The Barack Obama Banking Cartel: Taking The American Worker Down To Build The Bankers Up
Posted by BuelahMan on June 1, 2009
Grand Theft Auto: How Stevie the Rat bankrupted GM
by Greg Palast
Monday, June 1, 2009
Screw the autoworkers.
They may be crying about General Motors’ bankruptcy today. But dumping 40,000 of the last 60,000 union jobs into a mass grave won’t spoil Jamie Dimon’s day.
Dimon is the CEO of JP Morgan Chase bank. While GM workers are losing their retirement health benefits, their jobs, their life savings; while shareholders are getting zilch and many creditors getting hosed, a few privileged GM lenders – led by Morgan and Citibank – expect to get back 100% of their loans to GM, a stunning $6 billion.
The way these banks are getting their $6 billion bonanza is stone cold illegal.
I smell a rat.
Stevie the Rat, to be precise. Steven Rattner, Barack Obama’s ‘Car Czar’ – the man who essentially ordered GM into bankruptcy this morning.
When a company goes bankrupt, everyone takes a hit: fair or not, workers lose some contract wages, stockholders get wiped out and creditors get fragments of what’s left. That’s the law. What workers don’t lose are their pensions (including old-age health funds) already taken from their wages and held in their name.
But not this time. Stevie the Rat has a different plan for GM: grab the pension funds to pay off Morgan and Citi.
Here’s the scheme: Rattner is demanding the bankruptcy court simply wipe away the money GM owes workers for their retirement health insurance. Cash in the insurance fund would be replace by GM stock. The percentage may be 17% of GM’s stock – or 25%. Whatever, 17% or 25% is worth, well … just try paying for your dialysis with 50 shares of bankrupt auto stock.
Yet Citibank and Morgan, says Rattner, should get their whole enchilada – $6 billion right now and in cash – from a company that can’t pay for auto parts or worker eye exams.
Preventive Detention for Pensions
So what’s wrong with seizing workers’ pension fund money in a bankruptcy? The answer, Mr. Obama, Mr. Law Professor, is that it’s illegal.
In 1974, after a series of scandalous take-downs of pension and retirement funds during the Nixon era, Congress passed the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. ERISA says you can’t seize workers’ pension funds (whether monthly payments or health insurance) any more than you can seize their private bank accounts. And that’s because they are the same thing: workers give up wages in return for retirement benefits.
The law is darn explicit that grabbing pension money is a no-no. Company executives must hold these retirement funds as “fiduciaries.” Here’s the law, Professor Obama, as described on the government’s own web site under the heading, “Health Plans and Benefits.”
“The primary responsibility of fiduciaries is to run the plan solely in the interest of participants and beneficiaries and for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits.”
Every business in America that runs short of cash would love to dip into retirement kitties, but it’s not their money any more than a banker can seize your account when the bank’s a little short. A plan’s assets are for the plan’s members only, not for Mr. Dimon nor Mr. Rubin.
Yet, in effect, the Obama Administration is demanding that money for an elderly auto worker’s spleen should be siphoned off to feed the TARP babies. Workers go without lung transplants so Dimon and Rubin can pimp out their ride. This is another “Guantanamo” moment for the Obama Administration – channeling Nixon to endorse the preventive detention of retiree health insurance.
Filching GM’s pension assets doesn’t become legal because the cash due the fund is replaced with GM stock. Congress saw through that switch-a-roo by requiring that companies, as fiduciaries, must
“…act prudently and must diversify the plan’s investments in order to minimize the risk of large losses.”
By “diversify” for safety, the law does not mean put 100% of worker funds into a single busted company’s stock.
This is dangerous business: The Rattner plan opens the floodgate to every politically-connected or down-on-their-luck company seeking to drain health care retirement funds.
House of Rubin
Pensions are wiped away and two connected banks don’t even get a haircut? How come Citi and Morgan aren’t asked, like workers and other creditors, to take stock in GM?
As Butch said to Sundance, who ARE these guys? You remember Morgan and Citi. These are the corporate Welfare Queens who’ve already sucked up over a third of a trillion dollars in aid from the US Treasury and Federal Reserve. Not coincidentally, Citi, the big winner, has paid over $100 million to Robert Rubin, the former US Treasury Secretary. Rubin was Obama’s point-man in winning banks’ endorsement and campaign donations (by far, his largest source of his corporate funding).
With GM’s last dying dimes about to fall into one pocket, and the Obama Treasury in his other pocket, Morgan’s Jamie Dimon is correct in saying that the last twelve months will prove to be the bank’s “finest year ever.”
Which leaves us to ask the question: is the forced bankruptcy of GM, the elimination of tens of thousands of jobs, just a collection action for favored financiers?
And it’s been a good year for Señor Rattner. While the Obama Administration made a big deal out of Rattner’s youth spent working for the Steelworkers Union, they tried to sweep under the chassis that Rattner was one of the privileged, select group of investors in Cerberus Capital, the owners of Chrysler. “Owning” is a loose term. Cerberus “owned” Chrysler the way a cannibal “hosts” you for dinner. Cerberus paid nothing for Chrysler – indeed, they were paid billions by Germany’s Daimler Corporation to haul it away. Cerberus kept the cash, then dumped Chrysler’s bankrupt corpse on the US taxpayer.
(“Cerberus,” by the way, named itself after the Roman’s mythical three-headed dog guarding the gates Hell. Subtle these guys are not.)
While Stevie the Rat sold his interest in the Dog from Hell when he became Car Czar, he never relinquished his post at the shop of vultures called Quadrangle Hedge Fund. Rattner’s personal net worth stands at roughly half a billion dollars. This is Obama’s working class hero.
If you ran a business and played fast and loose with your workers’ funds, you could land in prison. Stevie the Rat’s plan is nothing less than Grand Theft Auto Pension.
It doesn’t make it any less of a crime if the President drives the getaway car.
******
Economist and journalist Greg Palast, a former trade union contract negotiator, is author of the New York Times bestsellers The Best Democracy Money Can Buy and Armed Madhouse. He is a GM bondholder and card-carrying member of United Automobile Workers Local 1981.
Palast’s latest reports for BBC Television and Democracy Now! are collected on the newly released DVD, “Palast Investigates: from 8-Mile to the Amazon – on the trail of the financial marauders.” Watch the trailer here.
This entry was posted on June 1, 2009 at 7:47 am and is filed under Barack Obama, Big Banking, Big Money, Corruption, Economy, Greg Palast, NeoLiberal Criminals, demoRATs. Tagged: Car Czar, Citibank, GM Bankruptcy, Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan Chase, Steven Rattner. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.



kelsosnuts said
Perfect analysis by Palast. The workers’ pension fund is the most senior debt obligation any corporation anywhere in the world has. In a bankruptcy the workers’ pension fund get first rights to exercise its implicit call option on its proportional assets of the company. The workers, by the way finance is understood everywhere in the self-governing world, are now the RIGHTFUL MAJORITY OWNERS OF GM. Any deviation from this must be approved by the workers and, after that, like Palast, the secured senior lenders. Except NO. Not in ObamaLand.
kelsosnuts said
I’m going crazy, B’Man. Torrance and I have been screaming about this on blogradio for six months now. Nowhere in the capitalist world does an equity holder get preferential treatment in bankruptcy or receivership over a debt holder. The is EARTH IS ROUND AND REVOLVES AROUND THE SUN STUFF. If there weren’t this order to the treatment of the financiers of the company, capitalism could not function. No one would ever lend money again!!!!!!
BuelahMan said
I believe that we left capitalism long ago, Bro’. Trying to prop up this failed system of fractional reserve banking will always end up where we are. It is a failed model, to begin with, and the American people are stuck holding the debt.
How many times does this have to happen before we realize we have been duped? It has happened at least 5 or 6 times since the inception years ago and it will continue to happen over and over. Each time, the American sheople appear just a little bit more stupid than before.
Foxwood said
You may have already read this info on the death of Capitalism, but you might check it out in case you missed it.
http://animal-farm.us/change/the-united-socialist-states-of-america-ussa-434
BuelahMan said
Dude,
Don’t be ignorant. This has nothing whatsoever to do with Socialism. Obama is an extension of the previous 6 administrations, so this isn’t that idiotic right/left bullshit that has stolen America from us.
Wake up from that shit.
It doesn’t matter one iota if it is a Republican or Democrat… left wing or right wing… Conservative or Liberal. This is about Big Money that owns our country and pulls the strings of whoever is in office.
kelsosnuts said
B’Man: I just wrote something in the same vein. I gave credit to Sheldon Whitehouse for making up his own mind and putting the search for the truth about GITMO before what his “party’s” “leaders” tell him to think. You know how I know that Whitehouse is on the right track? DailyKos can’t stand him. They take more pot-shots at him than we take at BushBama.
There’s something different about today. I’m usually very pessimistic but a couple of cool things happened in public affairs. (1) Ted Olson and David Boies (opponents in Bush v Gore) appeared together in support of “NO ON 8″ and marriage rights for same-sex couples (2)Former Rep. Tom Campbell declared for the Republican nomination for Governor of California with “NO ON 8″ as his lead issue.
I took a trip along the conventional liberal Telegraph Wire and I’m reading some of the kinds of ideas and dark sarcasm we use about politics for the first time. On sites that have been all-Obama-all-the-time I’m reading about Bernie Sanders’ ideas, the Segolene Royal-Nicolas Sarkozy race of a couple of years ago in France, the importance of commitment to the full palette of LGBTQ rights, workers’ rights, and of course a woman’s right to a private professional relationship with the doctor of her choice (I know it’s been settled for 36 years now, but you have to allow the slower students to learn at their own pace!). Liberals are starting to open their eyes on GITMO, too.
They’re not quite at the stage of caring that 250,000 children as young as 13 are sentenced each year to adult time in prison. Nor are they terribly bothered that it’s constitutional to execute a 16 year old child. Nor that the US prison system only houses 7% violent felons, the other 93% being drug “offenders”. Nor are they there with us on pan-Semitism. They seem to be starting a bit to like the concepts of personal freedom and human rights, though that part could be my optimism or imagination getting the best of me.
Let’s put it this way about the conventional liberal Telegraph Wire: whereas last week 96% of bloggers and commenters think that it’s George W. Bush and Dick Cheney in the White House, this week it’s down to maybe 88%. To see 8% more of conventional liberals newly realizing that Barack Obama is in the same 1-party system as George W. Bush is a definite sign of progress.
BuelahMan said
Let’s put it this way about the conventional liberal Telegraph Wire: whereas last week 96% of bloggers and commenters think that it’s George W. Bush and Dick Cheney in the White House, this week it’s down to maybe 88%. To see 8% more of conventional liberals newly realizing that Barack Obama is in the same 1-party system as George W. Bush is a definite sign of progress.
I hope so, but let me advise that it took upwards of 7 years for many of these very same people to figure that same shit out about Bush. Remember how he had record setting approval ratings early on. It wasn’t just the right thinking that man was something special.
(Special, is right, as in Special Education that was never obtained)
I knew from Day one he was a piece of shit and I have known from Day 1 of Obama’s entry into the mainstream that he, too, was a piece of shit (with plenty of cologne and gracious smiles to sway us from knowing the truth).
fx15 lida yılan yağı karınca yumurtası xacc said
Thank you for this post
kelsosnuts said
Will someone in Big Sammy please inform Barack Obama that he is not the President Of The Republic Of Panama? Martin Torrijos is the president. Ricardo Martinelli is the president-elect. The Clinton/Perez-Balladares Treaty of 1999 does not permit Barack Obama to dictate any law or policy to the Republic of Panama. Any attempt to do so by force is a violation of every aspect of World Court and United Nations law and policy. It’s just that simple.
I don’t understand why Clinton and even Bush were able to grasp this simple concept but it eludes the most intelligent man in the USA.
BuelahMan said
He said “change”, didn’t he?
kelsosnuts said
I’m growing despondent again. There’s no way to stop this without WWIII, I fear. An enormously popular George W. Bush with the Republicans bleeding voters because of their insane racism, Christianism, and shrill, absurd screams of “socialist” at Barack Obama, when everybody with a tiny brain can see he’s far right if not quite the FRIENDLY FASCIST we see, has created a bad situation. This guy is more or less an autocrat but for the CBC, CPC, and the few Republican libertarians like Paul, J. Campbell, Flake, Rohrabacher and Walter Jones, Jr.
Madison said
Did Gm deserve the bailout? You Ask me I would say NO.. why? When Honda and Toyota were out inventing new cars, GM was busy boasting about its pride and Showing off its hungry hungry Daughter the Hummer
Rebecca said
What Can we common Poeple do about the Bailout? Nothing.. we just have to wait and see if the company comes up and develops new cars and prototypes to please the americal consumer
ksuvalk said
Good post and good blog. What is this country coming to?! Help!
BuelahMan said
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the comments. I also visited your blog and it makes me wonder why you would consider my crapola
“Good”? What I mean is that I am a social liberal and fiscal conservative. I am not religious and even hesitate to call myself a Christian (Yeshua never called himself or anyone else that). I cuss like a sailor (I was a sailor many years ago).
I am very glad you consider me what you do. This means there is hope for this divided world if you can recognize the good from what many perceive as “the other side”.
To me, it really isn’t about left vs right, conservative vs liberal, Republican vs Democrat.
It is about truth and what is right for this country… what is done in respect of the Constitution or what is done in demise of the Constitution.
Right now this country is basically devoid of Constitutionality, because the Corporations own us and the ones that represent us. With only a handful in both houses that are patriots, we are in for a long, rough ride.
ksuvalk said
I think you hit it on the head when you said “It is about truth and what is right for this country.”
We all approach these issues from our particular perspectives. Yes my perspective is different from yours. But, we are both attempting to get more information and truth out there so that others can see some of the things going on that the mass media hides.
At least then we can all make more informed decisions!!!
Thanks.
BuelahMan said
I hope that you realize that you are one of the most rational sounding self-professed “conservatives” I have encountered.
I have said numerous times here that at the very root, we all want the same thing. What I cannot fathom is how so many of us are swayed by a spectrum in such a way that we cannot allow ourselves to educate and learn about our adversaries (and I use that word on purpose).
We end up adversaries because we fall for the paradigm that THEY want us to fall for. They create the wedge issues that, in the scope of things, is meaningless or inconsequential at this moment in time. The use our religion, fears and hatreds to pit us against each other, when they know that if we were to unite, they would be cast away.
There was a regular that came here that called himself Conservative09 who was the king of Republican party talking points and could site from sources that obviously were on “The Right”. He seemed interested in data for my claims and I provide such all over the place in links and under categories on the side bar. Usually I simply told him to google whatever set of words, so that I know that he would end up with very similar results (as to not necessarily point him to a particular article, but moreso to show what a plethora of information could be gleamed from doing what I did).
Suddenly, all there ever would be as a retort would be the same old talking point, as if he could not or would not take the time to study and learn.
It is this contingent, on “left” or “right”… these Bushies/Obamites (which are no different whatsoever), or Party/Personality syncophants that are the biggest detriment to our country and liberties. It is the brainwashed that cause the most problems.
So, it isn’t truly the name used (con vs lib, Rep vs Dem, etc) but how you actually live and relate in this world. For instance, Bush was called a conservative and Obama a liberal. Both are patently false and totally void of understanding of these two’s ideologies.
It is really about the brainwashed perception of ENOUGH people that keep us in this state of a One Party System, with two arguing schisms that are almost the same, anyway.
It is time that people like you and I tell these others where to get off and take back this country from fascism and make it a Republic, again.
ksuvalk said
Yes isn’t it too bad the word “adversaries” is so applicable?!
In terms of labels, I guess you would classify me as a conservative christian small business owner who things this country is going to hell in a handbasket fast. So yes I believe in fiscal conservatism, yes I believe in God and make Him part of my daily life, and yes I struggle with government both from a consumer and a business viewpoint. And YES I am getting really fed up with where everything is going in this country.
But, I try very hard not to get caught up in labels and whatever they say I am supposed to believe. I am a firm believer in doing research and in really understanding the other points of view. I watch Fox, but I also watch MSNBC. Mainstream media is pretty much worthless, but it can highlight major points that help to focus further research.
So, on my blog I post what is probably considered conservative content for the most part. I do regurgitate some things I don’t have time to dig into more. But I also try to not put out things I don’t truly believe in.
I think that’s why I like what you are doing. There is some real effort going into the information and a real caring for what is happening.
Those are EXACTLY the things we need more of in this country.
kelsosnuts said
It’s about more than just the United States. While the US gave me and my family great educations (my dad was in the U.S. Navy, too, and I still have much love for that branch of the service), I don’t live there anymore and really have no desire to come back for so much as a visit. I would love to visit if (when?) the Sheople(tm) wake up and ask why they can’t live in a self-governing, self-contained, REPUBLIC instead of a failed EMPIRE.
Sometimes, I get mad and write things like “gringo de mierda,” but I don’t feel that way about all Americans or even most. Almost every American I know actually is pretty cool and aware that peace, freedom and social justice are the ways to go if one wants to do well and do good.
I’m glad to have found some cool American blogs like BuehlahMan’s RedState Revolt, RawDawgBuffalo and if I may be so bold our team’s blog, EDITORIALS FROM HELL’S LEADING DAILY NEWSPAPER (well, we’re international) where we can all share different ideas.
I’ve forgotten what it’s like to have the circus political partisanship they have in the US. Here in Panama, we’ve kind of agreed to a social contract far more humane than in the US and the debate is largely economic and very, very, esoteric (pretty much EVERYBODY here are social liberals and fiscal conservatives). I prefer the PRD, but I don’t HATE the PP at all. Some of their ideas — like a subway system for the capital — are excellent.
We are an international trade and banking center so “mellowness” has to be an important cultural value. Elsewhere in South America party politics mean EVERYTHING. It’s not this bullshit of Democrat or Republican. In Colombia (a US-client state) for example politicians across the spectrum take their lives in their hands every day just showing up and doing the work of representing their constituencies and their VERY DIFFERENT ideological positions.
Barack Obama=George W. Bush, but I’ll be damned if anyone can convince me that there aren’t vast and important differences among President Alvaro Uribe (Conservador-Bogota), Senadora Piedad Cordoba (Liberal-Bogota) and Jefe Del Partido Carlos Gaviria (ADP-Pereira).
I prefer both opposition leaders but even as dictatorial and US-controlled as Uribe is most of the time, he will CONSIDER hostage exchange and cease-fires in times when the US’s attention is elsewhere! And Colombia still has National Health and full LGBTQ rights including marriage.
ksuvalk said
BTW, I am a new believer in Twitter! I use twitterdeck to stay plugged into certain topics and I find it’s a great way to dig down into more INFORMATION instead of just the mass media hype. Glad there’s others out there doing some real research on climate change, cap and trade, socialism/facism/marxism, capitalism, goldman sachs, the fed, treasury, ACORN, and all those fun things