The Lunatic Fringe 2015

Original Poem by DC Dave

http://www.dcdave.com/poet15/150316.htm

The Lunatic Fringe 2015

Where would one locate the lunatic fringe?
On what does this term of opprobrium hinge?
I speak of those people who lack the ability
To do anything for their pure gullibility.
Whatever tale anyone might conceive
These credulous creampuffs would no doubt believe.

They’d believe that a bullet would change its direction
As if from a magical mid-air deflection.
And a fighting young leatherneck PFC
Could teach himself Russian and travel for free
And then when the time came, believe it or not,
He’d pull off a motiveless, murderous plot.

They’d believe that the law is the sort of profession
In which criticism can foster depression,
Depression so deep that an upstanding man
Would do himself in with his very own hand.
He’d take his last drive, just as slick as you please,
Without even using his motorcar keys.

They’d swallow a story, and be none the wiser,
Of a powerful bomb made of farm fertilizer.
Lacking the long unused skill of deduction,
They can’t see how unlikely is the destruction.
Unable to reach firm conclusions and hold them,
They’re ripe to believe anything that is told them.

They’d believe that huge shoes fit the feet of a clown
And that hijackers knew that our jets would stand down.
They’d believe those two Chechens, and it could make you cry,
Could never be patsies for the FBI,
And the turmoil in Ukraine, they have the impression
Is every bit caused by Putin’s aggression.

The pity’s that few have the slightest conception
Of the insidiousness of the deception;
We’re not so much governed as arrantly ruled
By those who regard us as dupes to be fooled.
We’ll never get out of this terrible fix
Until we see who are the real lunatics.

Poem and Narration by DC Dave
http://www.dcdave.com

Video by BuelahMan
http://www.buelahman.wordpress.com

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

The Inconvenience of Truth

The outrage that these beautiful people created in our bestest ally in the world is intense. You can read the comments to see a duel between some decent Jews and then those that are murderous scumbag cheerleaders.

Although Israel isn’t mentioned by name in the song, Ambassador Mor asked the Hungarian broadcasting authority to remove the sentence about the Gaza war, explaining that it is seen as an “inconvenient” political message against Israel.

Truth is a bitch when lies is all you got.

h/t Vulture of Critique

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

Chosin

Chosin

A Review

by DC Dave

81v9MbGmOqL._SL1500_

Imagine that you were able to interview a number of the survivors of Custer’s battle at the Little Big Horn.  Imagine further that some film had been taken of the battle and you were able to get your hands on it.  Imagine, as well, that a very realistic Hollywood movie had been made about the battle and you were able to get some choice footage from it.  Then you locate a fine composer who can establish just the right mood, as you weave it all together into a documentary movie.

tom-ricks-chosin-reservoir

That comes close to what Brian Iglesias and Anton Sattler have accomplished with Chosin, a film about General Douglas MacArthur’s much bigger and more recent debacle.  It is known as the Battle of Chosin Reservoir, and it took place in the far reaches of northern Korea in the early winter of 1950, only five months after the Korean War began.  As a truly horrible experience, though, Chosin Reservoir was Little Bighorn on steroids.  It was anything but a short, sharp decisive battle.  It lasted for 17 days, sometimes in driving snow and always in bitter, sub-zero temperatures.  The American soldiers were surrounded and vastly outnumbered by several divisions of Chinese soldiers, and, in spite of strong evidence of what was about to happen, their leaders had been taken completely by surprise.  Listening to the compelling stories that the interviewers were able to elicit from a truly extraordinary collection of veterans, one is, by turns, heartbroken and inspired.  Particularly inspiring, as well, was the actual footage of the rescue of some 98,000 civilian refugees—many of them Christians—who faced almost certain slaughter at the hands of the Communists who suspected them of collaboration.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

I attended a premier showing of Chosin at the U.S. Navy Memorial in Washington, DC.  There was a panel discussion afterward with the two film makers, both of whom are U.S. Marine reserve officers and combat veterans of the first Gulf War and of Iraq, and two Chosin Reservoir battle survivors.  All agreed that the fact that the filmmaker/interviewers were themselves combat veterans explained, to a large degree, how they were able to draw out the stories of the battle survivors so well.

Korean_War_Wall6

They are probably right.  But what might have been a crucial factor in making this movie an artistic triumph makes it, to my mind, somewhat dubious politically.  Little Bighorn is now universally recognized as a military disaster born of extreme hubris, the folly of one inadequate leader, General George Armstrong Custer.  Chosin Reservoir was General MacArthur’s Little Bighorn, except that it was far, far worse in almost every way imaginable.  By the usual military measure, it was a crushing defeat.  From positions that they occupied deep in the country, the United States Army and Marines were driven out of North Korea, never to return.  The makers of Chosin commendably avoid politics or appearing to espouse any particular point of view, for the most part.  But war is by its very nature political; it is not just another tragedy or act of nature.  Politics is unavoidable in a war story.  In “avoiding politics,” the filmmakers end up depicting Chosin Reservoir as a battle for survival.  If the Americans escape their encirclement and make it back to the port and onto the waiting ships, they “win.”  They do and they do, at least all the ones we see on the screen.  We never have to worry if those individuals that the viewers get attached to are going to make it, because there they are, alive, telling their stories.  To be sure, we get to hear them tell about the gruesome deaths of some of their closest buddies, but those are not people that the viewers have come to care about.

marine-reunion-4f3f37020f8be44e

Reunion of the First Marine Division’ s Reconnaissance Company that was at the Battle of Chosin

 

In this regard, fiction is a superior medium for imparting the greater truth.  In the splendid Korean War movie, Tae Guk Gi: The Brotherhood of War, for instance, the viewers grow strongly attached to one of the characters who does what she has to do to survive during the Communist occupation of Seoul, but then, because of that, she is shot as a collaborator by the South Koreans when they retake the city.  The full senseless horror of this war and war in general is thus better revealed.

 

The Dead Have No Voice

Gray Bell

Gray Bell

The documentary makers are hamstrung, to a degree, by their method.  It is one that they share with all compilers of history who depend upon the accounts of the survivors.  They can’t interview the dead.  But they might have escaped the charge that they are unduly glorifying a costly defeat, and glorifying war in general, if they had interviewed, say, some of the widows or other loved ones of those who were killed.  My late mother, who never quite got over the loss of her drafted younger brother in that war, would have made a good interview subject.  Also, I should think that there would have been plenty of expressions of understandable bitterness toward their leaders by many, if not most, of the interviewees.  Virtually all we get to see are the brief complaints that captured Chinese soldiers are being ignored as evidence that the Chinese might have come into the war in force. (One of the survivor panelists called it the biggest failure of military intelligence in our history and said that he learned upon meeting with a Chinese veteran of the battle that the Chinese had been deployed to Korea for a full month before the actual mass attack.)

Perhaps it was because I saw the screening in a very military setting, and perhaps it was because the young film makers, like so many of their cohorts, flaunted their Marine background so strongly, but the movie, even with all the horror it depicted, to me came across as a bit too pro-war.  I can imagine General Buck Turgidson of Dr. Strangelove fame being pleased with it as an illustration of the American military “can-do” spirit instead of the needless blood-let that it was, resulting from political and military bungling.

With all the talk these days about anyone in uniform as a “hero,” selflessly serving the cause of freedom, one could easily lose sight of the fact that many of those who paid the ultimate price at Chosin Reservoir and in the Korean War were draftees, or joined to get a better deal than they would get when they were inevitably drafted.  There’s a certain irony in seeming to depict that as a glorious sacrifice for the cause of “freedom.”

maxresdefault1

All in all, this is a very powerful and important movie that repeatedly brought tears to my eyes. I fear, though, that it will be misused and the wrong message will be sent.

David Martin

December 16, 2010

 

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

I Just Don’t Believe David Cole-Stein

ColeBottle

David (Stein) Cole getting shitfaced? Or just part of the scam?

The title is something I have said to myself, but was restated in writing by Eric Hunt in his Response to David Cole found at the HolocaustHoaxMuseum website.

I have said here numerous times that I look for the Decent Jew (the ones that call out the actions of the tribe and are willing to discuss the lies of the HoloHoax without the anti-Semite canard… whom are virtually impossible to find). One sure fire way to know a tribe member is their knee-jerk reaction to the old lie with further lies or name calling.

As Anthony Clifton often points out in comments found here, a Jew doesn’t have to be a Jew (whether it is a real moniker or not). The fact is that a being a Jew is slowly morphing back into what many over the centuries have felt about them; that they are  murderous, thieving, supremacist scumbags intent on controlling the world (you and I) because of their Talmudic brainwashing. Sure, there are still some of you who believe the lies of how loving and caring they are about the planet and the rest of mankind. But when it comes down to the nut-cuttin’, a Jew will believe the tribal lies (and support their Talmudic masters in Israel) over any rational or sane thought progression.

One example of how these tribe members spread the lies to other tribal folks is via the media.

When you watch this video, if you can stop yourself from laughing hysterically at the bullshit or cry because so many believe this in the face of all the evidence that easily proves it untrue, try to pick out the obvious misdirection (and then consider who with a brain would ever believe such nonsense):

I made it to the 2:07 mark and it was already so chock full of total, obvious lies that I was steaming considering all the idiots who probably will believe it because the “comedian” said it.

Seriously, Stein has the chutzpa to say that the media is anti-Semitic, when it is owned, run and controlled by Jews? And that Bill Kristol is an example of “very good” media? That Nixon was the most pro-Israel President?

How can it be that this dumb ole redneck sees the real Semites being murdered by the fake Semites and I can distinguish between the two, and so many others still swallow the garbage?

The point I am trying to make is that no matter how hard I try to find a trustworthy Jew; one that I feel is truly about caring for the world (Jew or not), I keep finding things that cause me to rethink those that might somewhat resemble a “decent Jew” (like I once thought of David Cole).

This guy had a great deal of coverage back in the 90’s (even getting TV time). Much of the work he did back then helped prove the HoloHoax was a lie. But then he disappeared, supposedly beaten several times by the JDL (Jewish Defense League) and threatened with death (as the spaghetti eating SIX MILLION LIES worshiper said above).

A short while back, he was supposedly “outed” by a girlfriend and voila, he is back… front and center.

But this ain’t the same guy, meaning he now is contradictorily suggesting that there WERE gas chambers and “death camps (at least Treblinka) and also in some obscure camp where some freak Doctor was gassing Jews and collecting their brains.

He pops up outta nowhere and now is seemingly in the middle of assisting in the divide of the revisionist movement.

I don’t trust him.

Ry Dawson's Fag Selfie

Ry Dawson’s Fag Selfie

He spent some time with another Jew lover and defender (at least that was one reason why I was banned from the faggot, Ry Dawson’s YT

channel) and one that I don’t trust, either (although Foon1e at Mami’s has himself a crush on the fag). Since that ban by Foon1e’s lover, Ry has opened up somewhat towards the Jewish rule, but has publicly stated that he hates Nazis more than Zionists and was defending the Jews at every chance he got. Funny, though, Dawson’s own blog deleted the interview (at least the Mami’s link is bad).

Side note: Foon1e, at Mami’s Shit, deleted my comment where I said “Fuck Ry and fuck his Jewish mama”. Hence the removal of the link from my sidebar and I have informed the Ry sycophantic ass-kisser phenom that I will never comment at the site again (simply because of the hypocrisy, since a courtesy perusal of the site shows significantly worse language than I used… even though mine was somewhat in jest to piss off the fag, Ry, as I did here, too, but over his fawning slobber for Grampa Paul.)

Back to Cole: Why would anyone trust him? He told off on himself when he wrote:

“So what’s a knowledgeable but disgraced Holocaust revisionist to do? Play both sides. And make some decent scratch. I created two pseudonyms – one to sell books and videos to Holocaust studies departments around the world, and one to sell books and videos to revisionists.”

– David Cole, Republican Party Animal

Chapters 7-8 as reported by Friedrich Töben

Cole, to me, is working both sides, just as any opportunistic Jew does. Fag Ry is playing the same game. Avoid them both, like the plague (and Mami’s, too, for that matter, for I don’t know who of the group can be trusted).

Other Cole quotes from Friedrich Töben’s review of Cole’s book of obfuscation:

“The truth is, I neither denied the Holocaust, nor did I ever spread hate (except when referring to Nazis, who I do, indeed, hate).”
“There are two principles I live by when I decide I want to accomplish something successfully. The first principle is, ‘just do the fucking work.’… The other principle by which I live is the old saw ‘in the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.’ I find it best to work in fields where I’m surrounded by ninety percent idiots, because I can accomplish more that way. The field of Holocaust history, as I found it in 1990, and politics, as I found it in 2008, were perfect for me. My one eye beat most of the tin cup holding blindies who populated those fields.”

Thus far, what you have read is a fairly old draft that has been lingering in my Drafts folder for a several months. But yesterday, I found one of my favorite sources on these subjects (I suggest people follow his work) had addressed David ColeStein’s obvious manipulations. He is Karl Radl of Semitic Controversies. I appreciate his style:

David Cole, the infamous jewish holocaust revisionist, has been in the news a bit lately following the discovery that he had been living under a pseudonym (David Stein) and was a celebrated (orthodox) ‘holocaust’ promoter in Hollywood and among the hawkish neo-con element of the Republican party. Naturally all his former set, like Andrew Breitbart, have been shunning him because his revisionist past is completely incompatible with their slavish pro-Israel sycophancy (to Cole’s evident chagrin).

The irony to me is that Cole, who to be fair to him was brutally attacked three times by the Jewish Defense League (1) (inspired by the late Rabbi Meir Kahane, who has adroitly been called ‘Israel’s Ayatollah’), (2) is now pushing an extremist pro-Israel/pro-jewish agenda that has more than a passing similarity to the teachings of Rabbi Meir Kahane just without the Messianism and the advocacy of the use terrorism to achieve its desired ends.

Cole, for example, argues that, in terms of the concept of ‘hate speech’, there is a categorical differentiation to be made between jews and Muslims in regards to how they desire to suppress speech they don’t like. He asserts that while Muslims use shootings and bombings; jews use legal means to attempt to suppress that with which they disagree. This he judges makes talking about the ‘holocaust’ in an even vaguely critical manner far more preferable (because you’ll only go to prison/be socially ostracized) while if you make fun of Mohammed (while referring to his sexual preference for goats) then you are liable to be murdered by Muslims. (3)

This is superficially all fine and dandy, because I am sure a lot of people would rather go to prison/be isolated than murdered in cold blood by an unhinged fanatic. That said however Cole’s argument assumes that the immediate consequences are the only consequences. What Cole doesn’t talk about is the fact that while at the moment jews are criminalizing critical discussion of the ‘holocaust’; they are already paving the way for stronger punishments than simply fining and/or imprisoning their enemies.

Indeed there is an increasing medicalization of the whole concept of having a critical opinion of jews/Israel (as has been noted by Andrew Joyce) (4) and it is not unreasonable to suppose that in the next decade or two (if nothing changes) then criticism of jews and Israel will be considered ‘delusional’ and, as such, grounds for sectioning an individual, because they are evidently not right in the head.

Nor does Cole consider the fact that Muslims going mad over ‘hate speech’ directed at them is used by jewish organizations to push the boundaries of control on freedom of speech (as seen after the Charlie Hebdo case) so that the forces of law and order are increasing forced to prioritize political crimes over crimes of property and the infliction of bodily harm. (5)

This is hardly without harm especially as it is these very laws that Muslims exploit in order to justify their rampages since, after all they like the jews are a ‘persecuted minority’ trying to gain equality in a ‘racist system’. It is frankly dishonest for Cole not to even mention the fact that while Muslims may pull the trigger it is jews; who have enabled them to do it (viz. the creation of special anti-racism laws and the removal of selective immigration laws), gave them the gun and justified the acts after the fact (as being caused by ‘systematic racism’ and ‘Islamophobia’ leading to ‘alienation’ and ‘radicalization’ of the Muslim population).

Cole’s dishonesty is even more apparent on the subject of Israel when, for example, he claims, with typical chutzpathic aplomb, that jews don’t commit terrorist attacks or political violence. The fact is that they do and they have very, very long history of it.

In fact if you read the Torah, rabbinic commentaries, the story of the Shtetl and (especially) the history of Israel then you find it is actually one very long history of terrorism and political violence (often dressed up in religious garb no less).

As Elliot Horowitz, Ami Pedahzur and Arie Perliger have all noted in their work; asserting that the jews have been a meek and non-violent people is quite literally nonsense. (6)

This is thrown into stark relief when we note that only just recently an Israeli political columnist who writes for a mainstream right-wing Israeli news outlet actually advocated immediately exterminating all of Germany and Iran by nuking them. (7) When you take into account that the same threat is known to be part of Israeli policy (well actually it is just nuking the whole of Europe in ‘revenge’ for the ‘holocaust’ if Israel ever is losing a major war) and has been made on the political stage by Israeli leaders before; (8) then the idea that jews are a lesser threat then the legions of Islam to Europe is thrown into sharp relief as simply absurd.

That said Cole is partly right; the two threats are different.

The primary threat of the legions of Islam to Europe is on a primarily demographic, but it is felt more by the man on the street for the simple reason that most Islamic violence is low-level thuggery interspersed with more catastrophic (although mere pin pricks in the greater scheme of things) terror attacks.

The jewish threat on the other hand is of a whole different magnitude altogether, because while the Islamic threat is very visible as it affects people’s lives in obvious ways. The jewish threat is barely felt at street-level, because it exists in much higher arenas.

Where, for example, jews disproportionately help form and norm anti-nativist ideas, while absolutely insisting on nativism for Israel (for example Tim Wise and Barbara Spectre). It is also the state of Israel with its 200 nuclear weapons (and extensive biological and chemical arsenal) (9) and the, as we have seen, expressed desire to wipe Europe off the map at the first available opportunity. As Kevin MacDonald has rightly pointed out recently; jewish radicalism is increasingly the norm in Israel and as such Israel is going to get only ever more extreme and genocidal if current trends continue. (10)

Move over Ahmadinejad; you’ve got nothing on Netanyahu.

So the jewish and Islamic threats are different; the Muslims want a global caliphate, which has the only benefit that you might live through it. While the jewish threat by contrast is seeking the ultimate extermination of Europeans in ‘revenge’ for the ‘holocaust’, which you more than likely won’t live through.

Speaking of the ‘holocaust’ I couldn’t really mention Cole and not bring it up. From the above I think we can agree that Cole isn’t exactly ‘on our side’ and is actually shilling for Israel over at Takimag as well as trying to make the jews look like a lesser threat than the forces of Islam (I wonder why?).

Now everyone knows Cole made a ‘revisionist documentary’ about Auschwitz and the almost obscene lack of evidence (or even specifics from the ‘experts’) there is behind this charge in the mid-1990s.

Fair enough; he also got death threats from the Jewish Defense League (JDL) and was beaten up by them.

However ironic as it may seem; Cole actually downplays the very people who beat him up as a bunch of odd exceptions and small-time (if rather violent) thugs. The fact is that the JDL, the Kach organization and the modern equivalent, the Jewish Defense Organization (JDO), were, and are, fairy hard-core terrorists as can be ascertained by merely reading a book about them. (11)

Just a little chutzpah there, but it does give a good idea that Cole has strongly ideologically tinted lens to his work as well as being extremely egoistic.

He readily admits for example that, from 1997 until he was found out fairly recently, he was a knowing ‘holocaust scammer’ and profited personally from the ‘holocaust’ industry. (12) That said we at least owe him a nod in regard to his honesty about it, but it is worth bearing in mind that Cole, having been found out, is now seeking to carve out a new career niche for himself.

After a mensch has got to eat: hasn’t he?

I quote Cole’s own words about what he believes:

For the record, I never denied the Holocaust. My position was that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, and the buildings displayed there as gas chambers are Soviet fakes. I never denied mass exterminations of Jews at camps like Treblinka and Sobibór.’ (13)

Cole is being typically disingenuous here, because he ‘denies’ that Auschwitz was used as a death camp. He claims Treblinka, Sobibor and (presumably) Belzec were ‘death camps’ and that he has ‘never denied this’. This is rank lunacy of the first order for the simple reason that the ‘evidence’ for these camps being part of a ‘mass extermination program’ targeted specifically at jews (aka the ‘holocaust’) is actually worse than the ‘evidence’ for Auschwitz, which Cole ‘denies’ was a ‘death camp’.

To be specific:

A) There is no physical evidence of such a homicidal purpose at the camps.

B) The ‘survivor’ testimony is even more insane and contradictory than the ‘survivor’ testimony at Auschwitz. I mean gassing people with the fumes of a captured Russian submarine’s diesel engine or killing them with electrical frying pans is hardly likely to be true in the first place let alone with the absence of other evidence (rather like the infamous ‘vacuum chambers’): is it?

C) The ‘survivors’ shouldn’t have survived a pure death camp according to the official narrative and simple applied logic.

D) The transit/logistics records directly contradict the whole claim (i.e. huge numbers of jews can be shown to have transited through these ‘pure death camps’ came out alive and been sent on to work camps a few days later).

Cole has got to know this given that the numerous book length revisionist studies that have come out since he was around (and are freely available on the internet) that his position is frankly laughable, but hey it is all about being ‘respectable’ and reinventing his career.

After all if Cole was really interested in historical truth; he’d be speaking about why serious scholars, in the true sense of the term, of the ‘holocaust’, such as Jurgen Graf, Thomas Kues and Carlo Mattogno, are wrong and he is right.

But hey it is easier to go and bash out easy-reading copy for Takimag than dare debate those three scholars than a comedian with a PhD like Michael Shermer. (14)

That’s of course after you try to argue for a European-American alliance with Israel, downplay and misrepresent jewish terrorism (historic and current) and try and make everyone feel sorry for your personal trials and tribulations in general.

Karl provides all references for the above here.

Now for the punchline: The Times of Israel has banned ColeStein from his blog posting there. Seems that Jews don’t trust his duplicity and obvious scumbaggery, either. At least he has his gig at TakiMag… at least for the moment.

Twitter Link @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

Conspiracy Theorists Are The New Nazis

alex_jones_Nazi_King

That damned Alex Jones is going to shit his pants. The Nazi king (he is in a close race with Sweetie Zuesse for the kingship) is also the king conspiracy theorist of the alternative media whores. So, what is he going to do now that the French President François Hollande is now calling conspiracy theorists “Nazis”?

The meme has been building as of late and is highlighted by various Marxist outfits and has been a heavy feature on Reddit. Raw Story featured the folks at Stormfront who made it known that they were using the Reddit media to attract “Alex Jones-reading kosher retards”:

“Why bother trying to enlighten a bunch of Alex Jones-reading kosher retards who think that the ‘Illuminati lizard people’ run the world? Well, I’ll tell you why: conspiracy-minded people are the most open to considering the reality, which is that international Jewry, in fact, runs our societies.”

I know there are a few people that visit here and also visit StromFront. I know there is a mix of various types of people that frequentstormfront that site. However, I generally stay away, because the fact is that quite a few of the commenters are obviously simply in it for the hate.

But that doesn’t mean that I disagree with Slay’s sentiments above, but I do think the overall hateful demeanor of many of the commenters is detrimental to our mutual cause of awakening everyone, including Alex Jones types. I don’t dislike those people, but I stay away because I don’t see the hate as helpful in any way. At the same time, it would be foolish for me to discount the many folks who use the site, but don’t necessarily find hate in everyone but white people. From the perspective of white pride, I agree fully, just as I support other races for having pride in their race.

The fact is that there are many wonderful people that contribute to that site (which is quite large). And I appreciate their vigor and stamina when it comes to illuminating this message of hope. And the message of hope is to stop the Jewish control of the world (at least in my estimation). Perhaps there are a variety of ways to accomplish this, so each and every proposition needs to be offered for debate and evaluation. This is what StormFront does by and large.

The problem I see with StormFront is that it ends up being perceived as a white supremacy site, when the fact is that all the goyim need to fight the scourge that rules us (which includes the few decent Jews that are willing to fight with us, aka “self-hating Jews). This is why I say the hate is detrimental. It breaks down all the races into opposing forces (the divide and conquer scheme of the Jews). It PLAYS right into the Jews’ hands.

So, this hatred will be used against the entire movement. France will begin and others will follow. This is why Hollande said the following as he was kissing the Jew ass at the Shoah Memorial on Jan 27:

hollande

[Anti-Semitism] maintains conspiracy theories that spread without limits. Conspiracy theories that have, in the past, led to the worst “(…)” [The] answer is to realize that conspiracy theories are disseminated through the Internet and social networks. Moreover, we must remember that it is words that have in the past prepared extermination. We need to act at the European level, and even internationally, so that a legal framework can be defined, and so that Internet platforms that manage social networks are held to account and that sanctions be imposed for failure to enforce

All of us who use the internet to fight the scourge will be “held to account” by controlling the social media outlets (as if some aren’t already totally controlled by the Jews). DC Dave and I have both pointed out the connections of their control of Google and YouTube. But some of the other social media sites are much harder for them to censor, so legislation after duly demonizing us “conspiracy theorists” as Nazis will be necessary to control the outlets that cannot censor themselves.

After all, us conspiracy theorists are fermenters of hate and disintegrators of society for offering what is obvious to any thinking, unowned, subservient useful idiot that carries the Jews’ water.

The Voltaire.net article also has a quote from the Jean-Jaurès Foundation which tells us exactly what a Conspiracy Theorist is (Thanks for the lead, Dave… everyone should read that article):

[It’s] a heterogeneous movement, heavily entangled with the Holocaust denial movement, and which combines admirers of Hugo Chavez and fans of Vladimir Putin. An underworld that consist of former left-wing activists or extreme leftists, former “malcontents”, sovereignists, revolutionary nationalists, ultra-nationalists, nostalgists of the Third Reich, anti-vaccination activists, supporters of drawing straws, September 11th revisionists, anti-Zionists, Afrocentricists, survivalists, followers of “alternative medicine”, agents of influence of the Iranian regime, Bacharists, Catholic or Islamic fundamentalists “(p. 8).

Seriously, I fit into several of those categories, so I know I will be in the cross-hairs (it is evident that I already am because of the YouTube censorship I recently wrote about and has plagued me for years).

I hope it backfires and more people wake up to the Jewish onslaught because of it.

But I doubt it.

conspiracy-theory

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

The Secret Government’s Made Men

The Secret Government’s Made Men

by DC Dave

When the lead Democratic counsel on the Senate Whitewater Committee interviewed the lead investigator for U.S. Park Police of the death of Deputy White House Counsel Vincent Foster, Jr., we noticed a certain orchestrated quality to the exchange. The interviewee, John Rolla, seemed not to have rehearsed his lines very well, though, because in the 1999 article that we wrote about it, reproduced below, we can see that he bungled his way through it. Poor preparation might not have been the primary cause of his poor performance, though. In this testimony and other testimony he gave in the case, he comes across as the sort of person who would even make Howard Payne University professor Matthew McNiece look intelligent by comparison.

Rolla’s manifest shortcomings have not held him back, though, in his career in the national security state. We discover from LinkedIn that we, as Americans, can rest easily at night with the knowledge that the one man most responsible for preventing terrorists from blowing up the Liberty Bell, or at least defacing it with a pocketknife, is none other than John Rolla.

libertybell

Here is how he describes his current position:

025f709As the National Threat Coordinator for the Department of the Interior, working as a Task Force Agent at the FBI National Joint Terrorism Task Force, I access multiple databases and agencies monitoring possible domestic or international terroristic threats against Department of the Interior critical infrastructure, which includes National Monuments and Memorials, over 400 dams and 50 hydro-electric power stations nation-wide. I am also assigned to an FBI group working on other sensitive terrorism matters.

With this assignment to an “FBI group” one might say that his career has come full circle, because if the work of the most diligent independent researchers of Foster’s apparent murder can be credited, the cover-up from its very beginning until today has primarily been the work of the FBI. Another way of looking at it is that, possibly all along, Rolla has been an FBI employee, and that his employment with the Department of the Interior has simply been a cover. Whatever the case, it is clear that he did what was expected of him in the Foster case cover-up and he has been duly rewarded. One such thing is suggested in the dissenting memorandum presented to Kenneth Starr by his lead investigator, Miguel Rodriguez, before the latter’s resignation:

[Robert] Edwards apparently showed these photos to [Christine] Hodakievic, plus Edwards’ own photos.  Later, I suggested, after the corpse was staged with the revolver brought by [Cheryl] Braun, [Pete] Simonello and [John] Rolla. [sic, incomplete sentence] New photos were taken and thus [Franz] Ferstl’s were never produced to the OIC.  This explained the different arm/body distance, gun/hand positions, Hodakievic’s problems with the photos, Ferstl’s missing photos and EMT problems with the photos (and their observations of a different gun).

So questionable was Rolla’s performance, Rodriguez also wondered if he and others on the scene might have other affiliations than what they had nominally. The following is from a telephone conversation between Rodriguez and the late Reed Irvine of Accuracy in Media:

I found Rolla’s, the notes that he made at the scene, completely incredible and inconsistent with prior statements both made by him and accounts of others.  I think he is completely incredible.

God! I’m just brimming over, I’m bubbling over.  And I’m angry that I cannot respond.  I am angry myself.  Because there is much to be said.  Let me suggest to you, investigate, be investigative reporters.  Investigate these people too.  What background did they have? Wouldn’t it be surprising if, these people were special liaisons in a prior life to, in some capacity.  And were there any other supervisor people out there?  And, and what were the backgrounds of some of those police that were out there?  There’s a whole host of fertile ground out there.  And have you really identified all the main players out there at the park police?

As we noted in the earlier article, the interviewer, Ben-Veniste, was already something of a made man in the national security state. By performing so skillfully in making sure that novices like Rolla stayed on script, and otherwise keeping the lid on the Foster scandal, Ben-Veniste demonstrated his suitability for his biggest assignment of all, membership in the federal government’s 9/11 Commission. In that latter capacity, journalist Daniel Hopsicker suggests that Ben-Veniste might have had something of a conflict of interest:

ben-veniste1If Ben-Veniste client Truman Arnold’s business dealings with terror flight school owner Wally Hilliard come under scrutiny in the 9/11 probe, the slick Washington lawyer may find himself involved in a major national scandal from two different sides.

If he does, for Ben-Veniste, it won’t even be for the first time. He served as Majority Counsel to the Congressional Whitewater probe investigating the actions of Truman Arnold, and then went on to defend Arnold before Ken Starr’s Whitewater grand jury, an action for which he was roundly criticized.

Actually, Hopsicker somewhat misstates Ben-Veniste’s work for Arnold. He represented the man at the time that he was under investigation by Starr; defense counsel is not permitted in testimony before a grand jury. His work for Arnold is described more precisely in “The Hideous Career of Richard Ben-Veniste.”

Now here is the 1999 article:

The Counsel, the Cop, and the Keys

“Objection, your honor. Counsel is leading the witness.”

“Objection sustained.”

And so it goes daily, as any TV drama fan knows, in courtrooms all over the country. Not so when the charge in the case is self-murder and the victim/accused-perpetrator is without legal representation. Unchallenged witness leading, in fact, is the order of the day at your typical U.S. Senatorial sham hearing/investigation. But just as some horses coaxed to the proximity of liquid refreshment can be more easily persuaded to imbibe than can others, some witnesses are more easily led in desired directions than others.

Consider the super-smooth chief minority counsel of the Senate Whitewater Committee, Richard Ben-Veniste, as he interrogates the lead U.S. Park Police investigator, John Rolla, about Rolla’s work on his very first homicide case, that of Deputy White House Counsel, Vincent Foster. The exchange took place on Thursday, July 20, 1995, two years to the day after Foster’s body was found on the backside of an earthen berm in the far corner of a lightly visited, preserved leftover from the Civil War off Virginia’s George Washington Parkway, Fort Marcy Park. The body, we were to learn later, had been found lying straight as a stick with both arms neatly down by the side. No blood or brain tissue was seen blown out the back of the head although the autopsy doctor would report finding an exit wound there the size of a half dollar from a high-powered .38 caliber bullet supposedly fired into the mouth. The gaping exit wound noted by the septuagenarian doctor with previous highly-dubious autopsies leading to suicide conclusions to his credit was not seen by any of the twenty-five people–by known count–who saw the body that night. The autopsy had been moved up so that, contrary to standard procedure, the investigators at the park were not able to attend. Though the revolver found in the hand, lying almost under the right leg, was said to have been pressed deep into the back of the mouth, there was no disfigurement of the mouth from the blast or the recoil. No teeth were chipped. No blow-back was on the weapon or the hand or the sleeve nor were there any fingerprints of the deceased. Neither did he leave fingerprints on either the spent shell casing or the remaining bullet in the cylinder, and no matching bullets were ever found, to mention just a few of the anomalies.

The exchange begins this way:

BEN-VENISTE. Detective Rolla, what does your training tell you to do in a circumstance or situation where you have come upon a violent death by apparent gunshot in terms of control of the area?

ROLLA. On any crime scene you’re going to seal off a certain section of the area large enough to search and keep individuals out of that area.

BEN-VENISTE. So you want to secure the area and you want to take control of the situation?

ROLLA. That’s correct.

BEN-VENISTE. That’s what your training teaches you?

ROLLA. That’s correct.

BEN-VENISTE. Now, you made every effort, as we have heard today, to take control of the situation at Fort Marcy Park to ensure that the scene of Mr. Foster’s death was not disturbed. Is that so, sir?

ROLLA. That’s correct.

BEN-VENISTE. On the basis of your review of the evidence at Fort Marcy Park, everything that you saw was consistent with an apparent suicide; is that correct?

ROLLA. That’s correct, keeping an open mind to other options based on the physical evidence that was in front of us, it was all leading right to a suicide.

BEN-VENISTE. In fact, later that evening you and Sergeant Braun had advised the Foster family that this was an apparent suicide?

ROLLA. Yes I did.

So far so good for the Columbia-educated New Yorker, Ben-Veniste, a man who very early in his career rose to national prominence as an assistant to the special counsel in the Watergate case and later achieved a quieter notoriety as a defense counsel for government-protected, Arkansas and likely-CIA-connected mega-drug smuggler, Barry Seal. * The curious choice of the woefully-inexperienced, diction-challenged, but talkative, Rolla had already caused problems for the government case in the hearing and deposition stage of the Foster “investigation.” His very presence in such a key position certainly lends credibility to the fall-back position that the original investigation was simply botched, but his tendency to talk too much and his failure at times to see what he is expected to say have increased the need for an alternative to the simple suicide-from-depression scenario that the public has been sold from the beginning.

But at this point, Ben-Veniste must have been breathing easy. Notice that, with respect to police training and procedures, he has not elicited from Rolla that in the investigation of any violent death, the original assumption of murder is fundamental, an assumption that is to be maintained until enough evidence has been collected to rule it out. Ben-Veniste is not alone in ignoring this point. One may search the record with a fine-toothed comb and nowhere will he find the direct question put to the investigating officers, “What steps did you take to rule out murder?” Notice, too, that when Rolla, speaking of the early evidence, says that it was “all leading right to a suicide,” he is not asked to elaborate. Having obtained his invited answer, Ben-Veniste then exhibits less curiosity than one would expect from a casual bystander. He has, no doubt, been warned about Rolla, and knows that it is not safe to let him talk too much about the sensitive details of the case.

We may pass over the fact that conversation with the Foster family that Ben-Veniste alludes to would not have been possible if the authorities had stuck to the story that The Washington Post had put out on July 30, 1993, and was left unchallenged for almost a year, that is that the police were turned away from the Foster house that night. Immediately after the above quoted transcript, an exchange ensued–which we shall omit–about how essential it is for the police to make the death notification to the family, and then we have this:

BEN-VENISTE. Did you tell Mrs. Foster that no suicide note had been found in Fort Marcy Park?

ROLLA. No, she never asked that question, and I didn’t advise it.

BEN-VENISTE. Did you advise anyone there that evening that no note had been found?

ROLLA. I tell you, I don’t know if anyone asked me that question. I don’t remember. I may have told them.

BEN-VENISTE. If they asked you, you would have told them?

ROLLA. No, it was not a secret.

BEN-VENISTE. These people were grieving; they were looking to you for help as well as comfort from their friends and relatives, correct?

ROLLA. Yes; correct.

BEN-VENISTE. There wasn’t any reason you wouldn’t tell them?

ROLLA. No, there would be no secret about it.

BEN-VENISTE. In fact, you’ve indicated that you did search for a suicide note at the scene of Mr. Foster’s death?

ROLLA. We searched the scene, searched his person. His vehicle was on the scene. **

Woops! Sound the alarm bells! We’ve gone a bit too far here.

If Rolla had searched Foster’s body at the scene, it certainly stands to reason that he could have hardly failed to miss the keys to Foster’s car that Rolla says was there, that is, if the keys were actually there, but the record shows that no keys were found at the park, not on Foster, not in the car, not on the ground, nowhere. At the point where it dawned on the investigators that they had no car keys they surely could not have continued to think that “it was all leading right to a suicide.” At the very least, a frantic search of the grounds would have ensued, that is, if anyone really seriously thought that the evidence otherwise pointed to suicide. Not many people would believe that Foster hot-wired his car to take his last drive. But no, what we have been asked to believe is that the very first, not the last thought the police had was, “Oh, we must have missed the keys when we were going through Foster’s pockets looking for any evidence we could collect and put into our documented evidence collection. Let’s hustle right off to the morgue and look in his pockets again.”

Foster_hand

Ben-Veniste knows how the keys turned up, with a set of house and office keys thrown in to boot, and he tries to dig himself out of this little hole, pulling on the reins of the uncomprehending witness as hard as he can:

BEN-VENISTE. You didn’t search his person at the scene, did you?

ROLLA. After it was pronounced, we emptied his pockets. Yes, I did remove his personal property and search them.

Wake up, Rolla! Think of what you are saying.

BEN-VENISTE. At the scene or at the hospital?

ROLLA. At the scene. We went to the hospital because I happened to miss his car keys in his right front pants pocket.

Whew! That’s a relief. But what a gift Rolla or his sidekick/trainer Sgt. Cheryl Braun must have! It must be nice to know confidently where you must look when something is missing. I guess it helps when you have been told that two White House operatives are going to the morgue to “identify the body,” a body that the police have already identified perfectly well with the help of a White House photo ID. It’s a good thing that, by the time Kenneth Starr looked into the matter, Rolla had got on the same page with Braun and agreed that they went to the morgue before going to the Foster home and before the White House people got to the morgue instead of after, as Rolla had clearly implied in previous testimony. ***

BEN-VENISTE. So you made a cursory search of Mr. Foster’s pants pockets, but you did not at that time locate the set of keys to the car?

ROLLA. That’s correct. I neglected to turn the pocket inside out.

BEN-VENISTE. You did not find a note, clearly?

ROLLA. No, there’s no note.

Not yet, anyway. That would take a bit more doing. But for now, let’s heave a sigh that the counsel and the cop are off a subject the counsel dearly wanted to avoid, the matter of those pesky keys.

*In addition to Ben-Veniste, a surprising number of veterans of the “Silent Coup,” to use the title term of Len Colodny and Robert Gettlin’s 1991 book about Watergate, resurface in the Foster case. Foster’s boss, White House counsel and White House obstructer of the police search of Foster’s office, Bernard Nussbaum, was on the House Watergate Committee, where he supervised the freshly-minted young attorney, Hillary Rodham. On the Senate committee looking into Watergate as assistant chief counsel was close Clinton confidante in recent years, James Hamilton, the “Foster family attorney” chosen for them by the White House. Hamilton ranks up close to autopsy doctor, James C. Beyer, for the role he has played in building the case for suicide. And we must not forget convicted Watergate felon, G. Gordon Liddy, the man who brought forward the “confidential witness” with his belated and unlikely tale of how he discovered the body and anonymously notified authorities. These are the ones we know about. Who knows how many more there might be behind the scenes?

We also find in the Foster case, perhaps by coincidence and perhaps not, a number of Yale products. Both Clintons, Hamilton, and Williams and Connolly lawyer to the president, David Kendall, have Yale law degrees, and Whitewater special prosecutor, Robert Fiske and one of his consulting pathologists, James L. Luke, have Yale bachelor’s degrees.

FT MARCY PARK

**The evidence is quite strong that Foster’s car was not “on the scene” at Fort Marcy Park until well after his dead body was. The failure of early witness, Patrick Knowlton, to make his description of the car he saw in the Fort Marcy parking lot accord with what his FBI interrogators wanted him to say is, according to Knowlton’s thesis in his suit against them, what led to his harassment and attempted intimidation on the streets of Washington, DC. See the World Net Daily interview of investigator Hugh Turley on this topic.

***This is from John Rolla’s Senate deposition of July 21, 1994:

Q: Now, did you ever talk to, let’s see, Bill Kennedy at the White House, who was seeking permission to identify the body?

A: Oh, I’m sorry. Maybe through a question you asked before — yes. After we left the scene, myself and Investigator Braun were heading to Mr. Foster’s residence in Georgetown to make a death notification. Lieutenant Gavin called us and we talked to him, and he started to call these guys from the White House. Bill Kennedy and Craig Livingston, or Livingstone, whatever it is, I called them. I don’t know if it was on a mobile phone or whatever. They wanted to know where he was at, Mr. Foster, and could they see him. I told them he was taken to the Fairfax County Hospital, he was in the morgue. They wanted to see him. They knew him, they were personal friends, they worked with him at the White House. They could positively identify the body even though we, through photo identification. knew who he was. If they wanted to see the body, we didn’t have a problem with that. We called the security guards at the hospital, told them they would be coming and it would be all right to see the body. (Curious thing, that, wanting to see a colleague’s dead body. ed.)

 

David Martin

January 24, 1999

 

Addendum: Car Keys Never Entered into Evidence

Foster's Keys

Official FBI photograph of Vincent Foster’s keys

Maybe the keys that Officers Braun and Rolla say they retrieved from the morgue did not even include Foster’s Honda key.   The only keys that FBI investigators ever officially entered into evidence, keys with a Cook Jeep Sales of Little Rock, Arkansas, tag attached to the ring, did not include any key that would open or start a Honda automobile. You can see a photograph of the evidence at http://www.fbicover-up.com/photos/fosterkeys.htm.

July 31, 2006

We might note that Ben-Veniste’s Republican counterpart on that Senate Whitewater Committee was Michael Chertoff, who, as we demonstrate in “The Chertoff Century,” is the very epitome of a secret government “made man.” As we show in that article, he also did Ben-Veniste-like work in leading a key witness in the Foster case, in this instance, Detective Cheryl Braun.

Finally, the list of made men from the Foster case is not complete without mentioning Brett Kavanaugh and John Bates. President George W. Bush rewarded each for his work on Kenneth Starr’s staff with federal judgeships.

 

David Martin

March 19, 2015

 

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

They Are At It Again

Take a guess who might consider my video “It Ain’t” (collaborated with Digger) hate speech? It is obvious that anyone with a mouse can call any and every video anything they so want and get away with it. One doesn’t have to prove anything, just make a claim and tada, its gone.

It Ain't Hate SpeechThe video says:

It ain’t the Bilderburgers

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the Illuminati

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the Anglo-American Establishment 

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the banksters

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the Jesuits and Black pope

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the criminal cartel

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the Club of Rome and many other secret societies

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the Bush/Obama Administration

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the German Death Cult Alex

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the neo-colonialists

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the aliens

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the moon matrix (ha that’s a good one Icke)

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the Annunaki Zecharia

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the shape-shifting lizards Icke

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the Technocrats

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the Nazi death cult Alex

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the global power elite

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the Neocons

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the Imperialists

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the British Royal family

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the Globalists Alex

It’s the Jews

It ain’t the Rothschild zionists Icke

It’s the Jews

It really is the elite supremacist Jews

Just make a simple correction to the lies that the shills and liars keep you all stupid with and it is “hate speech”. I bet you can find THOUSANDS of videos attacking every one of these entities and there are no strikes against them. But tell the truth about the Jew and this is what you get.

I am on the Jews’ radar again, so I bet others will be coming.

If anyone happens to know of a copied version somewhere, let me know. I’ll add it.

UPDATE (March 26):

It appears that my attempt to appeal the strike has helped the situation, although it is still not a perfect outcome.

No Strike

Of course, there was no hate or incitement to hate in the video. It IS uncomfortable truths that rub certain people the wrong way, though. So, YT censorship is in full swing, but somehow the terrible video wasn’t quite bad enough to hold me to the strike against my account.

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com