Archive for July 3rd, 2008
Bush Tours America To Survey Damage Caused By His Disastrous Presidency | The Onion - America’s Finest News Source
Posted by BuelahMan on July 3, 2008
Posted in Bush, Humor, The Onion, Video | No Comments »
Food Shortages? Who Cares? There Is a Miley Cyrus Shortage Coming
Posted by BuelahMan on July 3, 2008
Sources Warn Miley Cyrus Will Be Depleted by 2013
Unless Americans turn to alternative sources of entertainment, the ‘Hannah Montana’ star will soon be completely tapped out.
Posted in Humor, The Onion, Video | Tagged: Miley Cyrus | 2 Comments »
How Are Those Unemployment Benefits Holding Out?
Posted by BuelahMan on July 3, 2008
Brace for things to get much worse, before they get any better:
Unemployment likely to worsen in coming months.
In a front-page story, the New York Times (7/2, A1, Goodman) reports that Tuesday’s automaker sales reports “reinforc[ed] the gloom spreading across the economy, [and] the troubles confronting American workers seemed to intensify.” The numbers mean manufacturers are “more likely to cut production and impose more layoffs. Until recently, the weak labor market has been marked more by the reluctance of employers to create new jobs than by mass layoffs.” Among economists, “the sense is broadening that the troubles dogging the economy will be stubborn, leaving in place an uncomfortable combination of tight credit and scant job opportunities perhaps well into next year.” The Times notes that the “national unemployment rate climbed a full percentage point over the last year to 5.5 percent in May,” and now Goldman Sachs is “forecast[ing] that the unemployment rate will peak at 6.4 percent late in 2009 before the picture improves, meaning that the painful process of shedding jobs may be only half-way complete.”
Posted in REAL State of the Union | Tagged: economy, unemployment | No Comments »
If Asked, Who Do You Support: Israel or Palestine?
Posted by BuelahMan on July 3, 2008
B’Man: I think there is really only one thing that my cohort and beautifully “skinny” friend, lrose and I disagree on, it is the Israel/Palestinian conflict (although I am not sure what it is we disagree upon, exactly). My stance about Israel and the lobby that reigns in American politics is that we do Israel’s bidding. They rule our foreign interests, when I am not convinced (as lrose is) that Israel is a wonderful ally or that their interests are actually “our” interests.
I have many reasons for thinking this way, but it is the hypocritical stance we have taken with them, but hold other countries in the ME to a totally different standard (but what else is new for our government who has flirted and propped up Dictators and rogue leaders for many years).
It boils down to this, if AIPAC loves Bush and Cheney so much and Bush and Cheney are the monsters they are known to be, I have no faith in Israel’s judgment of character and can only come to the conclusion that they are complicit and both untrustworthy.
Is there anything, whatsoever, that the Bush/Cheney admin has done that is honorable or trustworthy?
I can’t think of a thing. So, why would I consider their opinion and support of Israel anything other than more of their neocon bullshit?
But forget what this clueless redneck thinks. Let’s get the opinion of more of the world:
Don’t take sides in Israeli-Palestinian conflict: poll
WASHINGTON (Courtney C. Radsch, Alarabiya.net)
The first global public opinion poll about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict released Tuesday found that majorities in 14 out of 18 countries polled believe their government should not take sides in the decades-old Middle East conflict.
It also revealed that most people support a greater role for the United Nations, from guaranteeing security of the countries involved to sending peacekeepers to enforce an eventual peace agreement.
According to the poll – which was conducted by WorldPublicOpinion.org and covered 18,792 people in 18 countries and the Palestinian Territories – 58 percent of respondents said they did not believe their country should take a side in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Twenty percent said their country should support the Palestinians, while only seven percent supported the Israelis. Egypt, Iran and Turkey were the only countries favoring the Palestinians.
American view
Even Americans overwhelmingly said their government should not take sides.
In a finding that goes against the common assumption that Americans overwhelmingly support Israel, seven out of ten Americans said they thought their country should not take sides in the conflict. Of the rest, 21 percent said it should take Israel’s side compared to only 3 percent who supported taking the Palestinians side.
“Israel is liked a lot more and if you force them (Americans) to choose, Israel gets more sympathy,” Steven Kull, director of WorldOpinion.org, told AlArabiya.net in an interview.
“You ask them which side they blame more, and more blame Israel than the Palestinians, but if you look more closely there are huge numbers that refuse to answer or say they don’t know.”
Americans, said Mr. Kull, are unequivocal that U.S. policy needs to be even handed in dealing with the situation. “There is a discrepancy in this sense between the public and government foreign policy,” he added.
At 86 percent, Egypt was the only country to overwhelmingly support taking the Palestinian side and to say that Palestinians are doing their part to resolve the conflict. A similarly large percentage said neither Israel (88%) nor the U.S. (86%) is doing their part well.
Country assessments
Israel received the worst ratings about whether it is playing a positive role in the conflict, with majorities in thirteen out of fifteen countries asked this question saying that the Israelis are “not doing very well” or “not doing well at all.”
Arab countries and the United States did not fare much better.
Fifty-nine percent of those polled view America’s role in the conflict negatively, as do 46 percent of Americans themselves. A majority, 54 percent, of those polled also said that Israel is not playing a positive role while 47 percent say the same for the Palestinians.
The United Nations Security Council, however, fared far better in terms of people’s perceptions about the role it should and could play. Respondents said they believed the United Nations should play a greater role in the conflict, especially if an agreement is eventually reached.
All but one of the 17 countries asked had majorities or pluralities that supported sending U.N. peacekeepers were an agreement reached, with an average of 67 percent favoring and 20 percent opposing such an idea.
The predominantly Muslim countries of Egypt, Turkey, Indonesia and the Palestinian territories in particular supported U.N. involvement, from protecting Arab countries in case of an Israeli attack to sending peacekeepers.
Posted in Israel, Lynda, ReTHUGlican | Tagged: AIPAC | No Comments »
