Bad Crowd

Bad crowd

Desperate dummies sunbathe in sewage while the world burns and bleeds

By John Kaminski

So this is who we get to hang out with, after all these years, after all that time and effort spent trying to build a decent life, dodging hazards, expecting and demanding justice, teaching kids to be honest while cringing at the lies of our leaders, hooking up with people pursuing ideas that seemed true at the time and often were.

But many of these vocations only took us further away from ourselves before we figured out the important things in life were happy families and safely lived lives, and that the government trying to control us told us things that were and are deliberately wrong in order to assist the criminal corporations whose money motivates these same politicians to create the laws that make them rich and keep the people poor.

Poor and barely able to discern our own fate, brought up on a series fantastic accounts that never matched the actual events they described, one lie piled upon another, so that eventually night is called day, and war is called peace.

Like the village in Vietnam that was destroyed in order to save it, our government now demonstrates why it must kill us in order to keep us safe.

Sad to say that the graphically disgusting zombie movie fashion statement boosted by Hollywood in recent years has spawned a similar phenomenon in the behavioral psychology of the population at large, in which the old virtues of friendly neighborhoods and extended families have been hammered out of fashion by the Jewish vampire machine that dominates the consciousness of anyone who ever watched TV.

The lesser of two evils is still evil

What barometer of American intelligence is this horrifying sequence of defective personalities who become presidential candidates? They are individually and collectively accurate portraits of the brittle composition that is the American psyche, 85 percent unconscious and 15 percent half-aware listening to the news while doing something else, and therefore willing to accept the facile explanations of all these suspicious false flag atrocities.

Presidents retire fabulously wealthy as a direct reward for the blood they have spilled. And this is who we are as a people.

Crooked Hillary and The Donald, each trying to appear different from the other, yet both tethered to the Rothschild octopus and trying to drag the rest of us into perpetual servitude — this is an accurate depiction of the miniscule breadth of American consciousness.

People who have been taught by the Jews to be like Jews, and look the other way when it is profitable to do so.

People who will sell their friends for a lucrative commission and ignore artists and people of consciousness who insist homo sapiens has lost its conscience, and is well on the way to becoming a totally pliable Epsilon machine, suitable only for ditch digging, mass murder with automatic weapons, and other subhuman pursuits.

These are the people we get to hang out with on a daily basis, which is why so many sensible types have either fled the country entirely or drove on up into the deepest recesses of eastern Oregon, looking for sanctuary. But they immediately run into the problem of people who witnessed Lavoy Finicum’s government ritual murder rapidly dying mysterious deaths, one by one — not to mention the pulsating earth of Yellowstone.

Those who actually do care about what’s going on join groups that seem to focus on the big problem at hand but often, as is the case with religion, get diverted from their original objective by meaningless arguments about dogma. Picky differences in spiritual creeds are the No. 1 reason free people cannot form a group to overthrow the parasitic vampires who have taken control of both the world and reality.

To vote for either (or any) of the current candidates is, as it has always been, an endorsement for the continuing intensification of America’s Jewish produced war on all the free peoples of the world, including its own citizens.

Smell of sewage in all directions

All of these insane practices are denominated by the neverending blather of mainstream infotainment, which herds us into acceptable but unproductive expressions of contempt for a corrupt system. It also stimulates our emulation of it, as lawless leaders invariably produce a lawless populace.

The poisons we put into our systems are comparable to the lies we tell our children and the misperceptions we use to guide our chaotic lives.

When all our leaders do is lie, what do the people become? Apprentice scamsters just trying to get ahead at all cost, willing to sacrifice people they’ll never know on the altar of their own prepackaged poison food.

We have come more than a hundred years down the wrong path, laying waste to the planet without realizing that our consciousness was stolen along with our money in 1913, and the significant events in the world since then have been nothing more than a consolidation of Jewish control of an artificially created reality — each major event marked by millions of deaths and the constant, incremental loss of individual freedom.

The great voices of the past have been drowned out by titillating celebrities of the present media carnival, expounding messages from the New World Order to fit in and shut up. And the cops go around randomly shooting people and pets at the wrong addresses to make sure we get the message.

Who in their right mind would want to hang out with people who would choose between a publicly acknowledged corruption-peddling criminal who should be in jail and a combed-over narcissist who is propped up by Rothschild money? Either way, America loses big time, but after a 20th century completely ruined by Jewish control of the money supply, this is not a new development.

All of this meaningless folderol about contrived political dramas keeps people from focusing on the condition of the atmosphere, which has become fraught with foreign objects that have penetrated everyone’s lungs. And as the temperature rises every year, the future looks to be a unending series of fires that one day we might no longer be able to put out.

But no one in this bad crowd is really too concerned about that. Plenty of people have noticed sunspots are not firing, and predict that a period of intense cold will soon result in a big chill that will change the shape of civilization.

And so our cognitive dissonance continues, and deepens. Nothing ever gets fixed while the thievery continues, innocent people wind up in jail, and the thieves go free, exonerated by judges and lawyers who are in on the fix.

A disorganized opposition to this systemic criminality continues to fight among themselves over tangential issues, while the big fish that always gets away continues its unchecked rampage against the dimwitted population which seems chronically unable to recognize the lies they believe that keep their lives in perpetual disarray.

• • •

. . . and in case you missed it . . .

Andrew Carrington Hitchcock interviews John Kaminski 

about his story “Path of the parasites” which reviews

the classic book “The Nameless War” by Archibald Maule Ramsay


John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 6871 Willow Creek Circle #103, North Port FL 34287 USA.

Follow @BuelahMan


Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

The blog owner does not necessarily agree with the information published or with the original authors’ ideology, but supplies this information to foster comment, reporting, teaching and study. If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the right hand panel of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

Comment Policy:

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post. 1st time commenters must receive Admin approval, but have free reign after that.

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or

6 thoughts on “Bad Crowd

  1. Free-speech and free-choice – that’s what it boils down to if you want to unite human beings for a cause — any cause. People only do things that will either immediately or in the foreseeable future make them feel good. However, the old model of Nationalism is based on majority opinion and collective suppression of individuals and should be changed to a new model that stays true to principle. Thee are many people who are Libertarian to a point and then they say “Libertarianism leads to open borders” blah blah blah, not really taking the logic to its ultimate conclusion BEYOND so-called “open borders.”

    The question to ask is “what are borders?” and “can property, properly earned fair and square and not stolen through fraud, belong to vague collective concepts”? Collectives like “The Americans,” “The French,” “The Irish,” “The English,” “The Iranians,” or even vaguer ones like “White People” and “Brown People” etc. How can you possibly speak for each-&-every person in that collective and claim that they all agree unless you have a petition with all their signatures proving that they gave their volunatry consent? How can any group be anything but composed of unique individuals and exact aggregates of individuals and ONLY those people, that EXACT head count? Do there have to be actual walls and fences built or lines drawn on the ground for “cultural property” belonging to a certain aggregate of individuals and not others to be protected from degradation and damage?

    Think about it. What if you woke up tomorrow and you found out that The Fed had been shut down, money was back on not just the Gold standard but Gold, Silver, Platinum AND the productivity index of labor like they had in Germany, there was no more usury or fractional reserve counterfeiting, people only invested the money they actually had and borrowed the money other people actually had and not fiat funny-money from banks or just added zeros on a computer screen? What if you further had not only the free-speech but also full free-choice to not associate with ANYONE you do not want to for ANY REASON whatsoever, reasonable or unreasonable, rational or prejudiced, taking full responsibility for your own actions, of course, as long as you’re not initiating physical force or the indirect force of fraud against them?

    What would happen if the so-called “border” between America and Mexico was left completely open and Mexico did not have a similarly free system but was still as corrupt as it is today? What else but a lack of free-choice would delineate where one “nation” ends and the other begins? Since if Mexico had not usury, full free-speech and full free-choice, then, aside from racial and ethnic differences, it would be similar to the USA, would it not? Would Mexico still be Mexico if it’s corruption went away or would it lose the unique “charm” of its culture? How about the USA of today? Do you really think it wouldn’t change into something completely different and much better as soon as free-choice was fully restored and made inviolable and taught to every kid from an early age without a media-monopoly being able to obfuscate things into group-think nonsense?

    What would happen in a so-called “over-liberal” government-is-only-the-agent-of-the-defense-of-our-inalienable-rights Libertarian organization?

    Would a lot of unwanted foreigners still come flooding in?

    For what? What would give them the incentive?

    Would there still be the welfare and benefits they get now from extorted taxes without even being citizens? Nope, you can’t violate a person’s free choice not to pay any “taxes” or rather donations to the government if they don’t want to. Therefore, any “welfare” to “foreign refugees” would strictly be an individual charity choice, never an institutional “command” requiring anyone to take in and help anybody they don’t choose to.

    Would they be able to riot and say “give us jobs, we demand jobs or we’ll riot and destroy your town and people”? Nope. If they did that, they would be arrested and thrown behind another “border” with bars called a jail cell or prison and then de-ported to their own side of the “tracks,” which, if a government where initiating force against other people in order to intimidate them into giving you “jobs” is not tolerated either and called assault and vandalism. And what if they were not “free” like us? Then, they would still be deported because our prisons would be run only on voluntary donations and there would be no way for them to extort more money from us to pay to house these criminals. They would have to convince us to donate more symbols of our energy voluntarily to “keep the country safe.” No laws whatsoever violating free-choice would be acceptable, never mind be “passed.”

    Would some people give them jobs if they worked cheaper than slaves? Of course. Why? Because it would make them more profit to pay as little as possible for labor. But would they hire these people, even for the lowest wages in the world, if they did not do a good job? Of course not, since a bad job would mean having to hire others to make it good and would increase costs and furthermore destroy their profits by ruining the reputation of their products.

    Would a Mexican non-white who was a great worker, was not a criminal, did not want to freeload and did not steal be an asset to your business? Yes. Would others have to not discriminate against him based on ethnicity and use your own standards of “good worker” and “good character” only to judge? Nope. They are all still free to to anything they feel like as long as they’re not initiating force or fraud.

    Could a White man who was a degenerate, lazy bum be hired just because he was white? Yes, but at the cost of profits and reputation to whoever made the mistake.

    Could 50,000 and one White Nationalists or Black Nationalists get together and FORCEFULLY delineate an area and say these are our borders, we don’t respect anybody else’s free-choice, only white people’s and want to be entirely separated from the non-white portion of the human race? Yes, but only if they leave the people living all around their “county” who do respect everybody’s free-choice and not just white people’s alone. What would happen if they don’t? Police action just like in the case of the Mexican rioters or if serious enough a so-called “war” in defense of free-choice for everyone after which the entire batch of the trouble-makers even if all 50,000 and one were involved would be sent to voluntarily financed privately-run-for-profit-through-donations (which there will be no extorted taxes on whatsoever) prisons or camps after which if they do not repent of their ways, they will be exiled somewhere they cannot harm more rational people with their anti-free-choice criminal ways.

    You see how staying ON PRINCIPLE is always the way to go? Free-speech and free-choice and the 2nd amendment with full assault weapons rights to protect both in case there are bankster reunions. That’s how you unite everyone of goodwill and get rid of charlatans and phonies only looking to protect unearned privileges under the guise of “justice” and “freedom.” Without free-choice there isn’t even the possibility of morality and its concomitant of responsibility, never mind justice.

    “The object of this Essay is to assert one very simple principle, as entitled to govern absolutely the dealings of society with the individual in the way of compulsion and control, whether the means used be physical force in the form of legal penalties, or the moral coercion of public opinion. That principle is, that the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. That the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others. His own good, either physical or moral, is not a sufficient warrant. He cannot rightfully be compelled to do or forbear because it will be better for him to do so, because it will make him happier, because, in the opinions of others, to do so would be wise, or even right. These are good reasons for remonstrating with him, or reasoning with him, or persuading him, or entreating him, but not for compelling him, or visiting him with any evil, in case he do otherwise. To justify that, the conduct from which it is desired to deter him must be calculated to produce evil to someone else. The only part of the conduct of any one, for which he is amenable to society, is that which concerns others. In the part which merely concerns himself, his independence is, of right, absolute. Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.” ― John Stuart Mill, On Liberty


    • Correction to incomplete sentence: ” . . . and called assault and vandalism, they would also be thrown in jail to pay for their crimes against “our friendly neighbors” the Libertarian up north.


  2. Addition to clarify one paragraph a bit more: “Could 50,000 and one White Nationalists or Black Nationalists get together and FORCEFULLY delineate an area and say these are our borders, we don’t respect anybody else’s free-choice, only white people’s and want to be entirely separated from the non-white portion of the human race? Yes, but borders BASED ON EARNED PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS ONLY, . . . and only if they leave the people living all around their ‘country’ who do respect everybody’s free-choice and not just white people’s alone.”


You Got Something To Say? Please keep your maw respectful and gab on topic.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s