I wish I could remember who said it, but I can’t find the reference to give the correct credit, but I plan on using the moniker from here on out: Baby Eaters.
The Baby Eaters are ravenous. They hear what I write about the shortcomings in the Paulsterity Plan (Dr Doug linked to a video of the S Carolina primary where Paul admits my numbers are correct from a military standpoint, so any of you Baby Eaters that refuse to “do the math” just watch him:
And, “I told you so.”
But, since America is lost and even the smartest people are ready, willing and able to watch the poor starve in the street, while we strip our defense spending massively to the 2006 level (WHEW!), it is apparently too late. Even the stupid redneck contingent, by and large, are ready for some baby munching. Like everything else, they fall right in line and “think” they are some that will make it. I got news for you, you won’t. The deck is stacked against you and me and we still have these self-appointed/imagined “elitists” like Morgan Reynolds who would rather watch the babies die in the street than even look at the numbers. He would rather fall for another lie, just like all Sheoples, then say it is time for the death, carnage, and a meal (the babies, never forget that tender meat).
Here our exchange. Isn’t it amazing how the truth comes out from this people who think they are special… beyond such a calamity in their own lives… without a heart (or the one they have is rock):
(B’Man in red)
Mr Reynolds,
I am rather new to your blog and really don’t know much about you, except to say that I agree with most of what you have written since I subscribed to your blog.
I have a conundrum in which I have shared some findings about Ron Paul’s “Plan To Restore America” with various big blogs (and small ones), including a response this morning to Dr Paul Craig Roberts’ latest blog post (seen at his blog and Activist Post).
I specifically asked Dr Roberts to read my post and “do the math”, as I have done where I find that the Paul plan will cut 35% from Medicaid, 43% from SCHIP and 64% from Food Stamps, while cutting only 15% from the military budget.
I cannot undersatnd how people believe the rhetoric of “ending the Empire” or “ending the wars” if there is but a 15% cut (which could be accomplished solely by eliminating the failed F22 project).
There is much more related to the “Plan”: such as huge tax cuts for the richest speculators, bankers and corporations and not a single line item for the poor (which now equal about 53% of Americans).
I am not looking for sycophantic readers. I am wanting someone other than me to evaluate the numbers and give a fair, honest opinion of their findings. I asked Dr Roberts to do so and was given a knee-jerk reactionary ad hominen response. No truth. Nothing fair. Nothing honest.
You appear me to be a thinking man and I ask you to read my blog post, Paul’s plan and to “do the math” and let me know how I may be off base.
Is it possible that the austerity coming to America will come in the guise of “Paulsterity”?
(Morgan Reynolds in black… like his heart)
My bottomline: Ron Paul is the only guy I’d vote for in this field, especially if he appointed Jesse Ventura as his VP candidate, probably would take a 3d party ticket to go there.
Dr. Roberts? I don’t know what he’s thinking or doing.
On your numbers, I have no idea if they are correct. My impression is that Paul would cut the War Dept. big time, if only b/c he says he will pull all the troops home, end the wars of aggression and only spend on true defense. What do Dr. Paul’s fiscal numbers say? I certainly do not trust Webster Tarpley’s numbers who is at the opposite end of the political spectrum, a statist of the first order, FDR worshipper, etc., and enemy of Ron Paul.
I’m a free-market capitalist, not a forced redistributor welfare/warfare guy, like most ‘mericans. I’m with Patrick Henry. Separation of economy and state as Ayn Rand said. If separation is good enough for the church, it’s even better for production and exchange. Government intervention is counterproductive at every turn. Look at the $1.3 TR deficit spending per annum alone. That’s basically private savings (aside from newly printed Federal Reserve paper) that gov’t pisses away for its own vote-buying, campaign donation-attracting purposes instead of being directed into private sector (productive) investment. It’s all about poverty enhancement. Capitalism lifted people out of poverty, not government programs. Turn peaceful entrepreneurs loose and bail out no one. There is lots more to this but you get my drift.Mr Reynolds,
Thank you for your feedback. I agree with your philosophy in general. But if Paul is only cutting 15% from the military budget, do you still think that means ending the wars/Empire?
The numbers are all in his published “Plan To Restore America”. Its on his election website. Nice spreadsheets and the whole shebang. This is a document which hardly touches military (as opposed to the rhetoric), but savagely cuts social issues as I laid out.
I am highly disappointed in Roberts, whose only response was to accuse me of being a single issue voter (this is a laugh, if anyone simply looks at what I write about).
I have endured many elections in my life and I have never, not once, experienced truth from a POTUS candidate. There is nothing to tell me that Paul is telling me the truth now, since I ran his numbers.
Thanks, again. If you are truly interested in what his plan does (seemingly kills off a good many Americans and ALL food aid to other nations), its all there for you to see. I don’t know a lot about Tarpley, but his math is spot on (now corroborated by several money folks I know). And they are huge Paul fans.
Something is amiss and you should know that I have no axe to grind against Paul. I just want truth for a change.
OK, I believe your research but I’m not going to chase the numbers (pure conjecture/promises anyway) right now b/c not worth my time. If Paul actually is a candidate come November, then I’ll look more carefully at it in the months ahead to see if I’m excited enough to do something for his campaign. Right now, not interested enough in electoral shenanigans to bother.
btw, if gov’t ran all the pizza shops and decided to drop the pizza program, would would everybody sit around and starve for pizza, moaning all the way. No. Same with welfare/charity. Your implicit view about the “essentialness” of a massive and unsustainable welfare state is false. Further, I’m not worried about a do-nothing government so much as a do-nothing people.
Mr Reynolds,
Apparently, you have no idea how bad people are hurting, if you can lump everyone into the “useless eater” program. But it is quite telling about your compassion level.
Thank you, but don’t do any starving children any favors, ok?
And please do not consider the children or old people or mentally disturbed that need assistance now, in the worst economic times of our country’s history for the masses. And it would be a tragedy for you to consider which of the POTUS candiadtes might be used to bring about the mass death you seem to be hunky-dorily awaiting, just like the other baby eaters I have come into contact with. To put it bluntly: it is sickening.
I hope and pray you never fall upon hard times due to what this country has allowed and what its lords have done. But if you do, I promise I’ll not be so callous and heartless in my estimation of your demise in the streets as you experience what so many others are and will in the near future.
People with your attitude are the problem. The silver spoon gets in the way of any critical thought and certainly turns the heart into rock.
Good day.
And this is basically the most prolific answer I get. There have been a few that agree with my suggesting we should hold Paul’s feet to the fire, but by and large, I see only PaulTards or worse> assholes like Reynolds who make no qualms about their disdain for the indigent, the poor, the starving children. You see, people like Reynolds DO have some silver spoon clogging their thinking ability… or they are the most cold, callous, hatefull murder-loving, criminal-supporting sycophants who have fallen for the welfare Cadillac meme. These are supposedly smart people, too.
(I can’t link to a Baby Eater’s site, any more, sorry)
We are screwed, people. The fix is in. The austerity is coming. There will be death and carnage. It is guaranteed. And, the Baby Eaters will get a taste, just before they realize that they are the REAL Elitists’ Foie Gras. I wonder what a Baby Eater tastes like?
Fend for yourselves and remember that you can count on no one. Just yourself.
I Quit!
Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com
If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).




