Syria: War on Iran Through the Back Door?

Syria: War on Iran Through the Back Door?

by DC Dave


How appropriate it is that President Barack Obama should have invoked Franklin D. Roosevelt in his extremely bellicose speech on the evening of September 10.  Like FDR, the people who put Obama in power have given every indication that they are itching to get us into another war.  In this case, it is with Iran; in Roosevelt’s case, it was with Germany again.  In both instances, the American people in their wisdom are and were overwhelming opposed to it.

In the 1930s the opposition to U.S. involvement in war in Europe grew largely out of the fact that the country had learned that those awful atrocity stories that we had been told about the Germans that had played such a role in whipping up fervor for our entry into World War I were all just so much propaganda.  As President George W. Bush once tried to say, “Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.”

The same motivation is certainly at work today with what has now been admitted about the supposed “weapons of mass destruction” in Iraq and what a large and growing minority of people have learned about the events of 9/11.

One can add to that the great weariness of a people who have now been at war for more than a decade.  Whether it is the lies or the wars we are wearier of might well be a close call.

But the drumbeat for war against Iran that began during the last years of the Bush administration has continued just offstage throughout the Obama administration.  Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been openly pleading for it, as have his many unregistered agents in the United States. It has been as hard to sell as another war on Germany was to sell to the American public in the 1930s and most of the first two years of the 1940s.  If that much-wanted war with Iran is to be had it will require some great new “provocation,” Roosevelt’s example points the way.

With the 9/11 subterfuge we have already had the “new Pearl Harbor” that served to light the fuse for our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Another such direct provocation would be too obvious.  But if we can just commit ourselves militarily to the Syrian war, new opportunities would present themselves, and who can doubt that the plans are already in full swing?  Syria is allied with Iran, just as Japan was allied with Germany.  Roosevelt had tried his best to provoke the Germans into attacking us, but Hitler refused to go for the bait.  FDR’s solution was to provoke Japan into attacking us by presenting them with a secret ultimatum in the guise of negotiations.  He, in effect, made them an offer that they had to refuse, that left them no choice but to go to war with us.  He thereby achieved his war with Germany by the back door through war with Japan.

Aware of this country’s war weariness, and wariness, Obama, like Roosevelt, promises that we will have to make no further real sacrifice.  Obama says that there will be no American “boots on the ground,” while FDR, as late as October of 1940 during the election campaign in a speech in Boston declared, “I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars.”  All the while Roosevelt was taking every action he could to make sure that that is exactly what would happen.  Of course, that is not the FDR quotation that Obama chose for his speech.  Rather, it is this one from 1935:

Our national determination to keep free of foreign wars and foreign entanglements cannot prevent us from feeling deep concern when ideals and principles that we have cherished are challenged.

Uttered at this particular point in our history, the statement Obama’s speechwriters chose could hardly be more inapt.  Not since Britain at the height of its imperial power has any nation been more entangled in foreign martial enterprises.  Manifestly, if there be any “national determination,” it has been entirely in the opposite direction since Roosevelt took office, and at a quickened pace in this century.  In a certain sense, though, there is a harmony between the quote and Obama’s actions.  FDR spoke of our “ideals and principles” and proceeded to ally this country with Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union and then to pursue a war policy, on both the European and Pacific fronts, that could hardly have been better designed to advance the interests of that pernicious foreign power.  His war policies, in fact, which resulted in the Communist takeover of a large part of both Europe and Asia, were not in the furtherance of but were at the expense of this nation’s interests and our professed “ideals and principles.”

Once again, it is abundantly clear that the interests that we have been pursuing are not those of this country,

but those of a foreign power.

Israel is not the Soviet Union, but as a blatantly ethnic-supremacist, apartheid state, its fundamental makeup and goals, indeed, its cherished ideals and principles, could hardly be less consistent with those of this country.

David Martin

September 13, 2013


Follow @BuelahMan

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or

10 thoughts on “Syria: War on Iran Through the Back Door?

  1. wait,

    ….THERE’S MORE !!!

    these same “Bolshevik” JEWISH so-called ‘NEOCON’ Zionist “JEWS”…..

    are not from the tribe of Judah.

    which means that even with William Kristol on CSPAN explaining away the “Jewishness” of it all
    all one has to do is just look at the “countenance” of this abominable piece of excrement

    A group of American business and political leaders are building a pro-Israel media “war room” in Washington, D.C. The group will be called “Emet”—which in Hebrew means “truth.” Emet will try to address biased media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and also make the case that the conflict, while serious and important, pales in comparison to the larger geo-strategic threat posed to the United States and the West by Iran and Iraq, both of whom are trying to build and/or acquire weapons of mass destruction. Funding Emet is Leonard Abramson; he sold U.S. Healthcare to Aetna in the mid-1990s for $8.9 billion.
    Abramson has recruited a powerful board of directors, including Bernie Marcus, founder of Home Depot; Les Wexner, founder of The Limited; Edgar Bronfman Sr., who once owned Seagram’s; and Lou Ranieri, a major Wall Street player who now co-owns one of Israel’s largest banks. Also joining the board are Jeane Kirkpatrick, former U.S. Ambassador to the UN, and Jack Kemp

    What say ye the American people ?

    …. What say ye the people of the world ?

    visualize whirled peas


    • David Martin said:

      Aware of this country’s war weariness, and wariness, Obama, like Roosevelt, promises that we will have to make no further real sacrifice. Obama says that there will be no American “boots on the ground,” while FDR, as late as October of 1940 during the election campaign in a speech in Boston declared, “I have said this before, but I shall say it again and again and again: Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars.” – DC Dave, September 13, 2013

      Great insight by David Martin. Obama promised on September 10, 2013 he would conduct a surgical strike on Syria to punish the Assad regime for gassing to death civilians. As big a lie as arabs used two planes to knock down three buildings in New York September 11, 2013.

      The only way to garantee no boots on the ground is to resist the Rothschild/AIPAC coersion, and not to invade Syria (or Iran, N.Korea, Cuba etc) whatsoever.

      What say ye the American people? What say ye the people of the world?


  2. I say if the Obama regime succumbs to the pressure of the international bankers/zionism and fires even one tomahawk missile into Syria, I hope that Syria, Hezbollah and Iran pulverise the Amerikan ships and military stongholds all over the ME and the entire state of Israel. Further, if Israel or Amerika uses one single nuclear weapon in the ME war that Russia and China nuclear bomb the living sh*t out of whoever is responsible for the nuclear bomb launch.

    Syria has not used chemical weapons against its own people. Ever.


  3. It’s not like I neeeeed to say something to stir things up at your place, buddy, but . . . have you been by today? It’s hot over there with all the data on the non-gassing.

    Peace and love!


    • Howdy.

      Naw. That is the first time I ever even heard of it.

      At least they appear to understand that it is all faked (at least that the Syrian government was not involved wit gassing its own people).

      The lies won’t stand any more.


  4. since no-one else has taken the opportunity to restate the obvious…here is a follow up

    But there’s another version of this story. The Talmud (Sukkah 48b) includes a description of the aftermath of the etrog uprising:

    “The horn of the altar became damaged and the Temple service was halted until they brought a chunk of salt and put it there, so that the altar would not appear damaged.

    For an altar which lacks a horn or a base is invalid.”

    In their righteous rage, the people ended up damaging the sacred altar, leading to a temporary cessation of Temple rites. Attending priests quickly repaired the damage and restored the Temple service, but the scars remained visible to all: Crude pieces of salt replaced the regular polished stone of the altar.

    In the dung doodling Talmud’s account, the priest is still a heretic who has committed a grievous sin.
    But this version is more nuanced than the Mishna. It shows us that the people’s assault on the priest,
    even if justified, came at a high price.
    Indeed, they too violated the sanctity of the Temple,
    perhaps even more than the priest…who allegedly was still a LEVITE
    and not from the Tribe of JUDAH, as if living in “JUDEA” in minus 03AD {BC} or 03AD made someone
    a “JEW”….without a Talmud…there is no such thing as a “JEW”.

    Read more:

    so in PALESTINE the turko-mongolian {Japhetic} “GOG & MAGOG” so-called ASHKENAZIM

    “PROSELYTES” to TALMUDIC JUDAISM claiming to be “JEWS” in a “JEWISH” state which is a
    manifestation of BAD FAITH & TERRORISM full of paranoid schizophrenics, LIARS & MURDERERS

    ….who claim to be SO SPECIAL that one simply cannot “QUESTION” their so-called “NARRATIVE” {LIES}

    Synagogue of Satan “JEW” Shimon Peres announced on Thursday the names of the winners of the

    DUNG DOODLING Presidential Medal…..
    According to the president’s office, 2013 recipients will include:
    Brigadier General (Res.) Avigdor Kahalani, Professional LIARS…
    Elie Wiesel, Steven Spielberg and Rabbi Elimelech Firer…..

    and we don’t make this shit up……,7340,L-4429185,00.html


You Got Something To Say? Please keep your maw respectful and gab on topic.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s