The forgotten 1931 Jewish interview of Hitler

An Exclusive Interview with Germany’s Fascist Chieftain


In this sensational interview, the only one which Germany’s anti-Semitic leader has ever granted to a Jewish journalist, the -mental poverty of Adolf Hitler is revealed in its entirety. Cornered by a few direct questions by the fearless interviewer who introduced himself unceremoniously in a restaurant, the Nazis’ chief candidly lays bare his arrogant, unreasoning hatred of the Jews and definitely stamps himself as an intolerant ignoramus.

Berlin—In a Hallensee meeting hall some forty minutes from the Potsdamer Platz, transformed by an enterprising owner into a kind of beer restaurant, an obliging waiter whispered into my ear, with ill-concealed awe: “Da sitzt der Fuhrer” (There sits the Leader).

About a long wooden table bare of cloth a group of rather young-looking men were gathered. Their voices, loud, animated, outshouted one another except when he, the Leader, spoke. Then, as if by magic, complete silence fell not only over this one table but throughout the entire hall. He, the Leader, sensing that even his private conversation was regarded as a public address, raised his voice and put into play his extraordinary oratorical technique. Looking at his vis-a-vis, apparently unconcerned about the intense spotlight centered around his personality, the Leader, Adolf Hitler, spoke in a well-modulated voice, pausing from time to time to swallow an imposing-looking stein of beer.

Adolf Hitler’s pictures do not do justice to the uncontested leader of the National Socialists. He looks much younger than his forty-one years. His athletic figure, his military bearing, his fresh complexion, his authoritative expression, which is enhanced by his thin, pointed, aggressive mustache, give one the impression of a German officer of pre-war days in civilian clothes.

When I introduced myself he stiffened. His entourage studied his countenance so as to know whether to make room for me. But Hitler did not seem inclined to speak to a newspaper correspondent in front of his young followers. He motioned to the Oberkellner and asked him to show us into a sort of private office on the same floor. There, a little less stiffly but still business-like, he asked me: “What is it you want to know?”

My first question, without any introductory preamble, was: “Is anti-Semitism a plank of the political platform of the Nazis?”

Hitler blinked at my query, and asked: “Do you represent a Jewish paper?” I explained that I was interested in obtaining a clear idea of his stand because I was making a study of anti-Semitism in Europe. Speaking with a noticeable Bavarian accent, the leader of the Nazis then said:

“I don’t like to give interviews. I am a newspaperman myself and know how easily one’s words are distorted. But since you are here I shall answer some of your questions, it being understood that I represent my personal views. The rules of my party prohibit the issuing of statements unless they are approved by our inner council.”

I was unable to suppress a smile as I thought of Hitler’s dictatorial power. Guessing the reason for my apparent skepticism, Hitler added:

“We are a disciplined party. As a matter of fact, the Nationalist-Socialists are the best-disciplined political body in the Reich.

“Anti-Semitism,” he continued, “is not, as such, a part of our program. Our program is to purge Germany of all such elements as hinder its return to normal conditions. Germany must become a land for Germans, for free German citizens, not for German slaves dominated by Jewish capital.”

The interviewer interposed: “As one who has lived in Germany for many years I know that Jewish capital plays an unimportant role in the economic life of the country. In the great industries, in the manufacturing and of course in the agricultural phases of Germany life Jews play a minimal part. What, then, do you mean by ‘German slaves dominated by Jewish capital’?”

The would-be dictator of Germany was in no hurry to reply. Slowly, emphasizing every word, he said: “When I speak of Jewish capital, Jewish politics and Jewish domination I do not necessarily mean Jews. I mean, rather, all that is not truly German. The Jews have infected culture and German politics with their views. By trying to transform themselves into Germans they have turned Germans into Jews. They influence business and politics with their internationalistic ideas. The only way in which Germans who have become infected with Judeophilia can be saved is by labeling everything un-German Jewish.”

“In other words, you are making the German Jew the victim, the scapegoat of your policy,’ ‘I observed.

“No,” replied the Leader. “They are a real menace.”

“How can less than one per cent of the total population be a threat to the nation? There are only about half a million Jews in this country of almost seventy millions,” I continued.

“Your figures are not exactly correct, but a few tens of thousands one way or the other make little difference. However, how about the Communists in Russia ? Though their percentage in the total population is smaller than that of the Jews here they control the country.”

“What do you propose to do about this Jewish ‘menace’?” I countered.

Hitler smiled, but the smile did not soften his stern expression. With quiet determination he made this statement: “I intend to do nothing against the Jews except carry on the educational campaign I have prosecuted during the last few years. But whatever the National-Socialist Party will do to carry out its political program it will do in a constitutional way. German life must be purged of all foreign elements that distort the true German spirit. The government must be in the hands of Germans intent upon but one goal: to liberate Germany from its present slavery. This can be done by instilling into Germans their lost self-respect and their faith in their own abilities. The propaganda which we carry on is aimed to elevate German self-confidence.”

“Are you serious when you advocate the wholesale expulsion of Jews from Germany?” I inquired squarely.

Unhesitatingly the Leader replied: “I do want to get rid of”—he used the word loswerden—”those Jews who since the War have invaded our country from Eastern Europe and undermined our morale by mad speculation, who are devoid of all patriotism and have made fortunes out of our national catastrophe. As for the rest, I merely want to limit their influence by passing legal prohibitions against their participation in the Government and by eliminating from public life such non-Jews as act as puppets for Jewish capital.”

“Can you name any such ‘puppets’?”

“I would call the entire Bruening Cabinet a Jewish cabinet. I qualify the Stressemann foreign policy a Jewish policy. I designate the Berlin police department as Jewish. The humiliating surrender of German interests to our former enemies is due entirely to Jewish influence.”

“Do you, then, consider pacifism a Jewish quality or defect specifically?”

“I am a pacifist myself,” was the surprising rejoinder of the man who seven years ago tried to capture the governmental reins of Bavarie [sic] by means of a military putsch. “By pacifism I” — he stressed the “I” in dramatic fashion — “understand the maintenance of peace as long as one’s national honor is unsoiled. The Jewish view of peace, because of the international Jewish mind, means the surrender of all pride for the sake of financial interests.”

“Sometimes the anti-Semites accuse the Jews of militarism,” I remarked, “and sometimes they charge them with noxious pacifism; at other times the Jews are accused as destroyers of all law and order, while only the other day Count Salm, the uncle of your Austrian colleague Prince Starhemberg, called anti-Semitism a revolutionary movement because Jews always support the conservative property-loving classes of their country. How do you reconcile all this?”

By that time it appeared that Adolf Hitler was becoming annoyed at the persistent questioning. It seemed to dawn upon him that this interlocutor, notwithstanding his blond hair and blue eyes, must be a Jew. With a careful gesture the German Mussolini reassured himself that the immaculate part in his hair had not been disturbed. He rose and, adopting his favorite platform position — firmly taking hold the edge of the table with both hands— spoke slowly: “I do not have to go into details. My views are known. I am the only German leader who is not afraid to speak out. I am concerned with the Jews only in so far as they obstruct the realization of the ideal German Reich. But I will countenance no mob action, even against Jews. I never did. We have been made the scapegoat for the undisciplined mob action of the Communists. Jews have nothing to fear from us as long as thy do not mix with us. This they must learn — and I think they are learning very fast since the last elections. As long as the Jews here will not try to pose as Germans and have the temerity to speak for Germans they will be unmolested. That is all I have to say on the subject.”

The leader of the second-largest parliamentary party in Germany, whose name has become synonymous with anti-Semitism throughout Central Europe, drew himself up, bowed slightly and strode out to rejoin his companions. As he approached his party rose and a youngster in a brown shirt with sleeve adorned with the swastika stretched out his arm in the traditional Fascist salute.


Click to enlarge

h/t winstonsmith@theministryoftruth.ls1

Follow @BuelahMan


Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or

9 thoughts on “The forgotten 1931 Jewish interview of Hitler

  1. Spent a couple of hours last night searching for Max Fraenkel. The only one I came up with was a Hamburg physician who committed suicide in 1938 as a result of ‘anti-semitic policies and chicanery’.

    Imo, that stinks and I can’t imagine him being the author of above article. Me thinks, the publisher (The Jewish Criterion) used a pen name – no name to try and smear AH, which they really didn’t. Wishful thinking on the part of the Jew, but overall an attempt to obfuscate. I think that interview was bogus. But that’s just me.


    • You may be right about it being bogus. But I think it represents how AH felt fairly accurately. Even if meant to malign him, it really only shows the truth about what the Jew had done to corrupt Germany.

      Nonetheless, I seriously doubt that a Jew would commit suicide over “anti-semitic policies and (especially) chicanery”. What? The kings of chicanery are going to kill themselves over chicanery?


  2. Larken Rose 1 year ago
    To all those deluded Hitler admirers, please stop implying that because Hitler spoke out against really bad stuff, he must have been good. Learn to THINK. If there are two serial killers having a fight, who do you root for? How about NEITHER? Hitler was a power-happy sociopathic authoritarian collectivist statist, fighting against OTHER power-happy sociopathic authoritarian collectivist statists. Choosing a side in any such battle makes you a dupe.

    metamorphosis67 1 year ago
    Are you saying that if you were forced to fight in WWII, and you only had two choices, you would fight on the side of the collectivists seeking to impose a usurocracy against the collectivists fighting the usurocracy? No, you fight against the usurocracy and when that’s uprooted then lessening collectivist initiations of force minus the usury & legalized counterfeiting which is its main funding is a lot easier.

    Before everything else, if you haven’t already done it, watch “Last Days of the Big Lie” and “Hitler’s Speech on Palestine 1939”

    The main and huge difference between Marxist collectivism & German National Socialist “collectivism” (more like an extended family with a strict traditional father figure elected to lead the pack that is respected for instilling discipline) is that the former is funded by banksters and considers all private property illegitemate whereas the latter is based on private property and completely condemns and seeks to obliterate usury and fractional reserve counterfeiting. In fact, the VERY MAIN tenet of National Socialism, as laid down in the 25 points of the NSDAP in 1920, was


    Notice, that it does not condemn self-interest and does not say that the individual is not the basic unit of social science but seeks to restore a proper balance between the individual and his group, a win-win. In other words it is against extreme individualism, because it oppresses the individual and puts him in disharmony with the social group.

    “Fascism only regiments those who can’t do anything without it. If a man knows how to do anything it’s the essence of fascism to leave him alone.” ~ Ezra Pound

    “The trick is simple. Whenever the Rothschild and other gents in the gold business have gold to sell, they raise the price. The public is fooled by propagandizing the devaluation of the dollar, or other monetary unit according to the country chosen to be victimized. The argument is that the high price of the monetary unit is injurious to the nation’s commerce. But when the nation, that is, the people of that nation own the gold and the financiers own the dollars or other monetary units, the gold standard is restored. This raises the value of the dollar and the citizens of ‘rich’ nations, as well as citizens of other nations, are diddled.”~ Ezra Pound

    So, with no usury, no inflation (not until the imposed war, originally declared by Judea in 1933) and only 13.7% income tax (not increased during the war) even for the richest Germans (average Germans paid much less) Hitler was less “statist,” there was less extorted tax money funding “the state” than in either the USA or Britain at the same time. England was at 23.7% income tax and increased it during the war. Hitler was also freely elected and extremely popular by 1936, so much so that he got 98% of the free German vote and 99% of the free Austrian vote for reunification with Germany in 1938. The Germans under Hitler kept all their guns and had no segregation imposed in their racial laws (which affected only 2% of the population) whereas the USA had nearly full segregation under Jim Crow.

    “Germany’s unforgivable crime before the second world war
    was her attempt to extricate her economic power from the world’s trading systemand to create her own exchange mechanism which would deny world financeits opportunity to profit.” — Churchill to Lord Robert Boothby, as quoted in: Sidney Rogerson, Propaganda in the Next War (Foreword to the second edition 2001), originally published in 1938

    6 months ago

    +nate-m nate-m The Rothschilds of today have an estimated 500 trillion dollars in stolen wealth & control of 155 central banks through the BIS and you’re calling Hitler a megalomaniac for realizing 80+ years ago, when they only controlled 16 central banks, that the financial rape and devastation he had personally experienced in Germany would spread to the entire world, and for booting them out & not taking any shit from commies, freemasons & traitors? Who’s the megalomaniac here? Or do you believe that entire nations & European civilization itself could have been led to revolt against the biggest scumbag criminals in history by boy-scouts in some black-&-white fantasy world that does not exist? Where revolutions just happen without any major problems or blood being spilt? Considering what was accomplished, the complete turnaround of an entire nation in 3 years from imposed destitution to prosperity in 3 years with full-on economic war delcared, the Hitler revolution was a relatively bloodless one.

    Why would you try to whack the anti-usury/anti-legalized-counterfeiting leader-winner of a war if all you saw around you after victory were happy people experiencing even more prosperity (and this time, lasting) than the already unheard-of prosperity the Germans had experienced only 3 years after the NSDAP took power? Why would you have any grievances at all in a country where everyone was employed, there was no inflation, the economy was growing by leaps & bounds every year since the parasites were prevented from sucking its blood, where you paid hardly any taxes & even the richest people paid no more than 13.7% & if you had more than 3 kids you got your house for free? Joogle “The German Economic Miracle” by Michael Walsh. Why not just write a book & argue your case effectively among prosperous and happy people and demonstrate why their might should defend the non-initiation of force & the very underlying principle of the win-win dialectic of all civilization consistently since then they would then prosper even more? Would things not organically move in that direction anyway in the absence of usury & legalized bankster counterfeiting FUNDING media propaganda in the opposite direction?

    Why would you care if you found out that ‘the great leader’ of your country had whacked a hundred people in a political war when in the balance he saved 7 million from unemployment and starvation & all of Europe from communist misery? Would you whack a medal-of-honor-winning soldier that whacked 100 people on the ‘legal’ battlefield? Of course not. Because you have not been programmed to consider a soldier a killer, only political fighters during revolutions.

    Look at it this way: if you had a strict but highly competent dad that instilled discipline in you and made you a real man rather than some wimp degenerate & as a result of the competence gained through this discipline, he made your entire family happy for decades & one day you found out that during his youth he had ambushed and pre-emptively killed a gang of people that were planning to kill him or planning to rape your future prosperity, would you rat him out to the police or try to whack him yourself because he was a ‘murderer’? Of course not. Now multiply that by 60 million people, make your dad the head of an extended family of 60 million, and you’ll see why no one would have cared even if they did find out Hitler had whacked enemies during the early years when the pressure was most severe to turn things around.

    Did you know that when Hitler went to the front to visit with soldiers, even as late as the last weeks of the war, no one was required to unload their weapons like is routine in the American army? That’s because the most popular freely elected leader of all time had no fear of his fighting men even after a war that had claimed so many lives. By the way, I said if you had only two choices. Your only other choices would be to get shot for desertion or to sit in prison or work in the work camps with the commies and the Jews & swim in the swimming pool there & use your camp money in the medically inspected brothel. Being outside of any cities experiencing major bombing, you would have been safe, until the ALL-LIES bombed the supply lines.

    Might-makes-right-because-rights-make-the-most-might & for no other reason, not the other way around. One of these days you’ll learn this lesson. There is no such thing as an abstract ‘right’ that people will automatically respect which doesn’t have lethal force behind it stemming from the force-of-public-opinion, which itself stems from propaganda, protecting it. What is the moral? That which gives more-of-all and more-for-all simultaneously, but never in equal proportion, in keeping with natural inequalities yet sacrificing none in the process, and requiring only the bearing of responsibilities for free choices and actions. Only when the mass-propaganda is promoting eternal vigilance in protecting free-thought & free-choice because it results in the most synergized prosperity & therefore, the most overall might, will there be enough force behind it for it to become a reality. When the propaganda is in the hands of usurers who promote the very opposite or the purely collectivist principle of “democracy,” this will never become a reality.

    If ‘democracy’ or the tyranny of the majority is simply substituted for ‘liberty’ which can only ever apply to individuals or no one at all, then by this simple action of constantly reinforced and psychically driven word-substitution, the entire narrative of ‘eternal vigilance’ is turned upon its head and becomes weaponized to come to mean defending the tyranny of the majority, its elected leaders and all its initiations of force against the individual & the non-aggression principle at all times. This is the absurd and deliberately engineered schizophrenic state of all civilized nations of the world today where the weaponized narrative works to accomplish in reality the exact opposite (win-lose dialectic) of what its adherents have been taught to THINK it’s accomplishing in abstraction: the discipline of freedom, its win-win dialectic, and the general goodwill that can only result from this discipline and no other.

    6 months ago

    +jack lloyd
    It’s called backing up your statements with facts, smart guy, not ‘pretending’ it’s your own research. LOL. Your thoughts & ideas do not exist in a vacuum. They are based on the information you were fed since childhood by your momma and the media your momma exposed you to, and after that the indoctrination centers you call ‘schools’ and ‘universities.’ YOU have to determine if this information is valid or not. You can’t just take a bunch of base premises you have & WITHOUT INVESTIGATING and validating them, base your whole chain of logic on it. For example, once you discover that the holycost is a hoax Watch: David Cole at Auschwitz and Last Days of the Big Lie on you tube for proof, you HAVE to change your entire perspective on Hitler and the Third Reich or you’re just a dishonest, unprincipled scoundrel and shill, a useful ego/idiot, and that’s the end of it. Once you discover THE VERY BASIC TENET OF NATIONAL SOCIALISM, written in 1920 in the 25 Points of the NSDAP, which is:


    and the fact that they were strictly based on the principle of PRIVATE PROPERTY & only had 13.7% income taxes max, which you were DELIBERATELY never taught in history class or on the “history” (hitler) channel, then YOU HAVE TO REVISE your ideas about National Socialism being no different than Marxist socialist ‘collectivism.’ If you don’t, then you’re simply a dishonest person and every honest person who checks these facts on the internet will WITH FULL JUSTIFICATION call you a troll and a shill.

    So which one are you then, a troll, a shill or an honest truth-seeker? Go ahead and check my sources. You’ll see that they are primary sources, based on actual period documentation, and not BS.

    4 months ago

    +Larken Rose A legitimate ‘state’ is legalized self-defense force of the community that wants it in power. If you do not approve of any official state, you still have to approve of some form of immediate collective force of self-defense of the community of individuals you live in, either your family, your neighborhood, your town, region or nation. Nature is the ultimate dictator. All man-made laws have to concur with what nature dictates or they will fail sooner or later. Just like your family might vote for a father figure to make decisions for and protect your family, for better or worse, because they trust this person more than themselves to come up with the right path for them all, so the leader of the extended family of a nation of kindred individuals or common ancestry & shared principles. In a Libertarian or Anarchic organization, you HAVE to have full control of propaganda or a means of getting all like-minded individuals to form collectives at the drop of a hat to defend, with force, the non-aggression principle or the win-win dialectic of civilization against the initiated aggression &/or fraud of the win-lose (parasites). Fascism was basically John Philpot Curran’s ‘the price of liberty is eternal vigilance’ in EMERGENCY mode. They did the best they could under the circumstances & under absolutely enormous pressure. The German people’s trust in Hitler was not misplaced. They got rid of the banksters and they got rid of most of the exploiters of their country and as a result experienced an economic miracle.

    Rothbard and Mises refuse to acknolwedge this historically established fact and that’s why they’re not trusted. The fact that they were both Jews adds to the distrust but is not the main cause of it. The main cause of it is their unwillingness to be honest about National Socialist Germany and its anti-usury and anti-legalized-counterfeiting revolution which resulted in previously UNHEARD of economic prosperity and endless inventions such as:

    the first programmable computer

    first binary calculator

    first operational Jet engine & Jet airplane

    the helicopter

    Night Vision Technology

    Stealth Bombers

    Guided Missiles

    Nuclear Fission

    Freeways (the prototype & still the best – the autobahn – basic idea and design by Uncle Adolf himself) – so that people could FREELY travel everywhere unimpeded and without any checkpoints (all that stuff only came during the imposed war)

    Volkswagen Bugs (the most popular & longest lasting car model of all time & the pre-cursor to the Porsche 911, built at a time when only 35 people out of a thousand could even afford the 5 marks a week to buy one)


    Magnetic Tape

    3-D 35mm film

    synthetics, including fibers, fuels and buna rubber;


    300,000 patents and copyrights were stolen by Stalin’s allies from defeated Germany without compensation.

    What does that tell you ?

    Which stifling collectivist tyranny has ever produced that much creativity?

    Does a country of state-oppressed ‘slaves’ produce this:

    Officially published nude books that would never have been published in the censored U.S.A. at that time:

    Third Reich Nude Books:

    “Hitler will have no war (does not want war), but we will force it on him, not this year, but soon.” – Emil Ludwig Cohn in Les Annales, June, 1934 (also quoted in his book “The New Holy Alliance”).

    “Before the end of the year, an economic bloc of England, Russia, France and the U.S.A will be formed to bring the German and Italian economic systems to their knees.” – Paul Dreyfus, “La Vie de Tanger” May 15, 1938.

    On the 3rd of June, 1938, the American Hebrew boasted that they had Jews in the foremost positions of influence in Britain, Russia and France, and that these “three sons of Israel will be sending the Nazi dictator to hell.” – Joseph Trimble, the American Hebrew.

    “We Jews are going to bring a war on Germany.” – David A. Brown, National Chairman, United Jewish Campaign, 1934 (quoted in “I Testify Against The Jews” by Robert Edward Edmondson, page 188 and “The Jewish War of Survival” by Arnold Leese, page 52).

    “Germany is our public enemy number one. It is our object to declare war without mercy against her. One may be sure of this: We will lead that war!” – Bernard Lecache, the president of the “International League Against Racism and Anti-Semitism,” in its newspaper “Droit de Vivre” (Right to Life), 9 November, 1938.

    “Hitler will have no war (does not want war), but we will force it on him, not this year, but soon.” – Emil Ludwig Cohn in Les Annales, June, 1934 (also quoted in his book “The New Holy Alliance”).

    “Before the end of the year, an economic bloc of England, Russia, France and the U.S.A will be formed to bring the German and Italian economic systems to their knees.” – Paul Dreyfus, “La Vie de Tanger” May 15, 1938.

    “The war now proposed is for the purpose of establishing Jewish hegemony throughout the world.” – Brigadier General George Van Horn Mosely, The New York Tribune, March 29, 1939.

    The free elections of Germany & Austria & the Saar region attest to how few people agreed with your ‘evil bastard’ assessment in two of the most cultured countries in the world and 200 million VW bugs sold as of the 1990s as the most popular car ever made attest to the fact that this ‘evil bastard’ was nothing if not a man-of-the-people. You should weigh the positives against the negatives before declaring somebody to be ‘Darth Vader’ or an ‘evil bastard.’ If you do, you’ll see that the positives far outweigh the negatives, but always remember that self-defense force is absolutely justified at all times and there will never be any civilization without the capability of IMMEDIATE collective mobilization of self-defense force in defense of the win-win dialectic of a hard-working civilization which Germany mostly was during Hitler’s era.

    98% of the free German vote (March 29th, 1936)

    99% of the free Austrian vote for reunification with Germany (March 13th, 1938)

    90% of the free Saar Region vote for reunification (January 13th, 1935)

    “I don’t believe I’ll ever see again a people as happy and content as were the great majority of Germans under Hitler, especially in peacetime. Certainly some minorities suffered: former parliamentary politicians – because they couldn’t play their political games; the Jews – because they lost their power over Germany; the gypsies – because during the war they were required to work; and crooked union bosses – because they lost their parasitical positions. To this day I believe that the happiness of the majority of a people is more important than the well-being of a few spoiled minorities. In school there should be emphasis on promoting the best and the intelligent, as was done in Germany during the Hitler years – a fact that contributed after the war to the rapid German reconstruction.” “To be a boy or girl at that time was wonderful. In the Hitler Youth the differences between Christian denominations or the different German states didn’t count. We all truly felt that we were members of one body of people – one nation. Youth hostels were opened all over the Reich, enabling us to hike from one beautiful town to another seeing our fatherland. Every effort was made to strengthen our minds and bodies. Contrary to what is said today, we were encouraged to become free in spirit, and not to succumb to peer (or authority) pressure. In peacetime, no military training was allowed by the Hitler Youth leadership; scouting yes. Incidentally, to ‘snitch on our parents’ was frowned upon.” – from Hans Schmidt, Living in Hitler’s Germany

    6 days ago

    +Mike Fray Aware of what? Something that EVEN THE PROSECUTION’S OWN EXPERT WITNESS, Raul Hilberg, in the first Zundel trial, admitted ON THE COURT RECORDS: that there was NOT A SINGLE PIECE of corroborating hard evidence to back up the official fable of the holycost?

    “The prosecution expert in the first (Zundel) trial was Raul Hilberg, an American professor of Jewish descent and author of the standard reference work, [i]The Destruction of the European Jews[/i] (1961), which Paul Rassinier discussed in [i]Le Drame des Juifs européens[/i] (The Drama of the European Jews). Hilberg began his testimony by explaining, without interruption, his theory about the extermination of the Jews. He was then cross-examined by Zündel’s lawyer, Douglas Christie, who was assisted by Keltie Zubko and myself. Right from the start it was clear that Hilberg, who was the world’s leading authority on the Holocaust, had never examined a single concentration camp, not even Auschwitz. He had still not examined any camp in 1985 when he announced the imminent appearance of a new edition of his main work in three volumes, revised, corrected and augmented. Although he did visit Auschwitz in 1979 for a single day as part of a ceremonial appearance, he did not bother to examine either the buildings or the archives. In his entire life he has never seen a “gas chamber,” either in its original condition or in ruins. (For a historian, even ruins can tell tales). On the stand he was forced to admit that there had never been a plan, a central organization, a budget or supervision for what he called the policy of the extermination of the Jews. He also had to admit that since 1945 the Allies have never carried out an expert study of “the weapon of the crime,” that is to say of a homicidal gas chamber. No autopsy report has established that even one inmate was ever killed by poison gas.

    Hilberg said that Hitler gave orders for the extermination of the Jews, and that Himmler gave an order to halt the extermination on November 25, 1944 (such detail!). But Hilberg could not produce these orders. The defense asked him if he still maintained the existence of the Hitler orders in the new edition of his book. He dared to answer yes. He thereby lied and even committed perjury. In the new edition of his work (with a preface dated September 1984), Hilberg systematically deleted any mention of an order by Hitler.” — Robert Faurisson, The Zündel Trials of 1985 and 1988

    Search for and read Faurisson’s full account of both trials which Zundel won. This is why they took their revenge some 20 years later by kidnapping and deporting Zundel to Germany through 2 years of solitary confinement Canada just awaiting ‘trial,’ over a minor visa overstay violation where under German laws he was thrown in prison for 5 years. So, they took away 7 years of this man’s life for basically saying no different than what THEIR OWN EXPERT WITNESS was forced to admit on the stand in 1985!

    1 day ago

    +Mike Fray What’s so ‘disgusting’ about the truth? The truth is ‘disgusting’ only to those ‘disgusting’ people who hate the truth, such as yourself. If your official fable is so ‘real’ why is it ILLEGAL, on pain of up to 5 years in PRISON in 19 countries to even question it? Which ‘very real truth’ is it that requires LONG PRISON SENTENCES to back it up? LOL Give it up, you already lost right there, even out of the starting gate. I’ll bet you love ‘the truth’ so much that you support those laws, don’t you mister ‘give it a rest’? Did you tell the people who put Zundel in prison for 7 years (5 years in Germany, 2 years in solitary in Canada just awaiting trial), even his lawyer Sylvia Stolz in prison for 3 and a quarter years, Germar Rudolf in prison for almost 4 years, Horst Mahler in prison for a total of 12 years, as well as thousands of other people whose names we’ll never know to ‘give it a rest’? I didn’t think so. The only thing people like you want ‘given a rest’ is the truth itself.

    If the bullshit ‘extermination camp’ story is so ‘real’ why is it that RAUL HILBERG, THEIR OWN EXPERT WITNESS, the expert witness of the holohoax industry, ADMITTED ON THE STAND AND ON THE COURT RECORD (the entire records are online for anyone to see at IHR and David Irving’s site) in the first Zundel trial in Canada that NOT A SINGLE AUTOPSY exists proving the use of a gas chamber for executing even ONE person?

    For anyone actually interested in historical truth and accuracy (unlike this Fray clown) and 100% conclusive and detailed proof that the official fable is a GROSS and OUTRAGEOUS fabrication and not even just exaggeration (since an exaggeration would mean that Hitler and the German high-command actually had a deliberate plan to kill all the Jews in the first place, which they certainly did not, they had a deliberate plan to DEPORT all the Jews, communists, freemasons and Jesuits permanently out of Germany) to demonize the entire German nation forever, watch:

    Last Days of the Big Lie

    One Third of the holocaust

    The holocaust Unveiled – the Persecution of the Revisionists

    People did die in the camps because of medieval conditions CREATED BY ALLIED BOMBING, not because of any deliberate plan. Any other isolated killings or war-time crimes do not make a holycost. Around 280,000 people died, according to the detailed records kept by the Germans, and not even nearly all of those were Jews. Many German prisoners, guards and camp administrators also died primarily from the typhus epidemic, starvation, malnutrition, etc. This was due to ALLIED BOMBING of the supply lines towards the end of the war. If extermination was the plan of the National Socialists, a simple bullet to the head would have been far easier and a hundred times cleaner and less trouble free than this absurd fable they have made up through black-propaganda to guilt-trip not just Germans forever but most of the planet as well, especially the USA and Europe where there are MANDATORY holycost study programs in schools. They can also go steal all of Palestine and kill as many Palestinians as ruthlessly as they can for 60 years straight and claim it’s all ‘self-defense’ against people who want to ‘holycost’ them again. Hey let’s let Sefton Delmer explain the situation for us:

    Below are words from Denis Sefton Delmer, British chief propagandist after the capitulation of Germany in 1945 to the then German expert on International law Professor Grimm:

    “We won this war with atrocity propaganda and now we will start more than ever! We will continue this atrocity propaganda, we will increase it until nobody will accept one good word from the Germans anymore, until everything is destroyed which might have upheld them sympathies in other countries, and until they will be so confused that they don’t know what to do anymore. When this is reached, when they begin to pollute their own nest, and this not reluctantly but with hasty willingness to obey the winners, only then the victory is complete. It will never be definite. The reeducation demands thorough, steadfast nurture like an English lawn. Only one moment of inattention and the weed will break through, this ineradicable weed of historic truth.”

    Delmer was the head of “black propaganda,” meaning forged documents.

    metamorphosis67 4 months ago
    +Mike Fray The “conditions” before the Allies bombed the supply lines included a maternity ward where 3000 live births were registered with not a single infant mortality while the camps were still under German rule, pool, soccer field, medically inspected brothel, hospital, post office, cinema, theater, camp orchestra, camp money, camp marriages, dental facilities, camp sauna, etc. The Red Cross was openly invited to visit often and never declared any conditions ‘inhumane’ until the supply lines were bombed into oblivion To declare, without even a single autopsy on file, that 6 million people were gassed to death on purpose when only, at most, 300,000 died as a result of a typhus epidemic, malnutrition and hunger CAUSED by allied bombing of the supply lines towards the end of the war is the single most outrageously false LIE and fabrication of the entire 20th century, literally THE HOAX of the Twentieth Century, maybe even of all time, and not just an ‘exaggeration.’ Even Zyklon B was used for delousing in order to prevent the spread of typhus and deaths. The truth is not a matter of ‘who will take you seriously’ or not. The truth stands on its own.

    “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.” – Arthur Schopenhauer

    “A man may imagine things that are false, but he can only understand things that are true, for if the things be false, the apprehension of them is not understanding.” — Isaac Newton

    Click “View All 40 Replies” to the top comment by Larken Rose if you want to see all the posts in context and who I’m responding to. I’m metamorphosis67 over there.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Incredible, Neg. There is so much excellent rebuttal to the knee jerkers in that. I am overly impressed.

      I tried to follow Larken Rose early on (and much of what he says, I can agree with). But when he approaches the Hitler/Nazis are evil memes, certainly generated by brainwashing of some sort (I like the way you put it… by the media and the media his mother fed him… in so many words). I’ve had a similar run-in with him, but don’t have the knowledge and skills to lay it out in the same fashion.

      Paul Craig Roberts is the same. Very bright about many subjects, yet when he knee jerks with the brainwashing unsupported by fact, it makes him look like an imbecile. I could say the same thing about many other people, far more intelligent than I, but without even a slight bit of logical insight that easily puts the Big Lie to rest (as in why people are demonized and imprisoned for addressing the incongruities and bald faced lies that the Big Lie brainwashing uses.

      One doesn’t have to agree with every plank the NSDAP used, but when there isn’t any evidence backing these genius-idiots’ automatic responses, I begin to question their cognitive skills. It also makes them look like liars about other subjects, when it is really just a deep brainwashing by the Jew. And they are too stupid to understand this.

      I am going to be working on gathering the very best sources of anti-propaganda for a stealth DVD program that my friend MNM (marynotmartha) has approached me with. She is on fire to learn more about many of these subjects, and I hope that you might be interested in assisting by helping assemble a list of the best video/podcast sources regarding the Big Lie, Hitler, the NSDAP, the Holohoax and current Jew control of the world. IE: The Greatest Story Never Told, etc.

      Much of what you wrote here is chock full of that information. Not only will this be used in the stealth DVD program (sending dvd’s, leaving them, handing them out, etc), but I plan to make a page dedicated to the information as a single point of reference for here.

      Keep an eye out for the post coming up within the next week for your input (and Mach Nichts, and/or anyone/everyone else that frequents here), if you are interested. Thanks.


      • Look at the way this hate-filled kike introduces this honest and righteous man. The Fuhrer’s truthfulness and sincerity shines through despite his alleged “mental poverty”, “arrogant, unreasoning hatred of the Jews” and being an “intolerant ignoramus.” LOL.


        “The Jews are the scum of the earth, but they are also great masters in lying.”–the great Arthur Schopenhauer, 19th century German philosopher. *

        Liked by 1 person

You Got Something To Say? Please keep your maw respectful and gab on topic.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s