the very dreams of the people of Baquba have changed. For a start, they are no longer about the future.

Today, a shower is a dream. Or that the electricity supply continues just that little bit longer.

“These needs are very trivial for people of other countries,” 43-year-old political leader Saad Tahir told IPS. “But in Iraq, people dream more of these things than of some ambition or success.”

Abdullah Mahdi, a retired 51-year-old trader, says he dreams only of electricity.

“Like millions here, I hope supply gets better to help us to sleep in this hot summer,” Mahdi told IPS. “We have been suffering from this problem since the 1991 Kuwait war, and this current occupation only made things worse.”

Others dream of freedom of movement. “I dream of traveling among the Iraqi provinces freely and safely,” a local resident said. “For more than two years now, I have not traveled to any province of my country.” Lack of security means Iraqis can rarely travel even to a neighboring area.

Children also seem to have begun to dream differently.

“I dream of a playground in which I and my friends can play freely and at any time,” 11-year-old Luay Amjad told IPS. Children are not allowed to play just anywhere for fear of unexploded bombs, haphazard firing, and a general fear of the Iraqi military. Many children in Baquba and other districts of Diyala province have been kidnapped.

“All families wish to see their children safe, and then enjoying their time,” said a young father. “We know that they currently live in a very closed world. But we put pressure on our children for their own safety. Streets are dangerous, and even gardens may sometimes be dangerous.”

Others dream of a functioning economy. According to the ministry of trade, unemployment has been vacillating between 40-70 percent over the last two years.

“I hope that the trade and economic process will improve,” said an unemployed trader. “I wish Iraq could be an industrial country with a flourishing and luxurious status of living. I want to get back to my shop and have my own customers.”

Teachers dream of an Iraq that can be a center for education again. “Iraq was one of the countries that paid great attention to education,” a university professor, speaking on condition of anonymity, told IPS. “Now, breaking the rules of schools is very common, and fake certificates are spread widely all over the country. We dream of a rigorous and successful educational process.”

Farmers simply dream of water, and the security necessary to work in their fields. “I hope I can work on my farm again, and have water to irrigate all the land,” said a local vegetable farmer.

A cleric spoke of bigger dreams. “I dream that all Iraqis will love each other again, as we used to in the past days. We miss hope, a smile, and true love. We hope that cooperation prevails again among people. We hope for killing and displacement to end forever in this once peaceful country. We hope that the sectarian discrimination disappears.”

A political analyst said he dreams of an end to the occupation. “The occupation is the source of all the problems of our people. I do dream of the end of the occupation — no more arrests, no more prison for simple and poor people, and no more suffering.”

(*Ahmed, our correspondent in Iraq’s Diyala province, works in close collaboration with Dahr Jamail, our U.S.-based specialist writer on Iraq who has reported extensively from Iraq and the Middle East).

B’Man: So, what DO you rednecks dream about?

Honda Bringing More Work to Alabama

The WSJ reported that “Honda Motor Co. plans to meet growing U.S. demand for small cars while maintaining North American jobs by moving production of two bigger models from Canada to Alabama,” according to Thursday’s comments by Chief Executive Takeo Fukui. “Honda’s Pilot sport-utility vehicle and Ridgeline pickup, now rolling off its plant in Ontario, Canada, will be produced in Alabama, allowing the Canadian plant to increase production of the Civic sedan.”

B’Man: How does it feel to be considered a low-wage country?

B’Man’s Patriot Watch: Iraqi Soldiers

Ouch, McInsane! That has gotta smart, a bit.

They don’t even want to discuss the possibility of a Republican candidate. NONE of them.

CNN’s Kyra Phillips asks Iraqi soldiers who they prefer as a US president and which party is best for the future of Iraq.

They are “living the Republican war” and they “need change”. Yeah, no shit. So do we, buddy.

Oh, how the McBushie Fools must be gnashing their teeth and throwing ashes upon their own heads.

So much for the “conservative” movement… it just stopped dead in its tracks. Poor, pitiful, stupid-assed bastards.

Bush Is Learning As He Goes…

… but is making his friends rich while he is obtaining his education on such trivial matters.

I dunno about you, but it seems that these idiotic bastards should have KNOWN what they were getting into, before lying to us about the damn thing to begin with. It is my contention that they did and DO know precisely what is happening (and it is going perfectly to plan).

When will the rest of you rednecks wake up and demand that this maniacal asshole is removed from office and jailed for the rest of his miserable life?

Of course, he made this stupid comment to the Air Force Academy. (Who there will stand up and question the idiocy of such a statement without fear of loss of commission and career?) Nor would they have the balls to suggest that his further statements comparing the Iraqi/Afghan “mistake”“law-breaking” to what was done in Japan and Germany are even further proof of his inability to grasp truth or understand what is taught in high-school history (even though his lack of education doesn’t surprise me). Even a cursory history student knows he is full of shit.

He said that political and economic progress is hard without security.

Dude? No shit? Why is God’s name didn’t you just ask this old redneck, you waste of Barbara’s egg.

People, the fact is that if and when you attack another country, invade them, kill millions and send many more millions away from their homes, demolish their infrastructure and lives, they will tend to be a bit pissed about that. Maybe, the fact that the entire Bush Administration is a lying pool of snakes may cause you some issues in success, as well, since no one except the worst Koolaid Drinkers can believe a word any of them say.

I have never been more embarassed to be an American. These imbeciles have ruined the country I love. The best thing that could occur is impeachment and war crime tribunals for Bush, Cheney and all the Bush Admin.

ALL OF THEM!

Remote Area Medical Returns to Lafayette, Tennessee, U.S.A.

B’Man: I wrote about this group visiting Tn a while back here.

I do not find this situation an odd occurence in the deep south. Most people I know don’t have any real insurance (maybe hospitalization, for full coverage cannot be afforded right now). As a matter of fact, BuelahMan’s family is going through a harrowing ordeal right now and may likely lose much (if not all) my coverage.

So, we may be on board for the next visit from RAM…

Medical Charity Helping US Poor

Stan Brock is like a 21st-Century Florence Nightingale.

He started a charity – Remote Area Medical (RAM) – more than 20 years ago to bring relief to those cut off from healthcare.

Originally it was to help poor tribes in the former British colony of Guyana, South America.

That is where he lived after leaving Preston, Lancashire, more than half a century ago – he still is a British citizen.

But now Stan spends most of his time bringing relief to the richest country in the world.

Production line

Some 60% of RAM’s work is now carried out in the United States.

On a wet, spring weekend he lands his vintage World War II aircraft – once used to drop American troops on D-Day – in Lafayette, Tennessee.

He bought the plane to parachute medics into the jungle.

Today he is unloading dentists’ chairs from the plane into a pickup truck.

By eight o’clock on Friday evening the first patients have arrived after travelling hundreds of miles.

They start queuing.

For one weekend RAM has turned a high school into a hospital.

Classrooms have become consulting rooms and the sports hall has been transformed into a production line to fill or extract painful teeth.

Volunteer nurses, doctors and dentists have flown in from all over the country to man the stations.

ike Stan, they are not getting paid.

By five o’clock on Saturday morning the line is snaking round the school.

State troopers are on standby to help.

The patients are handed numbers as they wait in the pouring rain.

‘Working poor’

Most of those I speak to seem to have jobs, but cannot afford healthcare.

For one reason or another they do not have insurance.

They call themselves the “working poor”.

And then Stan Brock arrives with a loudspeaker to call the first batch in.

Once inside there is more queuing and waiting.

The patients slowly make their way to tables with yet more volunteers, who take blood pressure and medical history.

Among the sea of faces is Donna Pollard.

She wants a mammogram to check out a lump on her breast, as well as dental work and new eye glasses.

For her, this service is nothing short of a lifeline.

Healthcare is a luxury when you are struggling to pay the bills.

Then there is Ken Barbee.

At 64, he has been working for most of his life.

But recently he had to give up his job as a truck driver to look after his sick wife.

By the time I catch up with him he has already got his new glasses – now he hopes to have his last few teeth removed.

Ken calls it “a shame” that people have to resort to charity for their healthcare in the world’s most prosperous country.

He feels let down: “We’re just pushed out there and told to do the best y’can.”

Election issue

And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Some 47 million Americans have no health insurance.

Millions more are under-insured.

It is no wonder that healthcare is now such a big issue in the presidential race.

For a stoical Stan Brock, organising these clinics is both rewarding and depressing.

Come Sunday when it is time to pack up, he will be turning people away.

He watches over the whole operation wearing a neatly pressed khaki uniform, carrying a clipboard and pen, looking like a figure from the old British empire.

He has given his life to all this.

He takes no salary, and lives in an old school building in Kentucky from where he plans RAM’s expeditions.

As for his views on America’s healthcare, Stan says:

“We need to fix it… fall into line with Britain and France.

“Here in this country if you’re poor – you don’t have much of a shot.”

In this one short weekend, RAM treated 550 people – 416 teeth were extracted, more than 200 pairs of glasses handed out.

The estimated value of this free treatment was nearly $1m (£500,000).

So Stan Brock will continue flying in healthcare to rural Appalachia as well as the developing world.

He is also seriously thinking of returning to Britain – with a team of RAM volunteers.

He has heard his old country has a shortage of NHS dentists.

“I am sure we’ll get just as large a crowd as we’re getting here in the US,” he says.

© 2008 BBC News

Food Art….. Cool

WTF Thursday: Forcing Your Child to Dismember Her Mother?

Leave it to the southeast USA…

Memphis girl says father forced her to help dismember mother

MEMPHIS, Tenn. (AP) – A 12-year-old girl has testified in court that she saw her father kill her mother and he then forced her to help dismember the body with a circular saw.

Police said James Hawkins cleaned the saw and returned it to the store where he bought it.

The testimony came Wednesday at a preliminary hearing for Hawkins, 30, who is charged with killing and dismembering his girlfriend, Charlene Gaither, on Feb. 9 in their apartment. His case was sent to a grand jury.

According to The Commercial Appeal, the girl testified that her father made her help cut off her mother’s head, and she helped cut off Gaither’s hands and feet.

The Redstater’s Are Clueless Because of FoxNews and Talk Radio

Rednecks down south get most, if not all, their news from Fox News and Talk radio. Where I live, I cannot receive the more and more right-leaning NPR stations because the local stations bleed over and you can’t hear it most of the time. There is absolutely ZERO progressive radio here that I can find.

So, it is no surprise to me to hear a person like the following lay it out. It is obvious to me, but I encounter so many people down here who have fallen for the lies and bullshit that I get sick of listening to brainwashed fools spout off.

We are the Best Entertained and Least Informed country in the world and it is because people are embracing the lies of the neoconservatives (which is NOT conservative, at all).

USA Loses Technological Edge to China

B’Man: The entire scheme has supposedly been that the US was so far technologically advanced from the rest of the world that the US manufacturing segment was supposed to become the ultra high-tech center of the world. We would pass along the menial production jobs to the low wage countries (slave workers, etc), while our workers (being so much smarter and advanced than the rest of the fools of the world) would take in the high tech stuff and get rich.

But, what has happened is that we have denied what made us smart, rich and the USA, in general. It was always our manufacturing that made us what we are. But a few ideologues have convinced an entire country otherwise and look what is happening. We are not only losing the jobs, but some countries view us as the “low-wage” area to begin making their products. A slap in the face, if you ask me.

Of course, we need the jobs now, so I am not looking a gift horse in the mouth, but the gift pretty much sucks when our own auto industry is about to fall completely apart and we are sending much of that manufacturing overseas. Yet, we are low price enough for Asian and German automakers?

Bullshit!

The New World Order is set to bring the majority of us down to poverty levels. Never forget that. We need to reverse this foolish thing before we are totally ruined. From Alternet:

China Surpasses U.S. in Technological Prowess

Posted by Joshua Holland, AlterNet at 10:17 AM on May 26, 2008.

Did we outsource our edge?

For years, folks like Thomas Friedman and Robert Samuelson have dismissed concerns about our dwindling manufacturing base as just so much economic fear mongering. We don’t need those dirty manufacturing jobs, they said. There’s more value added in services, and with our educated workforce and technological edge, there’s no reason in the world not to have other countries build our play-stations, bikes and TVs.

The only problem is that the manufacturing sector has always been a key driver of technological innovation. When manufacturing goes, so does a large share of hi-tech R and D. Now, according to Manufacturing and Technology News, we appear to be reaping what the corporate globalizers have sown:

China has surpassed the United States in a key measure of high tech competitiveness. The Georgia Institute of Technology’s bi-annual “{High-Tech Indicators” finds that China improved its “technological standing” by 9 points over the period of 2005 to 2007, with the United States and Japan suffering declines of 6.8 and 7.1 respectively. In Georgia Tech’s scale of one to 100, China’s technological standing now rests at 82.8, compared to the U.S. at 76.1. The United States peaked at 95.4 in 1999. China has increased from 22.5 in 1996 to 82.8 in 2007.

“The message speaks out pretty loudly,” says Alan Porter, co-director of Georgia Tech’s Technology Policy and Assessment Center, which produces the benchmark. “I think the prospects are pretty scary.”

“In areas like nanotechnology, China now leads the United States in published articles, but what scares me is China is getting better at marrying that research to their low-cost productive processes,” says Porter. “When you put those together with our buzzword of innovation, China is big, they’re tough and cheap. Again, where is our edge?”

We had it, but we shipped it off to China, content to sell one another real estate, sue each other and manufacture only green pieces of paper to trade for oil and cheap knick-knacks at Wal-Mart.

This Is The Sound An Asshole Makes

A lying, asshole, to be specific.