Fabulist Frost: Fibber, Fabricator & False Witness


Watergate Lies Multiplied


The Fiction of Frost/Nixon

by DC Dave



We are now in the midst of a grand celebration of itself by the mainstream media.  Forty years ago this summer, through their great investigative reporting, they began the process that drove a president from office for the crime of lying about his participation in the cover-up of a political “black bag” operation.  To the more perspicacious young people among us who just became aware of their political surroundings in the 21st century, this so-called Watergate story, this morality play, must be very confusing.  Isn’t this the same mainstream press that shows not the slightest interest in big-time hush-ups like, say, the omission of any mention at all in the official 9/11 report of the collapse, demolition-style, of World Trade Center Building 7 or of who might have been behind the forgeries of documents purporting to show that Saddam Hussein was attempting to obtain raw material from Niger for building nuclear weapons?  Could our mainstream press really have come down so far so fast?

The answer, of course, is no.  As you might expect, our press in the Watergate episode was not the great knight in shining armor that they would have us believe they were, rather, they were the same old blackguards that are currently covering our current presidential race as if the American people have actually been presented with legitimate choices.  As it turns out, almost everything they have told us about Watergate is about 180 degrees from what actually happened.  For a good introduction to the real story, I recommend two recent contributions by Charles A. Burris on LewRockwell.com, his article “Watergate Plus Forty” and his LRC Blog entry “Russ Baker and Jim Hougan on Watergate.”

Watergate might have been a small time burglary, but the entire episode was a big time spook operation.  And that brings us to the title of this article.  If the official Watergate story itself is phony, what is one to make of the 2008 fictionalized movie that is based upon a 2006 fictionalized play about a set of carefully edited interviews that essentially retell the outlines of a phony story?  It’s like a fake of a fake of a fake of a fake; like raising a lie to the fourth power.


Actually, as it turns out, we are missing one of the links in the chain.  The following is from the dust jacket of James Reston, Jr.’s 2007 book, The Conviction of Richard Nixon: The Untold Story of the Frost/Nixon Interviews:  “Originally written in 1977 and published now for the first time, this book helped inspire Peter Morgan’s hit play Frost/Nixon.

How about that?  A prize-winning playwright somehow got his hands on an unpublished manuscript by one of David Frost’s researchers and saw enough in it that he was moved to turn it into a compelling play.  One has to wonder how, exactly, that came about, but the dust jacket says no more, nor is there any explanation in the book.

As it turns out, the playwright apparently didn’t see quite enough in the book for his dramatic purpose.  In the movie, his Nixon interview is one big desperate and frightfully expensive entrepreneurial venture by Frost and his young producer, John Birt.  The advance financing that he had hoped to get from one of the major U.S. networks did not materialize and Frost is forced to resort to his own rather shallow pockets and to do the interviews as an independent production.  If he can’t squeeze enough drama out of the Nixon exchanges to attract viewers, he could be ruined.  If this were actually true, one would think that this would be of some matter of concern to Frost employee Reston and of interest to readers of his book.  Since he makes no mention of this matter, we may draw our own conclusions about its veracity.  Reston also fails to mention the drunken, self-incriminating telephone call that the movie has Nixon making to Frost in the middle of the night.  As for the truth of that episode, we need make no surmises, director Ron Howard admitted in his commentary on the DVD release that the phone call was, “from start to finish, an artistic invention by the scriptwriter Peter Morgan.”

What is in Reston’s book that is central to the movie is Reston, himself, and his great research success in finding “obscure” court documents that, almost at the last minute, sufficiently arm the “lightweight” Frost that he is able to bring down the haughty and “heavyweight” Nixon to the point that the latter is forced, in essence, to admit his guilt before the world.

That’s all balderdash, too, but, at least, there is a James Reston, Jr., and he did work as a researcher for Frost, but are he and the Frost team really who the movie purports them to be?  There is some reason for skepticism.  Reston’s father, after all, was the famous New York Times reporter and columnist, but he was more than that.  He was also a high profile member of the “Georgetown Set.”

“Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, Carmel Office and Frank WISNER were the grand masters. If you were in a room with them you were in a room full of people that you had to believe would deservedly end up in hell. I guess I will see them there soon.” –James Angleton, CIA Chief of Counter Intelligence

“Allen Dulles, Richard Helms, Carmel Office and Frank WISNER were the grand masters. If you were in a room with them you were in a room full of people that you had to believe would deservedly end up in hell. I guess I will see them there soon.” –James Angleton, CIA Chief of Counter Intelligence

After the Second World War a small group of people began meeting on a regular basis. The group. living in Washington, became known as the Georgetown Set or the Wisner Gang. At the [sic] first the key members of the group were former members of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS). This included Frank WisnerPhilip GrahamDavid BruceTom Braden, Stewart Alsop and Walt Rostow. Over the next few years others like George KennanDean AchesonRichard BissellJoseph AlsopEugene RostowChip BohlenDesmond FitzGerald,Tracy BarnesCord MeyerJames AngletonWilliam Averill HarrimanJohn McCloyFelix FrankfurterJohn Sherman CooperJames RestonAllen W. Dulles and Paul Nitze joined their regular parties. Some like Bruce, Braden, Bohlen, McCloy, Meyer and Harriman spent a lot of their time working in other countries. However, they would always attend these parties when in Georgetown.

This, folks, is the very heart of the U.S. secret government/establishment.  Notice the “journalists” like Reston, Phillip Graham, and the Alsop brothers keeping close company with a lot of known high-level spooks.  Wisner, in fact, is the CIA man who coined the term, “mighty Wurlitzer,” to describe their propaganda apparatus for “influencing” the news media.  Reston, Sr., is alleged to have been a part of it. (See Operation Mockingbird.)


Frost and Birt

How far did the apple fall from the tree?  Before addressing that question, let’s have a look at some of the other characters involved with the Frost interviews of Nixon.  How about that fresh-faced, idealistic young producer, Birt?  We learn this from p. 179 of Reston’s book:

John Birt went on to the daunting post as director general of the BBC, to become a well-known public figure in Britain in his own right, and to become Prime Minister Tony Blair’s alter ego during Britain’s entry into the Iraq war.  He [like Frost] got his peerage and is now known in the House of Lords as Baron Birt of Liverpool.

“Once I challenged [Birt] to a chess game.  ‘I never play chess,’ he replied.  ‘My whole professional career is a chess game.’” (p. 30)


The executive editor of the Frost/Nixon interviews, Robert Zelnick, who came from National Public Radio, became a household name in America as a 20-year ABC correspondent covering the Pentagon, Moscow, and Israel.

My recollection is that these interviews of Nixon by Frost hardly made any splash at all at the time—certainly not the dramatic encounter that they are represented in the movie—but working on them, like working on the Watergate investigative staff (e.g. Hillary Clinton) surely looks like it was a good career move.

Speaking of the Watergate staff, Reston tells us that one of his mentors in his research job for Frost, a person with whom he developed a “friendly working relationship” (p. 48) was Richard Ben-Veniste.  Ben-Veniste was in charge of Special Prosecutor Leon Jaworski’s Watergate Task Force and was the chief prosecutor in the cover-up trial of several Watergate figures.  We encounter Ben-Veniste again playing a major cover-up role (along with the mainstream press, led by The Washington Post) in the case of the death of Deputy White House Counsel Vincent Foster during the Bill Clinton administration.  Most recently he has turned up as a member of the government’s 9-11 Commission.  Along the way he was defense counsel for CIA-connected drug smuggler Barry Seal.



Who is James Reston, Jr.?


1977-nixon-james-reston-crop80So what do we know about Reston other than who his father was?  When he got the call to join the Frost project, he was, perhaps quite appropriately, a lecturer in “creative writing” at his alma mater, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  We’ll have to take his word for it that the opportunity came about through a chance conversation that his mother had at a party in Washington, DC.  Although he has gone on to a successful career as an author and journalist, his credentials look rather thin for a job on the faculty of a major public university.  With just a bachelor’s degree, it would appear that he had somehow managed to leverage his just-published first novel into the cushy teaching job, a job that afforded him the time to work on his first non-fiction book, The Amnesty of John David Herndon.  What he had been doing in the form of actual employment before he got the UNC job is not clear.  On his Wikipedia page there’s a three-year gap between his U.S. Army tour and his college teaching job.

The résumé gap is intriguing, but so, too, is news of the Army tour.  He mentions it a couple of times in his book, once to one-up Zelnick who flaunted his Marine background, when he had only been in the Marine reserves while Reston had served a full three years of Army active duty.  What is odd here is that, to the very best of my memory, when we knew one another in Chapel Hill, he never mentioned the fact to me.  It is particularly odd because it is on account of my work as a principal organizer of the North Carolina Veterans for Peace that he sought me out in the first place. (See “Spooks on the Hill” for another future Washington figure, Frances Zwenig, whom I first encountered through my NC antiwar activism.)  He was working on his Herndon book and making contact with assorted veterans, particularly those who were opposed to the Vietnam War, which was just about all of us in Chapel Hill at the time.

In Frost/Nixon Reston is portrayed as something of a Nixon-hating anti-Vietnam War firebrand.  But by that time, the war was over.  The time to agitate against the war was when we were at Chapel Hill together, and the most effective way to do it was openly as a veteran.  In fact, after Nixon instituted the draft lottery, most of the undergraduates seemed to lose interest in the war.  Veterans’ agitation was the only antiwar game in town, and it is my recollection that Reston took no part in it.  Rather, he was busily working on his book that seemed to advocate leniency toward the least sympathetic of the war’s presumed opponents, military deserters, which is what John David Herndon was.  Reston, frankly, struck me as just a careerist and an opportunist, not as a sincere Vietnam War opponent.


Speaking of strange résumé gaps, upon reflection the Army tour looks a bit like one as well.  Straight out of college he got a good job as assistant to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior.  Then, with the Vietnam War raging most dangerously, he went into the Army for three years.  We know that he didn’t serve in Vietnam, or he would have told us.  Did he know that there was no chance that he would be sent to Vietnam before he signed up?  Was he drafted?  That’s not likely given his connections, and draftees were obligated to serve only two years of active duty.  Had he been in ROTC, with his active duty obligation deferred while he worked in his government job?  Again, an ROTC commission had only a two-year active duty requirement.  Maybe he went to Officers’ Candidate School, but why, and what did he do in the Army?  Maybe he didn’t tell us about his Army background because he was afraid we might ask him questions like that.



Professional Wrestling


Elizabeth Drew, writing in the Huffington Post, gets almost to the heart of the phoniness of the Nixon interviews by Frost.  She and others have told us that Nixon was paid $600,000 for it (Reston says it was a cool $1 million.), but, most importantly, what we don’t learn from Reston or the movie is that Nixon was also promised 20 percent of the television revenues.  That revelation completely undercuts the central premise of the movie that Frost and Nixon were great adversaries.  If Frost wanted the program to be interesting and “edgy” enough that it could make money, so, too, did Nixon.  Drew also throws cold water on the great Reston findings that supposedly gave the interviews, just in the nick of time, their edginess:

There are other distortions in the movie. One of them makes a very big thing of the “discovery” by James Reston, Frost’s chief researcher, of a taped conversation between Nixon and his political henchman Charles Colson, supposedly the first one about the cover-up. (Reston, is depicted as the moral conscience of the story, the one who is determined to hold Nixon to account, but he is made less of a noodge in the movie than in the play, where he became an irritating presence.) Much is made of the fact that this bit of conversation was theretofore unknown. But after I saw the play I checked with one of the Watergate prosecutors, who told me that that particular piece of tape was unknown because “we were awash in far more incriminating evidence” against Nixon, and the prosecutors didn’t consider it worth using.

So much for Reston’s crucial last minute “discovery.”  Where I part company with Ms. Drew is at her conclusion:

It doesn’t matter that Frost/Nixon moves some scenes around (though it’s not always clear why), and engages in some invention. But such a gross misrepresentation of such important events — roughly seventy percent of the population is too young to have been aware of Watergate — about a figure over whom there is still serious debate, in the name of entertainment and profits, to my mind, crosses the line of dramatic integrity and is dishonorable.

I believe that the evidence is far stronger that the movie and the play, like the interviews themselves, were not done primarily for entertainment and profits.  They were done as propaganda.


David Martin


June 20, 2012




For more on recent Hollywood propaganda, see “M. Stanton Evans on Good Night and Good Luck.”

Follow @BuelahMan

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

5 thoughts on “Fabulist Frost: Fibber, Fabricator & False Witness

  1. Here is the response of one of my British correspondents:

    Great research on Reston. Contrary to Reston’s account or the film, the Frost interview certainly never hit the Richter scale in terms of its impact. I mean did Frost ask the venerable Tricky Dickie re-his relationship with Rockefeller or Prescott Bush? Think not.

    Here’s an insightful Frost obit:


    His contemporary at Cambridge, Clive James, is quoted as saying that Frost and Nixon were similar personalities.

    (Curiously enough, Nixon came from Quaker stock while Frost’s dad was a Methodist minister.)

    Certainly, the obit notes how Frost stole a lot of satirical creativity from more talented luminaries like Peter Cook. However the drift towards the Establishment is well documented.

    As if it needed to be!

    The idea that a guy goes to Cambridge and thereafter spends the rest of his life conducting a satire campaign against-rather than spying for the Establishment-is rather far-fetched to say the least!

    The media skulduggery, on which Birt is cited as witness, the friendships with Rothschild and Jimmy Goldsmith suggest there were two crooks not one sitting it out during that interview!

    The references to the Profumo scandal of 1963 and how Frost et al were pioneers in irreverent treatment of the rich and powerful probably disguises the fact that the scandal was likely far more serious than the focus on the salacious highlights suggests.

    Keeler, the call-girl model friend of Defence Secretary Profumo had been sleeping with the Soviet naval attache as well as him. Much was made of the security threat represented by such relationships. In fact, to me, the whole affair reeks of arms dealing. The Cold War was a hoax that obscured the arms trade between the two Superpower blocs. Victor Rothschild was the notorious MI6 agent who worked for the Soviets as well. Frost et al never brought any of this to light at the time.

    Thus watching the Frost-Nixon film/play will be much like watching the film Scandal about the Profumo scandal. There’s one HELL of a lot of myth-making going on.

    That was Frost’s game. Myth-making for the PTB! (end email)

    Here is the best quote from the very long Guardian article:

    “Worse than that, he was nicknamed the ‘bubonic plagiarist, for allegedly appropriating Peter Cook’s gags and sketches from Beyond the Fringe for his television show That Was the Week That Was, and so piggybacking on the achievements of others.”

    Taken all and all, it’s hard to determine who of the three is the most reprehensible, Richard Nixon, David Frost, or James Reston, Jr. And speaking of myth making, has there ever been any more myth making surrounding an event than there has about the scandal known as Watergate?


  2. hear hear


    so much drama…


    but ugly RACISM always rears its ugly head


    In the wake of the release on Thursday, August 29, 2013 of the Mary Phagan video (http://trutube.tv/video/12255/Mary-Phagan) on johndenugent.com
    and on TheRebel.org in Australia,
    Google hits on the name “John de Nugent” SOARED from 434,000
    up to almost 2.5 MILLION as of 2:24 pm US EDT (4:20pm “Tulsa” time).
    A lot of those hits are from WORRIED JEWS,
    because of this:

    The US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) published a warning calling on all Americans planning to
    visit Israel to get vaccinated against polio, in order to avoid getting infected with the viral disease and for 25 dollars more they can get a booster shot for all the other diseases infecting the “Jewish” state,
    and a quart Jar of Holy Water and Annointing Oil to “Pray for the Peace of Jerusalem”….
    and all proceeds go towards the Iranian After School Ice Cream program,
    and helping the little DU babies in Iraq….http://www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2003/DU-Baby2003.htm
    thanks NEOCONS

    The spread of the virus in Israel has created worry among health authorities for so-called governments worldwide.

    The CDC in Atlanta,
    one of the leading professional bodies dealing with the issue of public health and safety,
    called on US citizens visiting Israel to get their polio vaccination,
    even if they were immunized as children,
    if they have not been revaccinated as adults…http://www.nizkor.org/.



  3. Frost was too blindly liberal to see the truth in Enoch Powell’s Rivers of Blood speech. Years later, he excoriated Powell in a TV interview he conducted with the politician.

    I wonder what Frost would have thought of Powell’s prophecy in recent times when he had to jostle his way through the brown and black masses choking the streets of London, and when he saw hordes of non-whites rioting in what were once pristine and white English suburbs on the evening news, and when he read of England-based Muslim clerics calling for the imposition of Sharia law in his country.

    Rot in hell, Frost.


You Got Something To Say? Please keep your maw respectful and gab on topic.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s