True Progressivism (Not The Fake Obama Kind You Were Fooled By)

One of the most open and honest discussion about progressive values concerning Single Payer Universal healthcare.

A real majority of the “Two Party System” (may be 60 now with Spector) has the numbers to do what is right for this country, but as Ed lays it out, the Dems are in the pocket of Big Insurance.

BTW: Bernie Sanders is a Patriot.

There is a chance to make this happen, but you must get loud in your own back yard. It isn’t enough to just post this shit on a blog. Get out in your community and start talking to people and asking them specific questions about their healthcare and it is easy to show them where their brainwashed ideas of “socialized medicine” are wrong headed and that there is a far better solution.

There is no reason why this country spends twice as much for health care as any industrialized country in the world, yet we have poorer health and health care as a result.

It is the Insurance Companies, idiot. Wake Up! Get them out of your health care and watch it improve for less money.

Will you get it from Barack Obama? No, because he is NOT a progressive and never has been. Also look at where he got his campaign finances from and your answer is obvious as to “why” he won’t push for it, even though he has the political clout to do so.

You Obama Maniacs are gullible fools. Just as gullible and foolish as any Bushie alive.

h/t AfterDowningStreet

America Is A Bunch Of Suckers

Obama’s 100 Days

The Mad Men Did Well

By John Pilger

April 29, 2009 “Information Clearing House” — The BBC’s American television soap Mad Men offers a rare glimpse of the power of corporate advertising. The promotion of smoking half a century ago by the “smart” people of Madison Avenue, who knew the truth, led to countless deaths. Advertising and its twin, public relations, became a way of deceiving dreamt up by those who had read Freud and applied mass psychology to anything from cigarettes to politics. Just as Marlboro Man was virility itself, so politicians could be branded, packaged and sold.

It is more than 100 days since Barack Obama was elected president of the United States. The “Obama brand” has been named “Advertising Age’s marketer of the year for 2008″, easily beating Apple computers. David Fenton of MoveOn.org describes Obama’s election campaign as “an institutionalised mass-level automated technological community organising that has never existed before and is a very, very powerful force”. Deploying the internet and a slogan plagiarised from the Latino union organiser César Chávez – “Sí, se puede!” or “Yes, we can” – the mass-level automated technological community marketed its brand to victory in a country desperate to be rid of George W Bush.

No one knew what the new brand actually stood for. So accomplished was the advertising (a record $75m was spent on television commercials alone) that many Americans actually believed Obama shared their opposition to Bush’s wars. In fact, he had repeatedly backed Bush’s warmongering and its congressional funding. Many Americans also believed he was the heir to Martin Luther King’s legacy of anti-colonialism. Yet if Obama had a theme at all, apart from the vacuous “Change you can believe in”, it was the renewal of America as a dominant, avaricious bully. “We will be the most powerful,” he often declared.

Perhaps the Obama brand’s most effective advertising was supplied free of charge by those journalists who, as courtiers of a rapacious system, promote shining knights. They depoliticised him, spinning his platitudinous speeches as “adroit literary creations, rich, like those Doric columns, with allusion…” (Charlotte Higgins in the Guardian). The San Francisco Chronicle columnist Mark Morford wrote: “Many spiritually advanced people I know… identify Obama as a Lightworker, that rare kind of attuned being who… can actually help usher in a new way of being on the planet.”

In his first 100 days, Obama has excused torture, opposed habeas corpus and demanded more secret government. He has kept Bush’s gulag intact and at least 17,000 prisoners beyond the reach of justice. On 24 April, his lawyers won an appeal that ruled Guantanamo Bay prisoners were not “persons”, and therefore had no right not to be tortured. His national intelligence director, Admiral Dennis Blair, says he believes torture works. One of his senior US intelligence officials in Latin America is accused of covering up the torture of an American nun in Guatemala in 1989; another is a Pinochet apologist. As Daniel Ellsberg has pointed out, the US experienced a military coup under Bush, whose secretary of “defence”, Robert Gates, along with the same warmaking officials, has been retained by Obama.

All over the world, America’s violent assault on innocent people, directly or by agents, has been stepped up. During the recent massacre in Gaza, reports Seymour Hersh, “the Obama team let it be known that it would not object to the planned resupply of ‘smart bombs’ and other hi-tech ordnance that was already flowing to Israel” and being used to slaughter mostly women and children. In Pakistan, the number of civilians killed by US missiles called drones has more than doubled since Obama took office.

In Afghanistan, the US “strategy” of killing Pashtun tribespeople (the “Taliban”) has been extended by Obama to give the Pentagon time to build a series of permanent bases right across the devastated country where, says Secretary Gates, the US military will remain indefinitely. Obama’s policy, one unchanged since the Cold War, is to intimidate Russia and China, now an imperial rival. He is proceeding with Bush’s provocation of placing missiles on Russia’s western border, justifying it as a counter to Iran, which he accuses, absurdly, of posing “a real threat” to Europe and the US. On 5 April in Prague, he made a speech reported as “anti-nuclear”. It was nothing of the kind. Under the Pentagon’s Reliable Replacement Warhead programme, the US is building new “tactical” nuclear weapons designed to blur the distinction between nuclear and conventional war.

Perhaps the biggest lie – the equivalent of smoking is good for you – is Obama’s announcement that the US is leaving Iraq, the country it has reduced to a river of blood. According to unabashed US army planners, as many as 70,000 troops will remain “for the next 15 to 20 years”. On 25 April, his secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, alluded to this. It is not surprising that the polls are showing that a growing number of Americans believe they have been suckered – especially as the nation’s economy has been entrusted to the same fraudsters who destroyed it. Lawrence Summers, Obama’s principal economic adviser, is throwing $3trn at the same banks that paid him more than $8m last year, including $135,000 for one speech. Change you can believe in.

Much of the American establishment loathed Bush and Cheney for exposing, and threatening, the onward march of America’s “grand design”, as Henry Kissinger, war criminal and now Obama adviser, calls it. In advertising terms, Bush was a “brand collapse” whereas Obama, with his toothpaste advertisement smile and righteous clichés, is a godsend. At a stroke, he has seen off serious domestic dissent to war, and he brings tears to the eyes, from Washington to Whitehall. He is the BBC’s man, and CNN’s man, and Murdoch’s man, and Wall Street’s man, and the CIA’s man. The Madmen did well.

h/t Dandelion Salad

Another Worthless Commission

Thanks Pat. All we need is another bogus “911 Commission” type coverup of torture and all the wrong-doings by the previous administration and the complicit reThugs and democRATS.

We know how bogus these “commissions” are and personally I believe that a Special Investigator is needed. Maybe Patrick Fitzgerald is looking for some more work.

You’ll know how serious it is by who is “selected” to be on the commission and who selects them.

h/t RawStory

And on a note of somewhat good news, it appears that major Progressive Caucus groups have joined together to fight for the Public Health Insurance Plan (h/t AfterDowningStreet)

(Traveling today… wish me luck on a big sale potential)

B’Man’s Hypocrite Watch: War Criminals (Just As Long As It Isn’t Americans)

This country is run by the most audacious hypocrites the world has known.

And the Sheople may say, “Amen.”

Back then, Bush gave a standard that showed that he and his Administration knew that there is no “good faith defense” in committing war crimes. He insisted “War crimes will be prosecuted, war criminals will be punished and it will be no defense to say, “I was just following orders.

h/t Jonathon Turley for the text and ThinkProgress for the video

Getting Your Freak On: How Freaky Are You?

Apparently I scored a 15 which means I am only 14% freakier than you are. My results:

pretty freaky

you have a fairly low freak score

you have a pretty good amount of freak.  you occasionally do something pretty freaky, but generally have the capacity to be normal.  you probably have an amount of freak within and don’t get stared at very often, which is nice.

Take the test yourself and get your freak on.

test to see how much of a freak are you, anyways?