C.W. Wade: Sandy Hooknose Worship With A Holocaust Denier

I haven’t stayed on Sandy Hook much (there are plenty of people who are covering this). I have many questions that have gone unanswered by the carriers of the official narrative, such as a person known as C.W. Wade (who has been prominently featured on Deanna Spingola’s shows several times).

I cannot understand why Deanna has jumped on this bandwagon so ferociously, basically defending the official storyline as accurate, when in virtually every other instance, she shows an ability to think outside the driven paradigm. Maybe she just doesn’t like some of the researchers. Maybe she truly believes the official story? In either way, it has caused loggerheads with me, because I cannot understand (even if she believes) why she would sidle up with the likes of Keith Johnson and Wade. These are two of the most unimpressive “researchers” I have ever read, depending upon more character assassination than actual facts.

Deanna joined in on the attack against Fetzer, Smallstorm, Halbig and others. This surprised me, because it really isn’t her modus operandi to do such attacks, but she did and does over and over again.

So, I wanted to learn more from her sources. I went to wade’s site and read a couple of posts which basically start off attacking people with ad hominim and straw men. But what was most interesting is that I found a series of comments here:

CW Wade commentsOops! Someone brought up the Holocaust card.

But doesn’t that cause a problem with the Holocaust Revisionist Queen Deanna Spingola? I mean, it was this subject that brought me to her to begin with, and as I explained a long time ago to NorthernTruthSeeker (who has had some run-ins with these same people over this subject), I respect her for the historical research she does, but do not agree much with her stance on Sandy Hook.

So, I added a curt comment to wade’s blog, pointing out this discrepancy and asked how it could be possible for him to work with such a stellar Holocaust denier (unfortunately, I didn’t bother to screen capture the interaction, so he’ll claim it never happened, which is what liars do).

Either Wade is an idiot or egotistical, but he posted my comment then replied, disparaging me and others who question the HoloHoax in the same fashion he attacks anyone who simply reconsiders the official storyline from the government on SH.

I grinned when he commented because I was able to hook this fool, and I knew I’d be writing this post regarding the subject, so I went back and Voila: he deleted the interaction. (I wonder which Jew it was that convinced him to do so?)

I posted this comment, but I will bet you it never shows (nor will he repost the previous interaction):

Poor CW was caught with his pants down and had to delete the spotlight of your bullshit.

I came here out of respect to Deanna Spingola, whom I believe is an excellent historian. I have not agreed with everything she has said or written about Sandy Hook, so I came to one of her sources to see how they address the points made by various researchers into the fake event.

But I see that you use very little logic and depend upon character attacks and the chiming in from the peanut gallery whores with more attacks against character, but virtually nothing substantial.

Now, I come back and see that as stupid as you are, you must have had someone whisper in your ear that our dialogue should not be seen, because it shows you for the shill you are. It forced you to delete the comment (and yours).

This explains all I need to know about you and your “research”.


Thank you.

I cannot understand Deanna’s lack of discernment with this obvious disinformationalist. But whether it is naivety, pride, or intentional misleading of her following folks (most seem very keen), none of it is acceptable.

She has surrounded herself with untrustworthy individuals, causing me to lose trust in her.

In a nutshell, even if you believe the official narrative, CW Wade is certainly untrustworthy to use as a source. Spingola should know this by now. I would love to be a fly on the wall when they discuss the Holocaust and see how she responds when Wade calls her names and attacks her character. But of course, he won’t because she gives him much more publicity than he could get on his own.

Sadly, they are now linked in this together. He hates Holocaust revisionists but loves him some Sandy Hook believers.

What happened to you, Deanna?

PS: Fetzer and all have put their book online in a pdf that you can read here:



One of the claims by Emmanuel Goldstein above (whom some believe may be Judy Wood???), is that Professor Fetzer acknowledged the deaths of those children when he appeared before the Newtown Board of Education. He did not, as can be seen here:

Follow @BuelahMan


Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

The blog owner does not necessarily agree with the information published or with the original authors’ ideology, but supplies this information to foster comment, reporting, teaching and study. If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the right hand panel of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

Comment Policy:

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post. 1st time commenters must receive Admin approval, but have free reign after that.

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

9 thoughts on “C.W. Wade: Sandy Hooknose Worship With A Holocaust Denier

  1. Good job, Buelahman…
    I too for the life of me cannot understand Spingola and her siding with disinformation specialists such as that Keith Johnson…. It does boggle the mind..

    And I too have had my recent run ins with that “Emmanuel Goldstein” character… He has attempted to flood some of my comment sections with his crud and in most cases other than a select few have deleted his comments…

    I also have for the most part no longer written about Sandy Hook simply because there is little left to say…. If the American people cannot see it by this time as a fraud and a war on their own minds, then there is no hope…


  2. The good little true believer conformists in the comments thread you have included with this post will happily jettison the first amendment when someone has an opinion that differs from the hivemind groupthink or deviates from the gospel heard on the teevee agitprop infotainment report.


  3. Some people like to argue about their opinions of their ideas of theories of speculation of opinions of views but there is no evidence that “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.” Even Dr. Fetzer knows this. The “tell” was Dr. Fetzer’s and Mr. Halbig’s meeting in front of the Sandy Hook School Board. Dr. Fetzer, in front of the School Board, did not say “nobody died,” but the contrary. Dr. Fetzer acknowledged that people died at the Sandy Hook shooting event. Again, this was in front of the school board. So it appears that Dr. Fetzer doesn’t want to be charged with “defrauding the government” by lying in front of the School Board. But on Dr. Fetzer’s radio show and other “entertainment” shows, Dr. Fetzer claims that nobody died. So the evidence reveals that Dr. Fetzer knows it is a federal crime to defraud the government. 3:44 to 6:03 Maybe Dr. Fetzer should request a court order to exhume the children’s bodies! LOL http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=vcsr&GSvcid=345407


    • Please point out the exact timeframe (between the 3:44 ~ 6:03 mark) of this claim you make that Fetzer acknowledged that people died. The video is above for your evaluation.


    • Ridiculous. I made it plain that I did not believe the official account. We now have a 425-page book (with contributions from a dozen students of Sandy Hook, including six Ph.D. (current or retired) college professors, which demonstrates CONCLUSIVELY, in my view, that NOBODY DIED AT SANDY HOOK (2015), When the book is hot off the press, why is this person going back to our statements before the school board, which were limited to 3 minutes apiece? Obviously, because she thought she could spin that brief statement, but not the 425-page book. This person is a phony, a shill and a first-class prevaricator.


  4. Yes my thoughts entirely B’Man. I/we were all gobsmacked when Deanna come out with her claims and then doggedly persisted with her theme; then went on to write a book on it. To me such time wasting and use of her research talent. I say gobsmacked because we all had/have so much respect for her level of research. It really is bizarre.

    Of course Deanna and others would suggest that part-time bloggers like me have not done our detailed research and are just running with the conspiracy ball – and to a degree she/they would be right. But I cannot see why Sandy Hook should be of exception to all the other pattens of false flags the jews have carried out for eons. Why should this patten suddenly alter in this one occasion; it makes no sense?

    We all make mistakes and get stuck in cul-de-sacs from time to time with so much disinformation about; but I particularly found it distasteful that Deanna made derogatory slurs at those of us whom disagreed with her ‘theory’. This seemed so out of character to her. To me she is the lady of the movement. And a smart one at that.

    Truly bizarre.


  5. The bigger the lie, the harder they fall. SH was so blatantly obviously a hoax that to continue to comment on it is a pathetic waste of time. I knew it from the first helicopter shot. I believe they pull off these hoaxes just to keep good researchers busy pulling each other’s hair. The holes in these events are big enough to drive a truck through and they know it. And that well educated people can endlessly fall for it is beyond my comprehension. The only good that comes from this is the exposure of shill/disinfo “researchers” who keep us looking the other way while the real agenda unfolds in the background. B’Man has done another excellent job here. Keep up the good work, kid. We’re right behind you.


  6. Pingback: B’Man’s Piece of Shit Watch: So You Still Trust The Jew Keith Johnson? | B'Man's Revolt

You Got Something To Say? Please keep your maw respectful and gab on topic.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s