ZIONISM: Demonic Jewish Death Cult by Arthur Topham

 

ZIONISM: Demonic Jewish Death Cult

By

Arthur Topham

July 14th, 2014

ZionistDeathCult

 

Recently my wife and I  had the wonderful opportunity to spend some time with my daughter and our granddaughter at our home here in the Cariboo region of beautiful British Columbia. It had been four years since we were able to do this as my constant legal battle with the Jewish Lobby group B’nai Brith Canada over the past eight years placed me in a position where we were unable to travel and visit family.

Finally seeing our ten year old granddaughter was a joy indeed and a very heart-warming reminder of just how precious one’s family truly is.

But all the while that we were enjoying each others’ company and having fun and reminiscing about past times and future plans, across the world in Gaza, Palestine, the Israeli Jews were busy with their endless blood-letting and slaughter of Palestinian children, women and men in their diabolical and insane effort to murder every non-Jew in the former Holy land that stands in their way of gaining absolute control over lands and resources that never ever belonged to them from day one.

MoreDeadKids

As I watched and listened and prayed for the cessation of bombing and mayhem I looked in vain to the West for some display of outrage but, beyond those who have always stood up for the Palestinian people and their just cause to remain the owners of the lands stolen from them since 1948, I looked in vain.

Where was (and is) my government as this slaughter of children and defenceless adults goes on daily with sickening and disgusting furor?

Please read the rest at the link.

This is a powerful “rant” that each and every human being on Earth needs to hear and understand. Just substitute American criminals’ names for the Canadian ones. Its all the same when it comes to serving the murderous Jews of Israel.

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

Holocaust Survivor Stories by Karl Radl

 

Holocaust Survivor Stories

 

(Week Ending: 13/07/2014)

by Karl Radl of Semitic Controversies

shoamoneybag_zpse3db3540

And we are back; after an enforced hiatus, with more lame-brained, imagined and often simply impossible nonsense from the world’s most famous fibbers (aka ‘Holocaust Survivors’). Before we begin this week we should first note that Jack Rubin over at bat-shit insane jews anonymous (aka the Jerusalem Post) is now claiming that after paying billions upon billions of dollars in official; as well as billions upon billions of unofficial, compensation: the German people should foot the bill (yet again) for all the ‘needs’ of ‘holocaust survivors’.

Hey Jackie: get your facts right deary.

Germany has paid a huge amount of money to jews and Israel already (probably something close to a year or twos worth of GDP over the course of the last seven decades) for ‘crimes’ that nobody can show any actual evidence its former government committed. Demanding that Germany pay yet more money when your so-called ‘Claims Conference’ can’t even hide the fact that it has been fiddling its account books for the last decade or so (and still has millions upon millions in assets) so that ‘untold millions of dollars’ has been lost to ‘morally upright’ jews who can’t resist getting their greasy paws on gentile gold.

It is Shoah business though: ain’t it?

If you want more money: how about you show a bit of gumption and ask the international jewish community for donations? You know you really should otherwise you will give the lie the hoary old canard common to philo-Semitic literature that jews are ‘great philanthropists’ and donate to charity more than gentiles do.

blood-moneyAt least one ‘holocaust survivor’; Gertrude Stanley, who died recently had a £1.3 million fortune, while an Israeli ‘holocaust survivor’; David Azrieli, who died this week had billions of dollars

How about the jews use that to pay the expenses of the few million ‘holocaust survivors’ who still seem to be alive currently?

Perhaps you should practice what you preach?

My my… wouldn’t that be a change?

Don’t hold your breath though readers: Jack Rubin and the circumcised intellectual pond life that actually take his twaddle seriously won’t part with any of their fancy five course kosher dinners to support their own kind. Instead they will insist that is all your fault and therefore you should pay for everything (like these gullible Americans in Israel):

It is called a confidence trick and by god are the jews good at it!

Now moving on from a bunch of crazy jews to one who is quite clearly suffering from paranoid delusions that the ‘Natzis’ were out to get him.

Blue Hitler by Irving Kamrat

Blue Hitler by Irving Kamrat

I will quote this verbatim as it has be read to believed.

‘In the beginning, Nasya Kamrat recounts, her goal was to memorialize her grandfather’s story. Irving Kamrat’s life was saved by a German guard: Towards the end of the war, the Nazis were killing people by playing a “game” in which Jews had to count off, and were killed if they got the “wrong” number. One day, Irving was picked and taken to a room where he was supposed to be killed by hanging. The German guard, who he had gotten to know well, hid him in a bin filled with laundry from previously killed inmates, and snuck him out of the room. The camp was liberated shortly thereafter.’

Now lets apply some common sense to this: if the Germans wanted to kill people they would have just killed people dependent on their lack of usefulness to the Reich’s war effort. Lining people up and then killing them dependent on what numbers they call out is just simply absurd, both because it defies logic and also because the camp; was Kamrat states, was just about to be liberated.

Why randomly kill jews just before you are going to be overrun by the Red Army?

Why not either march them off on one of the so-called ‘death marches’ (aka making jews walk distances as opposed to being carried in trucks and trains [Oy Vey!]) or kill them all?

It simply makes no sense does it?

You either kill all the jews and get out of there or you march out of there with the jews as fast as you can.

You don’t hang around sadistically killing random people given that you are aware that; as a member of the SS, if you are caught by the Red Army then you will be automatically executed per their standing orders.

Yes lets hang around randomly killing people in sadistic games and wait to be executed ourselves.

Makes no sense: does it?

As to the other bit of the story concerning the ‘hiding in the laundry bin': well that again is implausible given that it seems rather unlikely that a supposed ‘mass extermination camp’ would allow; presumably large, containers and hampers to go unchecked given the high likelihood of escape attempts and so forth.

Also given that a laundry hamper is a fairly light thing even when full of dirty clothes: wouldn’t everyone notice and become suspicious if it was seriously heavy, because there was a person inside it (whether or not it could be pushed or had to be carried)?

I mean come on: this story is blatantly made up. No ifs or buts about it: it simply doesn’t make any sort of logical or historical sense, but veritably reeks of an embellished story of ‘personal heroics’ that many so-called survivors appear to have concocted as a way of giving their life meaning.

Another such story is that of Charles Middenberg who; in a recent engagement at Warm Springs Middle School in West Virginia, claims that

JOSHUA RIDER & CHARLES MIDDLEBERG

Joshua Rider and
Charles Middleberg

he ‘knows’ his mother was ‘gassed to death’. We can even infer from the wording of the report; which claims these are his ‘memories’, that he believes he witnessed said ‘gassing’ (which would make sense as otherwise how does he know his mother was ‘gassed’?), but yet he was allegedly pretending; according to the same report, to be masquerading as a Catholic with a gentile Polish family at the time!

Whoops… contradicted yourself there didn’t you Charlie?

It is even stranger than that considering that even orthodox holocaustian historians acknowledge; however reluctantly, that they don’t know who was gassed and who was not in the camps.

More precisely they can’t actually prove any gassings of human beings took place in any of the German camps and they have to resort to what they like to call ‘convergence of [selected circumstantial] evidence’ to support the alleged ‘gassings’ taking place as opposed to actual evidence that they did indeed happen (which; considering the scale of the alleged killings, should be abundant but has been lacking for seventy years even after huge resources of manpower and money have been expended trying to find it).

It is unfortunate that the students at Warm Springs Middle School have yet to be trained in the critical interpretation of evidence (and nobody can blame them for taking Middenberg fanciful inventions as the ‘truth’), but the teachers and parents should be ashamed of having put someone who is obviously a bald-faced liar in front of their students/children as if he was actually genuine.

All they would have needed to do is read an orthodox account of the ‘holocaust’ to know that his ‘memories’ were fake!

Meanwhile a ‘holocaust survivor’ resident in Canada ironically named Pinchas Gutter has been promoted as the subject of a ‘documentary’ titled ‘Political, Polish Jew: The Story of Pinchas Gutter’ by the Polish-Jewish Heritage Foundation of Canada. In this documentary Gutter; who was born in 1932 into a Hasidic family in Poland, relates his experiences thus:

‘After the Nazis began terrorizing the Jewish population of Lodz, Gutter’s father sent his wife and two children to live with a relative in Warsaw, believing, incorrectly, that it would be safer there for his family. Eventually, he joined them in Warsaw

In the Warsaw ghetto, they endured terrible hardships. “We were like chickens in a coop,” Gutter recalls.

They survived the big deportations of 1942, but after the 1943 ghetto uprising was suppressed, they were caught by the Germans and sent to the Majdanek extermination camp. Gutter’s mother and sister were murdered. He thought he would meet the same fate, but muddled through. His father, however, was killed.

“I cried,” he says in a reference to his death. “I was 11 years old.”

To this day, Gutter finds it inconceivable that a crime so heinous as the Holocaust could have been committed.

In the wake of his father’s murder, he was savagely beaten by a German guard. He was then sent to a nearby labor camp, where ammunition and mines were manufactured for the German army. Toward the close of the war, he found himself in Buchenwald, which he describes as “hell on earth.” He was subsequently transported to a labor camp in Germany and forced to participate in a death march to Theresienstadt.’

>Heart-wrenching: isn’t it?

It just a shame that is all quite clearly nonsense given that firstly Majdanek wasn’t a death camp; and there is precious little evidence it could have been one as it was captured intact with no gas chambers (yet it has been the subject of numerous ‘holocaust survivor’ gassing stories), and that secondly the Germans wouldn’t have killed his father and left him; an 11 year old, alive considering that an 11 year old is a far less precious labour resource than a grown man.

Why leave the young child alive, but the fully-grown father not?

Also why kill Gutter’s sister and not Gutter if child labour was so useful to the war effort?

Much of a contradiction there?

I’d say so!

It doesn’t make any sense whatsoever: does it?

Then a German guard predictably beat him up; which is one of those absurd tropes of all ‘holocaust survivor’ stories in that a nasty Nazi badly beat them at least one, and to top it off he survived a ‘death march’ (aka requiring jews to actually walk a reasonable distance rather than waddle to the nearest train station or catch a taxi).

Pinchas’ ‘memories’ are quite clearly a bunch of nonsense pretending to be ‘recollections’ given that he uses all the standard tropes of ‘survivor’ ‘experiences’ and his claims defy any kind of logic to them and; as I have above demonstrated, actually contradict one another.

So much for the ‘power of memory’: huh?

Pinchas Gutter

Pinchas Gutter

Oh and just to cap off this week’s edition of ‘Holocaust Survivor Stories’ we should note that in Sydney, Australia an elderly jew is claiming that he is a ‘double’ ‘holocaust survivor’ because… wait for it… he was a homosexual and a jew.

Next he’ll be coming out claiming he a sexual relationship with one of his SS guards or something (as we all know SS personnel had sex with jewish inmates at the drop of a hat since jews are apparently so damn attractive and generally desirable that even those who hate them want to breed with them).

That’s it for this week folks.

 

Please visit Karl’s site for extremely in-depth analysis of past and current Semitic Controversies. Excellent site!

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

Greater Israel: The Reason For It All

As you hear more about the three teenagers killed and the tit-for-tat reprisal killings both by settlers and air strikes,

remember that the establishment of Zionist Israel,

the traitorous false flag attacks,

the control of every aspect of your American existence,

each and every war throughout Africa and the Middle East,

goals of regional military dominance (with intentions of world Talmudic control)…

there is an obvious purpose to the latest teenage false flag

 

Criminal Israel’s never-ending genocidal expansion.

 

Herzl_Greater_israel

If you can’t name this blatant, gaping truth and still call yourself a truther or patriot, then you are really nothing but a shill and a liar.

“The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.”

~ Rabbi Fischman

 

h/t the Goon Squad, kenny’s sideshow and zengardner

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

Does Your Support For Israel Outweigh Your Support For America? Seems Your Taxes Do

Tax Dollars, Detroit and Israel

by ROBERT FANTINA

As Detroit, Michigan grapples with bankruptcy, requiring at least $1 billion in aid, it is probably not alone. “More U.S. cities could be heading towards bankruptcy”, said Richard Ravitch, a former Lieutenant-Governor of New York, who was instrumental in helping New York City navigate through its financial woes in the 1970s.

So with Detroit, once the world leader in automobile manufacturing, now on its deathbed, and other major U.S. cities selling off their buildings to pay current expenses, it may be informative to look at how the Federal government is spending U.S tax dollars.

Half a planet away is the glittering city of Tel Aviv. One wonders why that city can be so successful, while U.S. cities are dying. Could it be the $9 million dollars the U.S. gives to Israel, every single day of the year, more in foreign aid than the United States give to all other countries combined?

One might reasonably ask what Detroit could do with $9 million dollars a day. That city is trying to cobble together $1 billion to stay afloat this year; Israel is getting more three times that much from U.S. taxpayers, every year.

‘But’, the august, so-called representatives of the U.S. citizenry will proclaim, ‘Israel is the only democracy in the Middle East, a major ally of the U.S., and therefore must be supported’. Really? One wonders why this ally not only refuses to cooperate with the U.S.’s hapless and insincere efforts to broker a peace agreement between Israel and Palestine, but actually spits in the face of the U.S., as it accepts $9 million a day. When the joke of peace talks is announced, with the U.S. saying neither side should do anything to jeopardize them, Israel announces more illegal settlements. When the United Nations proposes condemning increased settlement-building, which the U.S. has stated it believes to be in violation of international law, Israel knows it can rely on the U.S. to veto any such resolution. When the U.S. hypocritically decries the human rights abuses so prevalent around the world, Israel knows that it is exempt from any such condemnation, if it only brutally abuses Palestinians…

 

(Read the entire story at Counterpunch)

 

It’s not just our “representatives” who are falling to pieces, it’s the whole country.

~DC Dave

h/t Counterpunch and DC Dave

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

Wake Up, Slave


 

(recently re-uploaded to YouTube [please subscribe]… originally written by Digger here…shared here)

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

Martin and Irvine on Vince Foster

Listeners to the 1994 telephone conversation between David Martin and the late Reed Irvine of Accuracy in Media, need to know that the “Nussbaum” referred to was Vince Foster’s boss, White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum.  As they listen, they might also bear in mind the relevance of this poem by Martin:

Solicitude

Don’t you think that the family has suffered enough?
Why must you stir up this mess?
He wasn’t constructed of very strong stuff:
He couldn’t put up with the press.
He must not have been what he seemed to be.
He could not have have been very stable.
That he might have been killed for his honesty
Is just a romantic fable.
We’ll fight for his right to be off in the head.
What do you mean we offend you?
If you should turn up mysteriously dead,
This is how we would defend you.

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

Pearl Harbor vs. 9/11

Pearl Harbor vs. 9/11

by DC Dave

bushobama

When asked the question, “What impresses you more about George W. Bush and Barack Obama, their absence of intelligence or their absence of integrity,” a ready answer comes to mind, and it is clearly not the same for each. But in the case of Bush’s first Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, I think you will have to agree that it’s a tough call.

DonaldRumsfeld

That was the first thing that came to my mind when I saw in the pages of The New York Timesthat Rumsfeld had essayed a comparison between the momentous events in Hawaii on December 7, 1941, and in New York City, Arlington, VA, and Shanksville, PA, on September 11, 2001. The one big similarity that he was able to note was that—as the official script reads—we were caught completely by surprise in each case.

In turn, that got me to thinking along the lines that I lay out in the opening paragraphs of my article, “America’s Dreyfus Affair, the Case of the Death of Vincent Foster.” Suppose you were a professor of United States history and had the opportunity to give the following assignment to your students in an exam: “Compare and contrast Pearl Harbor and 9/11.” What are the answers that you would be looking for from your best students?

Surely they would have to say that each of the events resulted in our going to war. That’s where the comparison almost has to begin. But no sooner have we written it than a contrast arises. When Japan attacked us, we were, by definition, already at war. Disregarding, for the moment, what might have led up to the attack, one could hardly say about our war with Japan, as with our subsequent invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, that it was a “war of choice.” One might argue, however, that the war with Germany was a war of choice, even though Hitler declared war on the United States four days later on December 11. His rationale was not, as is commonly believed, that they were obligated by treaty to do so, but that the United States had every intention of going to war with Germany after the attack and he might as well beat us to the punch. One can’t read FDR’s speech of December 9, 1941, and come to any other conclusion than that Hitler was correct in his assessment, whether or not the “beating to the punch” move was wise from a propaganda perspective. That FDR speech laid the blame for the Pearl Harbor attack as much on Germany as on Japan and was clearly intended to prepare the country for war with all three Axis powers, Germany, Italy, and Japan.

5071The next strong comparison that can be made is that the wars that resulted were wars that powerful people within the United States government wanted to happen. For months Roosevelt had been doing almost everything he could to provoke Hitler into attacking us, but Hitler would not go for the bait. Even Roosevelt’s greatest defenders will admit that this was true. They argue that it was simply the right thing to do to ally ourselves with Britain (and the Soviet Union) against “Nazi aggression.” The big problem, from that perspective, is that the mood of the country was still strongly against our involvement in “foreign wars,” based upon our bitter World War I experience. In a campaign speech on October 30, 1940, as the European war raged, Roosevelt had catered to the national mood with these words, “And while I am talking to you mothers and fathers, I give you one more assurance. I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars.”

Pearl Harbor got him off the hook that he had created for himself with that promise. It wasn’t a “foreign war” anymore because we had been attacked.

neocons2

Similarly, the key people in the George W. Bush administration, including Rumsfeld, but also his top assistant Paul Wolfowitz and Vice President Dick Cheney, as members of The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) in 2000 had called for precisely the sort of aggressive military policy that followed 9/11, but acknowledged that it would not happen very quickly “absent a catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor.”

Two events brought PNAC into the mainstream of American government: the disputed election of George W. Bush, and the attacks of September 11th. When Bush assumed the Presidency, the men who created and nurtured the imperial dreams of PNAC became the men who run the Pentagon, the Defense Department and the White House. When the Towers came down, these men saw, at long last, their chance to turn their White Papers into substantive policy. 

Vice President Dick Cheney is a founding member of PNAC, along with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Defense Policy Board chairman Richard Perle. Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz is the ideological father of the group. Bruce Jackson, a PNAC director, served as a Pentagon official for Ronald Reagan before leaving government service to take a leading position with the weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin.

– “The Project for the New American Century,” by William Rivers Pitt

This “new Pearl Harbor” was something of a godsend to the men whose portraits we see in this video like the original one was to FDR and to the people behind him.

Maybe the most important contrast between the two events, again, using only the official narrative, is that the Japanese attack plan was, at least tactically, thoroughly rational and depended for its success upon predictable behavior by the U.S. adversary. By contrast, the 9/11 attacks were tactically irrational and, on paper, well nigh hopeless, depending as they did upon unprecedented incompetence on the part the North American Air Defense Command and amazing docility by airline passengers and crew and no less amazing competence by novice pilots of airliners. The Japanese, as we knew, were well served by their espionage agents in Hawaii and they knew that General Walter Short had not been supplied with an adequate number of patrol planes to provide sufficient warning by the air attack from carriers that they planned. * They also knew from observation that security tended to be somewhat more relaxed on a Sunday than on any other day. The Japanese attackers were professionals doing something very similar to what they must have done many times before in their training.

How could the supposed 9/11 hijackers have known that the North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) would not follow its usual protocol and simply intercept the airplanes very shortly after they had departed from their normal flight paths? The question holds true in particular for the attack upon the Pentagon, which occurred a full 51 minutes after the first plane crashed into the World Trade Center. Through what extraordinary espionage could the attackers have known in advance that the U.S. Air Force would send up interceptor jets from Langley Air Force Base in distant Hampton, Virginia, that would arrive too late, instead of from nearby Andrews Air Force Base just a few miles away in Maryland or even Bolling Air Force Base across the river in Washington, DC? See my satire, “Bin Laden’s Home Video: The Missing Portion,” for more on this whole question.

The supposed Al Qaeda plan, as it has been told to us, violated radically the U. S. military’s KISS (keep it simple, stupid) doctrine and Sun Tzu’s dictum, “Never underestimate your opponent,” in The Art of War.  The Japanese attack plan, by contrast, was simple and took due regard of our expected defense.

story1After Pearl Harbor, scapegoats were blamed and punished. No one has been punished for allowing 9/11 to happen. Admiral Husband Kimmel, in charge of the Pacific Fleet—based at Pearl Harbor instead of San Diego over the vigorous protests of his predecessor—who had been relieved of his duty over the issue—and General Short were promptly relieved of their commands and were later blamed by the Roberts Commission for “errors of judgment and dereliction of duty.”

The report of the Roberts Commission had its counterpart in the 9/11 wcshort-usa-photo-01Commission Report. There are no counterparts to Admiral Kimmel and General Short in that report, however. To this writer’s knowledge, no individual has ever been singled out for punishment for what happened. We have previously summed up the situation with the following poem:

That Country of the People…

The feds left us unprotected

On that fateful September day.

If we were a truly free

And democratic nation

Somebody up high would pay,

And, to be sure, there would be

A proper investigation,

But wouldn’t you know, it is we

Who get detained and inspected.

At Pearl Harbor, from the very first moment it was obvious that we were being attacked by the formidable military of a relatively large country population-wise in Japan. On 9/11, it was not at all obvious who was attacking us and it is still not to this day. The authorities and the news media were suspiciously quick to solve the crime and lay the blame on Osama Bin Laden when they had been suspiciously incompetent in preventing it. In this aspect of the case, 9/11 resembles the Oklahoma City bombing and the two Kennedy assassinations and the Martin Luther King, Jr., assassination more than it resembles the Pearl Harbor attack. Moreover, in terms of the real threat that it represents to the nation, there is a huge difference between being attacked by a heavily armed country and being attacked by a ragtag, stateless organization or group of individuals whose armaments amount to almost nothing.

The strategic objective of the Japanese was obvious, to gain a large advantage in the shooting-war phase of its war with the United States. The 9/11 attacks had no clear objective.

Having been given an ultimatum by the United States that no Japanese government could have accepted, the Japanese leaders initiated war in precisely the way in which they had been successful in the past. It was either that or be choked and starved by the U.S. embargo. They were fully aware that it would bring down the full might of the United States in retaliation, but they felt they had no choice in the matter. No such rationale existed for Osama Bin Laden to invite U.S. retaliation in a similar fashion.

HTH_Nov_30_1941_front_600

In neither case did the attacks catch everyone on our side by surprise. Our military leaders in Washington, through the interception and decryption of a message from Tokyo to its negotiators in Washington, knew beyond a reasonable doubt that Pearl Harbor would be attacked four hours before the attack took place, but failed to convey a warning to General Short and Admiral Kimmel until it was too late. They knew by the night before that an attack would occur somewhere in the Pacific. By the next morning, when the last part of the cable had been decrypted and they saw that the negotiators were ordered to deliver their message ending peace talks at 1 pm Washington time, they could see that the most likely target for attack was Pearl Harbor. That was 7:30 am Honolulu time, which was approximately dawn, the most likely time for an attack. See “Six Myths of the Traditional Pearl Harbor Story” by Michael T. Griffith for a good short summary.

No more than the American public or the American Congress, Short and Kimmel had not been told about the November 26 ultimatum to Japan that made war virtually inevitable. The most obvious conclusion to be reached is that to do so, like alerting them the morning of December 7 or the evening of December 6, would have resulted in their preparation to defeat the sort of attack that occurred. Japan’s spies in Hawaii, it was known, would have detected these preparations, and the desired war-starting attack would have been called off.

5-dancing-Israelis

Five Dancing Israelis

A number of people seemed to have had advance notice of the 9/11 attacks. To the list of links provided in this article, one might also add the group of “celebrating Israelis” who got themselves into place to “document the event.”  In the specific case of Building 7 of the World Trade Center, the BBC and CNN seem to have had prior warning of its collapse because they reported that it had fallen before it had done so.

As for the claims by various people in the Bush administration, detailed in this web site, that they could not possibly have imagined such a stunt as hijacking airliners and flying them into buildings, they are perhaps best belied by the fact that the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) had planned a drill for precisely that on the day of the attacks.

From all indications, the ships at Pearl Harbor that were damaged by the attack either sank or they did not in accordance with the laws of physics. That seems not to have been the case with respect the buildings damaged in New York or Arlington, VA, if the official narrative is to be believed.

No one has ever been given any reason to suspect that Pearl Harbor was a false flag incident. Although General Short had been led to believe by his superiors in Washington that the greatest danger he faced was from sabotage, and prepared accordingly, no one has claimed that sabotage caused any of the damage that occurred on December 7, 1941. By contrast, virtually all of the damage that occurred on 9/11 bears a very close resemblance to sabotage.

The United States was able to portray itself purely as a victim in each case. Such “victimology” is completely consistent with the historical tactics of one particular interest group that wielded a great deal of power within both the Roosevelt and Bush administrations. Pearl Harbor brought the United States into the war against that group’s greatest enemy, Nazi Germany, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, himself, said that the 9/11 attacks were “good for Israel.” It can also be safely said that Israel is the only country in the world where the majority of the population favored the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

The comparisons and the contrasts could go on and on, but we shall conclude by noting that the war in which the United States became involved as a result of Pearl Harbor was against other countries that would end in the usual way, when one side or the other surrendered. Since 9/11, our leaders have told us that we are in a war against a tactic, an abstract noun, “terrorism,” and that is a war that promises no end. An abstract noun cannot sign surrender papers.

1359

 


 

* “Col. Melvin W. Maas, of the Marine Corps Reserve, former Minnesota Congressman, said that when two hundred fifty patrol bombers necessary to bring Hawaii up to required minimum strength of three hundred planes came off the production lines, Washington ordered them sent to Britain. When protests were made to Roosevelt, he referred the admirals to Harry Hopkins, in charge of allocating war materials.

“’Hopkins received them as he lay in bed, nonchalantly smoking a cigarette,’ said Maas. ‘He listened to them, then told them the interview was over and that he had already made the allocation. Adm. Kimmel told me if those two hundred fifty patrol planes had been sent to Hawaii, the December 7 attack could never have succeeded, and probably would never have been attempted.’” (George Morgenstern, Pearl Harbor: The Story of the Secret War, Kindle location approx. 2300)

 

David Martin

April 3, 2014

 

Also see this oldie but goodie:

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com