The Great Monica Lewinsky Misdirection by DC Dave

The Great Monica Lewinsky Misdirection

The Death of American Virtue: Clinton vs. Starr

A review by David Martin

Monica Lewinsky

Monica Lewinsky

Kenneth G. Gormley, interim dean of the Duquesne University Law School, with this faux-weighty tome, continues the great misdirection done by Kenneth Starr and the American news media with respect to the Clinton scandals.  With all the later fuss that was made over the relatively inconsequential Monica Lewinsky episode, it is easy to forget that Starr was first appointed to look into the Whitewater scandal and, even more importantly, into the violent death of deputy White House Counsel, Vincent Foster.  (We have noted earlier that the original connection between Whitewater and the Foster death was wholly artificial.  It was clearly ginned up for the purpose of getting an authority figure in the form of an Independent Counsel to put his imprimatur upon the very weak case that the U.S. Park Police had made for Foster’s suicide. See the section entitled “The Search for a Mercier” in “America’s Dreyfus Affair, the Case of the Death of Vincent Foster.”)

From the beginning, because he was purported to be the choice of Jesse Helms protégé David Sentelle, one of the three judges in the federal panel that appointed him, Starr was painted as a right-wing fanatic out to get Bill Clinton (Actually, Sentelle was chosen to head the panel by ultimate government insider, Chief Justice William Rehnquist).  With that portrait fixed in our minds, we are not supposed to think about the fact that Starr had been the solicitor general under the “moderate” Republican, George H.W. Bush, and that Clinton and the elder Bush were and are quite close both politically and personally.

Starr-large_(1)

Kenneth Starr

Gormley plays the Starr-as-partisan, rather than Starr-the-inside-fixer, angle to the hilt.  The book has been touted as offering new details on the death of Foster, but, in fact, it has virtually none of any consequence.  It hardly even revisits the old details.  Gormley’s method of evaluating Starr’s Foster investigation is pure deduction.  He takes Starr’s press-created reputation as an ideologue out for blood as a given.   He then tips his hat to Starr for his surprising fair-mindedness in finally agreeing with his predecessor, Robert Fiske—after a full three years of foot-dragging which he mischaracterizes as exhaustive investigation—that Foster did, indeed, commit suicide.  In the book, as in the actual chronology, the Starr sally into the titillating and target-rich environment of Bill’s tom-catting serves as both a distraction from the Foster matter and a further reinforcement of the Starr image as an out-of-control right-wing crusader.

Many of the book’s reviewers praise Gormley for having “interviewed everyone” connected to the Clinton-Starr dust-up.  In fact, the book’s essential dishonesty is revealed by Gormley’s studied avoidance of at least one person who is absolutely essential for understanding what went on with Starr’s investigation of the Foster death.  That is Starr’s original lead investigator, Miguel Rodriguez, who, as anyone at all familiar with the case knows, resigned in disgust rather than go along with what he perceived was shaping up to be a cover-up.  Gormley makes no mention of Rodriguez.  How can we possibly take seriously an author who seems to have no curiosity at all about Rodriguez’s actions and apparently has no interest in what more he might have to say?  (Those sucked into buying the Gormley book because of the false promise of new details in the Foster case may seek consolation by reading Rodriguez’s resignation and my analysis of it here.  Details don’t get much newer than that, because the letter did not come to light until December 2009.)

ken_gormley

Ken Gormley

Another key person Gormley didn’t interview is the inconvenient witness in the Foster case, Patrick Knowlton.  Gormley is touted on the book’s dust jacket as an expert on independent counsels, yet he airbrushes out of the picture the historic role played by Knowlton and his lawyer, John Clarke, in challenging an independent counsel’s findings.  Over Starr’s vigorous and tightly reasoned written objections, which you will find nowhere in this supposedly “definitive” volume on Starr’s work, the three-judge panel ordered Starr to include Clarke’s 20-page letter as an appendix to his Foster report.  Two other people mentioned in the report also have letters appended, making the complete report 137 pages in length.  Apparently not wanting his readers even to know of the existence of this appendix, Gormley writes that Starr’s report is 114 pages long.

One small new fact we learn from Gormley related to the investigation of the Foster death is that the late John Butzner, the lone member of the three-judge panel appointed by a Democrat, had misgivings about the appointment of Starr on the dual grounds that he was too much of a Washington insider and

that he was perceived as too politically partisan.  Gormley has interviewed Judge Butzner, and he has also examined the papers that Butzner left to the library of the University of Virginia.

Matching in dishonesty his failure even to mention the existence of Miguel Rodriguez is what Gormley doesn’t tell us about that can be found among Butzner’s papers.  That is not only the complete text of the lawyer Clarke’s devastating 20-page letter and Starr’s very strong brief for keeping it out of his report, but also Butzner’s winning argument for accepting the motion that it be included.

“I suspect that if we deny the motion,” he wrote to Sentelle (the “Republican partisan” who favored denying the motion) and Judge Peter T. Fay on September 25, 1997, “we will be charged as conspirators in the cover-up.” (For a full treatment of this episode, see “Documents Reveal Judges’ Deliberations on Death.”)

David Martin

April 15, 2010

Addendum

In February of 2012 recorded tapes of Miquel Rodriguez’s telephone conversations with Reed Irvine, the late director of Accuracy in Media, were posted on YouTube.

They reveal, most importantly, his frustration in his attempt to blow the whistle to the American press on the ongoing cover-up being performed by Kenneth Starr and his crew.  The transcript of those tapes can be found at FBICover-up.com.

David Martin

May 7, 2013

Original Article published at DC Dave’s blog.

Follow @BuelahMan

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com
About these ads

7 thoughts on “The Great Monica Lewinsky Misdirection by DC Dave

  1. as a note in the fer what is worth dept…I personally took the results of the Mass Murder of the Davidians to Congress, and went to Little rock to deliver some very sensitive information to the office of OIC located there…they would not give me address…Now Kenn Starr is at Synagag of satan…”Baylor university”…gag…& magag.

    http://blogs.forward.com/jj-goldberg/#story-1

    chances are the “Jewish” narrative will land the whole hearted believer in a fiery furnace…called Hell.

    http://www.mediaite.com/tv/maddow-rips-conservative-think-tank-for-immigration-study-co-author-who-claimed-latinos-have-lower-iqs/

    remember “Chertoff” asking Maggie about the boxes removed from Vince’s office ?

    http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4378599,00.html

    and who can forget the same operatives of the Foster , Boorda & Colby cases being involved with the murder of

    http://www.dreamscape.com/morgana/leda.htm

    TWA 800 & Egypt 990 . . & John John.

    http://thelastoutpost.com/video-4/irs/gordon-kahl.html

    even Pierre Salinger was scoffed at….by their “Media”….psychophants

    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/167920

    wonder if Rachel Maddow had had her first period …?

    http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2013/05/10/neoliberal-raimondos-outrageous-screed-against-bds-says-it-boils-down-to-lets-boycott-the-jews/

    What difference does it make ?

    curiously the braindeadgoy always focus on the “spotty” details and miss the big picture…hmmmm

    http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com/2013/05/saturday-cartoons-may-11-2013.html

  2. Let’s see, Gormley, Starr and Lewinsky all have something in common, don’t tell me, I’ll figure it out…… Duh, duh, duh.

    There’s another fact that usually gets omitted when mentioning Whitewater, Slick Willy and his bisexual bitch, Hillary. The back-stabbing Israeli mega-spy, Pollard, worked at the Rose Law Firm of Arkansas along with Hillary.

    Just another of those bizarre coincidences, right?

    • I may be wrong, but I don’t believe that there is any credible evidence that Jonathan Pollard ever worked for the Rose Law Firm. Searching the Net, I find that the claim seems to begin here http://rense.com/general80/hll.htm in an article by Sander Hicks: “But did you know that Vince Foster, Hillary Clinton, and Jonathan Pollard were all simultaneously partners at Rose Law Firm?” It’s not easy to make partner in a major law firm, especially if you’re not a lawyer, and I don’t believe Pollard even attended a law school. If you or anyone else has any substantial evidence than Pollard even has an Arkansas or Clinton connection I would appreciate seeing it.

      By the way, recall that Gilad Atzmon characterization of the cult that he has abandoned, power-seeking, tribal, and treacherous. Pollard would seem to be an archetype. No wonder he’s glorified in Israel.

  3. Pollard worked at Rose Law Firm? I didn’t know that. Am I the only one who thinks Chelsea looks a helluva lot like Web Hubble(sp?) She doesn’t look like Bill OR Hillery. Sheesh, between Mena, womanizing, being bagman for daddy Bush, pretending to be governor…man, Bill had a pretty full day-planner. Maybe Hillery needed servicing…but damn Web…I’ve been closing time drunk…but I’ve NEVER been THAT drunk. I mean…HILLERY? Wow, I’m thinkin’ borderline alcohol poisoning drunk at the least. Anywho…anybody see this? http://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/05/10/dr-stan-monteith-a-35-year-orthopedic-surgeon-on-jeff-baumans-leg-amputations-i-believe-that-this-young-man-was-an-actor/ A qualified surgeon weighs in on our pal Jeff “Wheelchair” Bauman.

You Got Something To Say? (Don't Bother "Salvatore-In-Videre-Licet") Richard Noggins Are Not Invited To The Party

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s