BuelahMan's Revolt

A Redneck's Guide To Reversing The Corptocracy Brainwashing

Osama Bin Voorhees

Posted by BuelahMan on January 25, 2010

Just like Jason, he keeps coming back for more.

Osama comes out of the woodwork to take credit for the miserably failed panty bomber attack. To me this is amazing, considering that around 20 people used box cutters to take control of planes and the entire NORAD system of defenses and then bring down those humongous buildings with weaponized jets creating more dust than demolition explosive experts create in their line of work.

20+ (including their fearless leader, Osama) brought America to her shivering, sniveling knees in fear and total complacent following of each and every value and liberty reducing/eliminating action our leaders TOLD us we needed so they could protect us.

Then, after all of these years of their preparation to “defend us”, a simpleton (or drug-induced patsy) was able to sneak a bomb in his panties and then fart a small flame to freak us all out (enough so that most of us don’t mind showing our junk to the TSA mindless idiots (if you travel, you know what I’m talking about… these people are not the brightest crayons in the box). I wonder how many $BILLIONS have been spent already in preparation for such an event and then this happens? Coincidence? I laugh in your face at your foolish folly.

But to the point at hand… Jason Bin Laden keeps coming back, over and over, at the most critical times for propaganda. But there is a rub. Just look at how Scott Creighton describes the illusion in America Everyman‘s article entitled,

“Boo. I mean it this time…” Osama bin Laden™,“:

But now Osama bin Laden is channeling himself on the Umar Fizzlepants topic at a time when it seems that our new president may have already wiggled himself off the hook. That’s right folks, Osama has “officially” confirmed what the FBI claims Umar ”confessed” to; that he is in fact… al Qaeda.

Al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden issued a new audio message claiming responsibility for the Christmas Day airline bombing attempt in Detroit and vowed further attacks. MSNBC

What gets me about this, is that it is another example of how decrepid and morally bankrupt the journalism industry has become these days. The industry itself has become nothing more than a parade of millionaire whores working for the propaganda ministry and whatever globalist regime  happens to occupy our White House at the time. There is no real journalism anymore. The entire profession is littered with prostitutes and dim-witted sycophants who forgot long ago what it means to possess even the slightest modicum of journalistic integrity (Of course, the corporate compliance prep institutions that we laughingly refer to as “universities” would have stomped any illusions of integrity out of the journalism students from the very beginning).

See what little gem follows, buried later in this same article from MSNBC.

There was no way to confirm the voice was actually that of bin Laden, but it resembled previous recordings attributed to himMSNBC

Really? No way to know if it is bin Laden… yet the attention grabbing headline they went with reads “Bin Laden Takes Credit for Failed Detroit Attack“? And that’s “journalism” in America these days? Sounds more like propaganda to me. But why? Another October Surprize? In January?

Please read the entire article here. So, here is my issue (and Scott addresses it next). How is it that almost every report of a Bin Laden recording, since 2001, is labeled as “alleged”/”attributed”, when the last “confirmed” one was in 2001? Words have meaning, you know.

Pay close attention to the fact that they say it is impossible to confirm this message is from bin Laden and that it “resembles” previous records “attributed” to him. Not recordings “confirmed” to be bin Laden, but rather, more recordings  in the past that always seem to come out when it’s the most advantageous for whatever regime is in the White House (and thus in charge of the CIA) that were, like this one, “attributed” to bin Laden. Which means that this fake bin Laden propaganda piece is just as fake as previous bin Laden propaganda pieces in MSNBC’s legalistic “you can’t sue us later for spreading fake news as “truth”” speak.

By the way, do you know what was the last “confirmed” message from bin Laden? It was the Sept. 16th, 2001 message in which bin Laden clearly stated that he had nothing to do with 9/11. In that message he said that since he was living in Afghanistan, the leadership there (Taliban) would not allow him to have struck at the U.S. because the current administration (BushCo) was just looking for an excuse to bomb and invade Afghanistan.

In a statement issued to the Arabic satellite channel Al Jazeera, based in Qatar, bin Laden said, “The U.S. government has consistently blamed me for being behind every occasion its enemies attack it.

I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons,” bin Laden’s statement said.

“I have been living in the Islamic emirate of Afghanistan and following its leaders’ rules. The current leader does not allow me to exercise such operations,” bin Laden said.  CNN

Now those of you still convinced that Al Qaeda is this massive, super-human organization of super-killing ragheads that are at your door ready to kill you, I wonder why it is that these very important words being used are so illusionary… like vapor. Just enough cloudiness to keep you BELIEVING the lie without factualness to keep them accountable.

Look, I don’t know if Bin Laden is alive or dead. But I do know that these maniacs that use the mirage of Al Qaeda are the very ones who invented them in the first place. So why would I believe them now, as if they are Dr Frankenstein who cannot create their own monster?

Is it because they have such a long history of honor and truth?

4 Responses to “Osama Bin Voorhees”

  1. [...] to this and other claims this blogger talks about the mirage bin Laden being used by Al [...]

  2. GREAT POST

  3. Kelsosnuts said

    You know I´ve been a 9/11 TRUTHER since 9/11. I knew that a BOX-CUTTER was not a very good weapon with which to coerce compliance. Get any distance 3 feet and beyond from the guy with the box-cutter and you´re pretty safe. I know this because I´m a special National Security direct adviser…no,that´s not right…I know that because I´ve CUT BOXES with a box cutter. In fact,I had a job during college that required me to cut boxes and boxes all day.

    “Let´s Roll!” Too fuckin cliche. And what of Building 7 which, for a skyscraper, was very solidly build with the foundation way better
    constructed than either WTC 1 AND 2. The pentagon-bound plane could well have been photoshopped in or constructed out of bal tsa wood and bubble gum. Why was it so necessary to get Bandar, Makhtoum al Makhtoum, Sheik Mohammed out of the Fasig-Tipton weanling and yearling auction in Lexington, KY, but none of their assistants were not permitted on the FBI jet, which is a pretty serious constitutional violation: inverse of Posse Commitatus…all good questions, good basis for an on-going ANALYSIS EVEN WITH NO CUSTODIAL PENALTIES AS PUNISHMENT IF THE WITNESS TELLS THE TRUTH.

    Leahy suggested that and was told to fuck himself on the floor of the House by Cheney.

    The UNITED equity puts? I like to collect when I win.

    • BuelahMan said

      It just so happens that I once had an encounter with a guy holding a box cutter. And I was unafraid at every second during that encounter. Yes, it could hurt, but he would get but one attempt and I would break an arm. In my case, I simply hit the guy in the mouth and he ran away.

      But, I have actually encountered much worse and took a knife thru the hand as the guy was trying to stick me in the face. I chased the bastard two blocks with that knife sticking out of my hand and finally caught him and beat him half to death (until a little old woman came out and squirted me with a water hose). It was around freezing outside.

      The point is, especially on a plane, if I saw some freaks pulling box cutters out, I would be whoopin ass. Hell, I have pens that are just as good a weapon as a box cutter. I believe I could sink a pencil or pen deep in a juggler, couldn’t you?

      But more importantly than the interactions (or not) on the planes, how the hell did these box-cutter wielding assholes stop NORAD? Or, as you point out, bring down WTC7 (which, in fact, DID have a better support system and should have been MUCH harder to bring down than the towers (I have all the blue prints for the WTC complex). It truly is simple to see.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 61 other followers