2012: The Year Of Paulsterity
Posted by BuelahMan on December 31, 2011
I listened in to the last Raw Dawg Buffalo Radio Show on Thursday night. I had spent a couple of hours reviewing information I was gathering for this post… a post to explain just what I believe will happen as TPTB mind-muck all us rednecks with their dazzling bullshit into accepting the harsh austerity coming in the next year or two.
The first thing that stood out was the fact that most, if not all, the call-ins were pro-Paul (and likely members of the PPPP page of Facebook that I referenced a while back). This is the page that Kelso and Yancey started, in which Ron Paul is the main object of discussion. I was asked to join and did, knowing full well that my opinion would not be welcomed and that since I knew quite a few of the posters there, I also knew their modus operandi when it comes to debate. I did it to be part of an experiment that I knew up front would be bad for me… but I did it anyway.
I was immediately met with obfuscation, mis-direction, dead-end points, straw men arguments, and then the onslaught of the Rothbard Freaks who apparently haven’t enough brain cells to realize that this planet (nor the USA) can ever be that Idyllic Place they (and their freak leader, Rothbard) seem to think we live in. I tried to explain to them at the time that Paul is the “Austerity Bait and Switch” to the previous POTUS fools we have endured over the past several decades or more. I tried to show them that Paul’s platform will be hijacked, if they can’t squash him outright in the prelims. I tried to show that TPTB are not afraid of a Paul’s presidency, for it will play right into the meme. As a matter of fact, I would not be at all surprised to find out that Paul is THEIR man all along.
Why would I feel that, since so many seemingly smart people have totally swallowed the “Change” portion of his platform (they all want to bring us “change”, don’t they?). Why is it that these smart people, many I respect for their thinking ability, can be so gullible and sycophantic? How can these smart people (smarter than I) fall for ANOTHER “sElection” within the corrupt two-party system? How can these same smart people dog the bogusly single-minded, faux two party monstrosity and STILL believe that a solution could EVER come from that very system they disdain so much?
I didn’t want to call in to the show, for I felt I would be met with a knee-jerk negative reaction and that these “smart people” would not want to discuss or even entertain the facts I had to present. So, I fed some detail to Sista GP and Jackson Douglas via the chat window and hoped it would get some discussion as I listened in.
Man o man, did the fireworks light up the sky on the last show (from what I had heard, this was the best show I had ever been a part of or had ever heard on that channel).
To get the details, I cannot recommend enough to listen to this Guns and Butter Interview with Webster G Tarpley:
Critique Of Ron Paul’s Austerity Plan
Mr Tarpley evaluates Paul’s “Plan To Restore America” and does some math. It is here where the “smart people” on the show started to see where this old dumb-ass redneck might be on to something after-all (altho Kelso did his best to simply poo-poo the entire argument, by saying the numbers were off… its Paul’s numbers… heh).
In a nut-shell, Paul’s plan intends to cut $1TRILLION is spending. He tells us about how we need to cut the military and stop “policing the world” (which, of course, I agree with). We need to stop the illegal wars (duh?). We need to cut ALL foreign aid, including (and I applaud) aid to Israel.
Sounds good, huh?
But let’s discuss the OTHER things Paul wants to cut and compare some numbers so that you will understand precisely where I am coming from in my open disdain for the Paul platform (this was initially not the case… I actually liked most of his platform, until I get the numbers). To me, it is not the dollar amount that is the most critical for this explanation, but for us to look at the percentages of cuts to the social network, and THEN compare that to the overall dollar amount.
Cuts:
15% from military
40% from SCHIP (State Children’s Health Insurance Program)… insurance for poor kids
35% Medicaid ($276B to be cut by$95B)
63% cut to FoodStamps (cut $53B from the $83B line item)
(I broke this down for the listeners… assuming 50,000,000 Americans on food stamps equals $180/month/person… to be cut to $60/month/person… equals $15/week/person)
Do I have to ask you if you believe (even for a second) that you could feed yourself or child for $15/week?
Paul’s Plan Caters To The Rich and to speculators… kills off poor folk
Paul wants to keep the Bush Tax Cuts
Abolish Capital gains
Abolish Estate Tax
Cut corporate taxes from an estimated 35% (that many never pay to begin with) to 15%
Wants to entice corporations to “come back to America” and will not tax for their foreign profits
(All the above will NOT help a single poor person/family I know. It is simply tax relief for the rich and corporations, but not for individuals)
Cut Foreign Aid
We might initially all applaud the tactic of stopping ALL foreign aid, especially when it is related to continuing the support of the murderous apartheid Israel. But what if you knew that America provides about 57% of the aid that goes to feed starving children in the world? Is it the sign of a “Christian Nation” when we starve the children that need the help, when we are spending arguably $1TRILLION/year in military alone? Can we not see the ludicrousness in spending all that money to maim and kill innocent children and THEN to also take away what little support we offer for the starving and sick ones?
Deregulation/Privatization
We have gone thru a few decades of continual deregulation and privatization. To a point now that we are experiencing the repercussions of those decisions. Paul would have us believe that we need to dismantle even MORE regulations. To free up these criminal assholes to steal even MORE of your money.
It is the deregulation that led to this very financial crash and your newest Hopey Changer wants MORE.
Libertarian Versus Progressive
One of my favorite “progressive” writers is Stephen Lendman. He wrote an excellent piece today that delves into this very subject. Please read:
Ron Paul’s Anti-Progressive Agenda
That is an excellent article and approaches some of the same details I wrote of here.
Sure, he keeps talking about abolishing or reigning in The Fed. But in my opinion, The Fed is on its last legs, anyway. The entire system is being brought to a crash, after they squeeze as much out of it as they can. I have no doubt that ending The Fed could very well be part of the overall New World Order Agenda.
And don’t you worry your little self over those poor bankers who will seemingly take a hit when The Fed goes down and is replaced by some international banking cartel. Believe me, they will be eating just fine as you and your children suffer what could culminate in this.
A Bushie equals an Obama Maniac equals a Paul Bot.
’nuff said.
Let’s make a deal… let’s decide we are going to do things differently. Let’s decide that we cannot trust the reTHUGlican and demoRAT Parties. Let us never allow a R or D to be elected in office again. Something different is needed and us doing the same old same old is a sure sign we have become insane as a country.
You want something different, right? Some change?
How about you and I grow us some “Big Balls” and send these maniacs packing?
Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com
If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).



This is not my America said
I too have talked much about ending the Fed…only in the back of my mind I get this nagging feeling that would just usher in a ‘New World Order’ . But we can’t just keep doing as we are.
I also am sick and tired of watching the dems and repubs continue the status Quo. As suggested…never vote a D or R again…yet I get a nagging feeling again. What if all that is happening is designed to drive us to do just that, put an end to America as we know it. And replace it with what? A ‘New World Order”?
Our politics is driven by money. Whos money i ask? Foreign sources can easily funnel money to our leaders covertly and manipulate our policies and government. Stalemate our government? Turn its people against it?Over throw the Americans by instigating the people to do so? We cause our own problems because we let money do so. Too damned much money is in government, it needs to be in our hands. SERVING as a leader should be an HONOR not a career.
So , maybe we as a people need to push out all foreign interests, close our borders and go it alone for a while til we get our house in order.
Karl said
Taking Stephen Lendman’s word on what Ron Paul wants is foolish.
Why don’t you find out directly from Ron Paul, instead of from Lendman, who is a massive hypocrite. His form of “progressivism” is simply Steve Lendman As Ideological Dictator, and Big Government IS THE SAVIOR.
You’d have to be completely hibernating since 1973 to not notice that Big Government, Good Government, and Federalism are the problem instead of the solution.
You really think you can harness Big Fed Spending to a “progressive” purpose? I’d like to hear the plan for how that’s going to happen. In case you haven’t been paying attention, the “progressives” of America have been playing that game since the end of the Vietnam Murder Spree (1973) and where has it got us?
Well, if you are looking for “progress” as a “progressive” then you’d have to say it’s been an abject failure because it’s gone completely regressive.
Instead of fidelity to a label (“progressive”) why not pay attention to how much “progress” those “progressives” have given us.
I’m sure I know why.
It’s because there is NO progress with “progressives” in any area except more government spending on more programs that do no social good.
Stop the non-thinking with misplaced empathetic urges. Start paying attention to what’s actually happening!
BuelahMan said
Why thanks, Karl. You suggest that because I linked to Lendman’s piece, that I agree with him totally? I believe I laid out my own thoughts quite clearly, so, if you are interested in any real dialogue, why not address my sentiments, instead of some mis-direction into never-never land of right vs left, progressive vs regressive?
Maybe you could simply read more than one post to see how this ranter (me) actually feels about all those false divides, but note that I also use the very wording that the individual (Lendman) uses to describe himself, when I link to them. His idea of “progressive” and yours (and mine, for that matter) are surely different things. From your words, this is evident.
You really think you can harness Big Fed Spending to a “progressive” purpose?
I never said such a thing, but I will admit that I would RATHER see it go for “progressive” (as opposed to regressive) purposes. Specifically, I would rather my tax dollar go to caring for the poor, than the rich or continuing the MIC. Wouldn’t you?
It would seem from your comment, that you prefer to reign in “Big Fed spending” (your wording, not mine) by seeing your poor neighbors (and perhaps family and friends) go without, while the very system Paul preaches against gets even MORE shit? Seriously?
Methinks Karl is rich and totally without clue to what real world poor folk go thru. At least, his persona points this way. Or maybe he is just another 1% wannabe who still believes the American Dream and the goal to be the elite?
Me? I’m a poor redneck who has had most everything stripped from him after several decades of hard work and hardships. I see what is happening, as opposed to many Sheoples who still believe the system will work. Are you a Sheople, Karl?
Prove to me you aren’t and let’s discuss MY thoughts.
mmmkay
drduhgylie said
That Drduhgylie and his evil experiments on human Psychology. lol Man this has created a shit storm in the PPPP group. That shows ratings and downloads since Thursday nite are the best in the shows history. To bad that Redneck, Jew, Negro thingy will never get off the ground. However, hear that a new show Kavier, & Kornlicker is in its development stages.
BuelahMan said
Yes. Kaviar and Korn Likker has a nice ring to it, doesn’t it? (Remember the spelling: lol)
It was the best show I ever listened to on their channel…
Great job!
John Friend said
Great post! I am working on a post about Ron Paul myself, but I probably won’t be done until early next year. I agree with many of your criticisms here.
You write:
“I tried to show that TPTB are not afraid of a Paul’s presidency, for it will play right into the meme. As a matter of fact, I would not be at all surprised to find out that Paul is THEIR man all along.”
I disagree with this statement, as you probably already know. The establishment is shaking in their boots at the prospects of a Ron Paul victory in Iowa and other earlier primaries. My guess is they will not let him win — they will steal it if necessary, in addition to completely trashing him in the media. I have seen virtually NO ONE on TeeVee and other mainstream sites speak or publish anything flattering about to Ron Paul.
Ron Paul is just not going to go far enough for me, I understand that. His pathetic “blowback” stance (which contends Muslim extremists are waging a war against America because of our misguided policies) drives me nuts. I’ve talked to some Ron Paul people out here about this subject, and they all say the same thing: Ron Paul talking about 9/11 and the Jewish criminal cabal that controls this country will not get him elected. And yes, that’s true. BUT — going halfway, or even misdirecting, on these issues is not going to cut it.
Lendman and Tarpley (both of whom I disagree with totally about a whole range of subjects, 9/11 in particular) make a number of good points about Ron Paul’s stances. He’s not against the Global War on Terror because it’s evil and based on lies, but because the wars have been prosecuted illegally under the Constitution and we’ve given our authority over to the UN (yeah right!). This is completely misguided, ridiculous thinking in my opinion. And I’m going to keep hammering that home.
His insistence on lowering corporate taxes and allowing corporations to repatriate their profits tax-free is also missing the point. The problem with our economic system is systemic (private central bankers loaning money at interest to the government(s), private corporations, and individuals), and we have blatant criminals running around robbing people blindly. WE NEED TO ARREST THESE PEOPLE, not reduce their taxes. We need to arrest all the criminals (which is basically the entire government and most of corporate America), and enforce the rule of law. What if Ron Paul came out saying that he is for impeaching Obama and arresting his Cabinet and all members of Congress for passing the recent National Defense bill, which is clearly un-Constitutional and treasonous? That’s what we need out of him…
We need truth and justice in this country, and Ron Paul is halfway there on some issues, and completely missing the point on others. There’s really no other way around it…
BuelahMan said
I don’t see the “establishment” shaking anything. I see the reactionaries who know their bread is buttered by continuing the false left vs right, Rep vs Dem false paradigm.
My point about Paul potentially being “their man” is that at some point, logic predicts that TPTB will want someone from the Austrian School to take the reigns of the system. At some point, they will have ravaged and stolen as much as possible, and at that moment, they will begin the harshest “Paulsterity” towards social benefits and help for the poor.
I think that at one point, they (meaning the people on MSM and those that hold office due to their continued Empire stance) will be forced to accept that he is the leader of the pack. When this happens, you watch them as they turn the focus from ire to love.
At some point, John, the wars will no longer be affordable (of course, they already are not). When this country is dead broke and on her back, that will be the time for Paulsterity.
Your last sentence really says it all, doesn’t it. AGAIN, we are being forced to accept the lesser of the evils, being that he is only halfway correct (and totally off base on the other half).
Look, Paul can easily back track the war deal, simply by having the Congress retroactively endorse all the wars. Then, his bitch is moot. With one more false flag event, as POTUS, he will be pressured to “do something”. Since he is unable (or unwilling or too stupid????) to understand what happened on 911 (or at the very least, recognize that something is very wrong and insist on a real investigation), he is playing right into the controller’s hands.
I don’t think he is stupid. So, he is playing the game.
Well, the game is rigged and all I see is more of the same old BS we have been getting for decades. There is nothing, yet, that anyone has said that has offered enough substance to convince me otherwise (and I am fully open to it).
Also, the very fact that so many people are so focused on Ron Paul, as IF a single person will ever be able to change the system, tells me that much of America is still hoodwinked. The POTUS does what he is told to do. Period.
Only someone from outside the “system” will ever have a chance at making real change to the system. It will NEVER come from the reTHUGlican or demoRAT Parties. Never.
This is not my America said
I have to agree on one point(a point I drive like nails). It doesn’t matter WHO gets the seat , the power mechanizims behind our government will always have its way.
IF one man does get in and tries making REAL change….he won’t live long.
BuelahMan said
There is the nut-cutting issue… then there are the very Paul Bot fools who will apologize for him when he doesn’t have the balls to speak up. To the contrary, Paul belittles the very same dumbasses like this one who blogged this:
http://disquietreservations.blogspot.com/2012/01/ron-paul-denies-that-bush-white-house.html
What a stupid thing to write. It says volumes about Saman Mohammadi and his motives.
I Wish I Was You « BuelahMan's Revolt said
[...] 2012: The Year Of Paulsterity (buelahman.wordpress.com) [...]
dogismyth said
Only fools would trust anyone in government, including Ron Paul. Now like the Bushes, Ron Paul hopes to have more family members as part of the “insiders” with his son as the first. Trust no man or woman within the circle of government. This is why I do not believe in Ron Paul….He has done nothing for the American people but talk the talk. Just as no one thought a black man could be president, it happened and everyone was shocked yet excited that “change” was around the corner. How foolish those people were. And i feel that supporters of Ron Paul are just as foolish. The people hold the power…they just don’t want you to know or believe that fact. The cult following to Ron Paul is sad. Once again a politician is telling them exactly what they want to hear. Just as Obama did prior to his winning the presidency. Is it any wonder why they treat us like animals…like subspecies? You who put your hope in politicians like Ron Paul are nothing more than cattle. Good luck.
BuelahMan said
You who put your hope in politicians like Ron Paul are nothing more than cattle.
Yes, he has too much to do than address the very nut-cutting issue that first enamored some Americans and persuaded them that Paul was real. Paul says a lot of bullshit. But, when you read his plan, it all falls apart.
Thanks for the comment. Spot on.
The Knee Jerk « BuelahMan's Revolt said
[...] to restore America and gave us all hard numbers as how this would play out if he ever got elected. B’man has laid that out here on this site and has picked a part the numbers as to what the percentages are on each line item. [...]
interview question said
interview question…
[...]2012: The Year Of Paulsterity « BuelahMan's Revolt[...]…