Jewish Influence In America

I can’t get my head around the numbers. And because I question the unbelievable control Jews have on America, our thoughts and our policies, I am considered an “anti-Semite” by many people. I am considered a hater and a racist.

I am just asking the right questions and so should you:

How can 2% of the population of the USA (less than that in the world) wield so much power, hold such a vast number of political positions, manipulate the media with absolute control, run the elite universities and law schools, and have so much wealth as they do (50% of America’s billionaires are Jewish)?

Since the 1960s, Jews have come to wield considerable influence in American economic, cultural, intellectual, and political life. Jews played a central role in American finance during the 1980s, and they were among the chief beneficiaries of that decade’s corporate mergers and reorganizations. Today, though barely 2% of the nation’s population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews. The chief executive officers of the three major television networks, and the four largest film studios are Jews, as are the owners of the nation’s largest newspaper chain and most influential single newspaper, the New York Times. In the late 1960s, Jews already constituted 20% of the faculty of elite universities and 40% of the professors of elite law schools; today, these percentages doubtless are higher.

~Benjamin Ginsberg, The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State (University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1993)

Mr Ginsberg has a whole lot more to say on the subject here.

Some will claim that Jews are simply exceptional and very, very smart. According to David Duke’s research, this is not true. That due to “hard work” they earn their positions of influence. I just don’t agree. First, of the Jews I’ve gotten to know over the years, their intelligence is basically the same as most people… some smart, some stupid. I never saw anything exceptional, but I did see that other Jews’ influence got them seats at the best schools and jobs. As for hard work, most I have encountered wouldn’t know how to conduct a hard day’s work and if they were forced, would bitch and moan until it was through… constantly trying to figure out a way never to do it again.

I have worked in very hard laborious jobs in extreme conditions of heat with hundreds of men and I never met a Jew on the job. It always seems to be the cushiest positions you see them in. Maybe that’s just me, but it is my experience. Surely there are some professionals, like Doctors that work hard and long hours, but I’ve never met any Jew that does LABOR. I know one guy that will TELL you he works hard, when, in fact, he sits in front of a computer all day and gambles. I’d be willing to bet he couldn’t last 5 minutes with me in my garden, much less actually working with his hands.

Look, if we are to be real about things, we need to evaluate these claims I make. Any sensible person should be aware of what I am sharing, but it does take more than the normal American TV watcher or newspaper reader to realize it for the truth that it is. Why is that? Because Jews run those outlets and they don’t want to advertise the truth because you will get pissed if you find out the truth. It mucks up their control game.

“During the last three decades Jews [in the United States] have made up 50 percent of the top two hundred intellectuals … 20 percent of professors at the leading universities … 40 percent of partners in the leading law firms in New York and Washington … 59 percent of the directors, writers, and producers of the 50 top-grossing motion pictures from 1965 to 1982, and 58 percent of directors, writers, and producers in two or more primetime television series.”

~Seymour Lipset and Earl Raab, Jews and the New American Scene (1995)

And please. Stop with blaming all those OTHER inane entities the disinformation agents and useful idiots  (like Alex Jones) tell us it is:

Let’s get serious. First of all, it is critical to know how much we give to Israel and why. It is officially noted that we give in excess of $3BILLION yearly to Israel. This does not include all the various hidden military equipment. We are told that they are our best ally in the middle east and that we need to help them protect themselves from the rogue nations, like Iran. But any cursory look shows us that they are the only ones that are rogue. They are the only ones in the middle east that are attacking other countries and continuously accusing those countries of the very crimes they conduct. If Jews don’t control our policies, why are we sending so much money to them and furnishing them with the ordinance to kill so many children? Why do we turn away and disregard their assaults on innocents? Why do they get special treatment and protection from their abuses against common international laws? Why do we continuously attack Muslim countries if we aren’t following their policies? Do you still honestly believe that those middle eastern countries are OUR enemies… or theirs?

Why Do They Do It?

No, the real reason we treat them as special is that we are scared of them and that we have been brainwashed into their sob stories of lies and their religious garbage of their being the “Chosen Ones” of God. The politicians are scared because if they say something against their influence and control, they are immediately labelled by the media they control as anti-semites and vast sums of money are spent to unseat those truthful people. Many have been brainwashed by the Holohoax story, which is easily shown as the lie it is, with just a small amount of research. Even a 15 year old can figure it out. And too many “Christians” have been duped into believing that Christ following is really “judeo-Christianity” when He constantly taught against any such a stupid notion.

You can see the politicians every year fall all over themselves at the AIPAC convention:

and even in the State House…

Oh, God. It’s Pitiful.

Even the Jewish newspapers know it is control and MONEY in regards to politics.

Jewish influence is far more disproportionate to the size of the community Jewish leaders and US officials acknowledge, but so is the amount of money they contribute to election campaigns.

~The Jerusalem Post

Swindler’s List: The Bilking Never Ends

Swindler’s List: A Brief Look at the Holocaust Reparations Racket

SHAKEDOWN: Negotiators from the Claims Conference (L) met with German government officials in New York in
July to discuss compensation to alleged Jewish Holocaust survivors currently living in the former Soviet Union

By Richard Edmondson

After the conclusion of World War II did the Germans pay reparations of some sort to the Jews?

A lot of people would probably assume that, yes, some sort of redress did occur, but that whatever it was, most likely was paid out in one, two, three, or perhaps four lump sum payments, and that the matter was over, settled, and done with, oh, say maybe five years after the war, or ten at most. Few people—or at any rate few who aren’t Jewish, or who don’t make a regular habit of reading the Jewish press—would guess that today, fully 67 years after the war, Germany continues to pay reparations to Jews, or that the benefits doled out keep going up every year, rather than down. But this is indeed the case.

In July of 2012 observances were held marking the 60^th anniversary of the Luxembourg Agreement. The event took place in Washington D.C., with ceremonies held at the Israeli Embassy, the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, and the Hart Senate Office Building. So what, you may ask, is the Luxembourg Agreement?

Forcing the Germans to Pay Up

Formally known as the Reparations Agreement between Israel and West Germany, Luxembourg is an agreement signed on September 10, 1952 following lengthy negotiations between an ad hoc committee of Jews representing various Jewish organizations, including the World Jewish Congress; officials from the new state of Israel; and representatives of the West German government, including the country’s then-chancellor Konrad Adenauer. The upshot of the accord was that West Germany was to make restitution, partly in the form of large payments to Israel, on behalf of Jews who had suffered during the Nazi era. The agreement is discussed at some length in an article by Mark Weber, who tells us the West Germans basically had little choice in the matter, and who also supplies us with a rather illuminating quote from Adenauer’s memoirs:

It was clear to me that, if the negotiations with the Jews failed, the negotiations at the London Debt Conference [which were going on at the same time] would also run aground, because Jewish banking circles would exert an influence upon the course of the London Debt Conference which should not be under-estimated. On the other hand it was self-evident that a failure of the London Debt Conference would bring about a failure of the negotiations with the Jews. If the German economy was to achieve a good credit standing and become strong again, the London Conference would have to be ended successfully. Only then would our economy develop in a way that would make the payments to Israel and the Jewish organizations possible. See 5.

More on the London Debt Conference can be found in a summary here, but basically it was an agreement on how German debts, mainly from the period between the two world wars, would be settled with a number of creditor nations, including the US, Britain, and France. Weber goes on to relate (emphases added):

Zionist leader Nahum Goldmann, President of the World Jewish Congress and chairman of the Claims Conference, warned of a worldwide campaign against Germany if the Bonn officials did not meet the Zionist demands: “The non-violent reaction of the whole world, supported by wide circles of non-Jews, who have deep sympathy with the martyrdom of the Jewish people during the Nazi period, would be irresistible and completely justified.” See 6. The London Jewish Observer was more blunt: “The whole material weight of world Jewry will be mobilized for an economic war against Germany, if Bonn’s offer of reparations remains unsatisfactory.” See 7.

Goldman and the other Jews who participated in the negotiations collectively came to be known as The Conference on Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, or simply the Claims Conference (CC). As a result of the agreement, the CC was installed, not only as the representative of world Jewry, but also essentially almost as an arbiter, procuring payments from West Germany on the basis of claims filed by individual Holocaust survivors. And here it should be strongly emphasized that German funds have gone out not just to the Jewish state, but also to Jewish individuals as well. According to one source, more than $60 billion has been paid out in the past 60 years to some 500,000 purported Holocaust survivors living in 87 different countries.

The claims process works like this: the money is handed over by Germany to the CC, which in turn will allocate it into different funds that it oversees, with each fund earmarked for a specific purpose. There is, for instance, an Article 2 Fund, which provides lifetime pensions for anyone held in a concentration camp, ghetto, or who worked on a forced labor battalion. Also eligible for an Article 2 pension would be those who were only “forced to go into hiding,” as Wikipedia puts it. And then we have a Hardship Fund, which provides one-time payments for those Jews who emigrated to the West from Soviet-bloc countries, and a Holocaust Victims Compensation Fund, providing one-time payments to emigrants from the former Soviet Union itself. The compensation amounts have increased over the years. Currently the Article 2 pensions are set at 300 euros a month, while payments from the Hardship Fund are 2,556 euros each, and the Holocaust Victims Compensation Fund 1,900 euros each.

In addition there is also a Central and Eastern European Fund, which, like Article 2, allocates monthly pensions, only these specifically are provided for Jewish survivors who, rather than emigrating to the West, remained in Eastern Europe or the former Soviet Union. These pensions are currently set at 260 euros per month, however, as of Jan. 1, 2013, they will increase to 300 euros a month, making them equal to the Article 2 pensions.

Different funds have different eligibility requirements. For instance, a person may qualify for the Hardship Fund if he/she underwent i) deprivation of liberty; ii) flight from the Nazi regime; iii) “restriction of liberty” as defined under BEG, a German restitution law passed in the 1950s; iv) restriction of movement such as having to observe a curfew, as well as compulsory registration with limitation of residence, or wearing the star of David; or if they v) resided in Leningrad at some time between September 1941 and January 1944, or fled from there during the same period. According to the Claims Conference website, the CC has approved 355,146 claimants and paid out $971 million under the Hardship Fund. Figures are also available for certain of the other funds: under the Article 2 fund, for instance, 85,608 applicants have been approved with a total payout of $3.3 billion; and for the Central and Eastern European Fund—24,307 applicants and $479 million . No figures seem to be available for the Holocaust Victim Compensation Fund, or for a new fund, known as the Orphans Fund, set up as of January 1 this year, The latter offers a one-time payment of 1,900 euros to those born 1928 or later who “were orphaned due to Nazi persecution” with both parents having been killed.

Read the entire, very well researched and extremely enlightening article at the Leftwing-Christian blog.

I must also recommend the interview that John Friend did with Richard on The Realist Report, especially the second hour, which gets in to this subject (just before the break between hours, Richard reads one of his poems which is incredibly powerful). The rest of the article (and interview) also highlights the vast thievery of money taken from the reparations to fuel living the high life of virtually every personality that has their Jewish fingers in the pie.

The amount of money given in “reparations” is stifling and from what they continue to say and do, it will be never-ending (generations to come). You want to know how Israel was built and has survived, just understand that everything they have “accomplished” has come at the expense of Germans, other Europeans and obviously American tax-payers who are hoodwinked into supporting our own demise.

All over lies.

Is There A Kroll Advisory Solutions Connection To The Boston Bombing?

Mike sent me a link to an article with his commentary that asks the question about an Israeli connection to the bombing. That article is written by

Luckily, Mr Holley’s bio lists one of his forte’s as “crisis management”. Well, thank goodness for that. And, as luck would also have it, back in the day, Mr. Holley was employed as a litigation support specialist with the Environmental Enforcement Section of the United States Department of Justice. So, obviously, he is a ‘good guy’.

If you will remember, Kroll was the Israeli firm in charge of the World Trade Center Complex on 9/11. Besides the question of allowing an Israeli based firm to have such access to those buildings (why not an American company?), it appears that they have their fingers in a lot of American pies:

Falling To Pieces For Israel

New parody by DCDave:
http://www.dcdave.com/poet15/130405.htm

Falling To Pieces For Israel

(to Patsy Cline’s “I Fall to Pieces”)

You fall to pieces
At just the sound of their name.
You fall to pieces,
Now we’ve wised up to their game:

They want us to think that you work for us
Because we wanted you,
Went to the polls for you.
Well we’re sorry we see what you say and do:
They say “boo,” and you fall to pieces.

You fall to pieces.
We see what you’re all about.
You fall to pieces.
You’re only there to sell out.

You know who puts butter upon your bread.
You’ll jump through hoops for it.
Do loop de loops for it.
If you get out of line just a little bit
They flash cash and you fall to pieces.
They flash cash and you fall to pieces.

Featuring new singing sensation, Liz Dilling

Video by BuelahMan

It’s Time To Stop Being Israel’s Bitch

Richard Noggin’ Saturday: Senator Lindsey Graham

The smile rendered after kissing Jew ass.

“We’ve killed 4,700. Sometimes you hit innocent people, and I hate that, but we’re at war, and we’ve taken out some very senior members of Al-Qaeda.”

Who Killed James Forrestal? Part 4

Who Killed James Forrestal?  Part 4

Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 5, Part 6, Short Version, Synopsis, Letters to Historians, James Carroll’s Dishonesty, Patrick J. Hurley Meets David Ben-Gurion

Britain’s Forrestal

Imagine this scenario:  A powerful, radical Middle East movement, with a record of terrorism, decides to embark upon a program of bombings and assassinations of high government officials in the home territory of a major Western power.  The plot is to be carried out by five teams infiltrated into the Western country, and the primary target is the leading government minister opposing the actions and the aspirations of the radical group.

As luck would have it, the secret service of the Western country discovers the plot, and the terrorist movement has to fall back to a plan of sending 20 letter bombs to various government officers, including the aforementioned leading opponent of the terrorists as well as his predecessor.  The letter bombs also fail to reach their intended targets.

What would the Western power do in response to these bombing and assassination attempts?  You would be right if you answered that it would keep quiet about them for sixty years.  In the meantime, it would be a party to giving the terrorist group everything it hoped to get, and more, from the failed assassination.  It would even help the terrorists to develop their own nuclear weapons.

The scenario is not fanciful.  According to recently declassified British intelligence documents, it actually happened.  The targeted official was British Foreign Minister, Ernest Bevin.  His targeted predecessor was Anthony Eden.  The terrorists were the Zionist gang Irgun Tsvai Leumi, or Irgun, for short.  Its leader at the time of the assassination attempts in 1946, before the state of Israel had been carved out of Palestine, was Menachem Begin.  Begin would later become Israel’s Prime Minister and would be awarded the Nobel Prize for peace in 1978 for the agreement that he would reach with Egypt’s president, Anwar Sadat, known as the Camp David peace accords.

The intelligence documents were declassified in early March 2006.  The assassination attempts occurred in 1946 and 1947; the supplying of plutonium to Israel by Britain first occurred in 1966, but it had supplied heavy water, another nuclear weapons ingredient, in the 1950s.  The Times of London reported on the failed assassinations on March 5, and the BBC reported on the illegal nuclear assistance on March 9.

These shocking, extraordinarily important new revelations shed a great deal of light upon what we have virtually proved to be the assassination of America’s first Secretary of Defense, James Forrestal.   The parallels in the government careers of Bevin and Forrestal are great.  Although Bevin came up through the labor movement and was a member of the opposition Labor Party, Tory Prime Minister Winston Churchill had made him his Labor Secretary during World War II.  In that capacity, he played a key role in mobilizing Britain’s economy for the war.

Forrestal was a Wall Street investment banker whom Franklin Roosevelt made Under Secretary of the Navy.  A tireless worker, Forrestal was the key liaison person between the Roosevelt administration and the private industrial sector, and he was largely responsible for the transformation of the economy from production for consumption to production for the war effort.

When the Labor Party won a majority after the war, Bevin was appointed foreign secretary in the new government.  Forrestal had been elevated to Secretary of the Navy when the previous Secretary died near the end of the war.  He continued in that position when Harry Truman replaced Roosevelt upon the latter’s death in 1945.  When the National Security Act of 1947 consolidated the armed services, Truman made Forrestal the first Secretary of Defense.

Though both men were very popular and both were very successful in their government careers, each suffered major setbacks over the issue of the creation of a state for Jews in the territory of Palestine.  The Labor Party, heavily influenced by its Jewish members, when out of power during the war actually favored expulsion of the Arab population of Palestine to clear the way for a Jewish state.  As Foreign Minister of the new Labor government, Bevin, repulsed by Zionist terrorist actions directed at British military and government officials in Palestine, steered the British government toward a position more heavily favoring the rights of the Arab residents of the region.  In doing so, he made himself British public enemy number one of the Zionists.

As we have previously noted, Forrestal was enemy number one of the Zionists in the United States.  Near the end of part one of “Who Killed James Forrestal?” we told of the December 4, 1948, letter to The New York Times signed by a number of prominent Jews, including Albert Einstein, warning the American public about Menachem Begin and his terrorist organization upon Begin’s visit to the United States.  At the conclusion of the letter recounting the Begin organization’s murderous activities, we asked this question, “Would men like Menachem Begin and his followers have hesitated at assassinating the most popular, outspoken, and powerful critic of the nascent state of Israel in the United States if given the opportunity?”

How apt that question was has now been made manifest.  We now know that they had no compunction against assassinating Forrestal’s precursor and counterpart in Britain.  The main difference seems to be that the powers that be in Britain did not give them the opportunity, while those in the United States did.  Maybe that is a measure of the relative power of the Zionists in the two countries.  The federal government and the organs for molding public opinion were penetrated at the very top in the United States by the most extreme and violent elements of the Zionist movement, and they continue to be so, or, at least, effectively so.

That is not to say that the Zionists are exactly weak in Britain.  Official Britain hardly reacted with appropriate fury at the outrage.  Rather, the country sat on information about the attempted assassination, and soon fell into line behind the United States in its pro-Israel policies.  It even got a bit ahead of the United States over the nuclear weapons issue, as we have noted, and also during the Eisenhower administration when the British, the French, and the Israelis attempted a power grab known as the Suez Crisis.

Even now, the release of the news of the outrage of the attempted Bevin assassination has been extremely timid.  A search of the Internet some three weeks after the initial revelation shows only one other major newspaper in the world picking up on the story, the Sydney Morning Herald in Australia.  It has a slightly different version of events, though, claiming that it was the Stern gang, rather than Irgun, that planned the assassinations, though both stories are ostensibly based upon the same release of British intelligence documents.  The Times, itself, has barely squeaked out the news.  When I telephoned the newspaper, attempting to locate the reporter of the story, Peter Day, the person I talked to was unable to find Day in their directory, nor could he find the article in the hard copy of the March 5 Times.  The online version of the story lists no page number.  The folks at The Times foreign desk, with whom I was then connected, were familiar with the story, which the first contact person was not, but they did not know Mr. Day.  They were able to confirm only that he was not one of their own regular reporters.  Perhaps, as has been asserted in the case of the author of the only critical book on James Forrestal’s death, Cornell Simpson, the name is a pseudonym.*   The topic, after all, is a hot one, and it may not be good for one’s journalism career to be associated with it.  Maybe the publishers of The Times have had some second thoughts about what they have done in letting this news out.  As of April 5, the article could no longer be found on their web site.

The veritable radioactivity of the subject would explain, as well, the complete blackout of this news by the mainstream news organs of the United States.  The news suppression is of a piece with the complete failure of the U.S. press to report that the long secret report on the investigation of Forrestal’s death was finally made public in 2004.  The Seeley Mudd Manuscript Library of Princeton University even sent out a press release,  and the online History News Network of George Mason University made mention of it, but the mainstream press made certain that this very important news, like the news of the attempted assassination of Britain’s foreign minister, never reached the attention of the general public.

That the American press should vigorously suppress this news should hardly surprise us.  As we have seen throughout this series, they were a very active party in selling the story that the far-sighted statesman, Forrestal, the man who saw better than anyone where America’s Middle East policy was leading it, ended his own life.  The last thing such a press would want would be for the public to learn of the existence of powerful evidence that undermines the suicide thesis, and worse, points the finger of blame at Zionist terrorists.

The complete suppression of the news of Irgun’s assassination attempt on Foreign Minister Bevin for all these many years is almost as important as the attempt, itself.  Imagine how much stronger that 1948 New York Times warning letter by Albert Einstein and a number of other prominent American Jews about the murderous proclivities of Menachem Begin and company could have been had they known about Begin’s previous attempt on the life of Bevin.  In all likelihood, no such warning letter would have even been needed.  If Begin was known to have attempted to kill Britain’s most powerful opponent, when Britain was the power over Palestine, he and his organization would certainly have been regarded as a similar threat to Forrestal when the United States had become the main controller of Palestine’s destiny.

Who Knew? 

Although it is apparent that those signers of the warning letter to The New York Times had no knowledge of the previous attempt on the life of Ernest Bevin, one must wonder who, outside the ranks of British intelligence, did know about it.  In particular, we have to wonder if one so connected to the higher reaches of power in the world as Bernard Baruch, when he warned his friend Forrestal in February of 1949 that he had already become too identified with opposition to Israel for his own good, knew more than he was telling about the danger that Forrestal faced.  And when Forrestal complained about being followed and bugged, did he know that the Irgun crowd had come pretty close to snuffing out the life of his British counterpart?  Could such knowledge have been behind his resistance to commitment to Bethesda Naval Hospital and his reported claim that he would never leave the hospital alive when he attempted to get out of the car taking him there?  Might that have been the revelation from Secretary of the Air Force Symington on the day of Forrestal’s departure from office that drove him into his sudden funk?

And after Forrestal’s death, could there have been any doubt in the minds of those aware of the attempt on Bevin who had ultimately been behind the later crime?  Might these have included those powerful friends such as Ferdinand Eberstadt and Robert Lovett, who had failed to visit him in the hospital and then, when the results of the investigation of his death were never made public, failed to register any public complaint?  At the very least, those in the know included the contemporary and future leaders of Great Britain, and the knowledge that the leaders of the United States government had conspired with Zionist thugs in the assassination of the one courageous voice of reason in their midst would very likely have animated their own future Middle East policy.

Zionists and Communists

The Times article on the Bevin assassination attempt has one particularly intriguing passage, which might fill in some more pieces of the puzzle.  That is that Britain’s foreign intelligence service, MI6, believed that Menachem Begin was backed in his terrorist activities by the Soviet Union.  One might wonder whether their belief was founded on solid evidence and, if so, how far this backing went.  Did they just generally encourage him in his murderous endeavors, or were they actually calling the shots?  If MI6 was right, then those like author Cornell Simpson who argue that the Communists killed Forrestal and those who suggest that the Zionists did it are probably both right.

The Soviets, as Simpson explains quite well, certainly had ample reasons to want to be rid of Forrestal.  Not only was he the leading anti-Zionist in the Truman administration, but he was also the leading anti-Communist.  Interestingly enough, the same can probably be said for Ernest Bevin in Britain’s Clement Atlee administration.  Bevin’s anti-Communism carried a particular potency because he came from a British labor movement that was heavily influenced and infiltrated by the Communists.

In many instances in the United States in the 1930s and 1940s pro-Communism and pro-Zionism could be found in the same individuals.  As we noted in the first installment of this series, that appears to have been the case for the very powerful and secretive adviser to both Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, David Niles.**

With these new revelations, Niles is due even greater scrutiny than before as the most likely coordinator of the Forrestal assassination.  Some measure of Niles’s power can be gained from the following passage in the oral history interview of Truman aide, Stephen J. Spingarn:

David Niles worked with nobody. He was sui generis. David Niles was the oldest senior staff man in point of service. He came over from the Roosevelt administration. His titular jurisdiction was minorities. But, actually, his main job, I suppose you could say, was Jewish problems on the one hand, and the intricate politics of New York City, those two things; maintaining liaison with Dave Dubinsky and Alex Rose and the Liberal Party there, you know, and keeping the White House abreast of that. But David Niles seemed to me to pay very little attention to Negro and other minority matters, so it seemed to me. Philleo Nash was his assistant and Philleo paid a lot of attention, but it didn’t seem to me that Dave paid much. And there was another interesting thing, Dave Niles did not attend the President’s morning staff conferences — ever.

[JERRY] HESS: Can you tell me about those morning staff conferences?

SPINGARN: Yes. The President held a morning staff conference every morning at 9:30 — I think it was 9:30. It was indispensable to a staff man — a senior staff man — to attend that thing, but it was a very delicate matter as to who attended. http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/sping1.htm

Elsewhere Spingarn makes it clear that Niles was very much a part of Truman’s inner circle, so it would have been natural for him to attend these daily meetings.  The impression one gets is that he was so powerful, and confident of his power, that the staff meetings were actually beneath him.  He didn’t have to go in order to stay on top of the issues that really mattered, and to continue to have the ear of the putative boss, President Truman.  Or perhaps he realized that it wasn’t all that important to have influence with Truman, when he had influence with the people who really mattered.

At this point, the observations of the son-in-law of President Franklin Roosevelt, Colonel Curtis Dall, as relayed by Henry Makow, are apropos:

Dall maintained a family loyalty but could not avoid several disheartening conclusions in his book [FDR: My Exploited Father-in-Law, 1970].  He portrays the legendary president not as a leader but as a “quarterback” with little actual power.  The “coaching staff” consisted of a coterie of handlers (“advisers” like Louis Howe, Bernard Baruch and Harry Hopkins) who represented the international banking cartel.  For Dall, FDR ultimately was a traitor manipulated by “World Money” and motivated by conceit and personal ambition.

If such a commanding politician as Franklin Roosevelt, a man widely believed to be the most powerful president the United States has ever had, was really little more than a quarterback executing plays called in by the coaching staff, what would that have made the former haberdasher and protégé of the Kansas City machine of boss Tom Pendergast?  Certainly it was not Truman’s idea to have James Forrestal assassinated and very little was required of him for the assassination to be carried out and covered up.  In matters such as this, the President would not have been calling the shots.

David Martin

April 9, 2006

*As I reported in March of 2005, former John Birch Society official, J. Bruce Campbell asserts that the name “Cornell Simpson” is a pseudonym.  I had suspected as much because this “Simpson” is clearly a polished professional writer, but the name, to my knowledge, appears nowhere in any political writing except as the author of The Death of James Forrestal.  Recently, an acquaintance in Washington with Birch Society contacts confirmed that “Cornell Simpson” was the name assumed in this instance by Medford Evans, the father of noted conservative, M. Stanton Evans.  The elder Evans also wrote under his own name an even more obscure book, also published by the Birch Society’s Western Islands Press, The Assassination of Joe McCarthy.

(April 22, 2011 update:  Now the conclusion that “Cornell Simpson” was actually Medford Evans has been called into question by Evans, the younger.  Stay tuned.)

**The following passage from Alfred Lilienthal’s 1953 classic What Price Israel? is very revealing of the person described by Alfred Steinberg in the December 24, 1949, Saturday Evening Post as “Truman’s Mystery Man”:

There were many ways in which Niles served the State of Israel after partition, too.  Early in 1950, when the United States first awoke to the Soviet danger in the Middle East, our Government requested the various Arab countries for information regarding troops, equipment, and other confidential military data.  These statistics were necessary in order to plan possible assistance under the Mutual Security Act.  The Arab nations were naturally assured that the figures, supplied for the Chief of Staff, would be kept secret.

Late that year, military representatives of the Middle East countries and of Israel were meeting with General [W.E.] Riley, who headed the United Nations Truce Organization.  Trouble had broken out over the Huleh Marshes, and charges and countercharges of military aggression were exchanged between Israel and the Arab countries.  The Israeli military representative claimed that the Syrian troops were employed in a certain manner, and General Riley remarked: “That’s not possible.  The Syrians have no such number of troops.”  Whereupon the Israeli representative said, “You are wrong.  Here are the actual figures of Syrian military strength and the description of troops.”  And he produced the confidential figures, top-secret Pentagon information.  General Riley himself had not been shown the new figures given by the Syrian War Ministry to his superiors.

When the question of Egyptian military strength was raised, a similar security leak appeared.  It was obvious that top-secret figures had been passed on to the Israeli Government.  Both the Central Intelligence Agency and the Army G-2 investigated the security breach but discovered only that these figures had been made available to the White House.  How and through whom they leaked out of the White House remained forever obscure.  However, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Omar Bradley, reportedly went to the President and told the Chief Executive that he would have to choose between him (Bradley) and Niles.  Not too long after this reported intervention, David Niles resigned from his post as Executive Assistant to the President and went on a visit to Israel. (Pp. 72-73)

Addendum 1

While doing some additional research on the September 17, 1948, assassination in the new state of Israel of United Nations mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte of Sweden, by the Stern Gang (Lehi), I ran across this intriguing entry on the Bernadotte discussion page on Wikipedia:

Contrary to what you say, Lehi being a terror organization is very much disputed. Most (or at least many) Israelis (myself included) do not consider Lehi to be a terrorist organization. Lehi never targeted innocent civillians [sic] in attempt to terrorize them. All of Lehi’s attacks were against military or government targets (including high-ranked officials such as Bernadotte). This is very different than what “proper” terrorist organizations do – attacking random civilian targets such as busses or airplanes.

Avraham Stern’s memorial day is attended every year by Israeli political and government officials. Given Israel’s effort to gain international support for its ongoing war against terrorism of all kinds, you wouldn’t expect Israeli leaders to associate themselves with the memory of someone who led a terrorist organization. Indeed they don’t – like me they believe that Lehi, while sometimes using extreme measures, was not a terrorist organization.

I’m not really trying to convince you that Lehi was not a terrorist organization (you are entitled to your own opinion on that) – only that the issue is disputed. Since it is indeed so, the proper place to discuss it is on the Lehi page – rather than have is stated on every page which mentions Lehi.

This is a perfect example of the attitude toward the attempted Bevin assassination described in the aforementioned London Times article:

Lord Bethell, author of The Palestine Triangle and an expert on Soviet intelligence, said Bevin was detested by Zionist groups. He added, however: “Zionists would be very angry if you compared these people with terrorists now. You have to remember that Irgun were the grandfathers of today’s ruling politicians.

“They would say they were at war with the British and behaved well, fighting under Marquess of Queensberry rules. They would say that they didn’t target civilians.”

James Forrestal, as the leading opponent in the United States government of the new state of Israel would have been regarded as anything but an “innocent civilian,” and that would have made this great American patriot fair game for assassination in Zionist eyes.  Hardly anything could be more incriminating of them than their own words…unless it is their known deeds.

David Martin

April 13, 2006

Addendum 2

On June 13, 2006, Reuters reported that according to the Lebanese Army, a Lebanese man by the name of Mahmoud Rafeh had confessed to a series of assassinations of senior Hezbollah and Palestinian militants over a seven year period on behalf of Israeli intelligence.  If true, it would demonstrate that Israel has continued to use assassination as a weapon for what it considers to be the good of the state.  Any “senior official” in the world whom Israel should regard as a danger to its interests surely must be made uneasy at this latest development.

David Martin

June 14, 2006

Addendum 3

The beat goes on.  This is from the Lebanon Daily Star:

Beirut steps up search for head of terror group tied to Mossad

BEIRUT: Lebanese security forces redoubled their efforts Monday to find Palestinian Hussein Khattab after Mahmoud Rafeh, the reported leader of a recently uncovered Mossad-linked terrorist network, confessed that Khattab was the actual leader of the group.

Judicial sources told The Daily Star that Rafeh admitted receiving a list of names of Lebanese and Palestinian political figures to be assassinated on orders from Israel.

The sources said Rafeh told the authorities Khattab also received the list, and was “leading” assassination operations…

David Martin

June 20, 2006

Addendum 4

Just last year I discovered that the Jewish Stern Gang actually made an assassination attempt against President Harry Truman in 1947.  It seems not to have been reported by any news media at the time and biographers of Truman and other historians have kept the matter a secret even though it was reported in a book by the former head of the White House mail room in 1949 and again by Margaret Truman in her book about her father in 1972.  You can read about that episode in “’Jews’ Tried to Kill Truman in 1947.”

David Martin

February 21, 2013

And The Answer Is: Every One Of Them

My video called them all parasites. But it is far worse than that.

Look how much groveling, lying, and down right self-castration Chuck Hagel did in front of the Senate and cameras for all America to see (as if they cared). And this is supposed to be a “hero”… a decorated soldier.

He is a disgrace. He should ask Hillary for her balls.

The Definition of a Parasite

Adapted from Greg’s work at the Goon Squad.

The Shoa Comes To Memphis

Poor Justin. He obviously knows something that most West Tennesseans don’t know and for some reason felt he needed to mess with some “Holy Books”. I wonder if it was frustration that others are kept in the dark about the evil nature of that “religion”? Does he understand that the Torah is the mild book and that these Orthodox Jews deem the Talmud (the most evil, vile, piece of literature ever spoken, then written, to have ever existed on Earth)  superior and spend an exorbitant amount of time studying it, as opposed to the Torah?

Orthodox Judaism continues to stress the importance of Talmud study and it is a central component of Yeshiva curriculum, in particular for those training to be Rabbis. This is so even though Halakha is generally studied from the medieval codes and not directly from the Talmud. Talmudic study amongst the laity is widespread in Orthodox Judaism, with daily or weekly Talmud study particularly common in Haredi Judaism and with Talmud study a central part of the curriculum in Orthodox Yeshivas and day schools. The regular study of Talmud among laymen has been popularized by the Daf Yomi, a daily course of Talmud study initiated by Rabbi Meir Shapiro in 1923; its 13th cycle of study began on August, 2012.

~Wikipedia (A Jewish hangout)

It makes me wonder if one of the books Justin pissed on was this despicable text and that the “good” rabbi doesn’t want to illuminate it, for fear that all us rednecks will gain an understanding of what it says and teaches Jews from a very young age.

I mean, for goodness sakes, surely all us rednecks understand that virtually every practice these rabbis are a part of are wholesome and decent:

Safe, too. Especially for the children.

These law abiding rabbis would never think to thwart or disobey any law that forbids that disgusting, err, wholesome ritual, would they?

Rabbis Will Defy Law On Circumcision Ritual

Naw. Not these “Holy Men”. And, of course, these Jews would NEVER defile a Holy Book, would they? Of course not.

But what if they did, would they face 8 to 12 years and a fine (also needing $100,000 bond)?

Naw. They get one of the harshest punishments:

A REPRIMAND

Ouch. That’s gotta hurt.

But what about the “hate crime” statute that Mr Baker might face if the Wiesenthal Center has anything to do with it? Recon that might make this even worse?

Oh, B’Man, PLEASE! The Jews would never defile a Holy Site. Of course not. They have too much love for others in their heart, right?

Neither would they ever accost or belittle Jesus, right? Brother Nathanel approaches this and really shows us the love and respect the Jews have for us and Christianity, especially the reverence they have towards Jesus:

NO, NEVER.

You can clearly see, Jews love Jesus, all Christians, and any other faith. It shows by their tremendous respect for anything non-Jewish.

When their main “Holy Book” says these things about Jesus, really, it is just this dumb ole redneck that doesn’t understand “context” (that’s what the Jew rag Wikipedia says, so it must be true). Perhaps we need to look at a few of these loving verses from the Talmud just to see the “context”, shall we?

“‘Yashu’ (derogatory for ‘Jesus’) is in Hell being boiled in hot excrement.” (Gittin 57a)

[’Yashu’ is an acronym for the Jewish curse, ‘May his (Jesus) name be wiped out forevermore.’]

* Yashu (Jesus) was sexually immoral and worshipped a brick.” (Sanhedrin 107b)

* “Yashu (Jesus) was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness and refused to repent.” (Sotah 47a)

* “Miriam the hairdresser had sex with many men.” (Shabbath 104b, Hebrew Edition only)

* “She who was the descendant of princes and governors (the virgin Mary) played the harlot with carpenters.” (Sanhedrin 106a)

* “Christians who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.” (Rosh Hashanah 17a)

The “context” is that they greatly RESPECT Jesus and Mary and I just don’t understand, right? That because I point this out, I am an anti-Semite? That the words are “cryptic” and “hard to understand”? Right?

Oh, Wiki Master race: pray tell you explain this to the other stinking anti-Semites that read here:

Defenders of the Talmud argue that many of these criticisms, particularly those in antisemitic sources, are based on quotations that are taken out of context, and thus misrepresent the meaning of the Talmud’s text. Sometimes the misrepresentation is deliberate, and other times simply due to an inability to grasp the subtle and sometimes confusing narratives in the Talmud.

Oh israel

Another of Digger’s Ditties. As I explained to him, the words are powerful enough that added graphic pictures of dead Palestinian children and israel’s attacks against Gaza aren’t needed. (“i”srael is purposefully left non-capitalized to push home the idea that they have no right to exist in the first place).

Another Digger’s Ditty. Original ditty found here:

http://diggerfortruth.wordpress.com/2012/06/30/oh-israel/

Text:

Oh israel

If you only knew what disdain the world has for you.
If you only knew the palpable anger directed towards you.
If you only knew the global lust for your demise.
If you only knew.

Oh israel

How could you be so deluded?
How low you have sunk in humanity.
The levels of insanity you project.
How could you be so demonic?
How could you be so unconscious?

Oh israel

Are you aware you maim, torture, kill and seek unjust revenge?
Are you aware you degrade, sin, persecute and destroy?
Are you aware of the suffering, pain, fear, cruelty, distress you induce?

Oh israel

For your crimes, there will be payback.
For your sins, justice will be met.
For your atrocities, you will get your comeuppance.
For your your wrongful actions, karma will be dealt.
For your carnage, you have set a curse upon yourself.

For the little ones, the elderly, the weak, the European sex slaves, the disabled, the animals, the innocent, the land, the culture, the history, your universal criminality.

You will sorely pay.

Oh israel

Oh shut up israel, we’re all sick of your hubris.
Oh shut up israel, we’re all tired of your arrogance.
Oh shut up israel, we’re all fatigued with your haughtiness.
Oh shut up israel, we’re all exhausted with your smugness.

Oh israel

You, the only criminal state in the Middle East — you have no future.
You, the modern-day Babylon — you have no future.
You, the parasitic existence — you have no future.
You, Lucifer’s illegal squat — you have no future.

Oh israel

When are you going to wake up?
When are you going to join the human race?
When are you going to show compassion?
When are you going to drop your racist, supremacist ideology?
When are you going to become conscious?
When are you going to own up to your precious fake identity?

Oh israel

You have no right to freeload your existence.
You have no right to persecute the Palestinians.
You have no right to expand your evil empire.
You have no right to perpetrate criminal global activities.

Oh israel

You have no right to exist.

The True Meaning Of Nazism

Discovered! Iconic photo in Buchenwald is dishonest photo-fakery

By Carolyn Yeager, Dec. 19, 2012

This is the photograph that Allied Supreme Commander General Dwight David Eisenhower ordered, in April 1945, to be posted in every German town and city to show the defeated population the “true meaning of Nazism.”

Was this photo made to order according to Ike’s specifications?

A huge blown-up version then went on tour in the United States for the same purpose, to impress on the American people what evil they had gone to war against; why the sacrifice of blood and treasure was justified! Below: “A traveling exhibit of larger than life size photographs was first shown in St. Louis, MO in summer 1945 and then taken to Washington, DC.

Related articles

• The Perfect Match (buelahman.wordpress.com)

The Test: Failure Means La Fin Du Monde

Joe Cortina never holds back. He has lived it and has seen them in their most horrible, everyday, stinking ways of life. He lists these test questions to see if you know what is going on all around you as Muslims, Christians, white people, everyone EXCEPT the guilty culprits are being blamed for the tribe’s crimes against humanity. Read the questions and if the same single answer doesn’t come up for each query, you are missing the truth.

Who got us involved in WWI ?
Who got us involved in WWII ?
Who are trying hard to – and will eventually start WWIII ?
Who started all the ‘Gulf wars’ ?
Who masterminded 9-11 ?
Who created the greatest hoax con game on mankind in history ?
Who invented and first practiced usury ?
Who financed the slave trade in America ?
Who runs the Communist ACLU ?
What Godless alien race did George Washington lament that we should have kicked out of America ?
What Godless alien race did Ben Franklin describe as a menace to our young nation. ?
What Godless alien race did Thomas Jefferson damn as never being loyal to the land ( America) they live in ?
What Godless alien race did industrialist Henry Ford warn us that they would eventually control America ?
What Godless alien race did writer Mark Twain warn us as having made he entire human race their enemy ?
What Godless alien race did American hero aviator Lindbergh warn us would be a threat to a free press ?
What Godless alien race did writer H.L.Menchen term “the most unpleasant race ever heard of” ?
What Godless alien race did get playwrite, George Bernard Shaw call ” thereal enemy – oriental parasite” ?
What Godless alien race did composer Richard Wagner demean as “never having had an art of their own” ?
What Godless alien race did Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte term as ” master robbers of the modern age” ?
What Godless alien race did Voltaire call “biggest scoundrels who have ever dirtied the face of the earth” ?
What Godless alien race did American governor Peter Stuyvesant term “a deceitful race – blasphemers of Christ “?
What Godless alien race did Martin Luther condemn as “a most bloodthirsty and reverengeful people” ?
What Godless aline race did Cardinal Mindszenty acuse as the “troublemakers in Hungary” ?
What Godless alien race did Roman orator Cicero describe as “belonging to a dark and repulsive force”
What ethnicity has the highest percentage of Communists of any in America ?
What American ethnic group has the highest percentage of atheists ?
Who has transformed America into a morally and economicly bankrupt corpse ?
Who had prayer removed form our public schools ?
What people have turned Christmas into a greedy secular party frenzy totally devoid of devotionto Christ ”
Who ‘runs’ our corrupt thieving Federal Reserve responsible for bankrupting our nation ?
What ethnicity is associated with most treasonous acts against America ?
What people are leaders in the Pornography industry ?
What people were responsible for the torture and murder of Jesus?
What people established financed supported and enforced Communism ?
What people /nation are the only ones to have committed an act of war against America since Pearl Horbor?
What nation has threatened American with nuclear blackmail should we not continue to support them ?
What nation controls American foreign policy ?
What people are responsible for the murder of President Kennedy ?
What nation controls our Congress ?
What nation controls our Supreme court ?
What nation controls who we elect for President ?
What people had the Ten Commandments removed for our courthouses ?
What people have worked to destroy the Second Amendment ?
What People destroyed Tsarist Russia ?
What people destroyed Christian Germany ?
What people have worked to censure all negative truth spoken about them ?
What people control the Government of France ?
What people control the government of Germany ?
What people control the Government of Canada ?
What people control the Government of Australia ?
What people control the Government of Great Britain
What people have the world’s largest terrorist military ?
What people have infiltrated the Vatican with an immoral Pope ?
What people have infiltrated our military and created a Godless terrorist aggressor military ?
What people have been responsible for the murder of more unborn human beings that anyone in the world ?
What people are the only ones to openly mock Jesus as a BASTARD and His mother as a WHORE ?
What people chose Christmas time to escalate the murder Christians in Palestine ?
What people have had more spies commit treason against America than any other ?
What people control the principle publishers of the Holy Bible ?
What people are the only ethnicity in Holy Scripture to be condemned a the sons of Satan by God ?
What people’s religious leaders consider us to be only fit to be their slaves ?
What are the ONLY people that God has condemned as evil liars by nature in Scripture ?
What people lead the world in white slavery/ forced prostitution ?
What people have the highest infanticide statistics in the Mid – East ?
What people control both American mainstream political parties ?
What people are responsible for the current ruthless training of our police ?
What people are the only ones in earth’s history to be banished from over one hundred nations ?

Life And Death

Life

RAFEEF ZIADAH is a Canadian-Palestinian spoken word artist and activist. Her debut CD Hadeel is dedicated to Palestinian youth, who still fly kites in the face of F16 bombers, who still remember the names if their villages in Palestine and still hear the sound of Hadeel (cooing of doves) over Gaza.

Decent Jew Review

They do exist

Jewish Mom Realizes Zionist Upbringing Was Racism

h/t DProgram