Did Lyndon Step Down So Bobby Could Be Killed?

Did Lyndon Step Down So Bobby Could Be Killed?

by DC Dave

RFK and LBJ

“That evening, Johnson repeatedly phoned the Secret Service to ask if [Robert] Kennedy had died. He paced the floor for hours, phone in hand, muttering: ‘I’ve got to know. Is he dead? Is he dead yet?’ ” (David M. Oshinsky, New York Times, Oct. 26, 1997)

President Lyndon Johnson’s behavior in this instance is very reminiscent of his call to Parkland Hospital in Dallas after Lee Harvey Oswald was shot.

Quite suspiciously, once you give it just a little bit of thought, the man made president by his predecessor’s violent death wanted very badly for one lone gunman to take the blame for the murder. LBJ’s choice of words as he inquired repeatedly about Robert Kennedy’s condition suggests very strongly that there was something else that he wanted very badly. That was the death of the younger Kennedy brother.

Such a suggestion as this latter one would have been almost unthinkable before the recent arrival upon the scene of five books that place the blame for the JFK assassination squarely upon the shoulders of our 36th president. They are LBJ: The Mastermind of the JFK Assassination by Phillip F. Nelson, The Man Who Killed Kennedy: The Case against LBJ by Roger Stone, Blood, Money, & Power: How LBJ Killed JFK by Barr McClellan, LBJ and the Conspiracy to Kill Kennedy: A Coalescence of Interests by Joseph P. Farrell, and LBJ and the Kennedy Killing by James T. Tague.

The Lyndon Baines Johnson of those books was an extraordinarily crude, but also extraordinarily shrewd megalomaniac who would stop at absolutely nothing to advance himself politically. He had his own favored hit man in the person of Malcolm “Mac” Wallace, and working through Wallace and others Johnson had ordered a number of murders in Texas that had become necessary to cover up his wide-ranging corrupt activities.

Once he had attained his lifelong goal, no one ever reveled in—indeed wallowed in—the power of the office more than did Johnson. He was also an extraordinarily stubborn man, as best evidenced by his Vietnam War policy. That’s why it came as such a shock to almost everyone when he announced at the end of a speech on March 31, 1968, that he would not seek reelection that fall. That is also why, right up to the present day, there are almost as many explanations for it as there are people offering them. This comes from Wikipedia:

Historians have debated the factors that led to Johnson’s surprise decision. [Jeff] Shesol says Johnson wanted out of the White House but also wanted vindication; when the indicators turned negative he decided to leave. [Lewis] Gould says that Johnson had neglected the party, was hurting it by his Vietnam policies, and underestimated McCarthy strength until the very last minute, when it was too late for Johnson to recover. [Randall Bennett] Woods said Johnson realized he needed to leave in order for the nation to heal. [Robert] Dallek says that Johnson had no further domestic goals, and realized that his personality had eroded his popularity. His health was not good, and he was preoccupied with the Kennedy campaign; his wife was pressing for his retirement and his base of support continued to shrink. Leaving the race would allow him to pose as a peacemaker. [Anthony J.] Bennett, however, says Johnson, “had been forced out of a reelection race in 1968 by outrage over his policy in Southeast Asia.”

101209_JamesRJonesJames R. Jones, Johnson’s chief of staff in 1968, spoke for most of us when he wrote some 20 years later in The New York Times, “Most Americans couldn’t believe that this larger-than-life figure could voluntarily relinquish the reins of power. Scholars and politicians still argue over what really motivated his decision to step down.” Jones then proceeds to offer a whopper of an explanation that is Johnson-like in its proportions. This most selfish, self-centered user and abuser of people, concludes Jones, stepped down so he could work to end the war that he inherited and never quite believed in, free of politics.

We see how well that worked out, as the war continued through another presidential term and then some, but that is the explanation that the historian Dallek also settles upon, citing Jones, as the one best fitting the facts.

When this is the best that they can do, you just know there has to be another explanation. Jones, near the end of his article, inadvertently points us toward that explanation when, as an eyewitness, he recounts the reaction of Vice President Hubert Humphrey when he is told by Johnson that he is determined not to seek reelection and that Humphrey is now the man to step up.

“Mr. Humphrey’s facial expression was pathetic at that moment. Shoulders hunched, he said softly, ‘There’s no way I can beat the Kennedys.’ “

There you have it. Just two weeks before, in the wake of the surprisingly strong showing of insurgent antiwar candidate Senator Eugene McCarthy in the New Hampshire primary, Senator Robert Kennedy had announced his own candidacy for president. The Kennedy juggernaut was out of port and ready for battle. If Humphrey thought that he had little chance against it, one may readily conclude that Johnson’s chances wouldn’t have been all that good, either.

Forestalling the Counter-coup

bobby_lyndonc

Now reflect for a minute on the implications of the primary thesis of those five books on the JFK assassination. What it means is that there was a coup d’état whose purpose was as much to install Lyndon Johnson and the policies that he represented in the presidency as it was to remove John Kennedy and the policies he represented from the office. A Robert Kennedy presidency would have constituted an undoing of that coup. Worse yet, it would have seriously endangered the very powerful people who had carried it out.

It could not be permitted. Robert Kennedy had to be stopped, and the only way to do it with finality was the same way that his brother had been stopped.

But how would it have looked, no matter how hard the government and the press sold the notion that it was just the work of another lone, crazed gunman, for another Johnson rival for power to be removed by assassination? It might have been out of the question at the time for anyone to state publicly any suspicions about LBJs guilt in the JFK murder, the reality was that it was in the back of almost everyone’s mind. This latest outrage would have surely brought it to the front. Whether it was Johnson’s decision or he was made an offer that he could not refuse by his handlers, he had to disavow any further interest in retention of power so that the serious threat that RFK represented could be removed. Put bluntly, for the November 22, 1963, coup to stick, keeping Bobby out—permanently—trumped keeping Lyndon in for another four years.

As it happens, there were some people in the RFK camp who could already see which way the wind was blowing. The following quote is from Sons and Brothers: The Life and Times of Jack and Bobby Kennedy by Richard D. Mahoney:

…some around Bobby began to talk openly about the inevitable. French novelist Romain Gary, then living in Los Angeles, told Pierre Salinger, “Your candidate is going to get killed.” When Jimmy Breslin asked several reporters around a table whether they thought Bobby had the stuff to go all the way, John J. Lindsay replied, “Yes, of course, he has the stuff to go all the way, but he’s not going to go all the way. The reason is that somebody is going to shoot him. I know it and you know it, just as sure as we’re sitting here. He’s out there waiting for him.”

The only thing wrong with Lindsay’s prediction, as it turned out, was that it was not a “he” but a “they,” the official story notwithstanding.

To anyone inclined to offer the objection that the RFK murder, unlike that of his brother, was, indeed, the work of one man, I would call his attention to my 2001 essay “JFK and RFK, a Tale of Two Assassinations.” The case for conspiracy in Bobby’s June 5, 1968, murder is at least as strong as in that of his brother. The main reason why people might think otherwise is that the facts of the case have received so much less publicity.

My 2001 article on the two Kennedy assassinations concludes with this paragraph:

Like the relative silence about President Lyndon Johnson’s personal and political corruption compared to what we hear about Presidents Kennedy, Nixon, and Clinton, the relative silence about Robert Kennedy’s murder, I believe, is telling. Explaining either would carry us a long way toward understanding how, by whom, and toward what end we are currently ruled.

The relative silence with respect to LBJ has now been resoundingly broken by the recent spate of books on the subject (though certainly not as far as the mainstream press is concerned). We may anticipate that Nelson’s forthcoming book LBJ: From Mastermind to “The Colossuswill carry us further down the road toward unraveling the mystery of what it all means.

is he dead yet

 

David Martin

September 22, 2014


Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

3 thoughts on “Did Lyndon Step Down So Bobby Could Be Killed?

  1. Thanks B’Man, for another attempt to aide in the education of those that seek the truth. I ma glad that you have shared DC Dave so many times. Very well worth our attention.

    I learned in the 1970’s that LBJ was the MAJOR share holder in Bell Helicopters and had a lot to gain from the United States involvement in Viet Nam. But as we should know LBJ was a freaking EDOMITE JEW, so any reason to bring the White Nations into a war was good enough for him!

    Like

  2. Johnson’s quote was

    “Someone has poisoned the well”….

    and he should know.
    http://www.jewishmag.com/99mag/elicohen/elicohen.htm

    Texas has a lot to answer for, as well as America…the people not the silly
    edifice of some dysfunctional construct that has no soul…mind or body.

    [audio src="http://k007.kiwi6.com/hotlink/qou224bw8c/The_Realist_Report_with_John_Friend_Sept_23_2014_mike_king.mp3" /]

    it was alleged that Johnson had at one time at least five keys to five different
    rooms for [ZOG] Senate members for extra-curricular activities..trysts,
    liaisons, stress relief sessions, with “pages”, secretaries or otherwise pliant
    “sex slaves” in the “Nations Capital”…Johnson apparently had a thing for Negresses
    maybe he fashioned hisself as an EDOMITE SLAVE MASTER…like David Cohen or
    literally thousands of other so-called “Jewish” Slave traders & Owners in
    “American History”…

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6492350

    several points aside from Piper’s FINAL JUDGEMENT…

    1} Kill Zone :A Sniper Looks at Dealey Plaza by Craig Roberts

    http://jfklancer.com/sbt-1.html

    Pat Shannan invited me to have Breakfast with Craig back in ’06, and to visit with the
    Lancer group, as some Dr.’s from Parkland were discussing 22 Nov 93
    it became evident during the brief time we spent together that Craig had limited
    knowledge of the mind control element to the JEWISH agenda…

    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6492350

    Sirhan Sirhan was a mind control PATSY….and a Palestinian…go figure.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Ambler

    any deep background “back story” that I might have gleaned was from conversations
    with Billie Sol Estes, a retired Federal Judge one afternoon at Barton Springs
    and any number of investigators, ex-CIA, FBI, NSA, Special Forces, and ONI, Navy Seals
    family Members and eyewitnesses…as well as actual personnel who were “pulling triggers”

    http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/47574/gaddis-smith/the-samson-option-israels-nuclear-arsenal-and-american-foreign-p

    most guys back in the 60’s who jumped in feet first to fight the “communists”
    found they were actually working for the “Jews” {Bankers} who used “Communism”
    http://www.ampalestine.org/index.php/history/zionism/204-zionism-in-us-haganahs-arms-procurement
    as a smoke screen…like the John Birch Society…aka John McManus.

    http://www.richardsilverstein.com/2012/07/21/fbi-documents-confirm-involvement-of-hollywood-mogul-in-israeli-nuclear-smuggling-ring/

    avoiding looking at & talking about the Elephant in the room doesn’t make it

    http://mondoweiss.net/2012/07/netanyahu-implicated-in-nuclear-smuggling-from-u-s-big-story-in-israel

    GO AWAY…..like Talmudia and NUCLEAR TERRORISM

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Name_of_the_Rose_%28film%29

    Edoms Thorn is on the tip of the ICEBERG…in revealing the historical context
    http://www.thelivingmoon.com/45jack_files/03files/White_Sands_Proving_Grounds_01.html
    of the book of Obadiah…and why the Edomite so-called “Jews” will eventually
    be nothing more than a pile of Ashes….! It is true.
    http://zionism-israel.com/his/Israel_war_independence_1948_timeline.htm
    since in FACT there were never any so-called “Jews” in Egypt…
    http://www.israelvets.com/pictorialhist_acquiring_arms.html
    did you know that when the so-called “Jews” burned the Library at Alexandria
    http://www.lbjlibrary.org/
    there was another Library that had virtually all the same texts…that did not burn
    that was not in Egypt ?
    http://web.archive.org/web/20020417180627/http://worldmag.com/world/issue/08-18-01/

    I’m hoping one day that others besides Edoms Thorn will begin to focus like a Laser Beam
    http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/thel.htm
    of the ETHNIC GROUPS {Tribes} in the Old Testament besides the Edomites who were
    http://biblehub.com/text/jeremiah/44-1.htm
    also the enemies of the WHITE PEOPLE …”God’s Chosen people Israel ” who cannot
    http://israelect.com/reference/Willie-Martin/
    be “Jews” from the Gog & Magog tribes descended from Japheth !

    Maybe Jack Blood or Alex Jones or John Stadtmiller or Joyce Riley or
    Michael Savage or Rush Limbaugh or Thom Hartman or Amy Goodman
    http://battleofearth.wordpress.com/2010/04/24/kerry-lynn-cassidy-project-camelot-productions-interviews-laura-knight-jadczyk-of-the-cassiopaeans/
    or Charlie Sheen or David Icke or Laura…
    http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_autor_lauraknight04.htm
    can do a show on the
    War between the Sadducees and the Pharisees…

    eventually the language must be pure
    or the Bible is a Lie, and so is Jesus
    and the only thing that is true is the Jewish Lie of the day

    Like

  3. In 1967, the USS Liberty was deliberately attacked by israeli planes and torpedo boats, dozens of our lads died. Some were machine gunned in the water after they had abandoned ship. They managed to get a message out and a nearby carrier launched interceptors to aid our ship. Johnson called the admiral aboard the carrier and ordered him to call back the rescuers and the attack continued. The entire incident was kept completely covered up. The survivors received medals in a closed ceremony. Had Johnson run, there would have been survivors with stories to tell. Had this story gotten out at the time, a hanging sooner than an inauguration would have been in his future. And rightly so. [ http://www.gtr5.com/ ] A stab in the back? Not quite up to the Balfour Declaration but worth considering when choosing friends.

    Like

You Got Something To Say? Please keep your maw respectful and gab on topic.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s