Free Speech on Trial: IRS v. Hendrickson


THE SHOCKING TRUTH THE IRS DOESN’T WANT YOU TO KNOW: The limited nature of the ‘income’ tax…

Buried in Supreme Court rulings, legal minutia, tax code jargon, and the minutes from Congressional hearings is the truth that the what is commonly referred to as the income tax is meant to be a simple excise tax levied on those benefiting in some way from a federal privilege.

This means that government workers and office-holders, federal reserve bankers, subsidy recipients, investors in federal corporations, and any other person benefiting from the profitable exercise of federal privilege were meant to pay the tax, NOT independent hard-working American citizens.

RELEVANT COURT HEARINGS:

“…in Spinger v. U. S., 102 W.U. 568 (1880), it was held that [the] tax upon gains, profits, and income was an excise tax or duty, and not a direct tax, within the meaning of the constitution, and that its imposition was not, therefore, unconstitutional.” – United States Supreme Court, Pollock v. Farmer’s Loan & Trust, 158 U.S. 601 (1895)

“…taxation on income was in its nature an excise entitled to be enforces as such,” United States Supreme Court, Brushaber v. Union Pacific R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), quoting and reiterating language used in its ruling in Pollock v. Farmer’s Loan and Trust

IT DID NOT CHANGE AFTER 16TH AMENDMENT:

“The provisions of the Sixteenth Amendment conferred no new power of taxation…” – Stanton vs. Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 (1916)

“The Sixteenth Amendment, although referred to in argument, has no real bearing and may be put out of view. As pointed out in recent decisions, it does not extend the taxing power to new or excepted subjects…” – Peck vs. Lowe, 247 U.S. 165 (1918)

“The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income as such. It is an excise tax with respect to certain activities and privileges which is measured by reference to the income which they produce. The income is not the subject of the tax: it is the basis for determining the amount of tax.”
–F. Morse Hubbard, Treasury Dept legislative draftsman. House Congressional Record, March 27, 1943

These findings, along with other research meticulously gathered by Pete Hendrickson and presented in Cracking the Code, outline the limited nature of the income tax. This information, if truly understood and effectuated by the American public, could limit government faster than any electoral result or any half-baked reform scheme coming out of Washington D.C.

In ‘Free Speech on Trial,’ you will see the lengths to which the minions of the corrupt federal system will stoop to tread upon the rights of freedom-loving Americans and keep their illicit scam under wraps.

Buy the book ‘Cracking the Code’ and learn how to get your rightful earnings back from the federal criminals – http://www.losthorizons.com/cc.htm

Support Doreen Hendrickson financially as her family appeals the terrible injustice that has been perpetrated upon her – http://www.gofundme.com/DoreenRelief

 

h/t Sofia Smallstorm and John Kaminski

Sofia’s note:

I am sending to some of you who make videos or have a broad reach in other ways.  Doreen is 9-1/2 hours away from her family in a women’s correctional facility in West Virginia.  She did what few people would have done — she refused to lie on behalf of the government, ordered as she repeatedly was by a federal judge.  Most people would have signed the paper and shut up.  She has been sentenced to 18 months.

Thank you for thinking about this, passing it around, and especially, making something from this material in your own way to share.

A new precedent has been set by the courts.

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the right hand panel of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

Comment Policy:

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post. 1st time commenters must receive Admin approval, but have free reign after that.


All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

Did We Pull the Plug on the Shah?

Did We Pull the Plug on the Shah?

by DC Dave

Benjamin_Disraeli_by_Cornelius_Jabez_Hughes,_1878 Sidonia quote

Benjamin Disraeli, describing the sage Jewish financier Sidonia in his classic novel, Coningsby.

“Surely, your majesty, you’re not telling me that the Jewish lobby in the United States pulls the strings of the presidency.”

Shah_of_iran

Shah of Iran

Thus begins an extraordinary 1976 interview by the Jewish Mike Wallace of CBS of the Shah of Iran. It’s really quite amusing to hear the tone of fake incredulity in Wallace’s voice as the Shah makes observations about Jewish power in the United States that most people these days would accept as fairly commonplace, though seldom spoken so openly. Powerful Jewish interests controlling the media and banks and pressuring politicians? Heaven forfend!

Now consider that this was America’s “great ally” in the Middle East, a man widely regarded as our puppet, whom we installed in power after orchestrating, along with the British, the overthrow of the elected president Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953. It certainly looks like he was straying pretty far off the reservation here.

Listening to the Shah’s words in retrospect, we can’t help but think of what happened to CNN anchor Rick Sanchez when he made a much more cautious statement about Jewish media power in an unguarded moment, before a far smaller audience. He was gone in a heartbeat, as if to prove the truth of what he had to say. Could the Shah’s words to Wallace have sealed his fate in a similar way?

But the Rick Sanchez newsreader types of this world are a dime a dozen and easily replaceable, I hear you say. The Shah was the

Mosaddegh in imperial court in 1955 Tehran

Mosaddegh in imperial court in 1955 Tehran

bastion against the menace of Islamic fundamentalism in the Middle East. Look at what replaced him.

Exactly! Look at what has replaced Muammar Qaddafi in Libya and Saddam Hussein in Iraq and would no-doubt replace Bashar al-Assad in Syria should we have our way and he were to be brought down. The very fact that the United States has been instrumental in bringing down two strongmen who had been our allies when it suited us, as we were more consistently with the Shah, is another powerful reason for taking a more serious look at what really happened in the fall of the Shah of Iran.

That more serious look, to my mind, virtually begins and ends with a trenchant essay entitled “The British and U.S. Governments Installed Khomeini into Power in 1979,” posted on a web site called The Excavator on November 3, 2011 by Saman Mohammadi. Everyone who desires a better understanding of what is going on in the Middle East currently, and is likely to happen in the future, should read that essay. The article begins:

divideandconquer

The thesis that the British and U.S. governments drove out the Shah and replaced him with Khomeini destroys the clash of civilizations myth that has dominated the global conversation between Islam and the West for over a generation.

For years I thought this thesis was too “out there,” and a baseless conspiracy theory. I did not want to believe that there was any truth to this. It changes my entire view of the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the relationship between Iran and the West, and the history of our times.

The implications of the thesis are too frightening to think about. The level of the treason and betrayal that is taking place against the people of every nation is beyond most people’s imagination.

image961_ayatolla_conneryBut I always try to keep an open mind because anything is plausible in this crazy world. So, last month I finally decided to actually look at the evidence that is available on the Internet about this thesis and dig deeper into history.

The first clue that caught my eye was the Shah’s own words. “If you lift up Khomeini’s beard,” he said, “you will find Made In England written under his chin.”

More clues come from more of the Shah’s words in the article, from an interview with David Frost when the Shah was in exile in Panama:

Do you think that Mr. Khomeini, an uneducated person . . . could have planned all this, masterminded all this, set up all the organizations. I know that one man alone could not have done it. This I know.

I know that tremendous amount of money was spend [sic]. This also I know.

I know that top experts in propaganda were used to show us like tyrants and monsters, and the other side as democratic, liberal revolutionaries who wanted to save the country.

I know how mean the BBC, British Broadcasting Corporation, had been towards us. This I know. Because we have all the files. If you monitor the broadcast towards our country you would see that it was full of venom. So it seemed that it was really a very well orchestrated conspiracy.

Going right to the heart of what actually transpired, the article gives us this quote from historian F. William Engdahl:

81JMUc5jjiL

In November 1978, President Carter named the Bilderberg group’s George Ball, another member of the Trilateral Commission, to head a special White House Iran task force under the National Security Council’s [Zbigniew] Brzezinski. Ball recommended that Washington drop support for the Shah of Iran and support the fundamentalistic Islamic opposition of Ayatollah Khomeini. Robert Bowie from the CIA was one of the lead “case officers” in the new CIA-led coup against the man their covert actions had placed into power 25 years earlier.

Their scheme was based on a detailed study of the phenomenon of Islamic fundamentalism, as presented by British Islamic expert, Dr. Bernard Lewis, then on assignment at Princeton University in the United States. Lewis’s scheme, which was unveiled at the May 1979 Bilderberg meeting in Austria, endorsed the radical Muslim Brotherhood movement behind Khomeini, in order to promote balkanization of the entire Muslim Near East along tribal and religious lines. Lewis argued that the West should encourage autonomous groups such as the Kurds, Armenians, Lebanese Maronites, Ethiopian Copts, Azerbaijani Turks, and so forth. The chaos would spread in what he termed an “Arc of Crisis,” which would spill over into Muslim regions of the Soviet Union.

The coup against the Shah was run by British and American intelligence, with the bombastic American, Brzezinski, taking public “credit” for getting rid of the “corrupt” Shah, while the British characteristically remained safely in the background.

usrael

Speaking of “safely in the background,” one can’t help but notice what a boon to Israel all this balkanization of the entire Muslim Near East would certainly be. This policy of fracturing and destabilizing Israel’s biggest potential enemies bears a striking resemblance to “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm,” prepared by a neocon study group led by Richard Perle for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996. It is also in complete harmony with Oded Yinon’s “A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties.”

That securing Israel’s realm should be the foremost concern of noted Orientalist Bernard Lewis should be no surprise. In the following quote, M. Shahid Alam, contrasts a newer school of Oriental studies with that led by Lewis:

M-Shahid-AlamThey make an effort to locate Islamic societies in their historical context, arguing that Islamic responses to Western challenges have been diverse and evolving over time, and they do not derive from an innate hostility to the West or some unchanging Islamic mindset. The second camp, now led mostly by Jews, has reverted to Orientalism’s original mission of subordinating knowledge to Western power, now filtered through the prism of Zionist interests. This Zionist Orientalism has assiduously sought to paint Islam and Islamic societies as innately hostile to the West, modernism, democracy, tolerance, scientific advance, and women’s rights.

This Zionist camp has been led for more than fifty years by Bernard Lewis, who has enjoyed an intimate relationship with power that would be the envy of the most distinguished Orientalists of an earlier generation. He has been strongly supported by a contingent of able lieutenants, whose ranks have included the likes of Elie Kedourie, David Pryce-Jones, Raphael Patai, Daniel Pipes, and Martin Kramer. There are many foot soldiers, too, who have provided distinguished service to this new Orientalism. And no compendium of these foot soldiers would be complete without the names of Thomas Friedman, Martin Peretz, Norman Podhoretz, Charles Krauthammer, William Kristol, and Judith Miller.

Alam, whose essay is entitled “Scholarship or Sophistry: Bernard Lewis and the New Orientalism,” notes the irony of the fact that before the rise of Zionism, it was Jewish scholars who were more likely to give a more balanced view of Muslim and Middle Eastern societies.

eretz_israel_by_3d4d-d67paci

Yet the vigor of this early anti-Orientalism of Jewish scholars would not last; it would not survive the logic of the Zionist movement as it sought to create a Jewish state in Palestine. Such a state could only emerge as a child of Western imperialist powers, and it could only come into existence by displacing the greater part of the Palestinian population, by incorporating them into an apartheid state, or through some combination of the two. In addition, once created, Israel could only survive as a military, expansionist, and hegemonic state, constantly at war with its neighbors.

“They Hate Us for Our Freedom”

Claire Fontaine artwork

Claire Fontaine artwork

If the view of Muslim societies as hopelessly backward and riven with sectarian violence did not fit the facts, it was not the view but the facts that had to be changed. Iran under the Shah was not good for that worldview, which meant that he was not good for “the realm.” Returning to the Excavator article, here is a summary of why he had to go:

  1. Nuclear Power. The Shah was modernizing Iran in a significant way, and this had to be stopped. The Bilderberg and Club of Rome elite are notoriously anti-growth, and anti-economic development because keeping nations poor is the best way to control them. The British policy towards her colonies in Africa was based on under-development, keeping the people poor, and putting a tiny elite in power. This policy was also used against Iran.
  1. Oil Production. The Shah’s decision to increase Iranian oil production angered U.S. oil companies and others who wanted to maintain artificial scarcity in the international oil market in order to keep prices high and make more profits. Specifically, the Shah said that a couple of years before the Revolution he “heard from two different sources connected with the oil companies that the regime within Iran will change. . . If just in imagination, we believed that there was a plan that there must be less oil offered to the world market in order to make the price of oil go up, one country should have been the one chosen for this sacrifice.” (This quote is from an article called “Shah Retains Claim to Iranian Throne” that appeared in ‘The Fort Scott Tribute’ on January 18, 1980).
  1. Opium Profits. The Shah took serious measures to stop the flow of opium into Iran, which greatly damaged British interests. The Rothschilds and London’s financial empire depend on the world opium trade to retain their power and influence.
  1. Economic Threat of a Modern and Independent Iran to Interests of British-U.S. Elite. The Shah was building up Iran into a modern state by enriching the country and strengthening the middle class. He was not a perfect ruler, but he was not the tyrant that the West made him out to be. The Shah’s original sin was siding with the U.S. and British against Mohammad Mosaddegh in 1953. He should have known that if you make a deal with the devil and then spit in his face you will be treated accordingly. But, this is not about one man or one nation. Nations around the world are treated like colonies by international banks and multinational corporations, including America. America and Iran have lived under puppet leaders for most of the 20th century. When a true leader acts in the interest of his country and his people the elite secret societies get rid of him. They either kill the patriotic leader, like John F. Kennedy in 1963, or they instigate a revolution against him, like the Shah in 1979.
  1. Create A Clash of Civilizations. The destruction of the modern world economy, the nation state, and the current world order are three stated objectives of the Anglo-American power elite. They have created an artificial conflict between Islam and the West to achieve all three objectives.

2 world events

09263760180010700This global conflict came into being as a result of two world events. The first event was the 1979 Iranian Islamic Revolution which was the product of the MI6, CIA, Bilderberg Group, Club of Rome and other secret global organizations. The second event was the September 11 terrorist attacks that was orchestrated by the Mossad and the Anglo-American shadow government.

Iran was set up in 1979 as the representative of Islamic Civilization, and ever since then its extremist clerical oligarchy has used the language of Islam to pose as the leader of a resistance bloc to Western powers. Influential Iranian clerics are most likely in the fold of the same Western powers that turned Khomeini into “Time’s Person of the Year,” in 1979.

He might not have been as important a leader, but the killing of James Forrestal could also be offered as an important assassination in the context of U.S. policies in the Middle East. One might also question the closing assertion that the current leadership of Iran is as much in the hip pocket of the Western secret governments as the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini appears to have been. The example of the Shah, himself, shows the difficulty of keeping puppets in line after they have been put in place. If they are responsive to the needs and wishes of their own people they need to use less repression to remain in power.

Even the mainstream media admit that the Israelis were instrumental in the creation of Hamas, they say as a counterweight to the PLO, but perhaps also in furtherance of their “clash of civilizations” strategy. It is difficult to believe that Hamas remains in Israel’s fold, but one at least must wonder who has been behind those pinprick rocket attacks from Gaza, twice providing a pretext for Israel to rain wanton death and destruction upon the region.

It has also been argued that the dissolution of the Soviet Union was an inside job involving the Western banks and secret agencies, khomeinibut the man hand-picked, according to this thesis, by Western stooge Boris Yeltsin to preside over the further looting of Russia, Vladimir Putin, has apparently turned out to be too much of a Russian patriot, which explains the vitriol that is heaped upon him by the Western media and governments.

Whatever one might speculate about Iran’s current leadership, the evidence appears quite strong that Khomeini, himself, was not what he appeared to be. Drawing from various sources, with links provided, an anonymous poster on AANGIRFAN argues that Khomeini was not even Persian, that he was actually the son of a British Middle East adventurer and British Petroleum named William Richard Williamson and that his mother was a Punjabi from India. Whether it is photo-shopped or not, the depiction on the site of the Grand Ayatollah without a turban and beard and wearing a necktie is certainly enough to give one food for thought. We also find there many similar arguments to those at The Excavator for Khomeini having been a creature of the Western intelligence agencies.

Continuing the “Clash of Civilizations”

isis_beheading_2

The ever more cartoonish character of the supposed opposition faced by the Western military behemoth in the Middle East further encourages us to go back and look critically at what happened in the overthrow of the Shah. As black-hearted villains, the wanton beheaders known most commonly as ISIS are everything that the Western secret agencies, their military-industrial complex, and the Western imperial creation of Israel might wish for. As Sunni Muslims opposed by the governments of both Iraq and Iran and Israel’s next-door enemy, Hezbollah, they might muddle the clear civilization-clash lines a bit, but such fine distinctions are probably lost on most Americans. The important thing is that Muslims are the enemy.

This latest Muslim enemy, one must admit, is absolutely the strangest one yet. Armies are expensive, what with the need to feed, clothe, train, and transport them and to keep them supplied with functioning weapons and ammunition. Where is ISIS getting the wherewithal to wage modern warfare?

James Corbett has done what seems to me to be the most thoughtful inquiry into that question on the Internet with his Corbett Report entitled “Who Is Really Behind ISIS?” He might have left the “Really” out of his title, because it suggests that we are being told one thing when the reality is something else. The really odd thing about ISIS is that the propagandists don’t even seem to feel the need to put out a story about who’s backing them. Who would want to back the very incarnation of evil, anyway?

Who_Is_REALLY_Behind_ISIS__186797

In the absence even of a cover story, Corbett in his researches comes down to a list of the six likeliest candidates for ISIS creators and backers. They are Israel, NATO, Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the United States. Corbett came to that conclusion in late September 2014. Now, at the end of May 2015, we have a newly declassified Pentagon document concluding that “the West, Turkey, and the Gulf States” are behind the creation of ISIS, which accords quite closely with Corbett’s findings. Certainly the case is at least as strong that the U.S., Britain, and Israel were behind the fall of the Shah of Iran.

David Martin

June 3, 2015

Addendum

I have received this very thoughtful response from one of the people on my mailing list. He clearly knows a lot more about the web site in question than I do. If, as now seems likely to me, the article referenced is disinformation, it almost reinforces the central point of my article. If the spooks find it necessary to muddy the water in this way, it suggests that there must be something to the charge that Western intelligence was behind the replacement of the Shah with Khomeini. Think of all the garbage theories they’ve put out with respect to the JFK assassination and 9/11 to put the public off the scent:

Regarding the article “Did we pull the plug on the Shah” I believe there could be a lot behind the contention that western interests covertly supported the overthrow of the Shah. The writers quoted in the article impressed. There was one exception. This was the part that purported to provide biographical information on Ayatollah Khomeini.

If he were really the son of an Englishman this information would be widely known in Iran. Middle Eastern societies place a greater importance on familial relationships. If he were the son of a non-Muslim and a westerner this fact would have to be acknowledged for it would be to his disadvantage within the Shia religious hierarchy. To try to keep such information secret would be foolish and detrimental.

The two juxtaposed photos of him where one has him in western garb appear to be based on the same original where photo-shopping has produced a new version. It looks as though the original has been rotated a few degrees and then either brightened or darkened. Then new features are built in around the core of the face. I presume the one on the left is the original but maybe not!

So the alleged side-by-side photos of Khomeini in Shia religious and western garb are very highly suspicious. The notion that he secretly was not of Iranian parentage is most dubious.

Perhaps the aim of this fairly obviously questionable story about Khomeini is to discredit the idea that his overthrow of the Shah had western backing. Who knows?

An “anonymous poster” on AANGIRFAN is not what could be called a trustworthy source. This website has a history of putting questionable material under the noses of readers. On July 30, 2005 it carried a story from Arctic Beacon where the Bin Laden brothers in 1987 told two NASA research scientists about US government plans to cause 9/11. [1]

Arctic Beacon is a website which accuses “The Jesuits” of enormous malfeasance in world affairs. Draw your own conclusions.

On July 31, 2005 AANGIRFAN had a story about a Kay Giggs, a woman who claimed to be the wife of a senior US military officer. She heard all the details from him ‘usually while he was drinking before going into one of his drunken stupors’. There were stories of strange goings on, strange rituals and secret societies. In connection with 9/11 she manages to mention a host of guilty parties including, believe it or not, one “Basil Cardinal Hume”. It was all so very confused and incoherent. [2]

On Dec 22, 2010 AANGIRFAN tackled the question as to whether Julian Assange was gay. [3]

On the other hand the story for Dec 06, 2010 provokes thought. It deals with Wikileaks and the question as to whether it may actually be a construct of the intelligence world. It is a coherent piece. [4]

On Feb 09, 2011 the website referred to an article by Michael Collins Piper posted on American Free Press which dealt with how instability and turmoil in the Arab world played into the hands of Zionism. The AANGIRFAN piece went on to attack long time critic of Zionism Ralph Schoenman and suggest he was a “disinformation agent” and a “deep cover CIA agent”. The article also referred to the 1969 moon landing as a hoax. [5]

It is furthermore important to mention that there is no person or organisation identified in its profile as being responsible for the site. So, here is a mystery.

One must note there is a disclaimer at the top of the site to the effect that views expressed on the site are not necessarily endorsed by whoever runs it.

There is some very thought provoking and valuable material posted on AANGIRFAN. However, there is also some classic disinformation placed before the public. The professionally run disinformation operation contains a mix of truth and untruth. The truth is there to provide a carrier signal for the broadcast of the untruths. Disinformation on the web works by salting valid information with untruth so that actual reality becomes discredited in the mind of the viewer or so that the viewer becomes confused or else disillusioned with the search for verifiable fact.

It is hard for a current events/history website to be always 100 percent accurate in what it presents. However, the quality of the material on AANGIRFAN is very uneven. Profundity is set side by side with nonsense. We can not be assured the website has been set up deliberately as a disinformation source. However, nonetheless, this is a valid presumption. Even if it were not deliberately set up as a disinformation ploy it inevitably functions as such because of the mix of material it contains and the effect this will have of readers/viewers.

Even if we understand a website as a disinformation source this does not necessarily mean we avoid it at all costs. Instead we may decide to use it but with due care and discretion. For example AANGIRFAN contains many wonderful and thought provoking and well-presented articles. If we were to avoid accessing the site altogether, we might miss some of these treats. If an individual has a deep knowledge of the subjects that interest him or her then they can develop skills for recognizing disinformation. With these skills misleading articles and video presentations can be mentally cast aside and relieved of their power to cause harm.

We may discover a worthwhile article at a disinformation site and trace it to where it was originally placed online. If we want to reference it in an article of our own then we can reference the site where the article was originally put online. This will avoid the negative connotations of referencing a web resource tainted by an association with disinformation.

[1]       http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/article/1518131/30199.htm

http://aangirfan.blogspot.ie/2005_07_01_archive.html

[2]      http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/article/1518131/29982.htm

http://aangirfan.blogspot.ie/2005_07_01_archive.html

[3]      http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2010/12/assange-is-gay.html

[4]      http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2010/12/assanges-wikileaks-is-fake.html

[5]       http://aangirfan.blogspot.com/2011/02/piper-schoenman-truth-lies-on-egypt.html

 

David Martin

June 29, 2015

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

B’Man’s 2016 POTUS Watch: The Bride of Frankenfoods

The Monstrous Hillary Clinton

The Monstrous Hillary Clinton

We know she’s a monster, but how can it be that people are fooled into believing she is anything but another shill for giant corporations? Perhaps even some liberals are getting the real picture?

Former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stands with Wall Street corporations in her support of their pushing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on Iowa farmers, Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement (CCI) Action Fund Executive Director Hugh Espey told Sputnik.

On Monday, liberal Democrats in Iowa called Clinton the “Bride of Frankenfood” over her support of GMOs and the agribusiness company Monsanto.

Her ties to Big Money are renowned. Even progressive Democrats understand it (yet they probably can’t find the gumption to fight it with any real vigor).

Clinton Foundation money-raising already is drawing attention. “To a lot of progressive Democrats, Clinton’s ties to corporate America are disturbing,” says Jack Pitney, a politics professor at Claremont McKenna College who once worked for congressional Republicans. Mrs. Clinton’s connections to companies, he says, “are a bonanza for opposition researchers because they enable her critics to suggest the appearance of a conflict of interest.”

Yeah? No kidding. And I haven’t even begun to delve into her Jewish/Israeli Big Money connections which are quite well known even among non-anti-semites (snark):

“Weeks after Hillary Clinton became secretary of state, the State Department objected to a proposed consultancy arrangement offered to Bill Clinton by media mogul Haim Saban, citing concerns about conflict of interest. Nevertheless, public records show that Saban’s nonprofit gave millions to the Clinton Foundation throughout Hillary Clinton’s tenure.

Saban, a billionaire best known for creating Mighty Morphin Power Rangers, has dual U.S.-Israeli citizenship and has spent heavily to support Israel. “His greatest concern, he says, is to protect Israel, by strengthening the United States-Israel relationship,” The New Yorker noted in a 2010 profile of Saban. At a conference in Israel, the article said, Saban had outlined three methods for influencing American politics: “make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media outlets.”

[…]

Yet between 2009 and 2013, as Hillary Clinton served as secretary of state, the Saban Family Foundation paid the Clinton Foundation more than $7 million, and listed $30.5 million in “grants and contributions approved for future payment,” according to nonprofit records filed with the Internal Revenue Service. It’s unclear whether there was any overlap between the $7 million paid and $30.5 million committed to the Clinton Foundation in those years.”

But what about the “opposition” (he said in jest knowing they serve the same basic tribal money interests)? How do they see her Big Money connections, especially the GMO support?

Funny you might ask. Seems like she has some very strange bed-fellows (at least when Rush Limpballs isn’t bedding Dominican Republic fellows)

The Bride of Frankenfoods and Another Monster

The Bride of Frankenfoods and Another Monster

CALLER: No. I live in a city. (chuckles) I live in a liberal county surrounded by liberals….But people have to understand that a lot of the stuff that is not organic is sprayed with a lot of poisons.

RUSH: Yeah.

CALLER: A lot of bad stuff.

RUSH: Yeah, I know. That’s what I eat.

CALLER: These GMO foods — you know, the genetically modified stuff?

RUSH: That’s what I eat.

Silly me. I thought his idiocy was due to all the Oxycontin, not GMO foods.

As for Rushillary, I think they make a nice couple, don’t you?

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

Is She Onboard with the Cover-Up?

Is She Onboard with the Cover-Up?

Kenneth Starr has questions about departing paralegal

by DC Dave

Robert Bishop Fiske, Jr

Robert Bishop Fiske, Jr

She graduated from Johns Hopkins University and earned an MBA at the University of Denver, but her real education began with what was apparently her first job after receiving her graduate degree. Possibly through the connections of one of her parents, who both had important positions in New York City at the time, she got a job working as a paralegal for former United States Attorney for the southern district of New York, Robert Fiske. Fiske had been appointed as special prosecutor by Attorney General Janet Reno in January of 1994 to investigate the Whitewater scandal—and, particularly the death of Deputy White House Counsel Vincent W. Foster Jr.—of the Bill Clinton administration.

Lucia Rambusch, the person of whom we speak, would have likely been around 23 or 24 years old at the time of her appointment. We know of no evidence that she had any legal training, but it’s not really necessary for most of the sort of “gofer” work that paralegals typically do. We don’t know what she actually did for Robert Fiske or for Kenneth Starr when he was appointed by a three-judge panel to replace Fiske after the lapsed law creating the office of “Independent Counsel” was put back in force. The problem for Starr and for the head of the Little Rock office of the Independent Counsel, Hickman Ewing, is that they weren’t too sure what she did, either. Moreover, they didn’t know exactly what she had learned as of March 13, 1995, what she felt about what she had learned, and what she might do with that knowledge.

Starr and Ewing did know that she had learned a lot more than was safe for them…and for her. You see, the man for whom she had last worked directly, Miguel Rodriguez, had resigned in disgust, and before that, in December of 1994, he had written a long memorandum for the record laying out his case.

It is very clear what motivated Rodriguez to write this 30-page memorandum to “File.”  It is the same as what motivated Judge John Butzner when he argued with his two colleagues for inclusion of [dissenting witness Patrick] Knowlton’s letter with the Starr report.  He could see already that a cover-up was taking place.  He probably had already figured out that he was powerless to stop it, but he wanted the official record to show that he had tried.  (Partially covering her behind at the same time was Rodriguez’s assistant, paralegal Lucia Rambusch.  Her initials can be seen at the bottom of every page along with those of Rodriguez.)

Hickman Ewing’s Memo to Kenneth Starr

Hickman Ewing

Hickman Ewing

The Memphis attorney Ewing was Ken Starr’s “good cop,” and the head of Washington office, the politically connected Democrat and holdover from the Fiske investigation, Mark Tuohey, was his “bad cop.” Ewing, then, was the man to send to cozy up to Ms. Rambusch to feel her out and to see to it that she stayed in line. As you read Ewing’s report to Starr, which is a little more than two pages in length, you might conclude that the cozying up didn’t go well at all. Rambusch pretty much clammed up to Ewing, but the message got across to her quite clearly that she had better stay clammed up to everybody. We can see that message very clearly in the fourth of Ewing’s seven bullet points:

I told her that I wanted to find out from her what she thought had happened out at Fort Marcy Park. She said that she, Mark Tuohey and Chuck (SA Chuck Regini, FBI) had gone over every fact that she knew. She said words to the effect, “Thus, you have all the facts I had.”

I asked her for her opinion on what happened to Vince Foster. She said, “My opinion is irrelevant.” I told her, “No, it’s not. You worked on the case.” I told her that anytime I have ever taken over a case from someone, they have discussed it with me, both as to the facts developed to date, and what they think happened. I have done likewise if I was bringing someone up to speed on a matter.

I told her that if we continued on with the investigation and one and a half months from now came up with an opinion different from hers, was she then going to state that she had a different opinion. I told her that we were entitled to her input.

She said words to the effect, “I can’t go into something that I haven’t made my mind up on…maybe when I return from my trip, I might talk about it.” (emphasis added)

Mark Tuohey

Mark Tuohey

So Ewing, the salesman, was unable to close the sale. You know that after Rambusch has spent her two months about as far away from this nightmare as she can possibly get—in Tasmania, of all places—she is not going to have anything more to say to Ewing. She knows, quite correctly as we see, that anything she tells Ewing is going straight back to Starr. Furthermore, it’s likely to be going back to Starr’s enforcer, Tuohey, when, according to Ewing’s handwritten notes. “MT had asked LR to lie about MR” and “LR is terrorized by MT.”

But Ewing does not discourage easily. He tries another angle at bullet point 6, but once again he’s cold shouldered, like a smoothie being rejected on a persistent request for a date:

Since she said she did not want to give opinions or theories, I asked her if she would talk about facts. She said she would. I then asked:

Do you know of any facts that would show that [Cheryl] Braun, [John] Rolla, or [Peter] Simonello [of the Park Police] staged the corpse and planted the gun on Vince Foster? [I was looking a (sic) Miguel’s memo, p. 22, fn. 17, as my basis, but made no mention of Miguel or the memo in asking this.] She said, “I really don’t want to discuss this.”

Cheryl Braun and John Rolla testifying before Senate Committee

Cheryl Braun and John Rolla testifying before Senate Committee

Rambusch’s government education was at an end. One can only wonder what larger lesson she gained from the experience. Do you think she learned enough to agree with my observation in “Vince Foster’s Valuable Murder”: “For those willing to open their eyes only a little bit, no episode reveals so simply and clearly the complete corruption of America’s major institutions as we head into the 21st century”?

Don’t Talk to Lucia

Kenneth Starr

Kenneth Starr

When Ewing said to Rambusch “…if we continued on with the investigation and one and a half months from now came up with an opinion different from hers…” she knew full well what he was saying. He was telling her in so many words that they were going to proclaim Foster’s death a suicide even though Rambusch had seen thoroughly convincing evidence that it was a rather poorly covered-up murder.

And that’s what happened, although Starr’s team strung things out for more than two and a half additional years, no doubt in hopes that interest in the matter would die down. During that period their most noteworthy act occurred in October of 1995 when they were unsuccessful in their attempt to harass witness Patrick Knowlton into silence. In his book The Secret Life of Bill Clinton, British journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard has titled his chapter 12 about the episode, “Street Fascism.”

Miguel Rodriguez

Miguel Rodriguez

As we intimated earlier, Ewing’s call to Rambusch was not the complete failure that it might at first appear. Like Miguel Rodriguez, she got the message that it would not be a good idea for her to tell anyone what she had discovered on her first job. For his part, Rodriguez sent a memo to everyone at the office of the U.S. attorney in Sacramento, California, to which he had returned after leaving Starr’s employ in frustration, that anyone from the press inquiring about his work for Starr should be referred to Ewing’s office in Little Rock for a response. To show everyone how committed he was to omertà, U.S. shadow-government style, he open-copied the memo to his boss at the Sacramento office and to Ewing and Starr. You can see the memo here. And a couple of weeks before he wrote that memo, he had dutifully reported to Ewing about telephone calls he had received from the media and how he had brushed the callers off.

One might think that Rambusch would be proud to tell everyone that she had worked for a famous special prosecutor and a famous independent counsel right out of college, but such is not the case. Her Linked-In résumé has a curious gap after she left the University of Denver. You’d never know that she ever worked for the federal government. It could hardly be clearer that she doesn’t want anyone asking her about her work there.

It’s enough to make this writer feel a little bad about the article he has just written on account of the attention he has directed her way. Let everyone be clear, to paraphrase a man whose presence looms over this sorry affair, I have not had any sort of exchange, either written or oral, with that woman, Miss Rambusch. I made no attempt to contact her and plan no such attempt. Everything I have learned about her work for Fiske and Starr is available at the National Archives and what I have related about her professional life can be found with a diligent search of the Internet. If I have not documented statements about her career as I would usually do it is because I don’t want to make it easy for anyone to invade the privacy that she clearly wants to guard. She has married, has three children, and I am sure she wishes that she had never taken that job in Washington, DC.

 

David Martin

May 19, 2015

 

For more articles on Vince Foster’s murder and the cover-up go here.

 

Thanks to Hugh for the pictures.

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

Understanding Antisemitism

Ant-Semite

The standard, knee-jerk accusation about my views shared here regarding Jews is the fibbery of calling me an Anti-Semite. Its such a tired, worn-out canard that it really doesn’t bother me any more (it used to). My normal response is to ask why it even matters when the Khazar accusing me isn’t even Semitic to begin with and that I can prove that I do support the actual Semites whom the Khazars dominate and murder endlessly from within Israel’s borders.

Jewbootlicker

Of course, that doesn’t address the indoctrinated tribal sycophants who have foolishly fallen for the rhetoric, the Christian Zionists that erroneously believe and support these monsters, nor especially the hired hit squads that do the Khazar’s bidding. But still, its venom has worn very weak with its over use and false application.

I usually continue my explanation by telling my personal story which is that 100% of the Jews that I have encountered have used me, lied to me, stolen from me, and mostly, treated me as some sort of ignorant underling subservient to their G_d given supremacy over me. Unlike so many of the American bootlickers who are forever the Jews’ doormats, I have decided that I will not succumb to the same lickspittle obedience. I will let others know what their end game is and that with me, the jig is up.

Why? Not because I hate Jews (frankly, I don’t know any of them in person well enough to hate them). What I “hate” is Jewish dominion and control of me, my fellow countrymen and the world. What I hate is their Talmudic brainwashing that makes them feel some sense of false ascendancy over the rest of mankind.

To me, understanding exactly what anti-Semitism is to Jews (and their water-carriers) as opposed to what the actual meaning it has become in reality, is key to getting to the bottom of their control and stopping it.

So, what is it? And why is it?

FoxmanAnti-Semite

Abe Foxman’s broken record

 

I have been following John Friend at The Realist Report (linked in my favorites on the side panel) since he came on the scene several years ago. One reason I felt some sort of kinship was the fact that we basically started this realization at about the same time (which is odd since I am old enough to be his father) and much of what we were writing about at the time was very similar (he is by far, a better writer than I). We don’t agree on everything, but like my recent posts suggest, I believe he is sincere.

BTW: I don’t agree with anyone on 100% of the topics.

But when it comes to this particular subject (most subjects, for that matter), he and I see eye to eye.

John’s recent post informs us of what Jews (specifically Abe Foxman of the ADL) say antisemitism is (and why it is) and he also explains what it is in reality:

Foxman published a rather revealing OpEd in The Times of Israel as well, where he openly demanded that international Jewry be protected from “anti-Semitism,” which in reality translates to ensuring Jews are never criticized or challenged on their false interpretation of reality in addition to preventing any open, honest discussion of Jewish power, influence, criminality, and subversiveness.

[…]

According to Foxman, “anti-Semitism” is a threat to the Jewish people that is “never ending,” meaning it has always and will always exist. However, Foxman claims “anti-Semitism” has nothing at all to do with Jews, their power and influence in the non-Jewish world, or their behavior and subversive, criminal nature. Foxman and other Jewish leaders and intellectuals always portray “anti-Semitism” as some irrational, unfounded, pathological manifestation of psychosis that is entirely disconnected from the actions, behavior, and policies promoted by Jews.

Nothing could be further from the truth. 

The Jews have been universally despised throughout history, resulting in their expulsion from various European countries and territories over 100 times, specifically because of their subversive, criminal nature and actions.

Despite the fact that international Jewry controls virtually every aspect of Western political, economic, and cultural life, which includes their outright ownership of the Federal Reserve System, large segments of Wall Street and other international financial institutions, the mainstream mass media and Hollywood as well as their dominating influence in both the Democratic and Republican parties and their occupation of important positions of power and influence throughout all levels of the federal government (and many state and local governments as well), Foxman is still openly declaring that “the Jewish people demand and deserve commitments, policies and partnerships to contain and offset this enduring hatred,” i.e., “anti-Semitism”.

We’ve already seen organized Jewry and the Jewish state of Israel lobby to have “anti-Semitism” recognized as an international crime. Foxman does not explicitly call for that in this OpEd, but that is clearly where his line of thinking is heading.

The Jews simply cannot tolerate any sort of criticism or honest, frank discussion of their power and influence anywhere in the world. They are the ultimate tyrants, and are expecting us to meekly acquiesce to their demands. I for one know their bullying tactics will not work on me and the readers of this website.

I recommend anyone interested in this topic to follow Mr Friend’s blog.

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

Operation Jade Helm And Its Effect on the Truthers

Jade Helm

fames-fetzer-press-tv-headerSeems the web world is freaking out about Operation Jade Helm. There are plenty of excellent websites covering this situation, so I won’t lay out any detail. Shoot, who even knows about the graphic used above (found all over the web). This may be some Martial Law attempt or it may be bullshit. But it certainly is causing some division within some very large websites and among personalities.

In one example, Gordon Duff of Veteran’s Today has seemingly had a disagreement with Jim Fetzer over this issue, culminating in removal of Fetzer’s hundreds of articles that were published at VT. For whatever reason, Duff wants to disassociate with Fetzer (and that is his prerogative). I’ve done the same thing here with the Jew’s handful of posts after he asked me to remove his endorsement of me. I also removed all of Mublin Dick’s references after several uncalled for attacks on me and others in the comments section.

I’ve addressed my distrust for Duff and VT (and specifically about Alan Hart) here.

PaulFaul

But Fetzer was probably VT’s most prolific and serious writer. Fetzer is brilliant and offers a great deal of insight on various subjects (not that I agree with everything he writes). For instance, I am still on the fence about the Dead Beatle issue. But that is the tamest of his theories and he may be right (I don’t know). The forensic information about different facial structures, height, etc is very telling, to say the least. I know it caused a bit of a stir with he and Kevin Barrett, leading up to a “debate”, which really didn’t settle anything (I have been following Kevin for years at his blog and on VT).

This divide between Fetzer and Barrett is now expanding to the Jade Helm subject (where they, again, got into a bit of a pissing match during their weekly show). Subsequently, Barrett had Duff on his show and Duff blasted Fetzer as much as Fetzer blasted Duff.

Like I said, I don’t trust Duff. His demeanor, his approach, his constant self-serving bragging about his connections, personal defense abilities, his business ventures, etc all come off to me as a liar or bullshitter galore.

Gordon-Duff-Jewish-Gibbermonger-310x165Fetzer says that Duff immediately removed his Jade Helm writings (and Boston Bombing posts). Since, he may have removed everything from Fetzer over the years.

(BTW: you can read even more about the Boston Bombing setup and kangaroo court from Fetzer here)

It just makes me wonder what the hell is going on? Who is telling the truth and who is the shill? Fetzer and Duff are accusing each other of disinformation. As I said, I don’t trust Duff in any way, so I lean towards Fetzer being the most truthful. I feel Fetzer is sincere, whether or not he is correct, but I don’t see Duff as anything other than a liar and totally insincere.

So, if Fetzer is on to something about Jade Helm, I would hope that more are guarded about what is going on.

I found parts of this comment by dane_57 at Fetzer’s site intriguing:

Definition
Operation
A military action, performed on a living body to fix or remove an unwanted part of the body.

Definition
Jade
A Horse broken-down by abuse now turned vicious against its abusers.

Definition
Helm
To take undisputed control of the steering apparatus: ie, at the helm.

Translation
Operation+Jade+Helm+15
A 2015 Military Operation to fix or remove the unwanted part of the American population (broken down by Government abuse), who has turned vicious against their abuser.

I hope it is nothing, but I can’t be as sure as Duff the liar is.

Duff_lies

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com

The Jew In The Woodpile

TheJewsDidIt

I learned long ago that trusting the government (or media) to tell me the truth was folly and dangerous. I cannot think of a subject, except maybe some natural disaster (or the inane celebrity BS), in which they give us the truth.

jews-did-911One issue that I harp on is WWII and Germany at that time (the Japanese, as well). They were the “bad guys” according to government/media. But if these assholes lie about everything else, why should I believe that storyline? So, I spent hundreds of hours studying alternative sites to find out what the truth is/was. Until I was 51, I “believed”. But since researching, I now see the truth and who the real “bad guys” are (and were then).

It is true for each and every subject of importance.

If the government or media tells me something, I don’t just look for shades of truth, I basically see it as opposite and then try to find how they are using some bits of truth to bullshit me into something that is detrimental to me, my family, my country, and the world.

Or even the opposite. If the government/media doesn’t tell me something that is obvious upon inspection (like how they cover up the race issue of blacks attacking whites, compared to how easily they highlight the few occurrences of the whites on blacks), I see the agenda.

KelsoDisclaimerIt boils down to this: I don’t trust a Jew (who runs both government and media). I once did trust them and allowed a Jew to post here regularly… UNTIL I started seeing how I was being used.He even made a special statement for me to share here before my awakening and asked me to post it on the side panel (he subsequently said that he reneged and doesn’t want me to share it any longer).

No, I don’t “hate Jews” but they obviously have agendas that are detrimental to anyone but them (and the few “decent jews” I try to identify… and it ain’t many). And even the ones who don’t think they are part of that agenda, in reality, cannot help their tribal affiliation and knee jerk reaction to someone who gains the knowledge I have over the past few years.

Now, I must say, that I understand what they are doing (and it does piss me off), But who is more culpable?

Answer: All of us ass-kissing sycophants who carry the Jew’s poisoned-well water.

jewinwoodpile

We fell for the Holohoax myth and these bastards have used it against us to further their goals of domination and murder that their beloved Talmud teaches them. Hell, just name the subject and if a Jew is in the woodpile you will quickly see that there is an ulterior motive ingrained from Talmudism that is found. It is a brainwashing so deep and thorough that most simply cannot help themselves, no matter what information is given, nor what is historically accurate.

And the stupid goyim gobble it up.

Over the millennia, white people have always been the ones to recognize the game and have stopped it. Over and over and over. (All the anti-semites, you know.) But now, it seems that we have lost our insight and intellectual proclivity… and through the Jews’ murderous plans (like vaccines, gmos, chem trails, poisonous meds, erasure of the white race, etc, etc, etc), we have become their slaves.

Is it too late?

 

See also (click to read):

The Jews That Control Your Online Experience

The Holocaust For Rednecks

The Accusation

“White Supremacists” Epithet Is Used Because Everyone Is A Racist

 

Follow @BuelahMan

BuelaHuh?

Did I rub you the wrong way or stroke you just right? Let me know below in the comments section or Email me at buelahman {AT} g m a i l {DOT} com

Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Multiple links will automatically relegate your comment to the spam section, so keep that in mind as you post.

If for some reason you actually liked this post, click the “Like” button below. If you feel like someone else needs to see this (or you just want to ruin someone’s day), click the Share Button at the bottom of the post and heap this upon some undeserving soul. And as sad as this thought may be, it may be remotely possible that us rednecks here at The Revolt please you enough (or more than likely, you are just a glutton for punishment??), that you feel an overwhelming desire to subscribe via the Email subscription and/or RSS Feed buttons found on the upper right hand corner of this page (may the Lord have mercy on your soul).

All posts are opinions meant to foster comment, reporting, teaching & study under the “fair use doctrine” in Sec. 107 of U.S. Code Title 17. No statement of fact is made or should be implied. Ads appearing on this blog are solely the product of the advertiser and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of BuehlahMan’s Revolt or WordPress.com