More Shit Jews Own (And Blame Whites For)

The Slave Trade Was Owned and Run by Jews (As Admitted by Jews)


How many times have you heard a black person blame white people for the slave trade? Heck, for many years, I believed it too. I mean, surely they would know what they were talking about, right? Even to this day, white people are blamed for all sorts of black oppression and the old canard is continually used by the brainwashed (many being white who have white guilt over a glaring falsity that is fostered by Jews and eagerly accepted by blacks). But it doesn’t take long, if you look into the truth of the matter, you will see that very few white people actually had slaves. As a percentage, Jews were far more likely to own black slaves than white folk were (not to mention that the first slaves brought to this continent were white). It was a rich man’s endeavor and very few white folk were rich back in those days.

Why is this important? Because people need to know that Jews, on one hand, infiltrate and call themselves white, then when convenient, sever that claim, telling us they are their own race making it advantageous to blame white people for the disgusting programs they started to begin with. However, there are some Jews that tell the true story, in many cases thinking only Jews will hear and in other cases to the consternation of the Jews willingly subverting and hiding the truth, attempting to cover for their ill gotten gains and evil propensities.

The fact is that some whites did own slaves, but for that matter, so did some blacks. As a matter of fact, in direct opposition to the meme, it was blacks in Africa that sold those slaves to Jews and it was Jews that brought them into the western world. It was not rampaging white people going into the African continent, wiping out black tribes and taking them to the New World, as the Jewish media and movies insist (covering up their ancestor’s crimes).

Black People: I’m talking to you (and the gullible whites who still believe the Jew Lie)

The following links and posts lead you to the truth of this horrific time. You might recoil because you have been so thoroughly indoctrinated by those covering their own crimes, but this is from the horse’s mouth, as it were.

Read and learn:

Dutch Rabbi: ‘Jews monopolized slavery’

tsrv2_2d1One of the best-known Dutch Rabbi, Lody Van de Kamp, who has authored several books on European Jewish history, is quoted by JTA, saying: “Money was earned by Jewish communities in South America, partly through slavery, and went to Holland, where Jewish bankers handled it.”

In his forthcoming book, entitled ‘The Jewish Slave’, the rabbi claims that in one area of what used to be Dutch Guyana, 40 Jewish-owned plantations were home to a total population of at least 5,000 slaves. Known as the Jodensavanne, or Jewish Savannah, the area had a Jewish community of several hundred before its destruction in a slave uprising in 1832. Nearly all of them immigrated to Holland, bringing their accumulated wealth with them.

Rabbi Lody Van de Kamp has been criticized by the pro-Israel Dutch Jewish leaders in the past for suggesting that they should have dialogue with Dutch Muslim leaders instead calling them ‘antisemites’. He has also disagreed with other rabbis for “compromising” with the Dutch government over “kosher slaughtering” dispute, which he called “distortion” of Torah laws.

However, Rabbi Van de Kamp is not the first rabbi to admit Jewish role in African slavery. Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael, in book, ‘Jews and Judaism in United States: A Documentary History’, also exposed Jewish domination of slavery in the US, France, England and Denmark. Read more here.

In 1991, when Nation of Islam published its study, titled ‘The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews‘, the group’s leader Louis Farrakhan was called “racist and antisemite’ by the organized Jewry.

Farrakhan is hated by Jews, and has long been targeted by powerful Jewish groups such as the ADL and SPLC. Jews also detest the Nation of Islam itself. In 1942 a secret ADL file, “Temple of Islam Infiltration,” stated that “a Negro employed by us” proved “quite instrumental” in an FBI raid on the Chicago mosque that resulted in 82 arrests. In 1959 the American Jewish Committee sent black spies from the Urban League to report on an appearance by then-NOI leader Elijah Muhammad in Newark,” wrote Andrew Hamilton. Read more here.

Walter White Jr. in, ‘Who brought the slaves to America?,’ claims also that Jews were the dominant slave traders in Americas and Europe.

Professor Tony Martin (died 2013) an African historian at the Wellesley College, was chased by the Jewish Lobby for decades for exposing Jewish monopoly in human trading. Watch video below.

Rehmat had a video of Dr Martin in the post, but it is now defunct. I have previously posted about Dr Martin here and featured this video:

Another very important source is a David Duke post where he quotes from his book Jewish Supremacism. In that book, he also references Walter White Jr.’s book, Who Brought the Slaves to America in much greater detail, along with several other Jewish sources.

The following is just a snippet:

The Jewish Religion’s Position on the Slave Trade and Sexual Abuse: The Shocking Truth!

by David Duke


who-brought-the-slaves-to-america1It really surprised me when I found out that Jews played a prominent role in American slavery. In the early 1970s, I came across a book called Who Brought the Slaves to America by Walter White. I could understand the role of Jews in the slave trade of the Mediterranean region, but it seemed unlikely to me that the very small Jewish population in the early American Colonies could dominate such a large enterprise. I also retained, at that time, Hollywood’s image of White men, perhaps even Southerners, sailing to Africa and rounding up Black natives for the slave trade. In movies, articles and books, slavers were Anglo-Saxons with names like Smith or Jones. Usually, they were hard-drinking, uncouth, Southern types. Later I learned that slavery was ubiquitous in Africa among native Blacks themselves, and that they were seldom rounded up by Whites. Usually, Black African slaveholders were the ones who sold them to the slavetraders.

Who Brought the Slaves to America steered me to the library collections that housed the records of the slave ships, contemporary accounts, and a number of Jewish historians who documented the role Jews have played in slavery (also see the Barnes Review, Sept. 97). The Jewish writers I read were prideful in their accounts of the great Jewish slave traders. A good case in point is Marc Raphael’s Jews and Judaism in the United State: A Documentary History.

Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.

This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the ‘triangular trade’ that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750s, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760s, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760s and early 1770s dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent.

In North America, the slave trade had its most powerful center in Newport, Rhode Island. Newport formed a pivotal part of the triangular slave trade of rum and molasses from New England to Africa for slaves and back to the West Indies and the Colonies with the human cargo. I discovered that it was no coincidence that Newport, center of the slave trade, had the oldest synagogue in America and the largest thriving Jewish community in the American colonies.

Aaron Lopez, a Portuguese Jew of Marrano descent and a resident of Newport, was one of the most powerful slave traders in the Americas. He owned dozens of ships and imported thousands of Blacks into the Western Hemisphere. In an account of just two voyages of one of Lopez’s ships, the Cleopatra, at least 250 Blacks perished. Such horrendous loss of life in such a dirty business did not prevent Jewish chronicler Jacob Marcus from praising Lopez: “What can be said about this most attractive figure.?” Although Lopez acquired riches in the Colonies, he violated the anti-British non-importation trade agreements during the revolutionary period, supporting Britain’s interests rather than the Colonies.’

Jews dominated the slave trade not only in the American Colonies but all over the New World. In a major Jewish history of the early Americas called, New World Jewry, 1492-1776, one can find the following passage:

They came with ships carrying African blacks to be sold as slaves. The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the Jews were often appointed as agents for the Crown in their sale….[They] were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping business was mainly a Jewish enterprise….The ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains.


Although certainly indefensible by today’s moral standards, slavery in the United States was many times preferable to the incredibly cruel and murderous conditions of African slavery. The greatest inhumanity of Black slavery is associated with the passage to America. Some say that 10 to 15 percent of Black slaves died in the cramped and filthy conditions on the ships. Since the Jews have dominated the slave trade from ancient times, I realized that it is not only Blacks who have suffered from those inhuman conditions, but also untold numbers of White people of the Mediterranean region. It should also be pointed out that not only were Jews the principal slave traders, they had a markedly higher per capita holding of slaves than non-Jews.

All through the eighteenth century, into the early nineteenth, Jews in the North were to own black servants; in the South, the few plantations owned by Jews were tilled with slave labor. In 1820, over 75 percent of all Jewish families in Charleston, Richmond, and Savannah owned slaves, employed as domestic servants; almost 40 percent of all Jewish householders in the United States owned one slave or more. There were no protests against slavery as such by Jews in the South, where they were always outnumbered at least 100 to 1….Very few Jews anywhere in the United States protested against chattel slavery on moral grounds.

Considering that less than 2 percent of all colonists owned slaves, Marcus reveals that individual Jewish households (40 percent owned slaves) were far more likely to own slaves than were Gentiles. With their comparatively greater numbers in the Mediterranean world, Jews constituted disproportionate slaveholders in the ancient and medieval world just as they were in the Colonies. The importation of slaves to America is a relatively recent historical phenomenon that lasted about 200 years. From before the time of Christ to the African trade of the 1700s, most of the slaves owned and bartered by Jews were White.

When I learned of the Jewish role in the slave trade, it seemed to me that it could have certainly added to the resentment against the Jews felt by their host populations. Being known as the greatest perpetrators of the slave trade is not the best of public relations for Jews. It is no wonder that the Jewish-dominated media have avoided the issue. Only Jewish scholars, who faithfully record Jewish history, primarily for Jewish readers, are allowed to travel on to such forbidden historical ground.

After my first efforts on national television in the early 1970s to expose the Jewish role in slave trading (on PBS’s — Black Perspectives on the News), the Nation of Islam also did extensive research on the issue. Their historical research department came up with a tremendous amount of documented material on the subject that they published in the book called, The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews.

Today, simply by repeating the words of prominent Jewish historians on the Jewish role in slavery, one becomes guilty of anti-Semitism. It was only when the public began to learn some of the little-known facts previously reserved for Jewish scholars, that the ADL found it necessary to counter such “anti-Semitic” propaganda. The ADL and other Jewish organizations have responded by trotting out a number of prestigious Jewish scholars who have publicly announced that the Jewish role in the colonial slave trade was “minimal.”

In Spielberg’s blockbuster movie on the slave trade, Amistad, there was hardly a Jew to be found in the film. Although the Jews dominated the Newport, Rhode Island slave trade, all the slavers in the film seemed conspicuously Christian. A number of articles that discussed Amistad and the slave trade, including Time and Newsweek, went out of their way to deny a major Jewish role in slave trading. Unfortunately, most of their readers were not told what prominent Jewish historians themselves wrote about the matter before it became an embarrassing issue.

Few will read the words of the editor of the magazine of the American Jewish Historical Society; “Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated. This is no less true on the North American mainland…”


For a wonderful assembly of Jewish admittance to the slave trade, you must read Hoff’s piece, quoted from a now extinct site. Here are just a few of those quotes:

Dr. Seymour B. Liebman

“They came with ships carrying African blacks to be sold as slaves. The traffic in slaves was a royal monopoly, and the Jews were often appointed as agents for the Crown in their sale….[They] were the largest ship chandlers in the entire Caribbean region, where the shipping business was mainly a Jewish enterprise….The ships were not only owned by Jews, but were manned by Jewish crews and sailed under the command of Jewish captains.”

New World Jewry 1493-1825: Requiem for the Forgotten (KTAV, New York, 1982), pp. 170, 183. [Liebman is an attorney; LL.B., St. Lawrence University, 1929; M.A. (Latin American history), Mexico City College, 1963; Florida chapter American Jewish Historical Society, 1956-58; Friends of Hebrew University, 1958-59; American Historical Society Contributor to scholarly journals on Jewish history.

Dr. Herbert I. Bloom

“The Christian inhabitants [of Brazil] were envious because the Jews owned some of the best plantations in the river valley of Pernambuco and were among the leading slave-holders and slave traders in the colony.”1
“Slave trade [sic] was one of the most important Jewish activities here [in Surinam] as elsewhere in the colonies.”2

1. , “A Study of Brazilian Jewish History 1623-1654, Based Chiefly Upon the Findings of the Late Samuel Oppenheim,” Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society, vol. 33 (1934), p. 63.
2. The Economic Activities of the Jews of Amsterdam in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Port Washington, New York/London: Kennikat Press, 1937), p. 159.
[Bloom is a rabbi with degrees from Columbia University, Jewish Institute of Religion]

Dr. Arnold Wiznitzer

“The West India Company, which monopolized imports of slaves from Africa, sold slaves at public auctions against cash payment. It happened that cash was mostly in the hands of Jews. The buyers who appeared at the auctions were almost always Jews, and because of this lack of competitors they could buy slaves at low prices. On the other hand, there also was no competition in the selling of the slaves to the plantation owners and other buyers, and most of them purchased on credit payable at the next harvest in sugar. Profits up to 300 percent of the purchase value were often realized with high interest rates….If it happened that the date of such an auction fell on a Jewish holiday the auction had to be postponed. This occurred on Friday, October 21, 1644.”

Jews in Colonial Brazil (1960), pp. 72-3; [Note: Wiznitzer, Arnold Aharon, educator; Born in Austria, December 20, 1899; Ph.D., University of Vienna, 1920; Doctor of Hebrew Literature, Jewish Theological Seminary of America; Emeritus research professor, University of Judaism, Los Angeles; Contributor to historical journals in the United States and Brazil including the Journal of Jewish Social Studies and the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society. Former president, Brazilian-Jewish Institute of Historical Research.]

Dr. Ira Rosenwaike

“In Charleston, Richmond and Savannah the large majority (over three-fourths) of the Jewish households contained one or more slaves; in Baltimore, only one out of three households were slaveholding; in New York, one out of eighteen….Among the slaveholding households the median number of slaves owned ranged from five in Savannah to one in New York.”

“The Jewish Population in 1820,” in Abraham J. Karp, ed., The Jewish Experience in America: Selected Studies from the Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society (Waltham, Massachusetts, 1969, 3 volumes), volume 2, pp. 2, 17, 19.

Dr. Cecil Roth

“The Jews of the Joden Savanne [Surinam] were also foremost in the suppression of the successive negro revolts, from 1690 to 1722: these as a matter of fact were largely directed against them, as being the greatest slave-holders of the region.“

History of the Marranos (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1932), p. 292.

Dr. Abraham J. Peck, American Jewish Archives

“The first two centuries of the Black-Jewish encounter in America were highlighted by a fairly extensive record of Jewish slave-holding. Indeed, during the colonial period, in the small Jewish community of the time, almost every Jewish household of any form, North or South, possessed at least one slave.”

From the exhibit “Blacks and Jews: The American Experience: 1654-1992,” presented by Hebrew Union College, Jewish Institute of Religion, the American Jewish Archives, and the America Jewish Committee.

This is just a drop in the bucket of the proof that Jews, themselves were the main instigators and perpetrators of slavery in the early days of the Americas. Nowadays, it is hidden by Jews in media, but that is what they do: lie to cover their tracks. And what better scapegoat than white folks, when most white folk had no slaves and in my family’s case, were against slavery because it created artificially low wages (just as illegal immigration does today).

Is this a deflection from the white people that did own slaves? No, not any more than there should be the obvious deflection/ignoring that blacks owned slaves. Simply put, we all should know the whole truth. And the whole truth shows a much different picture than what we have all been hoodwinked to believe which hides the Jews’ complicity and their major role in what happened.

The fact is that the Jews are the enemy of Gentiles, both black and white. Stop falling for their tricks and schemes of division and understand what sort of mendacious monsters they truly are.

Read More Here:

h/t Rehmat’s World, David Duke and Hoff

Follow @BuelahMan


Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

The blog owner does not necessarily agree with the information published or with the original authors’ ideology, but supplies this information to foster comment, reporting, teaching and study. If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the right hand panel of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

Comment Policy:

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post. 1st time commenters must receive Admin approval, but have free reign after that.

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or

14 thoughts on “More Shit Jews Own (And Blame Whites For)

  1. Thx again Beulahman, for exposing what needs to be e posed! Yeah aw, you made my day. Get it out there! Loud and proud (er, not THAT, kind of proud)! Let’s rid the world of these hideous inbreeders!


  2. I think it was the latest issue of Michael Hoffman’s that covered the action on the West Coast of Africa – the relationship between Africa tribes and slavers. Slavers operated at the pleasure of the war lords. Very informative. Can’t find the issue or I’d leave a few quotations. (

    Big, big topic and the Tony Martin video is a vital tool for deprogramming the goy herd.


  3. August 13, 2015

    SLAVERY 2015

    We be slaves all, short, medium and tall.
    We be slaves to Master, to his minions,
    and to our Selves, any and all!
    We be slaves to money, fortune, and fame.
    We pretend not, we play their Game.
    We blame everyone but our Selves for our chains,
    The wicked binds of debt and fiat poverty.
    How could we possibly be to blame??


  4. A few quotes from over a hundred years ago that I still find relevant today. Not exactly related to slavery but nonetheless. Hope, you forgive me for this one, BMan.
    Wilhelm Marr has conceded ‘Vae Victis! to the Jews mainly because of their adaptability over the centuries and the culpability of their host countries and communities, from a non-religious point of view. He just doesn’t touch on the darker side of the Talmud.

    “This tribe, the Jews, possessed throughout its history by a theocratic fervor not found among other people and whose theocratic code of behavior in war and peace was dreadful, transformed its destructive potential into new forms and using these, vanquished the Occident, a victory it could not achieve in the Orient using fire and sword.”

    “The ‘culture struggle’ had begun. While we Germans had been banned and outlawed by the press since 1848 if we considered as much as criticism of anything Jewish, Jewry now involved itself in our religious and cultural struggles with Ultramontanism. — Well! The latter opposed Judaism in the battle for world domination! Here one may certainly not speak of Judaic tactfulness, which in turn demands from us that we treat it like glass or like a Mimosa pudica.”

    “I ask of you, do not berate the Jews! You vote for their foreign rule in your parliaments, you make them into legislators and judges, you elevate them to become dictators of your state’s finances. You have turned the press over to them, because you find brilliant frivolity more to your liking than moral fortitude, — what is it that you rather want?”

    “Victory of Judaism over Germanism” by Wilhelm Marr, Bern, Rudolph Costenoble, 1879, available open source on the net


  5. Check out what John le Bon had to say about all this a few days ago

    le Bon just bides his time and lets Abirato babble away and interrupt him constantly, basically repeating a bunch of mainstream indoctrination memes, then quickly wipes the floor with him and his cultural-Marxist, race-is-only-skin-color, all-is-nurture-nothing-is-nature, all-cultures-are-equal, egalitarian, pro-mass-immigration BS at the 3 hour and 28 minute mark.

    [audio src="" /]

    Too bad he played nice and apologized “if he had upset them” at the end. There was no need for that.

    Negentropic Chronicles – Episode 3 –

    [audio src="" /]

    Much more coming up in a few days


    • I tried several times to listen to Abirato’s show, but found I couldn’t stand it. He considers himself informed (discussing various theories most people find difficult to believe), then he says shit that the MSM would have us believe. Besides, as in this case, the show is LONGGGG. Too much for me.

      I don’t know much about le Bon, but kudos if he didn’t cringe under pressure.


You Got Something To Say? Please keep your maw respectful and gab on topic.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s