Will America Step Up And Help These Poor People?

Unappreciative bastards can go home as far as I am concerned.

What do you bet that the two Social Justice Warriors in America that would actually allow these miscreants to live in their home are murdered after being raped (because apparently, these freaks will screw anything, including goats and dogs and SJW‘s). Everyone knows that a SJW can’t get laid (too ugly and ignorant). And everyone also knows that SJW are all hat and no cattle when it comes to actually supporting these freaks in their own home (but they have no problem forcing you to do it).

I don’t know if this is true, but if so, I think I like Russian action.

400 angry locals, who happen to be Russian immigrants in Germany, took the law into their own hands recently after a 13-year-old Russian schoolgirl was gang-raped by Muslim refugees in a vicious 30-hour ordeal. Knowing the German police would do absolutely nothing to bring the Muslim rapists to justice, the angry locals apparently put the rapists to death. (LD)


h/t murderbymedia3, Stop White Genocide, and Lasha Darkmoon

Follow @BuelahMan


Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

The blog owner does not necessarily agree with the information published or with the original authors’ ideology, but supplies this information to foster comment, reporting, teaching and study. If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the right hand panel of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

Comment Policy:

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post. 1st time commenters must receive Admin approval, but have free reign after that.

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

6 thoughts on “Will America Step Up And Help These Poor People?

  1. Then please, by all means, go the hell home. Fix your country, work for the good, create the society you would like to see. Work with your countrymen, friends, families and develop your world there… not here.


  2. Comrades everyone has a right to come to Amerikwa. We are building the Benetton rainbow utopia where we will all hold hands and sing songs of praise to dear leader messiah as he builds the glorious new and improved Babeltopia. Yes we can! If you don’t like it and don’t want to pay for it all with your taxes then you are…wayciss!
    You uppity peasant serfs are doing too much waking up to the demockracy delusion and need to be replaced by a more compliant population who will always vote for the Uniparty demopublican republicrat in every (s)election. Forward!


  3. Fix your own house, solve your own problems and stay out of mine unless I invite you and I’ll do the same. Very simple concept to understand. Why the retardation when anything larger than a village or neighborhood is involved? All of this stuff stems from collective thinking gone overboard. Democracy is mob rule, period. It doesn’t become suddenly moral if a lot of people do it. The individuals who did not agree to the laws passed by the mob are still violated. Their most basic private property rights are violated. Democracy has to go. The only democracy that should exist is the majority vote that all parties agree to freely. If we’re ten people and want to determine where to go to eat and agree to majority vote to overrule our minority vote, then that’s different, but to say that majority vote makes ‘rite’ or proper ritual is absurd.

    “Liberty and democracy are eternal enemies, and every one knows it who has ever given any sober reflection to the matter. A democratic state may profess to venerate the name, and even pass laws making it officially sacred, but it simply cannot tolerate the thing. In order to keep any coherence in the governmental process, to prevent the wildest anarchy in thought and act, the government must put limits upon the free play of opinion. In part, it can reach that end by mere propaganda, by the bald force of its authority — that is, by making certain doctrines officially infamous. But in part it must resort to force, i.e., to law. One of the main purposes of laws in a democratic society is to put burdens upon intelligence and reduce it to impotence. Ostensibly, their aim is to penalize anti-social acts; actually their aim is to penalize heretical opinions. At least ninety-five Americans out of every 100 believe that this process is honest and even laudable; it is practically impossible to convince them that there is anything evil in it. In other words, they cannot grasp the concept of liberty. Always they condition it with the doctrine that the state, i.e., the majority, has a sort of right of eminent domain in acts, and even in ideas — that it is perfectly free, whenever it is so disposed, to forbid a man to say what he honestly believes. Whenever his notions show signs of becoming “dangerous,” ie, of being heard and attended to, it exercises that prerogative. And the overwhelming majority of citizens believe in supporting it in the outrage. Including especially the Liberals, who pretend — and often quite honestly believe — that they are hot for liberty. They never really are. Deep down in their hearts they know, as good democrats, that liberty would be fatal to democracy — that a government based upon shifting and irrational opinion must keep it within bounds or run a constant risk of disaster. They themselves, as a practical matter, advocate only certain narrow kinds of liberty — liberty, that is, for the persons they happen to favor. The rights of other persons do not seem to interest them. If a law were passed tomorrow taking away the property of a large group of presumably well-to-do persons — say, bondholders of the railroads — without compensation and without even colorable reason, they would not oppose it; they would be in favor of it. The liberty to have and hold property is not one they recognize. They believe only in the liberty to envy, hate and loot the man who has it.” ~ Henry Louis Mencken – “Liberty and Democracy” in the Baltimore Evening Sun (13 April 1925), also in A Second Mencken Chrestomathy : New Selections from the Writings of America’s Legendary Editor, Critic, and Wit (1994) edited by Terry Teachout, p. 35


You Got Something To Say? Please keep your maw respectful and gab on topic.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s