I AM A DIASPORAL JEW OF THE ASHKENAZ TRIBE AND I HEREBY DECLARE BUELAHMAN AND LYNDA OF BUELAHMAN'S REDSTATE REVOLT TO BE ABSOLUTELY FREE OF ANTI-SEMITISM OF ANY KIND. THEIR VIEWS ON AMERICA'S ISRAEL POLICY IS THE SAME AS MINE. IT IS THE SAME AS WELL OVER 30% OF THE ISRAELI PEOPLE AND OVER 70% OF THE DIASPORAL ASHKENAZ COMMUNITY IN THE WORLD OUTSIDE BOTH THE UNITED STATES AND ISRAEL.
I found this letter from CBS13 in Modesto, CA, where that Priest told his parish that if they voted for Obama they have committed a “mortal sin”.
The Rev. Joseph Illo says his parishioners at St. Joseph’s Catholic Church in Modesto shouldn’t risk losing their “state of grace” by receiving communion sacrilegiously. He delivered the message in a Nov. 21 letter and during mass.
In an interview this week with the Modesto Bee, Illo says he sent the letter because Catholic teaching requires that people go to confession when they commit a mortal sin.
I don’t know about the hell part, but brain function has definetely been altered.
Sometimes you just gotta dance (beware the lyrics)…
I hit the bottle in the morning in the summer time
I quit my job cause it gets in the way
I find a party by the ocean buy the cheapest wine,
tell my friends to come and waste the day.
I got a dimeback,corduroys,colored sleeves,
and a bindle with some LSD.
Now im just lookin for a girl to meet to help me forget my name.
I could spend my lifetime gettin high,
never wanna live in suit and tie.
Most of us are just livin a lie,
drunk gettin fucked up every night.
Im gettin drunk all night ohohoh im gettin drunk all day ooh im gettin drunk all night im sorry but i have to say,
im too drunk to fuck.
Now the party was jumpin and the girls were fine with the lipstick summer glaze.
I got so many women comin after me i put some pussy on layaway.
I was smoked out, tore up, drunk as fuck,
and i wouldn’t wanna change a thing.
Young and dumb and full of cum with a sugar loaded candy cane.
I could spend my lifetime gettin high.
never wanna live in suit and tie.
Most of us are just livin a lie,
drink gettin fucked up every night.
Im gettin drunk all night ohohoh im gettin drunk all day ohohoh im gettin drunk all night ohohoh im gettin drunk all day ohohoh im gettin drunk all night ohohoh im gettin drunk all day ohohoh im gettin drunk all night,
im sorry but i have to say.
IM TOO DRUNK TO FUCK YOU! aaahh yeah im too drunk to fuck you (guitar plays for a bit).
I can’t eat cant sleep and im bored as f**k and the girl i want just walked away.
She just found out im too drunk to f**k,
looks like im not gettin laid.
I could spend my lifetime gettin high,
never wanna live in suit and tie.
Most of us are just livin a lie,
drunk gettin fucked up every night.
Im gettin drunk all night ohohoh im gettin drunk all day ohohoh im gettin drunk all night ohohoh im gettin drunk all day ohohoh im gettin drunk all night ohohoh im gettin drunk all day ohohoh im gettin drunk all night.
Im sorry but i have to say,
IM TOO DRUNK TO FUCK YOU! YAAAAA…
IM TOO DRUNK TO FUCK YOU.
IM TOO DRUNK TO FUCK YOU…
“The more ‘faithful’ a nation is, the more likely it is to have markers of social pathology; like homicides, suicides, rape, unwed pregnancy, teen pregnancy, and the like.“
Large-scale surveys show dramatic declines in religiosity in favor of secularization in the developed democracies. Popular acceptance of evolutionary science correlates negatively with levels of religiosity, and the United States is the only prosperous nation where the majority absolutely believes in a creator and evolutionary science is unpopular. Abundant data is available on rates of societal dysfunction and health in the first world. Cross-national comparisons of highly differing rates of religiosity and societal conditions form a mass epidemiological experiment that can be used to test whether high rates of belief in and worship of a creator are necessary for high levels of social health. Data correlations show that in almost all regards the highly secular democracies consistently enjoy low rates of societal dysfunction, while pro-religious and antievolution America performs poorly.
Radio has been playing Christmas songs and advertisements for weeks now. It is worse now that every Tom, Dick and Harry are out singing there version of some Christmas song. I mean, damn, the turkey ain’t even shat, yet.
With the economy being what it is, it is surely evident that only the rich will be able to afford presents for their rich children. To plan ahead, I want to someday work as Santa Clause and this is my start (sort of a young Kris Kringle). Until I fully develop the white beard and put on another 50 pounds, I may just keep with my demented young Redneck Santa, BuelahClaws.
This year let me share my first of season curmudgeonly Christmas wishes by showing you this:
Its Santa Lifty and Elf Shifty coming to visit with thievery spirit!
Actually, BuelahGirl took that pic. So, I had to snap one of her.
A quick clip from Russian TV where a former Georgian Ambassador says that whomever is responsible for the illegal attacks on South Ossetia should be tried as a war criminal.
Those responsible for starting the Georgian-South Ossetian conflict should be tried in court. Thats according to Erosi Kitsmarishvili, Georgia’s former Ambassador to Russia, who spoke exclusively to RT after giving evidence to a Georgian parliamentary commission looking into the war.
In electing Barack Obama, the country traded the foreign policy of the second President Bush for the foreign policy of the first President Bush.
That is the meaning of Obama’s apparent decision to keep Robert Gates on as defense secretary and also to select Hillary Clinton as secretary of state.
With strong ties to the military and a carefully cultivated image of tough-mindedness, Clinton will protect the incoming president’s back from those on the right ready to pounce at any sign of what they see as weakness.
As for Gates, Obama has found the ideal figure to help him organize his planned withdrawal from Iraq, and to bless it.
What’s most striking about Obama’s approach to foreign policy is that he is less an idealist than a realist who would advance American interests by diplomacy, by working to improve the country’s image abroad, and by using military force prudently and cautiously.
This sounds a lot like the foreign policy of George H.W. Bush, and it makes perfect sense that Obama has had conversations with the senior Bush’s closest foreign policy adviser, Brent Scowcroft. Obama has drawn counsel from many in Scowcroft’s circle, and Gates himself was deputy national security adviser under Scowcroft.
The truth about Obama’s worldview was hidden in plain sight in his most politically consequential foreign policy speech. Antiwar Democrats cheered Obama for addressing a rally against the Iraq war in Chicago’s Federal Plaza on Oct. 2, 2002. His opposition to the war was a major asset in his nomination struggle with Clinton…
There was nothing “hidden in plain sight”. It was out in the open, all along (which gives Obama the right to say he didn’t lie). But there was a huge group pf people who were so anti-Iraq war that they were willing to listen to the anti-Iraq War rhetoric Obama used to defeat Clinton in the Primary and somehow close their ears and minds to the real militaristic agenda that Obama wants to continue.
And this isn’t just about pitting the “anti-war” folks against the “war” folks. I am not anti-war, but I am anti-criminal activity especially when it the criminals are the ones that control this country. I cannot stand the hypocrisy of it and even less, I cannot condone killing and maiming so many other people for these criminal reasons.
…In fact, Obama sounded a great deal like — Brent Scowcroft. In a widely noted 2002 op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal, published six weeks before Obama gave his speech, Scowcroft warned that an invasion of Iraq “very likely would have to be followed by a large-scale, long-term military occupation.” Going to Iraq, Scowcroft said, would “divert us for some indefinite period from our war on terrorism,” and it could “destabilize Arab regimes in the region,” “stifle any cooperation on terrorism” and “even swell the ranks of the terrorists.” Clinton, who once said that “we have to be both internationalists and realists,” is a natural fit with the new Obama-Scowcroft-Gates establishment. In explaining the appeal of Clinton, a senior Obama adviser recently spoke several times of the president-elect’s respect for her “toughness” and described the practical reasons for choosing a figure who would have instant credibility around the world…
And yes, militarily, President Clinton was basically a continuance of Papa Bush’s policy. The big difference is that Papa Bush and Willy knew not to be as brazen about their actions. They had differing styles, but the policy continued and even got worse under Clinton. When Baby Bush createdfound his opportunity (911) to become brazen (harboring an astonishing 90%+ Approval rating… I can say I was part of those pesky 10%ers) he went fucking nuts.
…Obama’s national security choices are already causing grumbling from parts of the antiwar left, even if Obama made clear six years ago that while he was with them on Iraq, he was not one of them.
Ironically, Obama is likely to show more fidelity to George H.W. Bush’s approach to foreign affairs than did the former president’s own son. That’s change, maybe even change we can believe in, but it’s not the change so many expected
I agree, not many “expected” this kind of “change”, but that simply shows their blindness and readiness to follow any perceived Savior without even listening to what their Messiah is saying.
I knew that Barack Obama was not on the up in up when he flip-flopped on his Palestinian stance and became the Zionist regime’s bag man. The day I saw for myself that AIPAC owned him, I knew he had been bought. Since then, there have been countless issues in which the illusion was forced into the light, yet reality was never absorbed by his followers… the “Progressives”.
The world’s ‘oldest’ stash of cannabis has been unearthed inside a remote tomb in China.
The 789 grams of marijuana is thought to be about 2,700 years old and appears to have been buried next to a shaman, according to The Star.
Favourable conditions means the stash still has its green tint, although possibly disappointed researchers said its lack of odour told them immediately it wasn’t still good to smoke.
According to an article in the Journal of Experimental Botany it’s ‘the oldest documentation of cannabis as a pharmacologically active agent’.
The tomb in north-west China also contained bridles, archery equipment and a harp, but apparently no ancient cache of chocolates, crisps and biscuits.
The article doesn’t mention the box of Twinkies found with the stash (still edible).What strikes me is that 2,700 years ago they knew what pharmacological benefits this drug had. The other thing to mention is that 789 grams is a damned good “stash” (29 pounds of bud). Makes me wonder if this truly was a Pharmacy of old.
The French say they need the largest condoms in Europe while Greeks get by on smaller ones, according to a Europe-wide study by a German consultancy that provides advice on condoms.
The snappily named Singen-based Institute of Condom Consultancy asked 10,500 men in 25 countries to measure their penis and enter the number into a database.
From these undoubtedly accurate and entirely true responses they found Frenchmen on average claim to need 15.48cm (6.09inch) long condoms, about 3 cm longer than Greeks, whose condom-size requirement was the most modest.
an Vinzenz Krause, the institute’s director said the data was collected over a period of eight months.
The survey was aimed at educating youngsters about the importance of effective contraception.
The institute also offers online condom-size advice and hosts “Pimp Your Condom” – an annual fair organised in cooperation with the national Aids Trust – with the aim of educating teens about sexually transmitted diseases.
Krause was in the spotlight in the past when he produced a prototype of the “spray-on condom” – an aerosol can which contains latex that creates a perfectly fitting condom. But the idea was surprisingly not developed further.
Robert Scheer is a man whom I respect and have quoted here on several occasions. However, when he began jumping on the Obama bandwagon and began the offensive towards Ralph Nader regarding this subject, I knew that he, too, had drank the Messiah koolaid. Now, we have him coming out and almost admitting he made a mistake and at the very least does hold claim that he wanted to challenge Ralph to a debate over the issue of the bail out and Mr Obama’s stance.
Now we see what Ralph (and I) have been saying for so long to be absolute truth and now the roaches are running wild that the light has been turned on. From The Nation:
Maybe Ralph Nader was right in predicting that the same Wall Street hustlers would have a lock on our government no matter which major party won the election. I hate to admit it, since it wasn’t that long ago that I heatedly challenged Nader in a debate on this very point.
But how else is one to respond to Barack Obama’s picking the very folks who helped get us into this financial mess to now lead us out of it? Watching the president-elect’s Monday introduction of his economic team, my brother-in-law Pete said, “You can see the feathers coming out of their mouths” as the foxes were once again put in charge of the henhouse. He didn’t have time to expound on his point, having to get ready to go sort mail in his job at the post office, but he showed me a statement from Citigroup showing that the interest rate on Pete the Postal Worker’s credit card was 28.9 percent, an amount that all major religions would justly condemn as usurious.
Let me tell you how one should respond. You respond the same way you would if you happened to see a man break your neighbor’s window and begin hauling shit out of the house. Call the law, make a fuss, stop them with your own might, if needed. But DON’T allow them to continue stealing the man blind.
…Why then has he appointed the very people responsible for this disaster to now make it all better? Why not ask him? Heck, yes, it is time for the many of us who responded to his e-mails during the campaign to now challenge our e-mail buddy as to why he suddenly acts as if the interests of Wall Street and Main Street are one and the same.
You think, Robert? But before I let you go, answer me this? Where the hell have you been this entire run-up to the election? I’m sure that being on the Obama bus caused you to not see or hear this coming from a mile away, right? Sorry, dude. It ain’t that easy when you have such a large microphone. Get real. Admit you were and are wrong, then use that loud assed microphone to change it.
Mine just has a peep coming from it, but I have never stopped warning people. Maybe you should join those who were right all along?
What if I told you that I believed that America, as we know it, will no longer be the same in 1 – 2 years… that we will divide into 6 different provinces owned and operated by the debtor nations who actually own us now?
Would you consider me a freak?
This is what Russian TV heard when interviewing Igor Panarin, a Russian professor of economics about his predictions.
I wonder who had Turkey today (I happen to love turkey oven roasted, smoked or deep fried)?
My Mother is a German cook who was raised during the aftermath of the war. Her family was desititute and as the oldest child she had to quit school and work to help out. Her father was long dead and she learned to cook (using anything available and you would think it exquisite). My mom likes turkey, but she prefers Goose and has cooked duck, quail, dove… among rabbits, squirrels, deer, crabs, frog legs, mountain oysters and virtually any edible farm animal (and God knows what else).
So when I saw this I knew I could finally do a tribute to a woman that would, by all means, be able to cook something like this (and I promise it would be delicious). I must admit that this is supposedly a hoax (CNN video), but no matter, my Mother could do it, I have no doubt.
Forget the turducken, here’s the turgooduccochiqua by Wil Shipley of Call Me Fishmeal blog. It’s a quail inside a cornish game hen inside a duck inside a chicken inside a turkey inside a goose. Oh, and with bacon between the layers…
I should also note that in many cases, it would have been game that my Mother, herself, hunted and bagged. She can clean a fish as well as any one alive, in my opinion, and certainly can cook them with the best.
She once was running a trot line (catching catfish in and around Pickwick Lake along the Tennessee River) when she noticed something swimming across the river. She noticed it was a male deer and she ran it down in the boat, pulled up beside it and beat it with a boat paddle until she was able to tie it up with a rope along side the boat.
She started driving towards the bank when the deer started trying to get loose and she pulled out her fish skinning knife and cut the deers throat. Luckily she was near the bank and could get it up on ground to finish field dressing the animal.
We ate deer that night.
Honest to God true story.
And you wonder what is wrong with me and what caused it?
For weeks I have been scratching my head over these bail-outs. History proves reliably that when such tactics are taken, only bad things end up happening. Bad for those of us who will be paying for the bail-outs and good for those who are being bailed out.
But one thing that is strikingly clear is the discrepancy between the Banking bail-out and the Automotive bail-out being debated right now (and next week when the car manufacturer head honchos go back to beg again). Is it just me that thinks something is radically unfair in the fact that the banks get money without accountability or barely any questions asked and now the car companies are having to jump through hoops to get the money needed to keep them afloat?
I have had my own rationale for this which tends to be along the lines that Paulson/Bernanke are trying desperately to protect and finance their crony friends who caused the problem and there is no insider doing the same for auto makers. Is it just me who thinks that they really don’t give a damn about the auto-makers and they DO care for the bankers (speaking of Congress)?
I worked for a company that supported Chrysler and GM for many years and have many horror stories to tell about the UAW and shenanigans they were party to. I can attest to over paying and being forced to work on Christmas Day because the skilled trades received over $120/hour (when I did the majority of work and they sat around getting hair cuts, etc).
But I can also attest to the UAW working very hard with the owners in recent years because they, surely, saw the writing on the wall about losing jobs and work in the USA.
I agree that the automakers should have had an alternative system for getting us around thirty years ago and should have never stopped. But I also understand that there has been no push, strong anyway, from the public at large for these changes.
However, in the instance of the banks and their abuses, we are simply paying for their crookedness and schemes… not a complacency like the car folk. With cars, we get what we pay for and demand. With banks, we are at their mercy (most of us don’t understand the inner workings of the banking fiasco) and they can do pretty much whatever they want.
Somehow, I have a problem with this picture.
Today, I saw jperryam’s video about the issue and it explains much and just so happens to mimic my feelings pretty accurately.
BuelahMan
Lynda
kelsosnuts
