Tom Mysiewicz

As I write this, President Trump is announcing an illegal (under international law) joint U.S.-UK and French attack on Syria apparently on the basis of target information provided to him by Israeli intelligence. After the failed Skripal chemical-attack hoax in the UK, the claimed reason for the 50-minute 100+ cruise-missile attack are questionable allegations of a chlorine attack in Douma by the Syrian government.

Chlorine is NOT a banned chemical weapon under the Chemical Weapons Convention and OPCW rules. The chemical has many civilian uses, such as disinfecting water. In places where infrastructure has been destroyed, it is essential in preventing outbreaks of Cholera. “Humanitarian” destruction of infrastructure and chlorine stocks at water plants in Yemen by our Saudi ally, for instance, has resulted in just such an outbreak.

President Trump asserts the attacks on Syria will continue until “animal” Assad stops using chemical weapons. But what if he never used such weapons? That, I believe, is the point. There was no real desire for an independent investigation—Nikki Haley vetoed a U.N. resolution calling for OPCW (Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons)to actually visit Douma and confirm that any chemical attack actually took place. And the attack itself may have been launched to forestall a general investigation due to start in just two days by the OPCW. Especially as the Russia Ministry of Defense (MOD) had just revealed it had hard cintel that British intelligence had instructed the terrorists to shell Damascus—which they did indiscriminately in violation of international law, causing numerous casualties–and then stage a false-flag chemical attack when the Syrian Government responded.i

Picture a cop saying to a man—I’m going to beat you until you stop hitting your wife. “But I don’t beat my wife,” the man replies. “Prove it” says the cop, and keeps beating the man. It’s difficult to prove a negative—this is why “innocent until proven guilty” is enshrined in U.S. law! This is the key to the strategy now being used on Syria—one in the basic founding document of the Neocons.

In 1996, “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm” was presented to Benjamin Netanyahu by Richard Perle and a group including Douglas Feith, Robert Loewenberg, and the Wurmsers. Aside from calling for the removal of Saddam Hussein (at the time, the “animal” de jour) from Iraq and the end of the Mid East peace process (land for peace) it also introduced a newly-discovered right of Israel: the right of hot pursuit. While the report advertised this treatment for Palestinians, Israel has now extended it to other parts of the Mid East, such as Syria. In simple terms, this doctrine means that Israel (or its proxies) can attack–without regard for any national border–people or facilities it considers an actual or potential threat, i.e., no actual overt aggression by the target is necessary to justify such an attack. And Israel (and its proxy states) don’t need a great deal of proof, as the Syrian response demonstrates.

I analyzed this doctrine in a piece entitled “Existential Enemies” in February 2004ii. In everyday terms, “hot pursuit” as it is used in the “Clean Break” doctrine means that if your neighbor has a double-barreled shotgun and loads his own ammo he might someday kill you. So by this Israeli logic, because of a remote potential danger you would be justified in burning your neighbor’s house to the ground and even killing him—as long as your neighbor is not Jewish!

The target of the latest attacks are Syrian research facilities. It brings to mind the alleged “mobile chemical weapons labs” in Iraq that the U.S. Government claimed were deadly threats prior to the 2003 invasion of that country. (An invasion I had correctly predicted would take place, at the behest of Israel, during the Jewish festival of Purim.)iii The deadly mobile labs turned out to be mobile food-safety testing labs. And there were no chemical weapons in Iraq. The invasion was a massive war crime and it destabilized the Middle East, causing a flood of refugees and bankrupting the U.S. as it became mired in an endless war.

For the above reason, Israel has not been bashful about using chemical and nuclear weapons hysteria as a weapon against neighboring states who feel threatened by it. Iraq was destroyed on the basis of such false allegations. Then came the CBW “axis of evil”–North Korea, Iran and Syria. This was used as a pretext to destroy Syria. And Russia’s helping to get Syria to destroy its chemical weapons did little to assuage the Neocon-Zionists from continuing with their plan to partition that devastated country. (The Israelis also had a long-standing beef with the Syrians for helping restore order in Lebanon after the Israeli defeat by Hezbollah during the last invasion of that country—more of its “hot pursuit.”)

Keep in mind that the incidents I’m now going to describe took place with (A) no overt actions by and (B) no threats or attacks by the victims or even their national employers. (North Korea is in a slightly different position. The U.S. is still technically at war with it as only an armistice or cessation of hostilities was signed.)

In the 1990s, a Russian general, Anatoly Kuntsevich, was reportedly in the lead on the development of chemical weapons and had been suspected by the Israelis of providing this knowledge to Syria (and possibly Iran) through a front company. By back channels, the Israelis demanded (i.e., made demarches) that the Russians rein him in. Yeltzin did not respond as Kuntsevich was a close advisor. On April 29th, 2002 Kuntsevich mysteriously died on a flight from Aleppo to Moscow. Syrian intelligence was convinced the Mossad had gotten to him—possibly with a chemical agent. His tombstone reportedly shows a death date prior to the flight he died on.iv

Another suspected Israeli attack on Syria and Iran took place in July 2007 at the al Safir complex in Aleppo, Syria, where Kuntsevich had provided assistance. The complex exploded killing and injuring over 600 people including a number of Iranian researchers. Syrian sources reportedly told Jane’s Defense Weekly that during a “test to weaponize a 500 km ‘Scud C’ with a mustard gas warhead, an explosion occurred in a laboratory adjacent to a chemical agent storage facility” at the most heavily guarded military camp in Syria.v However, an Israeli intelligence official told Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman, that the Syrians had privately determined the explosion was an act of sabotage and that it was “a wonderful accident.”vi

A mysterious blast in North Korea in 2004 near the Chinese border was another of many incidents in which key personnel have met violent ends cooperating with Syria (and Iran?) in developing weapons of mass destruction.

In early 2004, the U.S. NSA detected a curious, unusually high cluster of sustained electronic communications traffic between a remote location in the northeast Syrian Desert and Pyongyang. The NSA shared the information with Israel’s military signals intelligence and cypher department, Unit 8200, which designated the information as warranting priority monitoring. A few months later, on April 22, 2004, an explosion destroyed a train and decimated the small northwestern North Korean town of Ryongchon, in the heart of North Korea’s missile, chemical warfare, and nuclear weapons industrial production infrastructure, as the freight train headed to the coastal shipping port of Nampo with its highly secret cargo. The explosion (possibly caused by a tactical nuke) registered 3.8 on the Richter scale and the IRC reported 40% of the town had been flattened, more than 160 people killed and 1,300 injured, destroying thousands of buildings and leaving a crater 72-meters deep at the Ryongchon railway station.

Never acknowledged was that more than a dozen Syrian ballistic missile weapons scientists and technicians employed by the Syrian Scientific Studies and Research Center (SSRC), the agency in charge of Syria’s covert weapons of mass destruction development program, were killed in that mysterious blast..vii

Why would Iran (or Syria for that matter) want to even develop such weapons? Is it due to aggression as the Israelis would have us believe? Chemical weapons are instruments of denial of terrain, not conquest. (Buy a gas mask and try wearing it for 24-hours if you don’t believe me.) In other words, you don’t use chemical weapons on land you plan to immediately occupy—as the Syrians are now occupying Douma. But you do use chemical weapons, if you have them, to slow down an invading enemy.

Iran faced threats from the U.S., Israel and their proxy Arab states. At one point, the U.S. armed Iraq’s Saddam Hussein with chemical and other weapons and encouraged him to attack Iran. The resulting war caused a total of 1-million casualties and resulted in a stalemate. Israel, meanwhile, has assassinated dozens of Iranian Nuclear and other scientists and engaged in a program of sabotage across that country. This has included spreading the malware program Stuxnet that has infected utility and technical systems in Iran and now elsewhere.viii Syria had similar experiences. So did Iraq for that matter—it was invaded once it was confirmed it had really disposed of its chemical weapons stock. (Muammar Gaddafi of Libya went the atomic route, gave up the program in return for normalization and the assurances of the U.K., and was destroyed along with his country—opening the floodgates of Africa into Europe.)

What we are witnessing right now in the Mid East, I believe, is the bearing of fruit after decades of a monomaniacal effort to create a de facto Israeli super state—Eretz Israel–one unassailable and in complete control of the Mid East and, ultimately, the world. And, whether you’re a believer or not, I believe we will see this state manifest itself very much like the “Great City” described in the prophetic Book of Revelation of St. John the Divine. It’s worth remembering the identity of this future “Great City that rules over the kings of the Earth” and “over many peoples, nations and tongues”—the city recently recognized by President Trump as the capital of the Israeli state. This city is called other names by John: Mystery Babylon, Sodom, mother of harlots and abominations upon the Earth, scarlet woman, and whore of Babylon. John further explains it “made all the nations drunk” and that it would be “the city where our Lord also was killed,” i.e., Jerusalem.ix (Remember, when John wrote this in 96 A.D.x, Jerusalem was a deserted ruin.)

World Zionism now has its ducks lined up. It fully controls the leaders of the U.S., U.K., France and much of the EU, aided and abetted by armies of Freemasons who believe they’re about to rebuild Solomon’s Temple. And Arabs, terrorized by fears of a resurgent Persian Empire, therefore willing to collaborate with Israel and the U.S. and sell out their Palestinian brethren. And, for the time being, Mr. Putin and Russia covertly can be counted on to pull for Israel when the chips are down—as can the Chinese.

When the smoke clears we’ll see a very different situation—and not just in the Mid East—but in Asia as well. (Heck, MAGA Trump is already backtracking and today is toying with accepting the TPP and globalization after all!xi) Soon Trump droids will be welcoming all the Hillary Clinton policies and the war that Trump “saved” us from—because, after all, Q-anon said it’s so and it’s Trump draining the swamp and playing 4D chess! The philosophers among us will recognize this as the Hegelian dialectic: thesis, antithesis, synthesis.

I can’t guarantee that a few nasty exchanges won’t take place among the various parties—obviously the lower echelons aren’t privy to the fact that we’re witnessing a giant-scale “nice cop, bad cop” piece of play acting (the U.S. is the bad cop in this act BTW.) This is going to be a rerun of the Cuban Missile Crisis on steroids, I think. But it won’t end with the last great war—not just yet.

I have heard whispers that the watchword of the new program is “transcend.” Israel will transcend the current world situation by completely changing the parameters. A part of the Asian Infrastructure Development Bank, Israel will also be the final stop of the new Silk Road.

We won’t have the major world financial collapse until Israel feels totally secure, I think. And, after that collapse, Israel could well be the center of world commerce and economic revival. And all the technology “borrowed” from the West over these years—and finely tuned in high-tech Israel courtesy of U.S. taxpayers and with help from half a million Russian tech types living in Israel—will come back to us in the hands of the great benefactors of mankind. For a price, of course. (Hog traps work much the same way—put plenty of corn leading into the trap and the pigs will walk right into it. This is not an act of altruism on the part of the trapper.)

As for what’s in store for the Mid East, it all goes back to the Yinon Plan (“A Strategy for Israel in the 1980s”) which was published in February 1982 as an article in the Jewish quarterly Kivunim (“Directions”.) Yinon said Israel should aim to bring about the fragmentation of the Arab world into a mosaic of ethnic and religious groups and encourage every kind of inter-Arab confrontation. The immediate goal, he reasoned, should be destruction of the military capabilities of nearby Arab states…like Syria. This is what has been done and what is being done right now. Partition of Iraq and Syria and attrition of their military capabilities—at U.S. taxpayer expense.

Beyond this, in 2004 I sketched a picture of the future of the Mid East should Yinon’s proposals succeed. “Behold the Zone” appeared on The Vanguard in February 2004 and, since it is no longer in print, is reproduced in its entirety after this essay. Keep in mind this was written 14 years ago and some of the players have changed. But the plan has not.



29 February 2004


by Tom Mysiewicz

One of the last great American fiction novels, Gravity’s Rainbow1 by Thomas Pynchon, recounts the madcap adventures of naive American Tyronne Slothrop as he traverses “The Zone”. This Zone (mirrored in the anarchic text of the book) exists in the post-war wreckage of Europe and is devoid of any real religion, culture or government, except that of the unipresent natural order of the Poisson or parabolic curve.

To borrow a phrase from neocon Pulitzer Prize winner Charles Krauthammer, America and its Israeli ally are well on the way to creating a real-life “Zone” in the “Islamic crescent stretching from Afghanistan to North Africa”. Whether this Zone will be stable and beneficial for all inhabitants or simply a prelude to render helpless the regional states for “Eretz” or greater Israel remains to be seen.

One can see the first showing of the Zone as it emerges in the Occupied Territories. Here, all Palestinian infrastructure, vital services and economic structures have either been severely damaged or destroyed, while a “security wall”–that provides little security–slices willy nilly through the territory. What little government there is cowers, and is bottled up, in a small area. Most recently, Israeli troops have even implemented a form of bank robbery, in which they present a bank with an arbitrary demand note based on some alleged intelligence, and proceed to clean out its vaults at gunpoint.

The more-humane Americans have created their own versions of the Zone in Afghanistan and Iraq. Here, the countries are broken up into occupation areas, with “democratic” activity strictly controlled, vital services often nonexistent and economic life at a near standstill, except for the infusion of money from the occupation. In some areas, war lords are virtually the only stable government. The Neocons propose to soon extend this Zone to other areas, such as Syria and Lebanon.

To go along with this so-called “suasion of the bayonet”, as so aptly put by Krauthammer, is a reported proposal by the Bush Administration–for a GMEI or “Greater Middle East initiative”–that has been leaked before its planned debut at the June summit of industrialized nations.

Among other things, GMEI calls for:
*Economic pressure to be brought to bear to encourage regional states to adopt prescribed forms of democracy;
*More ties to be established with nongovernmental groups in target countries to “bring about change”;
*Expansion of education in the region, particularly the teaching of feminism and “women’s’ rights; and,
*Establishment of trade and industrial ZONES.

I’ll get back to the Zones shortly.
As reported Feb. 26th in several Egyptian papers, President Hosni Mubarak commented that the GMEI plan “almost ignores the fact that regional states exist…as if they have no sovereignty over their land, no ownership.” (2)

“Whoever imagines that it is possible to impose solutions or reform from abroad on any society or region] is delusional,” Mubarak aptly adds. (Although, to be fair, the Neocons say they will try anyway.)

Which brings us back to the Zone.

The creation of the conditions of vacuum necessary for a good Zone can, of course, be created by military means. This has been done well by Ariel Sharon and even more-extreme compatriots. However, most sane Israelis must realize that there are limits to what military action can accomplish. Enter the moderates, such as Shimon Peres.

Peres’ chief proposal for stabilizing the region, not surprisingly, is the establishment of Zones along the lines of the Qualifying Industrial Zones (QIZ) program set up with Jordan between 1996 and 1998. Under QIZ, a Zone takes a set percentage of an Israeli product, applies cheap Middle Eastern labor to it, and gets duty-free access to the U.S. market. If sufficient Israeli product is used, the product can be stamped “Made in Israel”. (Presumably, Bush’s proposal would also open EU markets to such duty-free imports.)

There is a serious problem with this Zone approach as I see it. Primarily, it places overemphasis on exports and the utilization of cheap Arab and Middle Eastern labor as a natural resource. Americans, in recent years, have been losing jobs at an alarming rate due to free-trade agreements such as NAFTA. At the same time, a rapidly-aging population will put increasing demands on the system–a reality that has prompted Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan to call for major cuts in Social Security benefits. Both the American and European populations may eventually balk at subsidizing the output of free-trade zones–even if they happen to be in the Middle East–as living standards dramatically drop.

Thus, it seems, the creation of Zones may serve well in the short run, and may be advantageous for middle men wishing to make large profits, but it leaves the region even more vulnerable to trade disruptions. Further, in order to maintain the viability of such Zones, it’s not really possible for the wage rates of workers to get too high. We in the U.S. have seen this happen in Mexico, where it was promised by Bill Clinton in his 1990’s “NAFTA, WE HAFTA” campaign that Mexican wages would rise “…and Mexicans would no longer need to come to the U.S. to get jobs”. Just the opposite has happened. But the profits to some from NAFTA have been enormous, just as long as one doesn’t look too closely at the massive deficits caused, in part, by loss of tariffs.

Any economic solution to the regional problems in the Middle East should not, I feel, rely on the traditional Western debt-based monetary system and deficit spending, along with currency manipulations. Instead, traditional Islamic teachings on money should be incorporated and the long-term emphasis should be placed on building wealth within the region and broadly within the respective populations, creating stable demand and stable domestic economies.


1 Thomas Pynchon, Gravity’s Rainbow (New York: Penguin Books, 1995)
(2) Gamal Essam El-Din, “Asserting Home-Grown Reform,” Al-Ahram Weekly, 4-10 March 2004


ii Existential Enemies,” by Tom Mysiewicz, Media Monitors Network, February 23rd, 2004

iii Purim 2003: This Year in Iraq?” by Tom Mysiewicz, Media Monitors Network, March 8th, 2003

iv An account can be found in a typical Israeli book “Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel’s Targeted Assassinations,” by Ronen Bergman, Ph.D. Bergman cites a book “The Volunteer” by a claimed Canadian Hasbara-Mossad agent, Michael Ross, in which Ross asserts he was repeatedly dispatched to Moscow by the Israelis to deliver warnings about the late general.

vi Also see: “The Secret War with Iran: The 30-Year Clandestine Struggle Against the World’s Most Dangerous Terrorist Power,” by Ronen Bergman, Ph.D., Free Press (2011).

viii It has been speculated that Fukushima may have been caused by Stuxnet. None of the reactor cooling pumps was submerged and there was plenty of fuel. All the pumps started as programmed after the earthquake. But all except one then shut down for no apparent reason.

ix Revelation 11:8

x Some speculate the book may have been written around 70 A.D. and been about the fall of Jerusalem. So why would John predict it would be a great power if he was chronicling its destruction?


The Russian embassy in Israel complimented “the wise position of West Jerusalem” after Israel declined to accuse Russia of the Skripal poisoning and instead issued a generic denunciation of the event.i

“Israel is a small nation that has become a high-tech superpower. This is something that is very appealing to the Chinese business person.” Gigi Levi, Israeli venture capitalistii

“…there is most definitely an economic surge taking place in high tech Israel, but it is less a miracle than the fruit of a long series of thefts and manipulations fueled by American tax money and the connivance of a Congress that is always willing to do favors for the country that it appears to love beyond all others.” Phillip Giraldiiii


by Tom Mysiewicz

In quantum theory, so-called “spooky action” relates to the ability of two quantum-linked particles to instantaneously affect each others at great distances. It shouldn’t happen according to the “great” Einstein. But it does because quantum particles don’t have a given state until observed. Take a stream of photons—they’re linked. Use a beam splitter and send one bunch to Earth and leave the others in space. Any changes to the linked photons on Earth are observed and thus instantly reflected in the space photons and vice versa if the process is reversed. (China’s Micius quantum satellite launched in 2016 allows unbreakable two-way quantum-encrypted messages to be sent; however, that’s not the subject of this article.)

For nearly a century, spooky action was considered in physics the equivalent of a conspiracy theory—much like believing that Israel masterminded 911, Oswald did not kill Kennedy, global warming is a complete fraud, or that many wars, mass shootings and other events are staged in various ways to achieve geopolitical goals.

Let’s look at some current events and see if we can detect another type of spooky action in two of these. I call it Mideast-Related Spooky Action (MRSA) after the dangerous flesh-eating disease organism now challenging doctors. Seemingly unconnected events are, in fact, related by nature of a supranational observer.

The first event is the March 4th alleged poisoning of Sergei Skripal—a Russian double agent likely involved in preparing the infamous Steele Trump-urination “Russiagate” report in 2016iv—and his daughter Yulia:

  • Both walk to a hospital and fully recover from what is called “Novichok” poisoning—they and those around them should be dead

  • The mass-spectrometry tests are completed in an impossible period and detect the only mass-spectrographic “Novichok” profile in the OPCW records (A-234)

  • The matter is not turned over for investigation by the OPCW (Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons)

  • Unproven allegations are made about the origin of the alleged chemical agent by the British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson (of rabbinic lineage on his mother’s side)v

  • Russia has not manufactured the agent in question and its chemical weapons stocks were destroyed under OPCW/U.S. supervision, and the alleged “Novichok” sites from the Soviet era are subjected to regular OPCW inspections

  • OPCW and UN investigations of the Skripal affair are blocked and the UK refuses to submit samples as required by the Chemical Weapons Convention, to which it is a signatory.

It turns out that “Novichok”–meaning “newcomer”–is a Western-created name for a program in the old USSR and the claimed compound was no longer produced in Russia (which had destroyed its chemical-weapons stocks.) There were multiple “Novichok” compounds: the structures of these compounds, labeled A-230, A-232, A-234, A-242 and A-262, were published by Mirzayanov in a book in 2008vi, twelve years after he emigrated to the US. An account by another Russian chemist Vladimir Uglev, often cited as corroboration of Mirzayanov’s story, appears on close examination to be about the development of a class of nerve agents denoted GV, which have been studied in several countries including Czechoslovakia and the US. A-234—the alleged agent used on the Skripals–was synthesized in the U.S. in 2009vii and the mass-spectrometry profile was posted on the NIST data base and then mysteriously removed.viii

Subsequently, Iran produced A-234 in 2017 under OPCW auspices. According to former British Ambassador Murray, the attempt was done under OPCW auspices to determine if the agents could be made using commercially-available materials, and the results were immediately reported to the OPCW so they could be added to the chemical weapons database.ix (Something Hillary Clinton and others in the U.S. and U.K. apparently did not want done for some reason according to Wikileaks disclosures of diplomatic cables.)

As explanations go, the idea that the Skripals were poisoned by British intelligence (a suggestion by Russia’s UK Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko)x to prop up the sagging career of Theresa May? Ridiculous. Few politicians are that indispensable and May is not one of them.

Based on flimsy evidence (or the lack thereof) the Russian Government has been blamed and numerous Russian diplomats expelled from the UK, US and various NATO countries—prompting a proportionate response from Russia. Further, additional sanctions are imposed on some of the oligarchs said to be Putin’s leading backers, allegedly to put pressure on him. Pressure to do what? Could it have anything to do with North Korea and Iran and nothing to do with the flimsy Skripal affair? I think so.

Unlike Iran, Israel has not ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention. But neither has North Korea. Which may be what this is all about. For, while Iranian sites are subject to OPCW inspection, any research and weapons it might have in North Korea would not be. I believe Israel would like their proxy, Mr. Trump, his European counterparts, and Mr. Putin to see that they remain the primary non-signatory of the Convention! Confirmation of this theory may be found in Trump’s curious behavior toward Putin: Russia is declared the number one threat to the U.S. run by an evil dictator Putin—then President Trump congratulates him on his reelection and announces he’s going to meet with him! Putin could be offered a return to the good graces of NATO and the EU if he and Lavrov get Iran and North Korea (just visited by Lavrov) to dismantle supposed CBW capabilities—much as they got Syria to do.

Far fetched? It’s worth remembering that Putin has always sought close relations with Israel and is kept in power partly through the good graces of the Chabad Lubbavitcher sect. And so may be counted on to cooperate fully provided it does not endanger Russia’s future role as arms-length peacemaker. Leonid Frolov, Russian Deputy Ambassador to Israel probably explains Putin’s position (and why Zionist Trump will have little trouble with him) best: “In the case of aggression against Israel, not only will the United States stand by Israel’s side—Russia, too, will be by Israel’s side.”xi

The second (related) event I want to hold up for MRSA testing is the announcement of steep tariffs on a number of Chinese products by President Trump. To believe Trump, this action is being taken solely for the benefit of American workers and American companies.

Trump correctly points out China has an almost organized system of piracy of intellectual property (I have experienced this myself in the 1980s and early 1990s.) However, he leaves out the role Sheldon Adelson and Bibi Netanyahu may have played in his decision–one that could be a major revenue producer for the Israeli state. Also, he leaves out the fact that the tariffs don’t go into effect for 60 days and this bargaining tactic may also be a way to strongarm China to make North Korea (DPRK) sign the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and/or break off its weapons development work with Iran. That being the case, the Israelis would get a clear accounting of exactly what weapons Iran has access to before attacking it in the future.

Confirming my theory about the intent of the tariffs to compel action on North Korea (for the benefit of Israel primarily) are the otherwise inexplicable recent actions of Trump. President Trump had made implied threats to nuke North Korea if it did not give up its nuclear program, while the U.S. conducts massive military maneuvers on that country’s border.  Then he announced a meeting with DPRK President Kim—a man he’d previously branded as a madman. (Trump made no such de-nuclearization demands of other non-NPT-signers—particularly the major nuclear powers Israel and India. Possibly for a reason.xii)

While China is held up as a potential enemy and thief of U.S. technology, the Israelocentric Trump neglected to mention its ever closer cooperation with our favorite ally. Or that his actions could cause a trade war and make Israel a de facto gatekeeper for the import and export of Chinese products and U.S. technology. Under such a scenario, Israel could collect substantial fees as a middleman.

Don’t take my word for it. Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Prime Minister, stated in March 2017: “We want to marry our technology with China’s capacity…We in Israel are eager to share with China our science and technology that can better the lives of all mankind, and the people of China.”xiii

Chinese investment in Israeli high tech and other companies increased from a small amount to $16.5-billion in 2016 and is probably much higher by now as the U.S. blocks many corporate takeovers by the Chinese government due to security concerns. Trump may be closing the proverbial barn door (after the horse gets out) with his tariffs. The funds for Israeli investment are believed to have come from the $26.3-billion in funds taken off the U.S. table due to concerns about blocked takeovers.xiv

Tomer Bar-Zeev, CEO of Israel’s IronSource, explains that strategic Chinese investors are attractive because they offer Israeli firms a way in to the huge domestic Chinese market, which is otherwise difficult to crack: “Once we became a portfolio company of these Chinese investors, they helped with opening doors in China…where the business community really relies on connections you build there…We are not worried to take Chinese money over U.S. money. If you can deliver, there are endless opportunities.”xv

Israel may not have to worry as much about its technology as much as the U.S. does—for the U.S. is a rich source of that technology. As early as 2010, a report to Congress from the U.S.-China Economic Security Review Commission claimed Israeli billionaire Lev Leviev had business connections with firms providing high-tech and strategic information to Chinese intelligence.xvi

On April 24th, 2008, the Wayne Madsen Report summarized the FBI arrest in the infamous Kadish affair. Kadish was a mechanical engineer who had worked at the U.S. Army’s Armament R&D and Engineering Center at the Picatinny Arsenal, Dover, N.J. Kadish’s handler was Yosef Yagur, Consul for Science Affairs at the Israeli Consulate General in Manhattan.

In the criminal complaint filed by the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York on April 22nd, 2008, Kadish was named a co-conspirator not a defendant—presumably to secure his cooperation. The complaint stated that Kadish took home a classified document concerning nuclear weapons and permitted Yagur to photograph the document in his basement. Yagur previously worked for Israeli Aircraft Industries (IAI) along with Kadish’s brother.

This wasn’t their first dance at the ball. In addition to Kadish, Madsen noted that Yagur and Israel’s Science Attache in the Washington embassy, Ilan Ravid, both had handled convicted U.S. Naval intelligence spy Jonathan Pollard and had hastily returned to Israel in November 1985 after Pollard’s arrest: “Yagur and Ravid both reported to Israeli master spy Rafi Eitan the head of the Israeli Defense Ministry’s Lakam—Lishka LeKishrei Mada (Liaison Bu­reau for Scientific Affairs), considered a rival to Mossad.”

Unfortunately, the Kadish investigation never led to the capture of a senior Reagan official only known as “Mega”xvii who was supposedly the kingpin of Israel’s high-tech intel gathering in the U.S. But it did show the duplicity of the Israelis, who had claimed Pollard was an “isolated case” and they weren’t going to do it any more and that they were being persecuted by the FBI.

Worth remembering: the friendship between Ashkenazic Jews of the Khazar Empire and the Chinese goes back over 1000 years—even that far back Jews had equal rights in Kaifeng, then the Chinese capital. Starting in the 1880s many more Jews came to China. They helped Mao Zedong fight the Japanese and, after the war, helped him establish the “new China.” This according to a 2014 article in the Jerusalem Post. (Conservative figures put the number of Chinese killed during Mao’s tenure at 60-million.)

Successful or not, the Skripal affair and Trump’s trade-war strategy indicate the depths of subjugation the West—and possibly all the major powers—have sunken to in subordinating their national interests to the strategic goals of a foreign power.


Coming soon: A brief companion article dealing with the Soviet WMD program, why countries like Iran and North Korea feel they need chemical and nuclear weapons, and the history of multiple probable Israeli assassinations of scientists from these and other countries, including Russia. Also, past covert attacks on suspected sites involving joint Israeli-U.S. collaboration.

i “Russia Compliments ‘The Wise Position of West Jerusalem’ in Spy Affair,” by Hagay Hacohen, The Jerusalem Post, March 17th, 2018.

ii “With Strong Tech Ties, Is Israel China’s New Best Friend?” by Maya Yarowski, cNocamels-Israeli Innovation News, May 3rd, 2015

iii “Stealing Success Tel Aviv Style,” by Phillip Giraldi,, Jan. 28th, 2010

iv “It was of course Christopher Steele and Orbis Intelligence who produced for the Clinton camp the sensationalist dossier on Trump links with Russia –including the story of Trump paying to be urinated on by Russian prostitutes—that is a key part of the “Russiagate” affair…And it seems more probable to me that Sergei Skripal contributed to the Orbis Intelligence dossier on Trump…He could add the proper acronym of a Russian committee here or the name of a Russian official there, to make it seem that Steele was providing hard intelligence,” says Craig Murray, a former British Ambassador. Indeed, Skripal’s outdated knowledge may be the reason for the glaring errors in the Steele report, Murray adds.

v Johnson got where he is thanks to the Brexit vote—which passed with the help of the same organization (or offshoots) that scripted President Trump’s 2016 election campaign. Cambridge Analytica had Steve Bannon as one of its directors, close ties to Israel and British Intelligence, and got much data from Zuckerberg’s Facebook operation. In the wake of the Brexit vote and prior to Trump’s election in 2016 I predicted Trump and Boris Johnson would be standing together as U.S. president and British PM in 2017. I had mistakenly predicted Johnson would be made Prime Minister and would work with Trump to achieve Israel’s strategic goals. Perhaps, to avoid being so obvious, Johnson was given his current role as Foreign Secretary. Not a big difference. See: “Brexit: A Bucket of Cold Water for You,” by Tom Mysiewicz, Renegade Tribune, June 27th, 2016 Also see: “…the Brexit movement is overwhelmingly dominated not just by common or garden Zionists, but by hard-core Zionist ultras…Boris Johnson, the part-Jewish de facto frontman for Brexit, describes himself as “a passionate Zionist” and supports with an equal passion both the corrupt City of London and mass migration to Europe,” Northsider writing in the Fitzpatrick Informer, June 2016

vi “State Secrets: An Insider’s View of the Russian Chemical Weapons Program,” by Vil S. Mirzayanov, Outskirts Press (2008)

vii Boris Johnson allegedly told the Russian ambassador that the compound detected was A-234. Russian experts have revealed that the mass spectrometry profile of this compound was submitted to a public database by a researcher (Dr. Dennis Rohrbaugh) in the U.S. Army’s Edgewood Chemical and Biological Center around 1998, indicating that the U.S. researcher had synthesized and studied this compound. To perform mass spectrometry of such a compound, obviously, one must have a sample of the compound to analyze.

viiiDoubts about Novichok,” by Prof. Paul Mckeigue, Prof. Piers Robinson and Jake Mason, Global Research, April 5th, 2018. The authors point out that the accession number 226889 for A-234 in the NIST Spectral Analysis database has now been deleted. The above article contains 2009 secret cables from Hillary Clinton as well as UK entities instructing OPCW participants to squelch any debate or discussion about this class of compounds? Why?

x “Russia Claims the Skripal Poisoning Was Staged by the British Intelligence,” Zero Hedge, April 1st, 2018 and See also

xi “Israel’s New Friend: Russia,” Hamodia—The Daily Newspaper of Torah Jewry, February 15th, 2018

xii India and Israel recently signed major agreements on science, agriculture and technology when Narendra Modi’s visited Netanyahu. Weapons systems still remain a key driver of Indian-Israeli cooperation. The countries further agreed to create a bilateral technology innovation fund worth $40-million.

xiii “In Beijing, Netanyahu looks to ‘marry Israel’s technology with China’s capacity’,” by Raphael Ahren, The Times of Israel, March 21st, 2017

xvi “U.S. Ties Israeli Billionaire with Chinese Intelligence,” by Yossi Melman, Haaretz, Jan. 28th, 2010

Live Your Life From The Position Of ‘Fuck You’

Sage advice (even from a jew in a movie). Get yourself where you can operate from a position of telling the assholes, “Fuck You”. Own your home, have some moolah put back, do work for yourself (not counting on ‘the man’) and don’t be a drunk (drughead). I still work for the man, but I am preparing to do otherwise.

And while we are saying “Fuck You”, here is a Big One for the gun grabbers (thanks to Whooli):

I’m with this dude right here. I seriously doubt my little gun toting town will ever ‘go there’, but if they did, I would be doing exactly the same thing.

Remember when I told you about the police-attracting riff raff that moved up the street? Besides the fact that the house now looks like Sanford and Son’s shack after only a month or so, and that every time they drive by with their giant stupid looking rims they are playing some awful rap shit so loud it could wake the dead, last weekend a black dude was strolling from there through my elderly neighbor’s yard and behind mine causing my dog to freak out (my yard is fenced and you don’t want to mess around with my Shepherd). This is the first time he ever saw a black dude up close and I am proud to say he has discernment.

I watched the crazy nig as he walked up to another neighbor while she was out walking her dog. I grabbed my closest pistol, stuck it in my back pocket with the handle visible and walked outside to have a chat. I made sure he saw I was packing and asked him a few questions. He was obviously on one and I explained that the people around here didn’t like him walking on their property any more than he would want us on his property (aka: trash strewn shithole).

He decided that moving on was probably the best and walked away.

The next day the SWAT team arrived at his house and busted down their door. I didn’t even know we HAD a SWAT team. I’ve never heard of or read a report of any SWAT teams ever being used around this sleepy town before.

I guess I am a racist for pointing out that they are niggers, unlike the black dude in the second video.

If you have a problem with that, please refer to the first video.

I Love Greta

I am an old time rock and roller. I grew up with the best.

Today’s music is shit. As a matter of fact, most everything I’ve heard (with a few exceptions) since the 90’s sucks ass.

That is until I met Greta yesterday. Greta gives me hope.

I dare you to not like this.

Robert Plant isn’t even dead yet and he’s been re-incarnated.

Mark my words, this band will be big time. I guarantee it.

Paper: Are Jews smarter than everyone else?

No, they just excel at talking shit. There are reasons for it.
One product our company sold was made in Israel. The ‘engineer’ would come to sales meetings to do various training. It quickly became evident that he wasn’t technically knowledgeable about most of the product (the long timers I worked with knew far more than he did), but boy, could he talk shit.
We all knew he was full of shit, but then one day we were golfing (he chose not to, assuming that he had no athletic abilities), on the 15th green (it was surrounded by corn fields), this weirdo stepped out from the cornfield, dirty, disheveled, and obviously freaked out, and looked at us with a huge sigh of relief (was he spying and got lost or was he just a freak looking for a cow to screw… we didn’t know).
We all just laughed and kept putting.
I doubt he was smarter than the dumbest of us.
BTW: there is a test for it.

Philosophies of a Disenchanted Scholar

Really, that’s the really real, actual title.

“Jews in America and Britain have an overall IQ mean somewhere between a half and a full standard deviation above the mean, with the source of the difference concentrated in the verbal component.” Murray again makes the argument of an unmistakable “Jewish Genius,” in Commentary, but now with an explanation:”

It’s mostly verbal. On spatial, they can actually score below average.

The most well-known Jews and IQ:

Ashkenazi literacy, economic specialization, and closure to inward gene flow led to a social environment in which there was high fitness payoff to intelligence, specifically verbal and mathematical intelligence but not spatial ability.

Greatest factor to least.

Mathematical, not so much. Financial? Yes.

Only Jews could charge interest (usury), an overt selection pressure.

Detailed demographic data about early medieval Ashkenazim are lacking,


but we can infer plausible parameters from the scarce information…

View original post 1,030 more words